Articles | Volume 10, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-979-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-979-2017
Research article
 | 
10 Mar 2017
Research article |  | 10 Mar 2017

Plume propagation direction determination with SO2 cameras

Angelika Klein, Peter Lübcke, Nicole Bobrowski, Jonas Kuhn, and Ulrich Platt

Viewed

Total article views: 4,922 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
3,053 1,607 262 4,922 213 222
  • HTML: 3,053
  • PDF: 1,607
  • XML: 262
  • Total: 4,922
  • BibTeX: 213
  • EndNote: 222
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Oct 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 28 Oct 2016)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,922 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,690 with geography defined and 232 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 29 Jul 2026
Download
Short summary
While measuring sulfur dioxide fluxes in volcanic plumes with a UV-sensitive camera, the wind direction can influence the retrieved fluxes. If the volcanic plume is tilted in the field of view of the camera, it can lead to over- or underestimations of the determined fluxes. This paper presents a method to deal with such a circumstance. Additionally, it provides the possibility to determine the wind direction of the plume directly from the image time series themselves.
Share