173 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. A Parts Per Billion (ppb) Sensor for NO2 with Microwatt (μW) Power Requirements Based on Micro Light Plates O. Casals et al. 10.1021/acssensors.9b00150
2. Low-Cost Air Quality Sensing towards Smart Homes H. Omidvarborna et al. 10.3390/atmos12040453
3. Varying Performance of Low-Cost Sensors During Seasonal Smog Events in Moravian-Silesian Region V. Nevrlý et al. 10.3390/atmos15111326
4. Understanding the ability of low-cost MOx sensors to quantify ambient VOCs A. Collier-Oxandale et al. 10.5194/amt-12-1441-2019
5. Calibration of Electrochemical Sensors for Nitrogen Dioxide Gas Detection Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles R. Mawrence et al. 10.3390/s20247332
6. Establishing A Sustainable Low-Cost Air Quality Monitoring Setup: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art M. Narayana et al. 10.3390/s22010394
7. Long-term evaluation of commercial air quality sensors: an overview from the QUANT (Quantification of Utility of Atmospheric Network Technologies) study S. Diez et al. 10.5194/amt-17-3809-2024
8. Using A Low-Cost Sensor Array and Machine Learning Techniques to Detect Complex Pollutant Mixtures and Identify Likely Sources J. Thorson et al. 10.3390/s19173723
9. Breathing chemicals: a review of air pollution over the years A. Totolici et al. 10.24193/subbbiol.2022.1.10
10. Multivariate Regression in Conjunction with GA-BP for Optimization of Data Processing of Trace NO Gas Flow in Active Pumping Electronic Nose P. Sun et al. 10.3390/s23031524
11. Characterising low-cost sensors in highly portable platforms to quantify personal exposure in diverse environments L. Chatzidiakou et al. 10.5194/amt-12-4643-2019
12. Calibrating low-cost sensors to measure vertical and horizontal gradients of NO2 and O3 pollution in three street canyons in Berlin S. Schmitz et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119830
13. Design and development of an open-source framework for citizen-centric environmental monitoring and data analysis S. Mahajan 10.1038/s41598-022-18700-z
14. Laboratory Performance Evaluation of a Low-Cost Electrochemical Formaldehyde Sensor Z. Pei et al. 10.3390/s23177444
15. Preparation of low-concentration H2 test gas mixtures in ambient air for calibration of H2 sensors N. Karbach et al. 10.5194/amt-17-4081-2024
16. In Situ Calibration Algorithms for Environmental Sensor Networks: A Review F. Delaine et al. 10.1109/JSEN.2019.2910317
17. Low-Cost Nitric Oxide Sensors: Assessment of Temperature and Humidity Effects S. Owen et al. 10.3390/s22229013
18. Performance of Aether Low-Cost Sensor Device for Air Pollution Measurements in Urban Environments. Accuracy Evaluation Applying the Air Quality Index (AQI) G. Spyropoulos et al. 10.3390/atmos12101246
19. Minimized training of machine learning-based calibration methods for low-cost O3 sensors S. Tondini et al. 10.1109/JSEN.2023.3339202
20. Humidity, density, and inlet aspiration efficiency correction improve accuracy of a low-cost sensor during field calibration at a suburban site in the North-Western Indo-Gangetic plain (NW-IGP) H. Pawar & B. Sinha 10.1080/02786826.2020.1719971
21. Urban Air Quality Management at Low Cost Using Micro Air Sensors: A Case Study from Accra, Ghana C. Hodoli et al. 10.1021/acsestair.4c00172
22. Machine learning techniques to improve the field performance of low-cost air quality sensors T. Bush et al. 10.5194/amt-15-3261-2022
23. Air Pollution Monitoring via Wireless Sensor Networks: The Investigation and Correction of the Aging Behavior of Electrochemical Gaseous Pollutant Sensors I. Christakis et al. 10.3390/electronics12081842
24. Connecting Air Quality with Emotional Well-Being and Neighborhood Infrastructure in a US City R. Lal et al. 10.1177/1178630220915488
25. Low-Cost Outdoor Air Quality Monitoring and Sensor Calibration F. Concas et al. 10.1145/3446005
26. Long-term behavior and stability of calibration models for NO and NO<sub>2</sub> low-cost sensors H. Kim et al. 10.5194/amt-15-2979-2022
