Articles | Volume 10, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3575-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3575-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Use of electrochemical sensors for measurement of air pollution: correcting interference response and validating measurements
Eben S. Cross
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Center for Aerosol and Cloud Chemistry, Aerodyne Research, Inc.,
Billerica, MA 01821, USA
Leah R. Williams
Center for Aerosol and Cloud Chemistry, Aerodyne Research, Inc.,
Billerica, MA 01821, USA
David K. Lewis
Center for Aerosol and Cloud Chemistry, Aerodyne Research, Inc.,
Billerica, MA 01821, USA
Department of Chemistry, Connecticut College, New London, CT 06320,
USA
Gregory R. Magoon
Center for Aerosol and Cloud Chemistry, Aerodyne Research, Inc.,
Billerica, MA 01821, USA
Timothy B. Onasch
Center for Aerosol and Cloud Chemistry, Aerodyne Research, Inc.,
Billerica, MA 01821, USA
Michael L. Kaminsky
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
Douglas R. Worsnop
Center for Aerosol and Cloud Chemistry, Aerodyne Research, Inc.,
Billerica, MA 01821, USA
John T. Jayne
Center for Aerosol and Cloud Chemistry, Aerodyne Research, Inc.,
Billerica, MA 01821, USA
Viewed
Total article views: 9,414 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 05 May 2017)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4,392 | 4,809 | 213 | 9,414 | 790 | 151 | 175 |
- HTML: 4,392
- PDF: 4,809
- XML: 213
- Total: 9,414
- Supplement: 790
- BibTeX: 151
- EndNote: 175
Total article views: 7,704 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 29 Sep 2017)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3,625 | 3,888 | 191 | 7,704 | 567 | 147 | 157 |
- HTML: 3,625
- PDF: 3,888
- XML: 191
- Total: 7,704
- Supplement: 567
- BibTeX: 147
- EndNote: 157
Total article views: 1,710 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 05 May 2017)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
767 | 921 | 22 | 1,710 | 223 | 4 | 18 |
- HTML: 767
- PDF: 921
- XML: 22
- Total: 1,710
- Supplement: 223
- BibTeX: 4
- EndNote: 18
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 9,414 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 8,942 with geography defined
and 472 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 7,704 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 7,254 with geography defined
and 450 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,710 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,688 with geography defined
and 22 with unknown origin.
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
168 citations as recorded by crossref.
- A Parts Per Billion (ppb) Sensor for NO2 with Microwatt (μW) Power Requirements Based on Micro Light Plates O. Casals et al. 10.1021/acssensors.9b00150
- Low-Cost Air Quality Sensing towards Smart Homes H. Omidvarborna et al. 10.3390/atmos12040453
- Understanding the ability of low-cost MOx sensors to quantify ambient VOCs A. Collier-Oxandale et al. 10.5194/amt-12-1441-2019
- Calibration of Electrochemical Sensors for Nitrogen Dioxide Gas Detection Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles R. Mawrence et al. 10.3390/s20247332
- Establishing A Sustainable Low-Cost Air Quality Monitoring Setup: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art M. Narayana et al. 10.3390/s22010394
- Long-term evaluation of commercial air quality sensors: an overview from the QUANT (Quantification of Utility of Atmospheric Network Technologies) study S. Diez et al. 10.5194/amt-17-3809-2024
- Using A Low-Cost Sensor Array and Machine Learning Techniques to Detect Complex Pollutant Mixtures and Identify Likely Sources J. Thorson et al. 10.3390/s19173723
- Breathing chemicals: a review of air pollution over the years A. Totolici et al. 10.24193/subbbiol.2022.1.10
- Multivariate Regression in Conjunction with GA-BP for Optimization of Data Processing of Trace NO Gas Flow in Active Pumping Electronic Nose P. Sun et al. 10.3390/s23031524
- Characterising low-cost sensors in highly portable platforms to quantify personal exposure in diverse environments L. Chatzidiakou et al. 10.5194/amt-12-4643-2019
- Calibrating low-cost sensors to measure vertical and horizontal gradients of NO2 and O3 pollution in three street canyons in Berlin S. Schmitz et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119830
- Design and development of an open-source framework for citizen-centric environmental monitoring and data analysis S. Mahajan 10.1038/s41598-022-18700-z
- Laboratory Performance Evaluation of a Low-Cost Electrochemical Formaldehyde Sensor Z. Pei et al. 10.3390/s23177444
- Preparation of low-concentration H2 test gas mixtures in ambient air for calibration of H2 sensors N. Karbach et al. 10.5194/amt-17-4081-2024
- In Situ Calibration Algorithms for Environmental Sensor Networks: A Review F. Delaine et al. 10.1109/JSEN.2019.2910317
- Low-Cost Nitric Oxide Sensors: Assessment of Temperature and Humidity Effects S. Owen et al. 10.3390/s22229013
- Performance of Aether Low-Cost Sensor Device for Air Pollution Measurements in Urban Environments. Accuracy Evaluation Applying the Air Quality Index (AQI) G. Spyropoulos et al. 10.3390/atmos12101246
- Minimized Training of Machine Learning-Based Calibration Methods for Low-Cost O3 Sensors S. Tondini et al. 10.1109/JSEN.2023.3339202
- Humidity, density, and inlet aspiration efficiency correction improve accuracy of a low-cost sensor during field calibration at a suburban site in the North-Western Indo-Gangetic plain (NW-IGP) H. Pawar & B. Sinha 10.1080/02786826.2020.1719971
- Machine learning techniques to improve the field performance of low-cost air quality sensors T. Bush et al. 10.5194/amt-15-3261-2022
- Air Pollution Monitoring via Wireless Sensor Networks: The Investigation and Correction of the Aging Behavior of Electrochemical Gaseous Pollutant Sensors I. Christakis et al. 10.3390/electronics12081842
- Connecting Air Quality with Emotional Well-Being and Neighborhood Infrastructure in a US City R. Lal et al. 10.1177/1178630220915488
- Low-Cost Outdoor Air Quality Monitoring and Sensor Calibration F. Concas et al. 10.1145/3446005
- Long-term behavior and stability of calibration models for NO and NO<sub>2</sub> low-cost sensors H. Kim et al. 10.5194/amt-15-2979-2022
- Chemical Emissions from Cured and Uncured 3D-Printed Ventilator Patient Circuit Medical Parts J. Krechmer et al. 10.1021/acsomega.1c04695
- Investigating NOx Concentrations on an Urban University Campus Using Passive Air Samplers and UV–Vis Spectroscopy C. Crosby et al. 10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00175
- Field and Laboratory Evaluations of the Low-Cost Plantower Particulate Matter Sensor M. Levy Zamora et al. 10.1021/acs.est.8b05174
- Low-cost system application for policy assessment: a case study from Berlin A. Caseiro et al. 10.1088/2752-5309/ad56bb
- Framework for the Simulation of Sensor Networks Aimed at Evaluating In Situ Calibration Algorithms F. Delaine et al. 10.3390/s20164577
- Outlier detection and gap filling methodologies for low-cost air quality measurements T. Ottosen & P. Kumar 10.1039/C8EM00593A
- An optimized multicopter UAV sounding technique (MUST) for probing comprehensive atmospheric variables C. Chang et al. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126867
