Articles | Volume 10, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3865-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3865-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Quantifying TOLNet ozone lidar accuracy during the 2014 DISCOVER-AQ and FRAPPÉ campaigns
Lihua Wang
University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, Alabama, USA
Michael J. Newchurch
University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, Alabama, USA
Raul J. Alvarez II
NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, USA
Timothy A. Berkoff
NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia, USA
Steven S. Brown
NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, USA
William Carrion
NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia, USA
Science Systems and Applications Inc., Lanham, Maryland, USA
Russell J. De Young
NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia, USA
Bryan J. Johnson
NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, USA
Rene Ganoe
Science Systems and Applications Inc., Lanham, Maryland, USA
Guillaume Gronoff
NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia, USA
Science Systems and Applications Inc., Lanham, Maryland, USA
Guillaume Kirgis
NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, USA
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA
University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, Alabama, USA
Andrew O. Langford
NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, USA
Thierry Leblanc
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Wrightwood, California, USA
Erin E. McDuffie
NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, USA
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA
Department of Chemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA
Thomas J. McGee
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
Denis Pliutau
Science Systems and Applications Inc., Lanham, Maryland, USA
Christoph J. Senff
NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, USA
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA
John T. Sullivan
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
Joint Center for Earth Systems Technology, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Grant Sumnicht
Science Systems and Applications Inc., Lanham, Maryland, USA
Laurence W. Twigg
Science Systems and Applications Inc., Lanham, Maryland, USA
Andrew J. Weinheimer
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA
Viewed
Total article views: 2,838 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 22 May 2017)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,865 | 876 | 97 | 2,838 | 108 | 121 |
- HTML: 1,865
- PDF: 876
- XML: 97
- Total: 2,838
- BibTeX: 108
- EndNote: 121
Total article views: 2,277 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 23 Oct 2017)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,541 | 652 | 84 | 2,277 | 101 | 101 |
- HTML: 1,541
- PDF: 652
- XML: 84
- Total: 2,277
- BibTeX: 101
- EndNote: 101
Total article views: 561 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 22 May 2017)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
324 | 224 | 13 | 561 | 7 | 20 |
- HTML: 324
- PDF: 224
- XML: 13
- Total: 561
- BibTeX: 7
- EndNote: 20
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 2,838 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,739 with geography defined
and 99 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,277 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,199 with geography defined
and 78 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 561 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 540 with geography defined
and 21 with unknown origin.
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
18 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Sensitivity of total column NO2 at a marine site within the Chesapeake Bay during OWLETS-2 A. Kotsakis et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119063
- Algorithm for Control of an Ozone Lidar Photon Counter A. Nevzorov et al. 10.1134/S1024856022050165
- Evaluating the Performance of Ozone Products Derived from CrIS/NOAA20, AIRS/Aqua and ERA5 Reanalysis in the Polar Regions in 2020 Using Ground-Based Observations H. Wang et al. 10.3390/rs13214375
- Mobile Lidar for Sensing Tropospheric Ozone A. Nevzorov et al. 10.1134/S1024856023050123
- Meteorological modeling relevant to mesoscale and regional air quality applications: a review R. McNider & A. Pour-Biazar 10.1080/10962247.2019.1694602
- Validation of the TOLNet lidars: the Southern California Ozone Observation Project (SCOOP) T. Leblanc et al. 10.5194/amt-11-6137-2018
- Long-range transport of Siberian biomass burning emissions to North America during FIREX-AQ M. Johnson et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118241
- Acyl Peroxy Nitrates Link Oil and Natural Gas Emissions to High Ozone Abundances in the Colorado Front Range During Summer 2015 J. Lindaas et al. 10.1029/2018JD028825
- A method for quantifying near range point source induced O3 titration events using Co-located Lidar and Pandora measurements G. Gronoff et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.01.052
