91 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. A measurement system for CO2 and CH4 emissions quantification of industrial sites using a new in situ concentration sensor operated on board uncrewed aircraft vehicles J. Bonne et al. 10.5194/amt-17-4471-2024
2. Evaluating the impact of storage-and-release on aircraft-based mass-balance methodology using a regional air-quality model S. Fathi et al. 10.5194/acp-21-15461-2021
3. A review of close-range and screening technologies for mitigating fugitive methane emissions in upstream oil and gas T. Fox et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ab0cc3
4. Quantification of methane emitted by ruminants: a review of methods L. Tedeschi et al. 10.1093/jas/skac197
5. Airborne Methane Emission Measurements for Selected Oil and Gas Facilities Across California S. Mehrotra et al. 10.1021/acs.est.7b03254
6. Methane remote sensing and emission quantification of offshore shallow water oil and gas platforms in the Gulf of Mexico A. Ayasse et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac8566
7. Direct measurements of methane emissions from key facilities in Alberta's oil and gas supply chain H. Li et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169645
8. A measurement-based upstream oil and gas methane inventory for Alberta, Canada reveals higher emissions and different sources than official estimates B. Conrad et al. 10.1038/s43247-023-01081-0
9. Estimating CH4, CO2 and CO emissions from coal mining and industrial activities in the Upper Silesian Coal Basin using an aircraft-based mass balance approach A. Fiehn et al. 10.5194/acp-20-12675-2020
10. Testing and evaluation of a new airborne system for continuous N2O, CO2, CO, and H2O measurements: the Frequent Calibration High-performance Airborne Observation System (FCHAOS) A. Gvakharia et al. 10.5194/amt-11-6059-2018
11. Comparisons of Airborne Measurements and Inventory Estimates of Methane Emissions in the Alberta Upstream Oil and Gas Sector M. Johnson et al. 10.1021/acs.est.7b03525
12. Methane source attribution in a U.S. dry gas basin using spatial patterns of ground and airborne ethane and methane measurements I. Mielke-Maday et al. 10.1525/elementa.351
13. Pricing Methane Emissions from Oil and Gas Production M. Lackner et al. 10.2139/ssrn.3834488
14. Excess methane emissions from shallow water platforms elevate the carbon intensity of US Gulf of Mexico oil and gas production A. Gorchov Negron et al. 10.1073/pnas.2215275120
15. A Review of Offshore Methane Quantification Methodologies S. Riddick et al. 10.3390/atmos16050626
16. Assessment of Regional Methane Emission Inventories through Airborne Quantification in the San Francisco Bay Area A. Guha et al. 10.1021/acs.est.0c01212
17. Temporal Variability of Emissions Revealed by Continuous, Long-Term Monitoring of an Underground Natural Gas Storage Facility C. Alden et al. 10.1021/acs.est.0c03175
18. Advancing Scientific Understanding of the Global Methane Budget in Support of the Paris Agreement A. Ganesan et al. 10.1029/2018GB006065
19. Investigating large methane enhancements in the U.S. San Juan Basin G. Pétron et al. 10.1525/elementa.038
20. Development of Methods for Top-Down Methane Emission Measurements of Oil and Gas Facilities in an Offshore Environment Using a Miniature Methane Spectrometer and Long-Endurance Uncrewed Aerial System B. Smith et al. 10.2118/206181-PA
21. Technological Maturity of Aircraft-Based Methane Sensing for Greenhouse Gas Mitigation S. El Abbadi et al. 10.1021/acs.est.4c02439
22. Quantifying methane emissions from United States landfills D. Cusworth et al. 10.1126/science.adi7735
23. Passive-tracer modelling at super-resolution with Weather Research and Forecasting – Advanced Research WRF (WRF-ARW) to assess mass-balance schemes S. Fathi et al. 10.5194/gmd-16-5069-2023
24. Airborne formaldehyde and volatile organic compound measurements over the Daesan petrochemical complex on Korea’s northwest coast during the Korea-United States Air Quality study A. Fried et al. 10.1525/elementa.2020.121
25. A cautionary report of calculating methane emissions using low-cost fence-line sensors S. Riddick et al. 10.1525/elementa.2022.00021
26. Estimating Total Methane Emissions from the Denver-Julesburg Basin Using Bottom-Up Approaches S. Riddick et al. 10.3390/gases4030014
27. Evaluating California dairy methane emission factors using short-term ground-level and airborne measurements S. Amini et al. 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2022.100171
28. Methane Emission Estimation of Oil and Gas Sector: A Review of Measurement Technologies, Data Analysis Methods and Uncertainty Estimation S. Sun et al. 10.3390/su132413895
29. Estimating Upper Silesian coal mine methane emissions from airborne in situ observations and dispersion modeling J. Kostinek et al. 10.5194/acp-21-8791-2021
30. Diurnal and Seasonal Variation of Area-Fugitive Methane Advective Flux from an Open-Pit Mining Facility in Northern Canada Using WRF M. Nambiar et al. 10.3390/atmos11111227