- Development of a general calibration model and long-term performance evaluation of low-cost sensors for air pollutant gas monitoring C. Malings et al. 10.5194/amt-12-903-2019
- Environmental pollution detection from susceptibility and conductivity measurement under microwave field: pollution detection under microwave field A. Rayon & S. Sahoo 10.1007/s13762-024-05566-z
- Low-Cost CO Sensor Calibration Using One Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network S. Ali et al. 10.3390/s23020854
- Development of multi-channel whole-air sampling equipment onboard an unmanned aerial vehicle for investigating volatile organic compounds' vertical distribution in the planetary boundary layer S. Yang et al. 10.5194/amt-16-501-2023
- Ground-based investigation of HO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and ozone chemistry in biomass burning plumes in rural Idaho A. Lindsay et al. 10.5194/acp-22-4909-2022
- Solution to the Problem of Calibration of Low-Cost Air Quality Measurement Sensors in Networks G. Miskell et al. 10.1021/acssensors.8b00074
- Assessment of air quality sensor system performance after relocation S. Zauli-Sajani et al. 10.1016/j.apr.2020.11.010
- Testing the performance of field calibration techniques for low-cost gas sensors in new deployment locations: across a county line and across Colorado J. Casey & M. Hannigan 10.5194/amt-11-6351-2018
- Characterising a mobile reference station (MoRS) to quantify personal exposure to air quality M. Hedges et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120160
- Assessing the accuracy of commercially available gas sensors for the measurement of ambient ozone and nitrogen dioxide K. Isiugo et al. 10.1080/15459624.2018.1513135
- Design and testing of a low-cost sensor and sampling platform for indoor air quality J. Tryner et al. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108398
- A machine learning calibration model using random forests to improve sensor performance for lower-cost air quality monitoring N. Zimmerman et al. 10.5194/amt-11-291-2018
- Exploration of intra-city and inter-city PM2.5 regional calibration models to improve low-cost sensor performance S. Jain & N. Zimmerman 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2024.106335
- Protocol development for real-time ship fuel sulfur content determination using drone based plume sniffing microsensor system A. Anand et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140885
- Evaluating the Performance of Using Low-Cost Sensors to Calibrate for Cross-Sensitivities in a Multipollutant Network M. Levy Zamora et al. 10.1021/acsestengg.1c00367
- Research of low-cost air quality monitoring models with different machine learning algorithms G. Wang et al. 10.5194/amt-17-181-2024
- Comparing Building and Neighborhood-Scale Variability of CO2 and O3 to Inform Deployment Considerations for Low-Cost Sensor System Use A. Collier-Oxandale et al. 10.3390/s18051349
- First-Principles Algorithm for Air Quality Electrochemical Gas Sensors B. Ouyang 10.1021/acssensors.0c01129
- River winds and pollutant recirculation near the Manaus city in the central Amazon T. Zhao et al. 10.1038/s43247-021-00277-6
- Performance characterization of low-cost air quality sensors for off-grid deployment in rural Malawi A. Bittner et al. 10.5194/amt-15-3353-2022
- An open‐source tool for evaluating calibration techniques used in low‐cost air pollutant monitors D. Tatsch et al. 10.1049/ell2.12816
- Performance evaluation of light weight gas sensor system suitable for airborne applications against co-location gas analysers over Delhi A. Ahlawat et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134016
- Monitoring Gas Emissions in Agricultural Productions through Low-Cost Technologies: The POREM (Poultry-Manure-Based Bio-Activator for Better Soil Management through Bioremediation) Project Experience D. Suriano & F. Abulude 10.3390/earth5040029
- Improving the Quality of Measurements Made by Alphasense NO2 Non-Reference Sensors Using the Mathematical Methods M. Rogulski et al. 10.3390/s22103619
- Development of Air Quality Boxes Based on Low-Cost Sensor Technology for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring P. Gäbel et al. 10.3390/s22103830
- Fire Influence on Regional to Global Environments and Air Quality (FIREX‐AQ) C. Warneke et al. 10.1029/2022JD037758
- A Survey on Sensor Calibration in Air Pollution Monitoring Deployments B. Maag et al. 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2853660
- Review of the Performance of Low-Cost Sensors for Air Quality Monitoring F. Karagulian et al. 10.3390/atmos10090506
- Clustering-Based Segmented Regression for Particulate Matter Sensor Calibration S. Liu et al. 10.3390/app122412934
- Study of the Suitability of a Personal Exposure Monitor to Assess Air Quality H. Aljofi et al. 10.3390/atmos15030315
- A Variational Bayesian Blind Calibration Approach for Air Quality Sensor Deployments G. Li et al. 10.1109/JSEN.2022.3212009
- A Kalman Filter Scheme for the Optimization of Low-Cost Gas Sensor Measurements I. Christakis et al. 10.3390/electronics13010025
- Using spatiotemporal prediction models to quantify PM2.5 exposure due to daily movement S. Jain et al. 10.1039/D3EA00051F
- Calibration-Free Analysis with Chronoamperometry at Microelectrodes V. Conceição et al. 10.1021/acs.analchem.4c01645
- Field comparison of electrochemical gas sensor data correction algorithms for ambient air measurements Y. Liang et al. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128897
- Electrochemical sensors for environmental gas analysis D. Williams 10.1016/j.coelec.2020.06.006
- Understanding the effect of temperature and relative humidity on sensor sensitivities in field environments and improving the calibration models of multiple electrochemical carbon monoxide (CO) sensors in a tropical environment R. Ariyaratne et al. 10.1016/j.snb.2023.133935
- Long-term evaluation of air sensor technology under ambient conditions in Denver, Colorado S. Feinberg et al. 10.5194/amt-11-4605-2018
- The U.S. EPA wildland fire sensor challenge: Performance and evaluation of solver submitted multi-pollutant sensor systems M. Landis et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118165
- Low-Cost Air Quality Measurement System Based on Electrochemical and PM Sensors with Cloud Connection P. Arroyo et al. 10.3390/s21186228
- Hybrid Nanomaterials: A Brief Overview of Versatile Solutions for Sensor Technology in Healthcare and Environmental Applications N. Godja & F. Munteanu 10.3390/bios14020067
- Carbon monoxide as an indicator of indoor air quality T. Salthammer 10.1039/D4EA00006D
- The BErkeley Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> Observation Network: field calibration and evaluation of low-cost air quality sensors J. Kim et al. 10.5194/amt-11-1937-2018
- Adaptive machine learning strategies for network calibration of IoT smart air quality monitoring devices S. De Vito et al. 10.1016/j.patrec.2020.04.032
- An efficient spatiotemporal data calibration approach for the low-cost PM2.5 sensing network: A case study in Taiwan C. Lee et al. 10.1016/j.envint.2019.05.032
- Reactive Uptake of Gas-Phase NO2 by Urban Road Dust in the Dark Z. Golay et al. 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.2c00221
