Thanks you for the revision to this manuscript and description of the changes. I feel that the changes addressed all but one of the reviewer comments:

At the end of Page 4 in the tracked changes version, the first reviewer's concern about potential bias due to different different spectral settings was partially answered. It is clear that the authors have chosen the correct technical setting in GGG (use of disc-averaged spectra for lunar observations rather than disc-centered spectra, as used in TCCON protocol during daytime). However, the reviewer is concerned that there could be a bias due to the choice of a different spectral settings between solar spectra and lunar (disc-averaged) spectral analysis. The first reviewer indicates this could be a source of bias, and the authors have not addressed the possibility of bias from this difference. This potential bias could be a mechanism by which the last comment of the reviewer. Please comment on on the potential for bias by this mechanism and or attempt to quantify this source of potential bias.

Thank you for addressing this point.

Thanks for the modification. Congratulations!