85 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. A measurement system for CO2 and CH4 emissions quantification of industrial sites using a new in situ concentration sensor operated on board uncrewed aircraft vehicles J. Bonne et al. 10.5194/amt-17-4471-2024
2. Evaluating the impact of storage-and-release on aircraft-based mass-balance methodology using a regional air-quality model S. Fathi et al. 10.5194/acp-21-15461-2021
3. A review of close-range and screening technologies for mitigating fugitive methane emissions in upstream oil and gas T. Fox et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ab0cc3
4. Quantification of methane emitted by ruminants: a review of methods L. Tedeschi et al. 10.1093/jas/skac197
5. Airborne Methane Emission Measurements for Selected Oil and Gas Facilities Across California S. Mehrotra et al. 10.1021/acs.est.7b03254
6. Methane remote sensing and emission quantification of offshore shallow water oil and gas platforms in the Gulf of Mexico A. Ayasse et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac8566
7. Direct measurements of methane emissions from key facilities in Alberta's oil and gas supply chain H. Li et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169645
8. A measurement-based upstream oil and gas methane inventory for Alberta, Canada reveals higher emissions and different sources than official estimates B. Conrad et al. 10.1038/s43247-023-01081-0
9. Estimating CH<sub>4</sub>, CO<sub>2</sub> and CO emissions from coal mining and industrial activities in the Upper Silesian Coal Basin using an aircraft-based mass balance approach A. Fiehn et al. 10.5194/acp-20-12675-2020
10. Testing and evaluation of a new airborne system for continuous N<sub>2</sub>O, CO<sub>2</sub>, CO, and H<sub>2</sub>O measurements: the Frequent Calibration High-performance Airborne Observation System (FCHAOS) A. Gvakharia et al. 10.5194/amt-11-6059-2018
11. Comparisons of Airborne Measurements and Inventory Estimates of Methane Emissions in the Alberta Upstream Oil and Gas Sector M. Johnson et al. 10.1021/acs.est.7b03525
12. Methane source attribution in a U.S. dry gas basin using spatial patterns of ground and airborne ethane and methane measurements I. Mielke-Maday et al. 10.1525/elementa.351
13. Pricing Methane Emissions from Oil and Gas Production M. Lackner et al. 10.2139/ssrn.3834488
14. Excess methane emissions from shallow water platforms elevate the carbon intensity of US Gulf of Mexico oil and gas production A. Gorchov Negron et al. 10.1073/pnas.2215275120
15. Assessment of Regional Methane Emission Inventories through Airborne Quantification in the San Francisco Bay Area A. Guha et al. 10.1021/acs.est.0c01212
16. Temporal Variability of Emissions Revealed by Continuous, Long-Term Monitoring of an Underground Natural Gas Storage Facility C. Alden et al. 10.1021/acs.est.0c03175
17. Advancing Scientific Understanding of the Global Methane Budget in Support of the Paris Agreement A. Ganesan et al. 10.1029/2018GB006065
18. Investigating large methane enhancements in the U.S. San Juan Basin G. Pétron et al. 10.1525/elementa.038
19. Development of Methods for Top-Down Methane Emission Measurements of Oil and Gas Facilities in an Offshore Environment Using a Miniature Methane Spectrometer and Long-Endurance Uncrewed Aerial System B. Smith et al. 10.2118/206181-PA
20. Technological Maturity of Aircraft-Based Methane Sensing for Greenhouse Gas Mitigation S. El Abbadi et al. 10.1021/acs.est.4c02439
21. Quantifying methane emissions from United States landfills D. Cusworth et al. 10.1126/science.adi7735
22. Passive-tracer modelling at super-resolution with Weather Research and Forecasting – Advanced Research WRF (WRF-ARW) to assess mass-balance schemes S. Fathi et al. 10.5194/gmd-16-5069-2023
23. Airborne formaldehyde and volatile organic compound measurements over the Daesan petrochemical complex on Korea’s northwest coast during the Korea-United States Air Quality study A. Fried et al. 10.1525/elementa.2020.121
24. A cautionary report of calculating methane emissions using low-cost fence-line sensors S. Riddick et al. 10.1525/elementa.2022.00021
25. Estimating Total Methane Emissions from the Denver-Julesburg Basin Using Bottom-Up Approaches S. Riddick et al. 10.3390/gases4030014
26. Evaluating California dairy methane emission factors using short-term ground-level and airborne measurements S. Amini et al. 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2022.100171
27. Methane Emission Estimation of Oil and Gas Sector: A Review of Measurement Technologies, Data Analysis Methods and Uncertainty Estimation S. Sun et al. 10.3390/su132413895
28. Estimating Upper Silesian coal mine methane emissions from airborne in situ observations and dispersion modeling J. Kostinek et al. 10.5194/acp-21-8791-2021