31. Temporal Variation and Persistence of Methane Emissions from Shallow Water Oil and Gas Production in the Gulf of Mexico K. Biener et al. 10.1021/acs.est.3c08066
32. Methane emissions from underground gas storage in California A. Thorpe et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ab751d
33. Constraining the accuracy of flux estimates using OTM 33A R. Edie et al. 10.5194/amt-13-341-2020
34. Single-blind test of airplane-based hyperspectral methane detection via controlled releases E. Sherwin et al. 10.1525/elementa.2021.00063
35. A national estimate of U.S. underground natural gas storage incident emissions H. Li et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac8069
36. Methodology and Uncertainty Analysis of Methane Flux Measurement for Small Sources Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles D. Xu et al. 10.3390/drones8080366
37. New Technologies Can Cost Effectively Reduce Oil and Gas Methane Emissions, but Policies Will Require Careful Design to Establish Mitigation Equivalence C. Kemp & A. Ravikumar 10.1021/acs.est.1c03071
38. Innovative drone-based methodology for quantifying methane emissions from landfills D. Fosco et al. 10.1016/j.wasman.2025.01.033
39. Facility level measurement of offshore oil and gas installations from a medium-sized airborne platform: method development for quantification and source identification of methane emissions J. France et al. 10.5194/amt-14-71-2021
40. Controlled-release testing of the static chamber methodology for direct measurements of methane emissions J. Williams et al. 10.5194/amt-16-3421-2023
41. Evaluating Cropland N2O Emissions and Fertilizer Plant Greenhouse Gas Emissions With Airborne Observations A. Gvakharia et al. 10.1029/2020JD032815
42. Ground-to-UAV, laser-based emissions quantification of methane and acetylene at long standoff distances K. Cossel et al. 10.5194/amt-16-5697-2023
43. Uncertainty in the Mobile Observation of Wind E. Leibensperger et al. 10.3390/atmos14050765
44. Ammonia and methane emissions from dairy concentrated animal feeding operations in California, using mobile optical remote sensing N. Vechi et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119448
45. Airborne Emission Rate Measurements Validate Remote Sensing Observations and Emission Inventories of Western U.S. Wildfires C. Stockwell et al. 10.1021/acs.est.1c07121
46. Quantification and assessment of methane emissions from offshore oil and gas facilities on the Norwegian continental shelf A. Foulds et al. 10.5194/acp-22-4303-2022
47. Critical review on mobile direct air capture: Concept expansion, characteristic description, and performance evaluation S. Li et al. 10.1016/j.matt.2024.01.003
48. Gas Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste Landfills: A Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Global Data D. Manheim et al. 10.1007/s41745-021-00234-4
49. Evaluating Methods To Estimate Methane Emissions from Oil and Gas Production Facilities Using LES Simulations P. Saide et al. 10.1021/acs.est.8b01767
50. Insights into Elevated Methane Emissions from an Australian Open-Cut Coal Mine Using Two Independent Airborne Techniques J. Borchardt et al. 10.1021/acs.estlett.4c01063
51. Technical note: Interpretation of field observations of point-source methane plume using observation-driven large-eddy simulations A. Ražnjević et al. 10.5194/acp-22-6489-2022
52. Assessing the bias and uncertainties in the aircraft mass balance technique for the determination of carbon dioxide emission rates K. Hajny et al. 10.1525/elementa.2022.00135
53. Quantitative estimate of several sources of uncertainty in drone-based methane emission measurements T. Mohammadloo et al. 10.5194/amt-18-1301-2025
54. Using the tracer flux ratio method with flight measurements to estimate dairy farm CH4 emissions in central California C. Daube et al. 10.5194/amt-12-2085-2019
55. Reconciling Multiple Methane Detection and Quantification Systems at Oil and Gas Tank Battery Sites S. Stokes et al. 10.1021/acs.est.2c02854
56. Hydrogen Sulfide Emission Properties from Two Large Landfills in New York State A. Catena et al. 10.3390/atmos13081251
57. Concurrent variation in oil and gas methane emissions and oil price during the COVID-19 pandemic D. Lyon et al. 10.5194/acp-21-6605-2021
58. Advanced Leak Detection and Quantification of Methane Emissions Using sUAS D. Hollenbeck et al. 10.3390/drones5040117
59. Temporal variability largely explains top-down/bottom-up difference in methane emission estimates from a natural gas production region T. Vaughn et al. 10.1073/pnas.1805687115
60. Aircraft-derived CH4 emissions from surface and in-situ mining activities in the Alberta oil sands region R. Staebler et al. 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2024.100280
61. Aerial Interyear Comparison and Quantification of Methane Emissions Persistence in the Bakken Formation of North Dakota, USA J. Englander et al. 10.1021/acs.est.8b01665