- A New Black Carbon Sensor for Dense Air Quality Monitoring Networks J. Caubel et al. 10.3390/s18030738
- Deployment, Calibration, and Cross-Validation of Low-Cost Electrochemical Sensors for Carbon Monoxide, Nitrogen Oxides, and Ozone for an Epidemiological Study C. Zuidema et al. 10.3390/s21124214
- Identification of the Safe Variation Limits for the Optimization of the Measurements in Low-Cost Electrochemical Air Quality Sensors I. Christakis et al. 10.3390/electrochem5010001
- Design, fabrication, and calibration of the Building EnVironment and Occupancy (BEVO) Beacon: A rapidly-deployable and affordable indoor environmental quality monitor H. Fritz et al. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109432
- Identifying optimal co-location calibration periods for low-cost sensors M. Levy Zamora et al. 10.5194/amt-16-169-2023
- Evaluation of low-cost gas sensors to quantify intra-urban variability of atmospheric pollutants A. Baruah et al. 10.1039/D2EA00165A
- Performance extrapolation of an ultraviolet-based photocatalytic air purifier against near-ambient-level formaldehyde S. Ha et al. 10.1016/j.jiec.2024.06.011
- Evaluation of low-cost sensors for quantitative personal exposure monitoring S. Mahajan & P. Kumar 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102076
- Development of a Unified IoT Platform for Assessing Meteorological and Air Quality Data in a Tropical Environment D. Kairuz-Cabrera et al. 10.3390/s24092729
- Performance of NO, NO<sub>2</sub> low cost sensors and three calibration approaches within a real world application A. Bigi et al. 10.5194/amt-11-3717-2018
- Performance evaluation of ozone and particulate matter sensors H. DeWitt et al. 10.1080/10962247.2020.1713921
- On the robustness of field calibration for smart air quality monitors S. De Vito et al. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.127869
- Field evaluation of low-cost particulate matter sensors in high- and low-concentration environments T. Zheng et al. 10.5194/amt-11-4823-2018
- Assessment of the Equivalence of Low-Cost Sensors with the Reference Method in Measuring PM10 Concentration Using Selected Correction Functions T. Owczarek et al. 10.3390/su12135368
- Low-cost sensors and microscale land use regression: Data fusion to resolve air quality variations with high spatial and temporal resolution L. Weissert et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.019
- Reliability of Lower-Cost Sensors in the Analysis of Indoor Air Quality on Board Ships O. Schalm et al. 10.3390/atmos13101579
- Assessing a low-cost methane sensor quantification system for use in complex rural and urban environments A. Collier-Oxandale et al. 10.5194/amt-11-3569-2018
- Examining spatiotemporal variability of urban particulate matter and application of high-time resolution data from a network of low-cost air pollution sensors S. Feinberg et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.026
- Calibration and assessment of electrochemical air quality sensors by co-location with regulatory-grade instruments D. Hagan et al. 10.5194/amt-11-315-2018
- Field evaluation of low-cost electrochemical air quality gas sensors under extreme temperature and relative humidity conditions R. Papaconstantinou et al. 10.5194/amt-16-3313-2023
- Unexpected Performance Improvements of Nitrogen Dioxide and Ozone Sensors by Including Carbon Monoxide Sensor Signal M. Hasan et al. 10.1021/acsomega.2c07734
- Review of low-cost sensors for indoor air quality: Features and applications M. Ródenas García et al. 10.1080/05704928.2022.2085734
- Evaluating and improving the reliability of gas-phase sensor system calibrations across new locations for ambient measurements and personal exposure monitoring S. Vikram et al. 10.5194/amt-12-4211-2019
- Impacts of Modifiable Factors on Ambient Air Pollution: A Case Study of COVID-19 Shutdowns R. Tanzer-Gruener et al. 10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00365
- Application of low-cost fine particulate mass monitors to convert satellite aerosol optical depth to surface concentrations in North America and Africa C. Malings et al. 10.5194/amt-13-3873-2020
- Analysis of wintertime O3 variability using a random forest model and high-frequency observations in Zhangjiakou—an area with background pollution level of the North China Plain H. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114191
- Augmenting the Standard Operating Procedures of Health and Air Quality Stakeholders With NASA Resources B. Duncan et al. 10.1029/2021GH000451
- Metal–Organic Coordination Polymers: A Review of Electrochemical Sensing of Environmental Pollutants K. Debsharma et al. 10.1021/acs.cgd.4c00421
- MAIC: Metalearning-Based Adaptive In-Field Calibration for IoT Air Quality Monitoring System N. Liu et al. 10.1109/JIOT.2022.3150849
- Spatially dense air pollutant sampling: Implications of spatial variability on the representativeness of stationary air pollutant monitors H. Li et al. 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2019.100012
- In search of an optimal in-field calibration method of low-cost gas sensors for ambient air pollutants: Comparison of linear, multilinear and artificial neural network approaches D. Topalović et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.028
- Design and Development of a Flexible, Plug-and-Play, Cost-Effective Tool for on-Field Evaluation of Gas Sensors D. Suriano et al. 10.1155/2020/8812025
- Low- and Medium-Cost Sensors for Tropospheric Ozone Monitoring—Results of an Evaluation Study in Wrocław, Poland M. Badura et al. 10.3390/atmos13040542
- Detecting Inaccurate Sensors on a Large-Scale Sensor Network Using Centralized and Localized Graph Neural Networks D. Wu et al. 10.1109/JSEN.2023.3287270
- Stationary and portable multipollutant monitors for high-spatiotemporal-resolution air quality studies including online calibration C. Buehler et al. 10.5194/amt-14-995-2021
- Development of a low-cost sensing platform for air quality monitoring: application in the city of Rome L. Shindler 10.1080/09593330.2019.1640290
- A Regularization-Based Big Data Framework for Winter Precipitation Forecasting on Streaming Data A. Kanavos et al. 10.3390/electronics10161872
- Barometric Pressure as a correction factor for low-cost particulate matter sensors I. Christakis et al. 10.1088/1755-1315/1123/1/012068
- Calibration and Inter-Unit Consistency Assessment of an Electrochemical Sensor System Using Machine Learning I. Apostolopoulos et al. 10.3390/s24134110
- Using low-cost sensors to monitor indoor, outdoor, and personal ozone concentrations in Beijing, China M. Liu et al. 10.1039/C9EM00377K
- Demonstration of a Low-Cost Multi-Pollutant Network to Quantify Intra-Urban Spatial Variations in Air Pollutant Source Impacts and to Evaluate Environmental Justice R. Tanzer et al. 10.3390/ijerph16142523
- Electrochemical sensors on board a Zeppelin NT: in-flight evaluation of low-cost trace gas measurements T. Schuldt et al. 10.5194/amt-16-373-2023
- Merging citizen science with epidemiology: design of a prospective feasibility study of health events and air pollution in Cologne, Germany S. Soja et al. 10.1186/s40814-023-01250-0
- Multi-Sensor Device for Traceable Monitoring of Indoor Environmental Quality V. Fissore et al. 10.3390/s24092893
- Machine learning calibration of low-cost NO<sub>2</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> sensors: non-linear algorithms and their impact on site transferability P. Nowack et al. 10.5194/amt-14-5637-2021
