Articles | Volume 12, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-211-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-211-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
11 Jan 2019
Research article |
| 11 Jan 2019
| 11 Jan 2019
Intercomparison of four airborne imaging DOAS systems for tropospheric NO2 mapping – the AROMAPEX campaign
Frederik Tack
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
BIRA-IASB, Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy, Brussels,
Belgium
Alexis Merlaud
BIRA-IASB, Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy, Brussels,
Belgium
Andreas C. Meier
IUP-Bremen, Institute of Environmental Physics, University
of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
Tim Vlemmix
TU Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
now at: KNMI, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, De Bilt,
the Netherlands
Thomas Ruhtz
FUB, Institute for Space Sciences, Freie Universität Berlin,
Berlin,
Germany
Marian-Daniel Iordache
VITO-TAP, Flemish Institute for Technological Research, Mol,
Belgium
Xinrui Ge
TU Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
now at: WUR, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
Len van der Wal
TNO, Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research, The Hague, the
Netherlands
Dirk Schuettemeyer
ESA-ESTEC, European Space Agency, Noordwijk, the Netherlands
Magdalena Ardelean
INCAS, National Institute for Aerospace Research “Elie Carafoli”,
Bucharest, Romania
Andreea Calcan
INCAS, National Institute for Aerospace Research “Elie Carafoli”,
Bucharest, Romania
Daniel Constantin
“Dunarea de Jos” University of Galati, Galati, Romania
Anja Schönhardt
IUP-Bremen, Institute of Environmental Physics, University
of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
Koen Meuleman
VITO-TAP, Flemish Institute for Technological Research, Mol,
Belgium
Andreas Richter
IUP-Bremen, Institute of Environmental Physics, University
of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
Michel Van Roozendael
BIRA-IASB, Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy, Brussels,
Belgium
Viewed
Total article views: 3,593 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 10 Apr 2018)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,970 | 1,563 | 60 | 3,593 | 88 | 78 |
- HTML: 1,970
- PDF: 1,563
- XML: 60
- Total: 3,593
- BibTeX: 88
- EndNote: 78
Total article views: 2,478 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 11 Jan 2019)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,454 | 974 | 50 | 2,478 | 83 | 70 |
- HTML: 1,454
- PDF: 974
- XML: 50
- Total: 2,478
- BibTeX: 83
- EndNote: 70
Total article views: 1,115 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 10 Apr 2018)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 516 | 589 | 10 | 1,115 | 5 | 8 |
- HTML: 516
- PDF: 589
- XML: 10
- Total: 1,115
- BibTeX: 5
- EndNote: 8
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 3,593 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,392 with geography defined
and 201 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,478 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,332 with geography defined
and 146 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,115 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,060 with geography defined
and 55 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
23 citations as recorded by crossref.
- COVID‐19 Induced Fingerprints of a New Normal Urban Air Quality in the United States S. Kondragunta et al. 10.1029/2021JD034797
- Assessment of the TROPOMI tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> product based on airborne APEX observations F. Tack et al. 10.5194/amt-14-615-2021
- Two Air Quality Regimes in Total Column NO2 Over the Gulf of Mexico in May 2019: Shipboard and Satellite Views A. Thompson et al. 10.1029/2022EA002473
- Impact of 3D radiative transfer on airborne NO<sub>2</sub> imaging remote sensing over cities with buildings M. Schwaerzel et al. 10.5194/amt-14-6469-2021
- Remote Sensing and Decision Support System Applications in Precision Agriculture: Challenges and Possibilities I. Mehedi et al. 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3380830
- Satellite validation strategy assessments based on the AROMAT campaigns A. Merlaud et al. 10.5194/amt-13-5513-2020
- Mapping the spatial distribution of NO<sub>2</sub> with in situ and remote sensing instruments during the Munich NO<sub>2</sub> imaging campaign G. Kuhlmann et al. 10.5194/amt-15-1609-2022
- Observations of Atmospheric NO2 Using a New Low-Cost MAX-DOAS System A. Roşu et al. 10.3390/atmos11020129
- Validation of Sentinel-5P TROPOMI tropospheric NO2 products by comparison with NO2 measurements from airborne imaging DOAS, ground-based stationary DOAS, and mobile car DOAS measurements during the S5P-VAL-DE-Ruhr campaign K. Lange et al. 10.5194/amt-16-1357-2023
- Evaluating Sentinel-5P TROPOMI tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> column densities with airborne and Pandora spectrometers near New York City and Long Island Sound L. Judd et al. 10.5194/amt-13-6113-2020
- Evaluating the impact of spatial resolution on tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> column comparisons within urban areas using high-resolution airborne data L. Judd et al. 10.5194/amt-12-6091-2019
- Horizontal distribution of tropospheric NO2 and aerosols derived by dual-scan multi-wavelength multi-axis differential optical absorption spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS) measurements in Uccle, Belgium E. Dimitropoulou et al. 10.5194/amt-15-4503-2022
- Crop Yield Prediction Using Multi Sensors Remote Sensing (Review Article) A. Ali et al. 10.1016/j.ejrs.2022.04.006
- Highly resolved mapping of NO2 vertical column densities from GeoTASO measurements over a megacity and industrial area during the KORUS-AQ campaign G. Choo et al. 10.5194/amt-16-625-2023
- Tropospheric O3 Model from Climatological Approaches in the Colombian Andes D. Nisperuza et al. 10.1080/00330124.2021.1922295
- High-Resolution Nitrogen Dioxide Measurements from an Airborne Fiber Imaging Spectrometer over Tangshan, China X. Zhang et al. 10.3390/rs16061042
- High-flying pseudosatellites get their day in the sun A. Witze 10.1038/d41586-019-00561-8
- Weak degassing from remote Alaska volcanoes characterized with a new airborne imaging DOAS instrument and a suite of in situ sensors C. Kern & P. Kelly 10.3389/feart.2023.1088056
- Airborne observation with a low-cost hyperspectral instrument: retrieval of NO2 vertical column densities (VCDs) and the satellite sub-grid variability over industrial point sources J. Park et al. 10.5194/amt-17-197-2024
- First high-resolution tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> observations from the Ultraviolet Visible Hyperspectral Imaging Spectrometer (UVHIS) L. Xi et al. 10.5194/amt-14-435-2021
- Constraining industrial ammonia emissions using hyperspectral infrared imaging L. Noppen et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2023.113559
- Concept of small satellite UV/visible imaging spectrometer optimized for tropospheric NO2 measurements in air quality monitoring T. Fujinawa et al. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.03.081
- Nitrogen dioxide and formaldehyde measurements from the GEOstationary Coastal and Air Pollution Events (GEO-CAPE) Airborne Simulator over Houston, Texas C. Nowlan et al. 10.5194/amt-11-5941-2018
21 citations as recorded by crossref.