62. Airborne Assessment of Methane Emissions from Offshore Platforms in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico A. Gorchov Negron et al. 10.1021/acs.est.0c00179
63. Aerially guided leak detection and repair: A pilot field study for evaluating the potential of methane emission detection and cost-effectiveness S. Schwietzke et al. 10.1080/10962247.2018.1515123
64. Comparing airborne algorithms for greenhouse gas flux measurements over the Alberta oil sands B. Erland et al. 10.5194/amt-15-5841-2022
65. Quantification of CH4 coal mining emissions in Upper Silesia by passive airborne remote sensing observations with the Methane Airborne MAPper (MAMAP) instrument during the CO2 and Methane (CoMet) campaign S. Krautwurst et al. 10.5194/acp-21-17345-2021
66. Likely substantial underestimation of reported methane emissions from United Kingdom upstream oil and gas activities S. Riddick & D. Mauzerall 10.1039/D2EE03072A
67. High-resolution spatiotemporal patterns of China’s FFCO2 emissions under the impact of LUCC from 2000 to 2015 J. Zhao et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ab6edc
68. Saskatchewan’s oil and gas methane: how have underestimated emissions in Canada impacted progress toward 2025 climate goals? S. Seymour et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ace271
69. Assessment of methane emissions from a California landfill using concurrent experimental, inventory, and modeling approaches N. Yeşiller et al. 10.1016/j.wasman.2022.09.024
70. Machine Learning to Predict Area Fugitive Emission Fluxes of GHGs from Open-Pit Mines S. Kia et al. 10.3390/atmos13020210
71. Validation of mobile in situ measurements of dairy husbandry emissions by fusion of airborne/surface remote sensing with seasonal context from the Chino Dairy Complex I. Leifer et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.03.078
72. Measurement-based carbon intensity of US offshore oil and gas production A. Gorchov Negron et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad489d
73. COCAP: a carbon dioxide analyser for small unmanned aircraft systems M. Kunz et al. 10.5194/amt-11-1833-2018
74. Quantification of CO2 and CH4 emissions over Sacramento, California, based on divergence theorem using aircraft measurements J. Ryoo et al. 10.5194/amt-12-2949-2019
75. Natural Gas Fugitive Leak Detection Using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle: Measurement System Description and Mass Balance Approach S. Yang et al. 10.3390/atmos9100383
76. Airborne in situ quantification of methane emissions from oil and gas production in Romania H. Maazallahi et al. 10.5194/acp-25-1497-2025
77. Estimating Regional Methane Emission Factors from Energy and Agricultural Sector Sources Using a Portable Measurement System: Case Study of the Denver–Julesburg Basin S. Riddick et al. 10.3390/s22197410
78. Global Tracking and Quantification of Oil and Gas Methane Emissions from Recurrent Sentinel-2 Imagery T. Ehret et al. 10.1021/acs.est.1c08575
79. Methane emission rate estimates of offshore oil platforms in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada A. Khaleghi et al. 10.1525/elementa.2024.00025
80. Recent Advances Toward Transparent Methane Emissions Monitoring: A Review B. Erland et al. 10.1021/acs.est.2c02136
81. Short-term methane emissions from 2 dairy farms in California estimated by different measurement techniques and US Environmental Protection Agency inventory methodology: A case study C. Arndt et al. 10.3168/jds.2017-13881
82. Measurement-based emissions assessment and reduction through accelerated detection and repair of large leaks in a gas distribution network S. MacMullin & F. Rongère 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2023.100201
83. Methane Emissions from Dairy Operations in California’s San Joaquin Valley Evaluated Using Airborne Flux Measurements B. Schulze et al. 10.1021/acs.est.3c03940
84. Natural Gas Fugitive Leak Detection Using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle: Localization and Quantification of Emission Rate L. Golston et al. 10.3390/atmos9090333
85. Source Apportionment of Ambient Methane Enhancements in Los Angeles, California, To Evaluate Emission Inventory Estimates T. Kuwayama et al. 10.1021/acs.est.8b02307
86. Developing Measurement-Informed Methane Emissions Inventory Estimates at Midstream Compressor Stations A. Ravikumar et al. 10.1021/acsestair.4c00237
87. Comparing facility-level methane emission rate estimates at natural gas gathering and boosting stations T. Vaughn et al. 10.1525/elementa.257
88. Observations of Methane Emissions from Natural Gas-Fired Power Plants K. Hajny et al. 10.1021/acs.est.9b01875
89. Airborne Quantification of Methane Emissions over the Four Corners Region M. Smith et al. 10.1021/acs.est.6b06107
90. Spatiotemporal Variability of Methane Emissions at Oil and Natural Gas Operations in the Eagle Ford Basin T. Lavoie et al. 10.1021/acs.est.7b00814
91. Improved Mechanistic Understanding of Natural Gas Methane Emissions from Spatially Resolved Aircraft Measurements S. Schwietzke et al. 10.1021/acs.est.7b01810