- Influence of Absorption Cross-Sections on Retrieving the Ozone Vertical Distribution at the Siberian Lidar Station S. Dolgii et al. 10.3390/atmos13020293
- Three decades of tropospheric ozone lidar development at Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany T. Trickl et al. 10.5194/amt-13-6357-2020
- Demonstration of an off-axis parabolic receiver for near-range retrieval of lidar ozone profiles B. Farris et al. 10.5194/amt-12-363-2019
- Intercomparison and evaluation of ground- and satellite-based stratospheric ozone and temperature profiles above Observatoire de Haute-Provence during the Lidar Validation NDACC Experiment (LAVANDE) R. Wing et al. 10.5194/amt-13-5621-2020
- Intercomparison of lidar, aircraft, and surface ozone measurements in the San Joaquin Valley during the California Baseline Ozone Transport Study (CABOTS) A. Langford et al. 10.5194/amt-12-1889-2019
- Evaluation of UV aerosol retrievals from an ozone lidar S. Kuang et al. 10.5194/amt-13-5277-2020
- NASA GEOS Composition Forecast Modeling System GEOS‐CF v1.0: Stratospheric Composition K. Knowland et al. 10.1029/2021MS002852
- Cluster-based characterization of multi-dimensional tropospheric ozone variability in coastal regions: an analysis of lidar measurements and model results C. Bernier et al. 10.5194/acp-22-15313-2022
- The Ozone Water–Land Environmental Transition Study: An Innovative Strategy for Understanding Chesapeake Bay Pollution Events J. Sullivan et al. 10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0025.1
18 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Sensitivity of total column NO2 at a marine site within the Chesapeake Bay during OWLETS-2 A. Kotsakis et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119063
- Algorithm for Control of an Ozone Lidar Photon Counter A. Nevzorov et al. 10.1134/S1024856022050165
- Evaluating the Performance of Ozone Products Derived from CrIS/NOAA20, AIRS/Aqua and ERA5 Reanalysis in the Polar Regions in 2020 Using Ground-Based Observations H. Wang et al. 10.3390/rs13214375
- Mobile Lidar for Sensing Tropospheric Ozone A. Nevzorov et al. 10.1134/S1024856023050123
- Meteorological modeling relevant to mesoscale and regional air quality applications: a review R. McNider & A. Pour-Biazar 10.1080/10962247.2019.1694602
- Validation of the TOLNet lidars: the Southern California Ozone Observation Project (SCOOP) T. Leblanc et al. 10.5194/amt-11-6137-2018
- Long-range transport of Siberian biomass burning emissions to North America during FIREX-AQ M. Johnson et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118241
- Acyl Peroxy Nitrates Link Oil and Natural Gas Emissions to High Ozone Abundances in the Colorado Front Range During Summer 2015 J. Lindaas et al. 10.1029/2018JD028825
- A method for quantifying near range point source induced O3 titration events using Co-located Lidar and Pandora measurements G. Gronoff et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.01.052
- Influence of Absorption Cross-Sections on Retrieving the Ozone Vertical Distribution at the Siberian Lidar Station S. Dolgii et al. 10.3390/atmos13020293
- Three decades of tropospheric ozone lidar development at Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany T. Trickl et al. 10.5194/amt-13-6357-2020
- Demonstration of an off-axis parabolic receiver for near-range retrieval of lidar ozone profiles B. Farris et al. 10.5194/amt-12-363-2019
- Intercomparison and evaluation of ground- and satellite-based stratospheric ozone and temperature profiles above Observatoire de Haute-Provence during the Lidar Validation NDACC Experiment (LAVANDE) R. Wing et al. 10.5194/amt-13-5621-2020
- Intercomparison of lidar, aircraft, and surface ozone measurements in the San Joaquin Valley during the California Baseline Ozone Transport Study (CABOTS) A. Langford et al. 10.5194/amt-12-1889-2019
- Evaluation of UV aerosol retrievals from an ozone lidar S. Kuang et al. 10.5194/amt-13-5277-2020
- NASA GEOS Composition Forecast Modeling System GEOS‐CF v1.0: Stratospheric Composition K. Knowland et al. 10.1029/2021MS002852
- Cluster-based characterization of multi-dimensional tropospheric ozone variability in coastal regions: an analysis of lidar measurements and model results C. Bernier et al. 10.5194/acp-22-15313-2022
- The Ozone Water–Land Environmental Transition Study: An Innovative Strategy for Understanding Chesapeake Bay Pollution Events J. Sullivan et al. 10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0025.1
Latest update: 23 Nov 2024
Short summary
Intercomparisons have been made between three TOLNet ozone lidars and between the lidars and other ozone instruments during the 2014 DISCOVER-AQ and FRAPPÉ campaigns in Colorado. Overall, the TOLNet lidars are capable of measuring 5 min tropospheric ozone variations with accuracy better than ±15 % in terms of their vertical resolving capability and better than ±5 % in terms of their column average measurement. These results indicate very good measurement accuracy for the three TOLNet lidars.
Intercomparisons have been made between three TOLNet ozone lidars and between the lidars and...