- Low-Cost Sensors for Air Quality Monitoring - the Current State of the Technology and a Use Overview P. Buček et al. 10.2478/cdem-2021-0003
- Reliability Testing of a Low-Cost, Multi-Purpose Arduino-Based Data Logger Deployed in Several Applications Such as Outdoor Air Quality, Human Activity, Motion, and Exhaust Gas Monitoring E. Hernández-Rodríguez et al. 10.3390/s23177412
- Investigating the Sources of Urban Air Pollution Using Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors at an Urban Atlanta Site L. Yang et al. 10.1021/acs.est.1c07005
- Gas-Phase Interaction of CO, CO2, H2S, NH3, NO, NO2, and SO2 with Zn12O12 and Zn24 Atomic Clusters M. Doust Mohammadi et al. 10.1021/acsomega.3c01177
- Air Quality Sensors and Data Adjustment Algorithms: When Is It No Longer a Measurement? G. Hagler et al. 10.1021/acs.est.8b01826
- A Smart Rig for Calibration of Gas Sensor Nodes M. Benammar et al. 10.3390/s20082341
- Factors affecting variability in infiltration of ambient particle and gaseous pollutants into home at urban environment M. Hossain et al. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108351
- Annual NO2 as a Predictor of Hourly NO2 Variability: Do Defra UK’s Heuristics Make Sense? A. Mills & S. Peckham 10.3390/atmos12030385
- Real-time measurements of formaldehyde emissions in a gross anatomy laboratory A. Baldelli et al. 10.1007/s42452-020-2569-7
- Are dense networks of low-cost nodes really useful for monitoring air pollution? A case study in Staffordshire L. Frederickson et al. 10.5194/acp-22-13949-2022
- A Novel Method for Removing Baseline Drifts in Multivariate Chemical Sensor A. Grover & B. Lall 10.1109/TIM.2020.2976224
- DENSE: DiElectric Novel Soil Evaluation System to Electrochemically Profile Soil Matrices V. Dhamu et al. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac7a64
- Atmospheric particulate matter characterization by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy: a review of statistical calibration strategies for carbonaceous aerosol quantification in US measurement networks S. Takahama et al. 10.5194/amt-12-525-2019
- Inferring Aerosol Sources from Low-Cost Air Quality Sensor Measurements: A Case Study in Delhi, India D. Hagan et al. 10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00393
- Intra-workday fluctuations of airborne contaminant concentration and the time-weighted average P. Smith 10.1080/15459624.2022.2132258
- The Spatial and Temporal Variability of the Indoor Environmental Quality during Three Simulated Office Studies at a Living Lab N. Clements et al. 10.3390/buildings9030062
- A sampler for atmospheric volatile organic compounds by copter unmanned aerial vehicles K. McKinney et al. 10.5194/amt-12-3123-2019
- Robust statistical calibration and characterization of portable low-cost air quality monitoring sensors to quantify real-time O<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations in diverse environments R. Sahu et al. 10.5194/amt-14-37-2021
- Enhancing PM2.5 Measurement Accuracy: Insights from Environmental Factors and BAM-Light Scattering Device Correlation M. Kim et al. 10.1155/2024/2930582
- Monitoring Excess Exposure to Air Pollution for Professional Drivers in London Using Low-Cost Sensors L. Frederickson et al. 10.3390/atmos11070749
- Short-Term Field Evaluation of Low-Cost Sensors Operated by the “AirSensEUR” Platform A. Pichlhöfer & A. Korjenic 10.3390/en15155688
- Calibrating low-cost sensors for ambient air monitoring: Techniques, trends, and challenges L. Liang 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111163
- Variational Bayesian calibration of low-cost gas sensor systems in air quality monitoring G. Tancev & F. Toro 10.1016/j.measen.2021.100365
- Field calibration of electrochemical NO<sub>2</sub> sensors in a citizen science context B. Mijling et al. 10.5194/amt-11-1297-2018
- Air Quality Sensor Networks for Evidence-Based Policy Making: Best Practices for Actionable Insights J. Hofman et al. 10.3390/atmos13060944
- Field and laboratory performance evaluations of 28 gas-phase air quality sensors by the AQ-SPEC program A. Collier-Oxandale et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117092
- Added Value of Vaisala AQT530 Sensors as a Part of a Sensor Network for Comprehensive Air Quality Monitoring T. Petäjä et al. 10.3389/fenvs.2021.719567
- Environment-Adaptive Calibration System for Outdoor Low-Cost Electrochemical Gas Sensors B. Tian et al. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2916826
- A Distributed Network of 100 Black Carbon Sensors for 100 Days of Air Quality Monitoring in West Oakland, California J. Caubel et al. 10.1021/acs.est.9b00282
- Characterizing the Aging of Alphasense NO2 Sensors in Long-Term Field Deployments J. Li et al. 10.1021/acssensors.1c00729
- Development of Low-Cost Air Quality Stations for Next Generation Monitoring Networks: Calibration and Validation of PM2.5 and PM10 Sensors A. Cavaliere et al. 10.3390/s18092843
- Performance evaluation of low-cost air quality sensors: A review Y. Kang et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151769
- Spatial-Temporal Analysis of PM2.5 and NO2 Concentrations Collected Using Low-Cost Sensors in Peñuelas, Puerto Rico S. Reece et al. 10.3390/s18124314
- Estimating the spatial variability of fine particles at the neighborhood scale using a distributed network of particle sensors R. Shafran-Nathan et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117011
- Evaluation of the Performance of Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors at a High Mountain Station with Complex Meteorological Conditions H. Li et al. 10.3390/atmos11020212
- Low-Cost Investigation into Sources of PM2.5 in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo D. Westervelt et al. 10.1021/acsestair.3c00024
- Evaluation of field calibration methods and performance of AQMesh, a low-cost air quality monitor D. Wahlborg et al. 10.1007/s10661-021-09033-x
- Developing a Modular Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Platform for Air Pollution Profiling Q. Gu et al. 10.3390/s18124363
- Assessing neuropsychological disorders affecting pottery workers occupationally exposed to air pollutants G. Abo-el-Ata et al. 10.1016/j.neuro.2023.01.011
- Garbage in, gospel out? – Air quality assessment in the UK planning system A. Mills & S. Peckham 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.06.010
- High Resolution On-Road Air Pollution Using a Large Taxi-Based Mobile Sensor Network Y. Sun et al. 10.3390/s22166005
- Real‐time measurements of PM2.5and ozone to assess the effectiveness of residential indoor air filtration in Shanghai homes K. Barkjohn et al. 10.1111/ina.12716
- Seasonal Influence on the Performance of Low-Cost NO2 Sensor Calibrations S. Ratingen et al. 10.3390/s21237919
- Schools’ air quality monitoring for health and education: Methods and protocols of the SAMHE initiative and project L. Chatzidiakou et al. 10.1016/j.dibe.2023.100266
- Advances in Application of Air Quality Sensors in Environmental Monitoring 英. 宋 10.12677/AEP.2019.93037
- Relevance and Reliability of Outdoor SO2 Monitoring in Low-Income Countries Using Low-Cost Sensors R. González Rivero et al. 10.3390/atmos14060912
166 citations as recorded by crossref.