- COVID‐19 Induced Fingerprints of a New Normal Urban Air Quality in the United States S. Kondragunta et al. 10.1029/2021JD034797
- Assessment of the TROPOMI tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> product based on airborne APEX observations F. Tack et al. 10.5194/amt-14-615-2021
- Two Air Quality Regimes in Total Column NO2 Over the Gulf of Mexico in May 2019: Shipboard and Satellite Views A. Thompson et al. 10.1029/2022EA002473
- Impact of 3D radiative transfer on airborne NO<sub>2</sub> imaging remote sensing over cities with buildings M. Schwaerzel et al. 10.5194/amt-14-6469-2021
- Remote Sensing and Decision Support System Applications in Precision Agriculture: Challenges and Possibilities I. Mehedi et al. 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3380830
- Satellite validation strategy assessments based on the AROMAT campaigns A. Merlaud et al. 10.5194/amt-13-5513-2020
- Mapping the spatial distribution of NO<sub>2</sub> with in situ and remote sensing instruments during the Munich NO<sub>2</sub> imaging campaign G. Kuhlmann et al. 10.5194/amt-15-1609-2022
- Observations of Atmospheric NO2 Using a New Low-Cost MAX-DOAS System A. Roşu et al. 10.3390/atmos11020129
- Validation of Sentinel-5P TROPOMI tropospheric NO2 products by comparison with NO2 measurements from airborne imaging DOAS, ground-based stationary DOAS, and mobile car DOAS measurements during the S5P-VAL-DE-Ruhr campaign K. Lange et al. 10.5194/amt-16-1357-2023
- Evaluating Sentinel-5P TROPOMI tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> column densities with airborne and Pandora spectrometers near New York City and Long Island Sound L. Judd et al. 10.5194/amt-13-6113-2020
- Evaluating the impact of spatial resolution on tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> column comparisons within urban areas using high-resolution airborne data L. Judd et al. 10.5194/amt-12-6091-2019
- Horizontal distribution of tropospheric NO2 and aerosols derived by dual-scan multi-wavelength multi-axis differential optical absorption spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS) measurements in Uccle, Belgium E. Dimitropoulou et al. 10.5194/amt-15-4503-2022
- Crop Yield Prediction Using Multi Sensors Remote Sensing (Review Article) A. Ali et al. 10.1016/j.ejrs.2022.04.006
- Highly resolved mapping of NO2 vertical column densities from GeoTASO measurements over a megacity and industrial area during the KORUS-AQ campaign G. Choo et al. 10.5194/amt-16-625-2023
- Tropospheric O3 Model from Climatological Approaches in the Colombian Andes D. Nisperuza et al. 10.1080/00330124.2021.1922295
- High-Resolution Nitrogen Dioxide Measurements from an Airborne Fiber Imaging Spectrometer over Tangshan, China X. Zhang et al. 10.3390/rs16061042
- High-flying pseudosatellites get their day in the sun A. Witze 10.1038/d41586-019-00561-8
- Weak degassing from remote Alaska volcanoes characterized with a new airborne imaging DOAS instrument and a suite of in situ sensors C. Kern & P. Kelly 10.3389/feart.2023.1088056
- Airborne observation with a low-cost hyperspectral instrument: retrieval of NO2 vertical column densities (VCDs) and the satellite sub-grid variability over industrial point sources J. Park et al. 10.5194/amt-17-197-2024
- First high-resolution tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> observations from the Ultraviolet Visible Hyperspectral Imaging Spectrometer (UVHIS) L. Xi et al. 10.5194/amt-14-435-2021
- Constraining industrial ammonia emissions using hyperspectral infrared imaging L. Noppen et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2023.113559
2 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Concept of small satellite UV/visible imaging spectrometer optimized for tropospheric NO2 measurements in air quality monitoring T. Fujinawa et al. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.03.081
- Nitrogen dioxide and formaldehyde measurements from the GEOstationary Coastal and Air Pollution Events (GEO-CAPE) Airborne Simulator over Houston, Texas C. Nowlan et al. 10.5194/amt-11-5941-2018
Latest update: 17 Apr 2024
Short summary
We present an intercomparison study of four airborne imaging DOAS instruments, dedicated to the retrieval and high-resolution mapping of tropospheric nitrogen dioxide (NO2) vertical column densities (VCDs). The AROMAPEX campaign took place in Berlin, Germany, in April 2016 with the primary objectives (1) to test and intercompare the performance of experimental airborne imagers and (2) to prepare the validation and calibration campaigns for the Sentinel-5 Precursor/TROPOMI mission.
We present an intercomparison study of four airborne imaging DOAS instruments, dedicated to the...
