Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
AMT
Articles | Volume 10, issue 10
Articles | Volume 10, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4001-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4001-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Articles | Volume 10, issue 10
Research article
 | 
27 Oct 2017
Research article |  | 27 Oct 2017

The effects of different footprint sizes and cloud algorithms on the top-of-atmosphere radiative flux calculation from the Clouds and Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) instrument on Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership (NPP)

Wenying Su, Lusheng Liang, Walter F. Miller, and Victor E. Sothcott

Viewed

Total article views: 2,575 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,497 991 87 2,575 85 87
  • HTML: 1,497
  • PDF: 991
  • XML: 87
  • Total: 2,575
  • BibTeX: 85
  • EndNote: 87
Views and downloads (calculated since 13 Apr 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 13 Apr 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,575 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,526 with geography defined and 49 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 17 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
The footprint size of NPP CERES is larger than that of Aqua CERES, because the altitude of the NPP orbit is higher than that of the Aqua orbit. Additionally, the cloud retrievals from VIIRS and MODIS, the imagers that fly alongside NPP CERES and Aqua CERES, are also different. This paper outlined a simulation study using the MODIS pixel-level data to address the impact of these differences on the NPP CERES fluxes inverted using the Aqua CERES angular distribution models.
Read more