- A Parts Per Billion (ppb) Sensor for NO2 with Microwatt (μW) Power Requirements Based on Micro Light Plates O. Casals et al. 10.1021/acssensors.9b00150
- Low-Cost Air Quality Sensing towards Smart Homes H. Omidvarborna et al. 10.3390/atmos12040453
- Understanding the ability of low-cost MOx sensors to quantify ambient VOCs A. Collier-Oxandale et al. 10.5194/amt-12-1441-2019
- Calibration of Electrochemical Sensors for Nitrogen Dioxide Gas Detection Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles R. Mawrence et al. 10.3390/s20247332
- Establishing A Sustainable Low-Cost Air Quality Monitoring Setup: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art M. Narayana et al. 10.3390/s22010394
- Long-term evaluation of commercial air quality sensors: an overview from the QUANT (Quantification of Utility of Atmospheric Network Technologies) study S. Diez et al. 10.5194/amt-17-3809-2024
- Using A Low-Cost Sensor Array and Machine Learning Techniques to Detect Complex Pollutant Mixtures and Identify Likely Sources J. Thorson et al. 10.3390/s19173723
- Breathing chemicals: a review of air pollution over the years A. Totolici et al. 10.24193/subbbiol.2022.1.10
- Multivariate Regression in Conjunction with GA-BP for Optimization of Data Processing of Trace NO Gas Flow in Active Pumping Electronic Nose P. Sun et al. 10.3390/s23031524
- Characterising low-cost sensors in highly portable platforms to quantify personal exposure in diverse environments L. Chatzidiakou et al. 10.5194/amt-12-4643-2019
- Calibrating low-cost sensors to measure vertical and horizontal gradients of NO2 and O3 pollution in three street canyons in Berlin S. Schmitz et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119830
- Design and development of an open-source framework for citizen-centric environmental monitoring and data analysis S. Mahajan 10.1038/s41598-022-18700-z
- Laboratory Performance Evaluation of a Low-Cost Electrochemical Formaldehyde Sensor Z. Pei et al. 10.3390/s23177444
- Preparation of low-concentration H2 test gas mixtures in ambient air for calibration of H2 sensors N. Karbach et al. 10.5194/amt-17-4081-2024
- In Situ Calibration Algorithms for Environmental Sensor Networks: A Review F. Delaine et al. 10.1109/JSEN.2019.2910317
- Low-Cost Nitric Oxide Sensors: Assessment of Temperature and Humidity Effects S. Owen et al. 10.3390/s22229013
- Performance of Aether Low-Cost Sensor Device for Air Pollution Measurements in Urban Environments. Accuracy Evaluation Applying the Air Quality Index (AQI) G. Spyropoulos et al. 10.3390/atmos12101246
- Minimized Training of Machine Learning-Based Calibration Methods for Low-Cost O3 Sensors S. Tondini et al. 10.1109/JSEN.2023.3339202
- Humidity, density, and inlet aspiration efficiency correction improve accuracy of a low-cost sensor during field calibration at a suburban site in the North-Western Indo-Gangetic plain (NW-IGP) H. Pawar & B. Sinha 10.1080/02786826.2020.1719971
- Machine learning techniques to improve the field performance of low-cost air quality sensors T. Bush et al. 10.5194/amt-15-3261-2022
- Air Pollution Monitoring via Wireless Sensor Networks: The Investigation and Correction of the Aging Behavior of Electrochemical Gaseous Pollutant Sensors I. Christakis et al. 10.3390/electronics12081842
- Connecting Air Quality with Emotional Well-Being and Neighborhood Infrastructure in a US City R. Lal et al. 10.1177/1178630220915488
- Low-Cost Outdoor Air Quality Monitoring and Sensor Calibration F. Concas et al. 10.1145/3446005
- Long-term behavior and stability of calibration models for NO and NO<sub>2</sub> low-cost sensors H. Kim et al. 10.5194/amt-15-2979-2022
- Chemical Emissions from Cured and Uncured 3D-Printed Ventilator Patient Circuit Medical Parts J. Krechmer et al. 10.1021/acsomega.1c04695
- Investigating NOx Concentrations on an Urban University Campus Using Passive Air Samplers and UV–Vis Spectroscopy C. Crosby et al. 10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00175
- Field and Laboratory Evaluations of the Low-Cost Plantower Particulate Matter Sensor M. Levy Zamora et al. 10.1021/acs.est.8b05174
- Low-cost system application for policy assessment: a case study from Berlin A. Caseiro et al. 10.1088/2752-5309/ad56bb
- Framework for the Simulation of Sensor Networks Aimed at Evaluating In Situ Calibration Algorithms F. Delaine et al. 10.3390/s20164577
- Outlier detection and gap filling methodologies for low-cost air quality measurements T. Ottosen & P. Kumar 10.1039/C8EM00593A
- An optimized multicopter UAV sounding technique (MUST) for probing comprehensive atmospheric variables C. Chang et al. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126867
- Development of a general calibration model and long-term performance evaluation of low-cost sensors for air pollutant gas monitoring C. Malings et al. 10.5194/amt-12-903-2019
- Environmental pollution detection from susceptibility and conductivity measurement under microwave field: pollution detection under microwave field A. Rayon & S. Sahoo 10.1007/s13762-024-05566-z
- Low-Cost CO Sensor Calibration Using One Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network S. Ali et al. 10.3390/s23020854
- Development of multi-channel whole-air sampling equipment onboard an unmanned aerial vehicle for investigating volatile organic compounds' vertical distribution in the planetary boundary layer S. Yang et al. 10.5194/amt-16-501-2023
- Ground-based investigation of HO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and ozone chemistry in biomass burning plumes in rural Idaho A. Lindsay et al. 10.5194/acp-22-4909-2022
- Solution to the Problem of Calibration of Low-Cost Air Quality Measurement Sensors in Networks G. Miskell et al. 10.1021/acssensors.8b00074
- Assessment of air quality sensor system performance after relocation S. Zauli-Sajani et al. 10.1016/j.apr.2020.11.010
- Testing the performance of field calibration techniques for low-cost gas sensors in new deployment locations: across a county line and across Colorado J. Casey & M. Hannigan 10.5194/amt-11-6351-2018
- Characterising a mobile reference station (MoRS) to quantify personal exposure to air quality M. Hedges et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120160
- Assessing the accuracy of commercially available gas sensors for the measurement of ambient ozone and nitrogen dioxide K. Isiugo et al. 10.1080/15459624.2018.1513135
- Design and testing of a low-cost sensor and sampling platform for indoor air quality J. Tryner et al. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108398
- A machine learning calibration model using random forests to improve sensor performance for lower-cost air quality monitoring N. Zimmerman et al. 10.5194/amt-11-291-2018
