Articles | Volume 10, issue 7
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 2455–2475, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2455-2017

Special issue: Ten years of Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) observations...

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 2455–2475, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2455-2017

Research article 13 Jul 2017

Research article | 13 Jul 2017

Validation of 10-year SAO OMI Ozone Profile (PROFOZ) product using ozonesonde observations

Guanyu Huang et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 2,893 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,807 1,008 78 2,893 108 128
  • HTML: 1,807
  • PDF: 1,008
  • XML: 78
  • Total: 2,893
  • BibTeX: 108
  • EndNote: 128
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Feb 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Feb 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,847 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,838 with geography defined and 9 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 22 Sep 2021
Short summary
It is essential to understand the data quality of +10-year OMI ozone product and impacts of the “row anomaly” (RA). We validate the OMI Ozone Profile (PROFOZ) product from Oct 2004 to Dec 2014 against ozonesonde observations globally. Generally, OMI has good agreement with ozonesondes. The spatiotemporal variation of retrieval performance suggests the need to improve OMI’s radiometric calibration especially during the post-RA period to maintain the long-term stability.