27. Chemical Emissions from Cured and Uncured 3D-Printed Ventilator Patient Circuit Medical Parts J. Krechmer et al. 10.1021/acsomega.1c04695
28. Investigating NOx Concentrations on an Urban University Campus Using Passive Air Samplers and UV–Vis Spectroscopy C. Crosby et al. 10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00175
29. Field and Laboratory Evaluations of the Low-Cost Plantower Particulate Matter Sensor M. Levy Zamora et al. 10.1021/acs.est.8b05174
30. Low-cost system application for policy assessment: a case study from Berlin A. Caseiro et al. 10.1088/2752-5309/ad56bb
31. Framework for the Simulation of Sensor Networks Aimed at Evaluating In Situ Calibration Algorithms F. Delaine et al. 10.3390/s20164577
32. Outlier detection and gap filling methodologies for low-cost air quality measurements T. Ottosen & P. Kumar 10.1039/C8EM00593A
33. An optimized multicopter UAV sounding technique (MUST) for probing comprehensive atmospheric variables C. Chang et al. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126867
34. Development of a general calibration model and long-term performance evaluation of low-cost sensors for air pollutant gas monitoring C. Malings et al. 10.5194/amt-12-903-2019
35. Environmental pollution detection from susceptibility and conductivity measurement under microwave field: pollution detection under microwave field A. Rayon & S. Sahoo 10.1007/s13762-024-05566-z
36. Low-Cost CO Sensor Calibration Using One Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network S. Ali et al. 10.3390/s23020854
37. Development of multi-channel whole-air sampling equipment onboard an unmanned aerial vehicle for investigating volatile organic compounds' vertical distribution in the planetary boundary layer S. Yang et al. 10.5194/amt-16-501-2023
38. Ground-based investigation of HO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and ozone chemistry in biomass burning plumes in rural Idaho A. Lindsay et al. 10.5194/acp-22-4909-2022
39. Solution to the Problem of Calibration of Low-Cost Air Quality Measurement Sensors in Networks G. Miskell et al. 10.1021/acssensors.8b00074
40. Assessment of air quality sensor system performance after relocation S. Zauli-Sajani et al. 10.1016/j.apr.2020.11.010
41. Testing the performance of field calibration techniques for low-cost gas sensors in new deployment locations: across a county line and across Colorado J. Casey & M. Hannigan 10.5194/amt-11-6351-2018
42. Characterising a mobile reference station (MoRS) to quantify personal exposure to air quality M. Hedges et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120160
43. Assessing the accuracy of commercially available gas sensors for the measurement of ambient ozone and nitrogen dioxide K. Isiugo et al. 10.1080/15459624.2018.1513135
44. Design and testing of a low-cost sensor and sampling platform for indoor air quality J. Tryner et al. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108398
45. A machine learning calibration model using random forests to improve sensor performance for lower-cost air quality monitoring N. Zimmerman et al. 10.5194/amt-11-291-2018
46. Exploration of intra-city and inter-city PM2.5 regional calibration models to improve low-cost sensor performance S. Jain & N. Zimmerman 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2024.106335
47. Revisiting Atmospheric Oxidation Kinetics of Nitrogen Oxides: The Use of Low-Cost Electrochemical Sensors to Measure Reaction Kinetics S. Owen et al. 10.3390/reactions5040040
48. Protocol development for real-time ship fuel sulfur content determination using drone based plume sniffing microsensor system A. Anand et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140885
49. Evaluating the Performance of Using Low-Cost Sensors to Calibrate for Cross-Sensitivities in a Multipollutant Network M. Levy Zamora et al. 10.1021/acsestengg.1c00367
50. Research of low-cost air quality monitoring models with different machine learning algorithms G. Wang et al. 10.5194/amt-17-181-2024