29. Diurnal and Seasonal Variation of Area-Fugitive Methane Advective Flux from an Open-Pit Mining Facility in Northern Canada Using WRF M. Nambiar et al. 10.3390/atmos11111227
30. Temporal Variation and Persistence of Methane Emissions from Shallow Water Oil and Gas Production in the Gulf of Mexico K. Biener et al. 10.1021/acs.est.3c08066
31. Methane emissions from underground gas storage in California A. Thorpe et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ab751d
32. Constraining the accuracy of flux estimates using OTM 33A R. Edie et al. 10.5194/amt-13-341-2020
33. Single-blind test of airplane-based hyperspectral methane detection via controlled releases E. Sherwin et al. 10.1525/elementa.2021.00063
34. A national estimate of U.S. underground natural gas storage incident emissions H. Li et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac8069
35. Methodology and Uncertainty Analysis of Methane Flux Measurement for Small Sources Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles D. Xu et al. 10.3390/drones8080366
36. New Technologies Can Cost Effectively Reduce Oil and Gas Methane Emissions, but Policies Will Require Careful Design to Establish Mitigation Equivalence C. Kemp & A. Ravikumar 10.1021/acs.est.1c03071
37. Facility level measurement of offshore oil and gas installations from a medium-sized airborne platform: method development for quantification and source identification of methane emissions J. France et al. 10.5194/amt-14-71-2021
38. Controlled-release testing of the static chamber methodology for direct measurements of methane emissions J. Williams et al. 10.5194/amt-16-3421-2023
39. Evaluating Cropland N2O Emissions and Fertilizer Plant Greenhouse Gas Emissions With Airborne Observations A. Gvakharia et al. 10.1029/2020JD032815
40. Ground-to-UAV, laser-based emissions quantification of methane and acetylene at long standoff distances K. Cossel et al. 10.5194/amt-16-5697-2023
41. Uncertainty in the Mobile Observation of Wind E. Leibensperger et al. 10.3390/atmos14050765
42. Ammonia and methane emissions from dairy concentrated animal feeding operations in California, using mobile optical remote sensing N. Vechi et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119448
43. Airborne Emission Rate Measurements Validate Remote Sensing Observations and Emission Inventories of Western U.S. Wildfires C. Stockwell et al. 10.1021/acs.est.1c07121
44. Quantification and assessment of methane emissions from offshore oil and gas facilities on the Norwegian continental shelf A. Foulds et al. 10.5194/acp-22-4303-2022
45. Critical review on mobile direct air capture: Concept expansion, characteristic description, and performance evaluation S. Li et al. 10.1016/j.matt.2024.01.003
46. Gas Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste Landfills: A Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Global Data D. Manheim et al. 10.1007/s41745-021-00234-4
47. Evaluating Methods To Estimate Methane Emissions from Oil and Gas Production Facilities Using LES Simulations P. Saide et al. 10.1021/acs.est.8b01767
48. Technical note: Interpretation of field observations of point-source methane plume using observation-driven large-eddy simulations A. Ražnjević et al. 10.5194/acp-22-6489-2022
49. Assessing the bias and uncertainties in the aircraft mass balance technique for the determination of carbon dioxide emission rates K. Hajny et al. 10.1525/elementa.2022.00135
50. Using the tracer flux ratio method with flight measurements to estimate dairy farm CH<sub>4</sub> emissions in central California C. Daube et al. 10.5194/amt-12-2085-2019
51. Reconciling Multiple Methane Detection and Quantification Systems at Oil and Gas Tank Battery Sites S. Stokes et al. 10.1021/acs.est.2c02854
52. Hydrogen Sulfide Emission Properties from Two Large Landfills in New York State A. Catena et al. 10.3390/atmos13081251
53. Concurrent variation in oil and gas methane emissions and oil price during the COVID-19 pandemic D. Lyon et al. 10.5194/acp-21-6605-2021
54. Advanced Leak Detection and Quantification of Methane Emissions Using sUAS D. Hollenbeck et al. 10.3390/drones5040117
55. Temporal variability largely explains top-down/bottom-up difference in methane emission estimates from a natural gas production region T. Vaughn et al. 10.1073/pnas.1805687115
56. Aircraft-derived CH4 emissions from surface and in-situ mining activities in the Alberta oil sands region R. Staebler et al. 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2024.100280
57. Aerial Interyear Comparison and Quantification of Methane Emissions Persistence in the Bakken Formation of North Dakota, USA J. Englander et al. 10.1021/acs.est.8b01665
