Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
AMT
Articles | Volume 10, issue 12
Articles | Volume 10, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4697-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4697-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 10, issue 12
Research article
 | 
05 Dec 2017
Research article |  | 05 Dec 2017

A more representative “best representative value” for daily total column ozone reporting

Andrew R. D. Smedley, John S. Rimmer, and Ann R. Webb

Viewed

Total article views: 2,055 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,275 720 60 2,055 84 79
  • HTML: 1,275
  • PDF: 720
  • XML: 60
  • Total: 2,055
  • BibTeX: 84
  • EndNote: 79
Views and downloads (calculated since 13 Jul 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 13 Jul 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,055 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,998 with geography defined and 57 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (preprint)

Latest update: 29 Jun 2024
Download
Short summary
Long-term trends of total column ozone and assessments of its recovery are underpinned by daily “best representative values” from Brewer spectrophotometers and other ground-based instruments. However, the current calculation of these best representative values often rejects otherwise useful data and has deficiencies during partly cloudy days. We propose a new methodology that takes into account all valid data and accounts for unevenly spaced observations and their uncertainties.
Read more