Articles | Volume 12, issue 5
Research article
14 May 2019
Research article |  | 14 May 2019

Is a scaling factor required to obtain closure between measured and modelled atmospheric O4 absorptions? An assessment of uncertainties of measurements and radiative transfer simulations for 2 selected days during the MAD-CAT campaign

Thomas Wagner, Steffen Beirle, Nuria Benavent, Tim Bösch, Ka Lok Chan, Sebastian Donner, Steffen Dörner, Caroline Fayt, Udo Frieß, David García-Nieto, Clio Gielen, David González-Bartolome, Laura Gomez, François Hendrick, Bas Henzing, Jun Li Jin, Johannes Lampel, Jianzhong Ma, Kornelia Mies, Mónica Navarro, Enno Peters, Gaia Pinardi, Olga Puentedura, Janis Puķīte, Julia Remmers, Andreas Richter, Alfonso Saiz-Lopez, Reza Shaiganfar, Holger Sihler, Michel Van Roozendael, Yang Wang, and Margarita Yela


Total article views: 2,401 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,580 770 51 2,401 68 49
  • HTML: 1,580
  • PDF: 770
  • XML: 51
  • Total: 2,401
  • BibTeX: 68
  • EndNote: 49
Views and downloads (calculated since 11 Oct 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 11 Oct 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,401 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,178 with geography defined and 223 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1


Latest update: 20 Mar 2023
Short summary
In this study the consistency between MAX-DOAS measurements and radiative transfer simulations of the atmospheric O4 absorption is investigated. The study is based on measurements (2 selected days during the MADCAT campaign) as well as synthetic spectra. The uncertainties of all relevant aspects (spectral retrieval and radiative transfer simulations) are quantified. For one of the selected days, measurements and simulations do not agree within their uncertainties.