51. Comparing Building and Neighborhood-Scale Variability of CO2 and O3 to Inform Deployment Considerations for Low-Cost Sensor System Use A. Collier-Oxandale et al. 10.3390/s18051349
52. Temporal and spatial variations in NO2 fluxes by tall tower eddy covariance measurements over a dense urban center in Sakai, Japan S. Okamura et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120870
53. First-Principles Algorithm for Air Quality Electrochemical Gas Sensors B. Ouyang 10.1021/acssensors.0c01129
54. River winds and pollutant recirculation near the Manaus city in the central Amazon T. Zhao et al. 10.1038/s43247-021-00277-6
55. Performance characterization of low-cost air quality sensors for off-grid deployment in rural Malawi A. Bittner et al. 10.5194/amt-15-3353-2022
56. An open‐source tool for evaluating calibration techniques used in low‐cost air pollutant monitors D. Tatsch et al. 10.1049/ell2.12816
57. Performance evaluation of light weight gas sensor system suitable for airborne applications against co-location gas analysers over Delhi A. Ahlawat et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134016
58. Monitoring Gas Emissions in Agricultural Productions through Low-Cost Technologies: The POREM (Poultry-Manure-Based Bio-Activator for Better Soil Management through Bioremediation) Project Experience D. Suriano & F. Abulude 10.3390/earth5040029
59. Improving the Quality of Measurements Made by Alphasense NO2 Non-Reference Sensors Using the Mathematical Methods M. Rogulski et al. 10.3390/s22103619
60. Development of Air Quality Boxes Based on Low-Cost Sensor Technology for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring P. Gäbel et al. 10.3390/s22103830
61. Fire Influence on Regional to Global Environments and Air Quality (FIREX‐AQ) C. Warneke et al. 10.1029/2022JD037758
62. An overview of outdoor low-cost gas-phase air quality sensor deployments: current efforts, trends, and limitations K. Okorn & L. Iraci 10.5194/amt-17-6425-2024
63. A Survey on Sensor Calibration in Air Pollution Monitoring Deployments B. Maag et al. 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2853660
64. Review of the Performance of Low-Cost Sensors for Air Quality Monitoring F. Karagulian et al. 10.3390/atmos10090506
65. Clustering-Based Segmented Regression for Particulate Matter Sensor Calibration S. Liu et al. 10.3390/app122412934
66. Study of the Suitability of a Personal Exposure Monitor to Assess Air Quality H. Aljofi et al. 10.3390/atmos15030315
67. A Variational Bayesian Blind Calibration Approach for Air Quality Sensor Deployments G. Li et al. 10.1109/JSEN.2022.3212009
68. A Kalman Filter Scheme for the Optimization of Low-Cost Gas Sensor Measurements I. Christakis et al. 10.3390/electronics13010025
69. Using spatiotemporal prediction models to quantify PM2.5 exposure due to daily movement S. Jain et al. 10.1039/D3EA00051F
70. Calibration-Free Analysis with Chronoamperometry at Microelectrodes V. Conceição et al. 10.1021/acs.analchem.4c01645
71. Field comparison of electrochemical gas sensor data correction algorithms for ambient air measurements Y. Liang et al. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128897
72. Electrochemical sensors for environmental gas analysis D. Williams 10.1016/j.coelec.2020.06.006
73. Understanding the effect of temperature and relative humidity on sensor sensitivities in field environments and improving the calibration models of multiple electrochemical carbon monoxide (CO) sensors in a tropical environment R. Ariyaratne et al. 10.1016/j.snb.2023.133935
74. Long-term evaluation of air sensor technology under ambient conditions in Denver, Colorado S. Feinberg et al. 10.5194/amt-11-4605-2018
75. The U.S. EPA wildland fire sensor challenge: Performance and evaluation of solver submitted multi-pollutant sensor systems M. Landis et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118165