- Exploration of intra-city and inter-city PM2.5 regional calibration models to improve low-cost sensor performance S. Jain & N. Zimmerman 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2024.106335
- Protocol development for real-time ship fuel sulfur content determination using drone based plume sniffing microsensor system A. Anand et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140885
- Evaluating the Performance of Using Low-Cost Sensors to Calibrate for Cross-Sensitivities in a Multipollutant Network M. Levy Zamora et al. 10.1021/acsestengg.1c00367
- Research of low-cost air quality monitoring models with different machine learning algorithms G. Wang et al. 10.5194/amt-17-181-2024
- Comparing Building and Neighborhood-Scale Variability of CO2 and O3 to Inform Deployment Considerations for Low-Cost Sensor System Use A. Collier-Oxandale et al. 10.3390/s18051349
- First-Principles Algorithm for Air Quality Electrochemical Gas Sensors B. Ouyang 10.1021/acssensors.0c01129
- River winds and pollutant recirculation near the Manaus city in the central Amazon T. Zhao et al. 10.1038/s43247-021-00277-6
- Performance characterization of low-cost air quality sensors for off-grid deployment in rural Malawi A. Bittner et al. 10.5194/amt-15-3353-2022
- An open‐source tool for evaluating calibration techniques used in low‐cost air pollutant monitors D. Tatsch et al. 10.1049/ell2.12816
- Performance evaluation of light weight gas sensor system suitable for airborne applications against co-location gas analysers over Delhi A. Ahlawat et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134016
- Monitoring Gas Emissions in Agricultural Productions through Low-Cost Technologies: The POREM (Poultry-Manure-Based Bio-Activator for Better Soil Management through Bioremediation) Project Experience D. Suriano & F. Abulude 10.3390/earth5040029
- Improving the Quality of Measurements Made by Alphasense NO2 Non-Reference Sensors Using the Mathematical Methods M. Rogulski et al. 10.3390/s22103619
- Development of Air Quality Boxes Based on Low-Cost Sensor Technology for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring P. Gäbel et al. 10.3390/s22103830
- Fire Influence on Regional to Global Environments and Air Quality (FIREX‐AQ) C. Warneke et al. 10.1029/2022JD037758
- A Survey on Sensor Calibration in Air Pollution Monitoring Deployments B. Maag et al. 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2853660
- Review of the Performance of Low-Cost Sensors for Air Quality Monitoring F. Karagulian et al. 10.3390/atmos10090506
- Clustering-Based Segmented Regression for Particulate Matter Sensor Calibration S. Liu et al. 10.3390/app122412934
- Study of the Suitability of a Personal Exposure Monitor to Assess Air Quality H. Aljofi et al. 10.3390/atmos15030315
- A Variational Bayesian Blind Calibration Approach for Air Quality Sensor Deployments G. Li et al. 10.1109/JSEN.2022.3212009
- A Kalman Filter Scheme for the Optimization of Low-Cost Gas Sensor Measurements I. Christakis et al. 10.3390/electronics13010025
- Using spatiotemporal prediction models to quantify PM2.5 exposure due to daily movement S. Jain et al. 10.1039/D3EA00051F
- Calibration-Free Analysis with Chronoamperometry at Microelectrodes V. Conceição et al. 10.1021/acs.analchem.4c01645
- Field comparison of electrochemical gas sensor data correction algorithms for ambient air measurements Y. Liang et al. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128897
- Electrochemical sensors for environmental gas analysis D. Williams 10.1016/j.coelec.2020.06.006
- Understanding the effect of temperature and relative humidity on sensor sensitivities in field environments and improving the calibration models of multiple electrochemical carbon monoxide (CO) sensors in a tropical environment R. Ariyaratne et al. 10.1016/j.snb.2023.133935
- Long-term evaluation of air sensor technology under ambient conditions in Denver, Colorado S. Feinberg et al. 10.5194/amt-11-4605-2018
- The U.S. EPA wildland fire sensor challenge: Performance and evaluation of solver submitted multi-pollutant sensor systems M. Landis et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118165
- Low-Cost Air Quality Measurement System Based on Electrochemical and PM Sensors with Cloud Connection P. Arroyo et al. 10.3390/s21186228
- Hybrid Nanomaterials: A Brief Overview of Versatile Solutions for Sensor Technology in Healthcare and Environmental Applications N. Godja & F. Munteanu 10.3390/bios14020067
- Carbon monoxide as an indicator of indoor air quality T. Salthammer 10.1039/D4EA00006D
- The BErkeley Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> Observation Network: field calibration and evaluation of low-cost air quality sensors J. Kim et al. 10.5194/amt-11-1937-2018
- Adaptive machine learning strategies for network calibration of IoT smart air quality monitoring devices S. De Vito et al. 10.1016/j.patrec.2020.04.032
- An efficient spatiotemporal data calibration approach for the low-cost PM2.5 sensing network: A case study in Taiwan C. Lee et al. 10.1016/j.envint.2019.05.032
- Reactive Uptake of Gas-Phase NO2 by Urban Road Dust in the Dark Z. Golay et al. 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.2c00221
- A New Black Carbon Sensor for Dense Air Quality Monitoring Networks J. Caubel et al. 10.3390/s18030738
- Deployment, Calibration, and Cross-Validation of Low-Cost Electrochemical Sensors for Carbon Monoxide, Nitrogen Oxides, and Ozone for an Epidemiological Study C. Zuidema et al. 10.3390/s21124214
- Identification of the Safe Variation Limits for the Optimization of the Measurements in Low-Cost Electrochemical Air Quality Sensors I. Christakis et al. 10.3390/electrochem5010001
- Design, fabrication, and calibration of the Building EnVironment and Occupancy (BEVO) Beacon: A rapidly-deployable and affordable indoor environmental quality monitor H. Fritz et al. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109432
- Identifying optimal co-location calibration periods for low-cost sensors M. Levy Zamora et al. 10.5194/amt-16-169-2023
- Evaluation of low-cost gas sensors to quantify intra-urban variability of atmospheric pollutants A. Baruah et al. 10.1039/D2EA00165A
- Performance extrapolation of an ultraviolet-based photocatalytic air purifier against near-ambient-level formaldehyde S. Ha et al. 10.1016/j.jiec.2024.06.011
- Evaluation of low-cost sensors for quantitative personal exposure monitoring S. Mahajan & P. Kumar 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102076
- Development of a Unified IoT Platform for Assessing Meteorological and Air Quality Data in a Tropical Environment D. Kairuz-Cabrera et al. 10.3390/s24092729
- Performance of NO, NO<sub>2</sub> low cost sensors and three calibration approaches within a real world application A. Bigi et al. 10.5194/amt-11-3717-2018