58. Airborne Assessment of Methane Emissions from Offshore Platforms in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico A. Gorchov Negron et al. 10.1021/acs.est.0c00179
59. Aerially guided leak detection and repair: A pilot field study for evaluating the potential of methane emission detection and cost-effectiveness S. Schwietzke et al. 10.1080/10962247.2018.1515123
60. Comparing airborne algorithms for greenhouse gas flux measurements over the Alberta oil sands B. Erland et al. 10.5194/amt-15-5841-2022
61. Quantification of CH<sub>4</sub> coal mining emissions in Upper Silesia by passive airborne remote sensing observations with the Methane Airborne MAPper (MAMAP) instrument during the CO<sub>2</sub> and Methane (CoMet) campaign S. Krautwurst et al. 10.5194/acp-21-17345-2021
62. Likely substantial underestimation of reported methane emissions from United Kingdom upstream oil and gas activities S. Riddick & D. Mauzerall 10.1039/D2EE03072A
63. High-resolution spatiotemporal patterns of China’s FFCO2 emissions under the impact of LUCC from 2000 to 2015 J. Zhao et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ab6edc
64. Saskatchewan’s oil and gas methane: how have underestimated emissions in Canada impacted progress toward 2025 climate goals? S. Seymour et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ace271
65. Assessment of methane emissions from a California landfill using concurrent experimental, inventory, and modeling approaches N. Yeşiller et al. 10.1016/j.wasman.2022.09.024
66. Machine Learning to Predict Area Fugitive Emission Fluxes of GHGs from Open-Pit Mines S. Kia et al. 10.3390/atmos13020210
67. Validation of mobile in situ measurements of dairy husbandry emissions by fusion of airborne/surface remote sensing with seasonal context from the Chino Dairy Complex I. Leifer et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.03.078
68. Measurement-based carbon intensity of US offshore oil and gas production A. Gorchov Negron et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad489d
69. COCAP: a carbon dioxide analyser for small unmanned aircraft systems M. Kunz et al. 10.5194/amt-11-1833-2018
70. Quantification of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions over Sacramento, California, based on divergence theorem using aircraft measurements J. Ryoo et al. 10.5194/amt-12-2949-2019
71. Natural Gas Fugitive Leak Detection Using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle: Measurement System Description and Mass Balance Approach S. Yang et al. 10.3390/atmos9100383
72. Estimating Regional Methane Emission Factors from Energy and Agricultural Sector Sources Using a Portable Measurement System: Case Study of the Denver–Julesburg Basin S. Riddick et al. 10.3390/s22197410
73. Global Tracking and Quantification of Oil and Gas Methane Emissions from Recurrent Sentinel-2 Imagery T. Ehret et al. 10.1021/acs.est.1c08575
74. Methane emission rate estimates of offshore oil platforms in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada A. Khaleghi et al. 10.1525/elementa.2024.00025
75. Recent Advances Toward Transparent Methane Emissions Monitoring: A Review B. Erland et al. 10.1021/acs.est.2c02136
76. Short-term methane emissions from 2 dairy farms in California estimated by different measurement techniques and US Environmental Protection Agency inventory methodology: A case study C. Arndt et al. 10.3168/jds.2017-13881
77. Measurement-based emissions assessment and reduction through accelerated detection and repair of large leaks in a gas distribution network S. MacMullin & F. Rongère 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2023.100201
78. Methane Emissions from Dairy Operations in California’s San Joaquin Valley Evaluated Using Airborne Flux Measurements B. Schulze et al. 10.1021/acs.est.3c03940
79. Natural Gas Fugitive Leak Detection Using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle: Localization and Quantification of Emission Rate L. Golston et al. 10.3390/atmos9090333
80. Source Apportionment of Ambient Methane Enhancements in Los Angeles, California, To Evaluate Emission Inventory Estimates T. Kuwayama et al. 10.1021/acs.est.8b02307
81. Comparing facility-level methane emission rate estimates at natural gas gathering and boosting stations T. Vaughn et al. 10.1525/elementa.257
82. Observations of Methane Emissions from Natural Gas-Fired Power Plants K. Hajny et al. 10.1021/acs.est.9b01875
83. Airborne Quantification of Methane Emissions over the Four Corners Region M. Smith et al. 10.1021/acs.est.6b06107
84. Spatiotemporal Variability of Methane Emissions at Oil and Natural Gas Operations in the Eagle Ford Basin T. Lavoie et al. 10.1021/acs.est.7b00814
85. Improved Mechanistic Understanding of Natural Gas Methane Emissions from Spatially Resolved Aircraft Measurements S. Schwietzke et al. 10.1021/acs.est.7b01810