76. Low-Cost Air Quality Measurement System Based on Electrochemical and PM Sensors with Cloud Connection P. Arroyo et al. 10.3390/s21186228
77. Hybrid Nanomaterials: A Brief Overview of Versatile Solutions for Sensor Technology in Healthcare and Environmental Applications N. Godja & F. Munteanu 10.3390/bios14020067
78. Carbon monoxide as an indicator of indoor air quality T. Salthammer 10.1039/D4EA00006D
79. The BErkeley Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> Observation Network: field calibration and evaluation of low-cost air quality sensors J. Kim et al. 10.5194/amt-11-1937-2018
80. Adaptive machine learning strategies for network calibration of IoT smart air quality monitoring devices S. De Vito et al. 10.1016/j.patrec.2020.04.032
81. An efficient spatiotemporal data calibration approach for the low-cost PM2.5 sensing network: A case study in Taiwan C. Lee et al. 10.1016/j.envint.2019.05.032
82. Reactive Uptake of Gas-Phase NO2 by Urban Road Dust in the Dark Z. Golay et al. 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.2c00221
83. A New Black Carbon Sensor for Dense Air Quality Monitoring Networks J. Caubel et al. 10.3390/s18030738
84. Deployment, Calibration, and Cross-Validation of Low-Cost Electrochemical Sensors for Carbon Monoxide, Nitrogen Oxides, and Ozone for an Epidemiological Study C. Zuidema et al. 10.3390/s21124214
85. Identification of the Safe Variation Limits for the Optimization of the Measurements in Low-Cost Electrochemical Air Quality Sensors I. Christakis et al. 10.3390/electrochem5010001
86. Design, fabrication, and calibration of the Building EnVironment and Occupancy (BEVO) Beacon: A rapidly-deployable and affordable indoor environmental quality monitor H. Fritz et al. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109432
87. Identifying optimal co-location calibration periods for low-cost sensors M. Levy Zamora et al. 10.5194/amt-16-169-2023
88. Evaluation of low-cost gas sensors to quantify intra-urban variability of atmospheric pollutants A. Baruah et al. 10.1039/D2EA00165A
89. Performance extrapolation of an ultraviolet-based photocatalytic air purifier against near-ambient-level formaldehyde S. Ha et al. 10.1016/j.jiec.2024.06.011
90. Evaluation of low-cost sensors for quantitative personal exposure monitoring S. Mahajan & P. Kumar 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102076
91. Development of a Unified IoT Platform for Assessing Meteorological and Air Quality Data in a Tropical Environment D. Kairuz-Cabrera et al. 10.3390/s24092729
92. Performance of NO, NO<sub>2</sub> low cost sensors and three calibration approaches within a real world application A. Bigi et al. 10.5194/amt-11-3717-2018
93. Performance evaluation of ozone and particulate matter sensors H. DeWitt et al. 10.1080/10962247.2020.1713921
94. On the robustness of field calibration for smart air quality monitors S. De Vito et al. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.127869
95. Field evaluation of low-cost particulate matter sensors in high- and low-concentration environments T. Zheng et al. 10.5194/amt-11-4823-2018
96. Assessment of the Equivalence of Low-Cost Sensors with the Reference Method in Measuring PM10 Concentration Using Selected Correction Functions T. Owczarek et al. 10.3390/su12135368
97. Low-cost sensors and microscale land use regression: Data fusion to resolve air quality variations with high spatial and temporal resolution L. Weissert et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.019
98. Reliability of Lower-Cost Sensors in the Analysis of Indoor Air Quality on Board Ships O. Schalm et al. 10.3390/atmos13101579
99. Assessing a low-cost methane sensor quantification system for use in complex rural and urban environments A. Collier-Oxandale et al. 10.5194/amt-11-3569-2018
100. Examining spatiotemporal variability of urban particulate matter and application of high-time resolution data from a network of low-cost air pollution sensors S. Feinberg et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.026