- Performance evaluation of ozone and particulate matter sensors H. DeWitt et al. 10.1080/10962247.2020.1713921
- On the robustness of field calibration for smart air quality monitors S. De Vito et al. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.127869
- Field evaluation of low-cost particulate matter sensors in high- and low-concentration environments T. Zheng et al. 10.5194/amt-11-4823-2018
- Assessment of the Equivalence of Low-Cost Sensors with the Reference Method in Measuring PM10 Concentration Using Selected Correction Functions T. Owczarek et al. 10.3390/su12135368
- Low-cost sensors and microscale land use regression: Data fusion to resolve air quality variations with high spatial and temporal resolution L. Weissert et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.019
- Reliability of Lower-Cost Sensors in the Analysis of Indoor Air Quality on Board Ships O. Schalm et al. 10.3390/atmos13101579
- Assessing a low-cost methane sensor quantification system for use in complex rural and urban environments A. Collier-Oxandale et al. 10.5194/amt-11-3569-2018
- Examining spatiotemporal variability of urban particulate matter and application of high-time resolution data from a network of low-cost air pollution sensors S. Feinberg et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.026
- Calibration and assessment of electrochemical air quality sensors by co-location with regulatory-grade instruments D. Hagan et al. 10.5194/amt-11-315-2018
- Field evaluation of low-cost electrochemical air quality gas sensors under extreme temperature and relative humidity conditions R. Papaconstantinou et al. 10.5194/amt-16-3313-2023
- Unexpected Performance Improvements of Nitrogen Dioxide and Ozone Sensors by Including Carbon Monoxide Sensor Signal M. Hasan et al. 10.1021/acsomega.2c07734
- Review of low-cost sensors for indoor air quality: Features and applications M. Ródenas García et al. 10.1080/05704928.2022.2085734
- Evaluating and improving the reliability of gas-phase sensor system calibrations across new locations for ambient measurements and personal exposure monitoring S. Vikram et al. 10.5194/amt-12-4211-2019
- Impacts of Modifiable Factors on Ambient Air Pollution: A Case Study of COVID-19 Shutdowns R. Tanzer-Gruener et al. 10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00365
- Application of low-cost fine particulate mass monitors to convert satellite aerosol optical depth to surface concentrations in North America and Africa C. Malings et al. 10.5194/amt-13-3873-2020
- Analysis of wintertime O3 variability using a random forest model and high-frequency observations in Zhangjiakou—an area with background pollution level of the North China Plain H. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114191
- Augmenting the Standard Operating Procedures of Health and Air Quality Stakeholders With NASA Resources B. Duncan et al. 10.1029/2021GH000451
- Metal–Organic Coordination Polymers: A Review of Electrochemical Sensing of Environmental Pollutants K. Debsharma et al. 10.1021/acs.cgd.4c00421
- MAIC: Metalearning-Based Adaptive In-Field Calibration for IoT Air Quality Monitoring System N. Liu et al. 10.1109/JIOT.2022.3150849
- Spatially dense air pollutant sampling: Implications of spatial variability on the representativeness of stationary air pollutant monitors H. Li et al. 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2019.100012
- In search of an optimal in-field calibration method of low-cost gas sensors for ambient air pollutants: Comparison of linear, multilinear and artificial neural network approaches D. Topalović et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.028
- Design and Development of a Flexible, Plug-and-Play, Cost-Effective Tool for on-Field Evaluation of Gas Sensors D. Suriano et al. 10.1155/2020/8812025
- Low- and Medium-Cost Sensors for Tropospheric Ozone Monitoring—Results of an Evaluation Study in Wrocław, Poland M. Badura et al. 10.3390/atmos13040542
- Detecting Inaccurate Sensors on a Large-Scale Sensor Network Using Centralized and Localized Graph Neural Networks D. Wu et al. 10.1109/JSEN.2023.3287270
- Stationary and portable multipollutant monitors for high-spatiotemporal-resolution air quality studies including online calibration C. Buehler et al. 10.5194/amt-14-995-2021
- Development of a low-cost sensing platform for air quality monitoring: application in the city of Rome L. Shindler 10.1080/09593330.2019.1640290
- A Regularization-Based Big Data Framework for Winter Precipitation Forecasting on Streaming Data A. Kanavos et al. 10.3390/electronics10161872
- Barometric Pressure as a correction factor for low-cost particulate matter sensors I. Christakis et al. 10.1088/1755-1315/1123/1/012068
- Calibration and Inter-Unit Consistency Assessment of an Electrochemical Sensor System Using Machine Learning I. Apostolopoulos et al. 10.3390/s24134110
- Using low-cost sensors to monitor indoor, outdoor, and personal ozone concentrations in Beijing, China M. Liu et al. 10.1039/C9EM00377K
- Demonstration of a Low-Cost Multi-Pollutant Network to Quantify Intra-Urban Spatial Variations in Air Pollutant Source Impacts and to Evaluate Environmental Justice R. Tanzer et al. 10.3390/ijerph16142523
- Electrochemical sensors on board a Zeppelin NT: in-flight evaluation of low-cost trace gas measurements T. Schuldt et al. 10.5194/amt-16-373-2023
- Merging citizen science with epidemiology: design of a prospective feasibility study of health events and air pollution in Cologne, Germany S. Soja et al. 10.1186/s40814-023-01250-0
- Multi-Sensor Device for Traceable Monitoring of Indoor Environmental Quality V. Fissore et al. 10.3390/s24092893
- Machine learning calibration of low-cost NO<sub>2</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> sensors: non-linear algorithms and their impact on site transferability P. Nowack et al. 10.5194/amt-14-5637-2021
- Low-Cost Sensors for Air Quality Monitoring - the Current State of the Technology and a Use Overview P. Buček et al. 10.2478/cdem-2021-0003
- Reliability Testing of a Low-Cost, Multi-Purpose Arduino-Based Data Logger Deployed in Several Applications Such as Outdoor Air Quality, Human Activity, Motion, and Exhaust Gas Monitoring E. Hernández-Rodríguez et al. 10.3390/s23177412
- Investigating the Sources of Urban Air Pollution Using Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors at an Urban Atlanta Site L. Yang et al. 10.1021/acs.est.1c07005
- Gas-Phase Interaction of CO, CO2, H2S, NH3, NO, NO2, and SO2 with Zn12O12 and Zn24 Atomic Clusters M. Doust Mohammadi et al. 10.1021/acsomega.3c01177
- Air Quality Sensors and Data Adjustment Algorithms: When Is It No Longer a Measurement? G. Hagler et al. 10.1021/acs.est.8b01826
