Articles | Volume 11, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-819-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-819-2018
Research article
 | 
13 Feb 2018
Research article |  | 13 Feb 2018

Evaluation of atmospheric profiles derived from single- and zero-difference excess phase processing of BeiDou radio occultation data from the FY-3C GNOS mission

Weihua Bai, Congliang Liu, Xiangguang Meng, Yueqiang Sun, Gottfried Kirchengast, Qifei Du, Xianyi Wang, Guanglin Yang, Mi Liao, Zhongdong Yang, Danyang Zhao, Junming Xia, Yuerong Cai, Lijun Liu, and Dongwei Wang

Viewed

Total article views: 2,539 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,553 894 92 2,539 96 101
  • HTML: 1,553
  • PDF: 894
  • XML: 92
  • Total: 2,539
  • BibTeX: 96
  • EndNote: 101
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Jun 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 Jun 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,539 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,431 with geography defined and 108 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 17 Jul 2024
Download
Short summary
In this study we focus on evaluating zero-difference processing of BDS RO data vs. single-difference processing. From the statistics, average bias (and standard deviation) of the bending angle and refractivity profiles were found to be as small as about 0.05–0.2 % (and 0.7–1.6 %) over the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, including for the GEO, IGSO, and MEO subsets. Zero differencing was found to perform slightly better, as may be expected from its lower vulnerability to noise.