101. Calibration and assessment of electrochemical air quality sensors by co-location with regulatory-grade instruments D. Hagan et al. 10.5194/amt-11-315-2018
102. Field evaluation of low-cost electrochemical air quality gas sensors under extreme temperature and relative humidity conditions R. Papaconstantinou et al. 10.5194/amt-16-3313-2023
103. Unexpected Performance Improvements of Nitrogen Dioxide and Ozone Sensors by Including Carbon Monoxide Sensor Signal M. Hasan et al. 10.1021/acsomega.2c07734
104. Review of low-cost sensors for indoor air quality: Features and applications M. Ródenas García et al. 10.1080/05704928.2022.2085734
105. Evaluating and improving the reliability of gas-phase sensor system calibrations across new locations for ambient measurements and personal exposure monitoring S. Vikram et al. 10.5194/amt-12-4211-2019
106. Impacts of Modifiable Factors on Ambient Air Pollution: A Case Study of COVID-19 Shutdowns R. Tanzer-Gruener et al. 10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00365
107. Application of low-cost fine particulate mass monitors to convert satellite aerosol optical depth to surface concentrations in North America and Africa C. Malings et al. 10.5194/amt-13-3873-2020
108. Analysis of wintertime O3 variability using a random forest model and high-frequency observations in Zhangjiakou—an area with background pollution level of the North China Plain H. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114191
109. Augmenting the Standard Operating Procedures of Health and Air Quality Stakeholders With NASA Resources B. Duncan et al. 10.1029/2021GH000451
110. Metal–Organic Coordination Polymers: A Review of Electrochemical Sensing of Environmental Pollutants K. Debsharma et al. 10.1021/acs.cgd.4c00421
111. MAIC: Metalearning-Based Adaptive In-Field Calibration for IoT Air Quality Monitoring System N. Liu et al. 10.1109/JIOT.2022.3150849
112. Spatially dense air pollutant sampling: Implications of spatial variability on the representativeness of stationary air pollutant monitors H. Li et al. 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2019.100012
113. In search of an optimal in-field calibration method of low-cost gas sensors for ambient air pollutants: Comparison of linear, multilinear and artificial neural network approaches D. Topalović et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.028
114. Design and Development of a Flexible, Plug-and-Play, Cost-Effective Tool for on-Field Evaluation of Gas Sensors D. Suriano et al. 10.1155/2020/8812025
115. Low- and Medium-Cost Sensors for Tropospheric Ozone Monitoring—Results of an Evaluation Study in Wrocław, Poland M. Badura et al. 10.3390/atmos13040542
116. Detecting Inaccurate Sensors on a Large-Scale Sensor Network Using Centralized and Localized Graph Neural Networks D. Wu et al. 10.1109/JSEN.2023.3287270
117. Stationary and portable multipollutant monitors for high-spatiotemporal-resolution air quality studies including online calibration C. Buehler et al. 10.5194/amt-14-995-2021
118. Development of a low-cost sensing platform for air quality monitoring: application in the city of Rome L. Shindler 10.1080/09593330.2019.1640290
119. A Regularization-Based Big Data Framework for Winter Precipitation Forecasting on Streaming Data A. Kanavos et al. 10.3390/electronics10161872
120. Barometric Pressure as a correction factor for low-cost particulate matter sensors I. Christakis et al. 10.1088/1755-1315/1123/1/012068
121. Calibration and Inter-Unit Consistency Assessment of an Electrochemical Sensor System Using Machine Learning I. Apostolopoulos et al. 10.3390/s24134110
122. Using low-cost sensors to monitor indoor, outdoor, and personal ozone concentrations in Beijing, China M. Liu et al. 10.1039/C9EM00377K
123. Demonstration of a Low-Cost Multi-Pollutant Network to Quantify Intra-Urban Spatial Variations in Air Pollutant Source Impacts and to Evaluate Environmental Justice R. Tanzer et al. 10.3390/ijerph16142523