- A Smart Rig for Calibration of Gas Sensor Nodes M. Benammar et al. 10.3390/s20082341
- Factors affecting variability in infiltration of ambient particle and gaseous pollutants into home at urban environment M. Hossain et al. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108351
- Annual NO2 as a Predictor of Hourly NO2 Variability: Do Defra UK’s Heuristics Make Sense? A. Mills & S. Peckham 10.3390/atmos12030385
- Real-time measurements of formaldehyde emissions in a gross anatomy laboratory A. Baldelli et al. 10.1007/s42452-020-2569-7
- Are dense networks of low-cost nodes really useful for monitoring air pollution? A case study in Staffordshire L. Frederickson et al. 10.5194/acp-22-13949-2022
- A Novel Method for Removing Baseline Drifts in Multivariate Chemical Sensor A. Grover & B. Lall 10.1109/TIM.2020.2976224
- DENSE: DiElectric Novel Soil Evaluation System to Electrochemically Profile Soil Matrices V. Dhamu et al. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac7a64
- Atmospheric particulate matter characterization by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy: a review of statistical calibration strategies for carbonaceous aerosol quantification in US measurement networks S. Takahama et al. 10.5194/amt-12-525-2019
- Inferring Aerosol Sources from Low-Cost Air Quality Sensor Measurements: A Case Study in Delhi, India D. Hagan et al. 10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00393
- Intra-workday fluctuations of airborne contaminant concentration and the time-weighted average P. Smith 10.1080/15459624.2022.2132258
- The Spatial and Temporal Variability of the Indoor Environmental Quality during Three Simulated Office Studies at a Living Lab N. Clements et al. 10.3390/buildings9030062
- A sampler for atmospheric volatile organic compounds by copter unmanned aerial vehicles K. McKinney et al. 10.5194/amt-12-3123-2019
- Robust statistical calibration and characterization of portable low-cost air quality monitoring sensors to quantify real-time O<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations in diverse environments R. Sahu et al. 10.5194/amt-14-37-2021
- Enhancing PM2.5 Measurement Accuracy: Insights from Environmental Factors and BAM-Light Scattering Device Correlation M. Kim et al. 10.1155/2024/2930582
- Monitoring Excess Exposure to Air Pollution for Professional Drivers in London Using Low-Cost Sensors L. Frederickson et al. 10.3390/atmos11070749
- Short-Term Field Evaluation of Low-Cost Sensors Operated by the “AirSensEUR” Platform A. Pichlhöfer & A. Korjenic 10.3390/en15155688
- Calibrating low-cost sensors for ambient air monitoring: Techniques, trends, and challenges L. Liang 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111163
- Variational Bayesian calibration of low-cost gas sensor systems in air quality monitoring G. Tancev & F. Toro 10.1016/j.measen.2021.100365
- Field calibration of electrochemical NO<sub>2</sub> sensors in a citizen science context B. Mijling et al. 10.5194/amt-11-1297-2018
- Air Quality Sensor Networks for Evidence-Based Policy Making: Best Practices for Actionable Insights J. Hofman et al. 10.3390/atmos13060944
- Field and laboratory performance evaluations of 28 gas-phase air quality sensors by the AQ-SPEC program A. Collier-Oxandale et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117092
- Added Value of Vaisala AQT530 Sensors as a Part of a Sensor Network for Comprehensive Air Quality Monitoring T. Petäjä et al. 10.3389/fenvs.2021.719567
- Environment-Adaptive Calibration System for Outdoor Low-Cost Electrochemical Gas Sensors B. Tian et al. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2916826
- A Distributed Network of 100 Black Carbon Sensors for 100 Days of Air Quality Monitoring in West Oakland, California J. Caubel et al. 10.1021/acs.est.9b00282
- Characterizing the Aging of Alphasense NO2 Sensors in Long-Term Field Deployments J. Li et al. 10.1021/acssensors.1c00729
- Development of Low-Cost Air Quality Stations for Next Generation Monitoring Networks: Calibration and Validation of PM2.5 and PM10 Sensors A. Cavaliere et al. 10.3390/s18092843
- Performance evaluation of low-cost air quality sensors: A review Y. Kang et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151769
- Spatial-Temporal Analysis of PM2.5 and NO2 Concentrations Collected Using Low-Cost Sensors in Peñuelas, Puerto Rico S. Reece et al. 10.3390/s18124314
- Estimating the spatial variability of fine particles at the neighborhood scale using a distributed network of particle sensors R. Shafran-Nathan et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117011
- Evaluation of the Performance of Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors at a High Mountain Station with Complex Meteorological Conditions H. Li et al. 10.3390/atmos11020212
- Low-Cost Investigation into Sources of PM2.5 in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo D. Westervelt et al. 10.1021/acsestair.3c00024
- Evaluation of field calibration methods and performance of AQMesh, a low-cost air quality monitor D. Wahlborg et al. 10.1007/s10661-021-09033-x
- Developing a Modular Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Platform for Air Pollution Profiling Q. Gu et al. 10.3390/s18124363
- Assessing neuropsychological disorders affecting pottery workers occupationally exposed to air pollutants G. Abo-el-Ata et al. 10.1016/j.neuro.2023.01.011
- Garbage in, gospel out? – Air quality assessment in the UK planning system A. Mills & S. Peckham 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.06.010
- High Resolution On-Road Air Pollution Using a Large Taxi-Based Mobile Sensor Network Y. Sun et al. 10.3390/s22166005
- Real‐time measurements of PM2.5and ozone to assess the effectiveness of residential indoor air filtration in Shanghai homes K. Barkjohn et al. 10.1111/ina.12716
- Seasonal Influence on the Performance of Low-Cost NO2 Sensor Calibrations S. Ratingen et al. 10.3390/s21237919
- Schools’ air quality monitoring for health and education: Methods and protocols of the SAMHE initiative and project L. Chatzidiakou et al. 10.1016/j.dibe.2023.100266
Latest update: 03 Oct 2024
Short summary
Low-cost air quality sensor technologies offer new opportunities for fast and distributed measurements of air pollution, but a persistent characterization gap remains when it comes to evaluating sensor performance under realistic environmental sampling conditions. We present results from a newly developed integrated AQ-sensor system (ARISense) and demonstrate the utility of using high-dimensional model representation to improve the conversion of raw sensor signal to ambient concentration.
Low-cost air quality sensor technologies offer new opportunities for fast and distributed...