124. Electrochemical sensors on board a Zeppelin NT: in-flight evaluation of low-cost trace gas measurements T. Schuldt et al. 10.5194/amt-16-373-2023
125. Merging citizen science with epidemiology: design of a prospective feasibility study of health events and air pollution in Cologne, Germany S. Soja et al. 10.1186/s40814-023-01250-0
126. Multi-Sensor Device for Traceable Monitoring of Indoor Environmental Quality V. Fissore et al. 10.3390/s24092893
127. Machine learning calibration of low-cost NO<sub>2</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> sensors: non-linear algorithms and their impact on site transferability P. Nowack et al. 10.5194/amt-14-5637-2021
128. Low-Cost Sensors for Air Quality Monitoring - the Current State of the Technology and a Use Overview P. Buček et al. 10.2478/cdem-2021-0003
129. Reliability Testing of a Low-Cost, Multi-Purpose Arduino-Based Data Logger Deployed in Several Applications Such as Outdoor Air Quality, Human Activity, Motion, and Exhaust Gas Monitoring E. Hernández-Rodríguez et al. 10.3390/s23177412
130. Investigating the Sources of Urban Air Pollution Using Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors at an Urban Atlanta Site L. Yang et al. 10.1021/acs.est.1c07005
131. Gas-Phase Interaction of CO, CO2, H2S, NH3, NO, NO2, and SO2 with Zn12O12 and Zn24 Atomic Clusters M. Doust Mohammadi et al. 10.1021/acsomega.3c01177
132. Air Quality Sensors and Data Adjustment Algorithms: When Is It No Longer a Measurement? G. Hagler et al. 10.1021/acs.est.8b01826
133. A Smart Rig for Calibration of Gas Sensor Nodes M. Benammar et al. 10.3390/s20082341
134. Factors affecting variability in infiltration of ambient particle and gaseous pollutants into home at urban environment M. Hossain et al. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108351
135. Annual NO2 as a Predictor of Hourly NO2 Variability: Do Defra UK’s Heuristics Make Sense? A. Mills & S. Peckham 10.3390/atmos12030385
136. Real-time measurements of formaldehyde emissions in a gross anatomy laboratory A. Baldelli et al. 10.1007/s42452-020-2569-7
137. Are dense networks of low-cost nodes really useful for monitoring air pollution? A case study in Staffordshire L. Frederickson et al. 10.5194/acp-22-13949-2022
138. A Novel Method for Removing Baseline Drifts in Multivariate Chemical Sensor A. Grover & B. Lall 10.1109/TIM.2020.2976224
139. DENSE: DiElectric Novel Soil Evaluation System to Electrochemically Profile Soil Matrices V. Dhamu et al. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac7a64
140. Atmospheric particulate matter characterization by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy: a review of statistical calibration strategies for carbonaceous aerosol quantification in US measurement networks S. Takahama et al. 10.5194/amt-12-525-2019
141. Inferring Aerosol Sources from Low-Cost Air Quality Sensor Measurements: A Case Study in Delhi, India D. Hagan et al. 10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00393
142. Intra-workday fluctuations of airborne contaminant concentration and the time-weighted average P. Smith 10.1080/15459624.2022.2132258
143. The Spatial and Temporal Variability of the Indoor Environmental Quality during Three Simulated Office Studies at a Living Lab N. Clements et al. 10.3390/buildings9030062
144. A sampler for atmospheric volatile organic compounds by copter unmanned aerial vehicles K. McKinney et al. 10.5194/amt-12-3123-2019
145. Robust statistical calibration and characterization of portable low-cost air quality monitoring sensors to quantify real-time O<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations in diverse environments R. Sahu et al. 10.5194/amt-14-37-2021
146. Enhancing PM2.5 Measurement Accuracy: Insights from Environmental Factors and BAM-Light Scattering Device Correlation M. Kim et al. 10.1155/2024/2930582
147. Monitoring Excess Exposure to Air Pollution for Professional Drivers in London Using Low-Cost Sensors L. Frederickson et al. 10.3390/atmos11070749
148. Short-Term Field Evaluation of Low-Cost Sensors Operated by the “AirSensEUR” Platform A. Pichlhöfer & A. Korjenic 10.3390/en15155688
149. Calibrating low-cost sensors for ambient air monitoring: Techniques, trends, and challenges L. Liang 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111163
150. Variational Bayesian calibration of low-cost gas sensor systems in air quality monitoring G. Tancev & F. Toro 10.1016/j.measen.2021.100365
151. Field calibration of electrochemical NO<sub>2</sub> sensors in a citizen science context B. Mijling et al. 10.5194/amt-11-1297-2018
152. Air Quality Sensor Networks for Evidence-Based Policy Making: Best Practices for Actionable Insights J. Hofman et al. 10.3390/atmos13060944
153. Field and laboratory performance evaluations of 28 gas-phase air quality sensors by the AQ-SPEC program A. Collier-Oxandale et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117092
154. Added Value of Vaisala AQT530 Sensors as a Part of a Sensor Network for Comprehensive Air Quality Monitoring T. Petäjä et al. 10.3389/fenvs.2021.719567
155. Environment-Adaptive Calibration System for Outdoor Low-Cost Electrochemical Gas Sensors B. Tian et al. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2916826
156. A Distributed Network of 100 Black Carbon Sensors for 100 Days of Air Quality Monitoring in West Oakland, California J. Caubel et al. 10.1021/acs.est.9b00282
157. Characterizing the Aging of Alphasense NO2 Sensors in Long-Term Field Deployments J. Li et al. 10.1021/acssensors.1c00729
158. Development of Low-Cost Air Quality Stations for Next Generation Monitoring Networks: Calibration and Validation of PM2.5 and PM10 Sensors A. Cavaliere et al. 10.3390/s18092843
159. Performance evaluation of low-cost air quality sensors: A review Y. Kang et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151769
160. Spatial-Temporal Analysis of PM2.5 and NO2 Concentrations Collected Using Low-Cost Sensors in Peñuelas, Puerto Rico S. Reece et al. 10.3390/s18124314
161. Estimating the spatial variability of fine particles at the neighborhood scale using a distributed network of particle sensors R. Shafran-Nathan et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117011
162. Evaluation of the Performance of Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors at a High Mountain Station with Complex Meteorological Conditions H. Li et al. 10.3390/atmos11020212
163. Low-Cost Investigation into Sources of PM2.5 in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo D. Westervelt et al. 10.1021/acsestair.3c00024
164. Evaluation of field calibration methods and performance of AQMesh, a low-cost air quality monitor D. Wahlborg et al. 10.1007/s10661-021-09033-x
165. Developing a Modular Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Platform for Air Pollution Profiling Q. Gu et al. 10.3390/s18124363
166. Assessing neuropsychological disorders affecting pottery workers occupationally exposed to air pollutants G. Abo-el-Ata et al. 10.1016/j.neuro.2023.01.011
167. Garbage in, gospel out? – Air quality assessment in the UK planning system A. Mills & S. Peckham 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.06.010
168. High Resolution On-Road Air Pollution Using a Large Taxi-Based Mobile Sensor Network Y. Sun et al. 10.3390/s22166005
169. Real‐time measurements of PM2.5and ozone to assess the effectiveness of residential indoor air filtration in Shanghai homes K. Barkjohn et al. 10.1111/ina.12716
170. Seasonal Influence on the Performance of Low-Cost NO2 Sensor Calibrations S. Ratingen et al. 10.3390/s21237919
171. Schools’ air quality monitoring for health and education: Methods and protocols of the SAMHE initiative and project L. Chatzidiakou et al. 10.1016/j.dibe.2023.100266
172. Advances in Application of Air Quality Sensors in Environmental Monitoring 英. 宋 10.12677/AEP.2019.93037
173. Relevance and Reliability of Outdoor SO2 Monitoring in Low-Income Countries Using Low-Cost Sensors R. González Rivero et al. 10.3390/atmos14060912