113 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Measurement report: Atmospheric fluorescent bioaerosol concentrations measured during 18 months in a coniferous forest in the south of Sweden M. Petersson Sjögren et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4977-2023
2. Association between short-term pollen exposure and blood pressure in adults: A repeated-measures study A. Bürgler et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2024.119224
3. Global Climate Change and Pollen Aeroallergens J. Davies et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iac.2020.09.002
4. Operational pollen classification using digital holography and fluorescence B. Crouzy et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-025-09882-w
5. Impact of Fungal Spores on Asthma Prevalence and Hospitalization K. Hughes et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23084313
6. Efficient and scalable training set generation for automated pollen monitoring with Hirst-type samplers A. Biricz et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-31646-2
7. Lessons from automatic airborne pollen monitoring by holography at three Australian sites A. Milic et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-026-09907-y
8. Pollen recognition through an open-source web-based system: automated particle counting for aerobiological analysis A. Chaves et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-023-01189-z
9. Air Sampling and Analysis of Aeroallergens: Current and Future Approaches E. Levetin et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-023-01073-2
10. Clustering approach for the analysis of the fluorescent bioaerosol collected by an automatic detector G. Daunys et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247284
11. Why should we care about high temporal resolution monitoring of bioaerosols in ambient air? M. Smith et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154231
12. Quantification of pollen viability in Lantana camara by digital holographic microscopy V. Kumar et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/qpb.2023.5
13. Applying wind patterns and land use to estimate the concentrations of airborne pollen of herbaceous taxa in a statistical framework A. Picornell et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101496
14. Emerging scientific and industrial applications of digital holography: an overview R. Kumar & G. Dwivedi https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/acf97e
15. Real-time field measurements of bioaerosols in the agricultural environment: Concentrations, components and environmental impacts Z. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127033
16. Assessment of real-time bioaerosol particle counters using reference chamber experiments G. Lieberherr et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7693-2021
17. Low-Cost Pollen and Allergy Symptoms Monitoring with Beenose Sampler and Livepollen App: The Case Study of the Metz City, France, During Spring 2023 J. Renard et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16030271
18. CALIPSO Overpasses During Three Atmospheric Pollen Events Detected by Hirst-Type Volumetric Samplers in Two Urban Cities in Greece A. Karageorgopoulou et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16030317
19. On the application of scattering matrix measurements to detection and identification of major types of airborne aerosol particles: Volcanic ash, desert dust and pollen J. Gómez Martín et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107761
20. Fast Atmospheric Aerosol Size and Shape Imaging Instrument: Design, Calibration, and Intelligent Interaction L. Dong et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2025.3551849
21. Detection and characterization of bioaerosol emissions from wastewater treatment plants: Challenges and opportunities J. Tian et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.958514
22. Spectral dependence of birch and pine pollen optical properties using a synergy of lidar instruments M. Filioglou et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9009-2023
23. Interpretable machine learning classification of cedar and cypress pollen on routine Durham slides for environmental exposure assessment N. Suzuki et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2026.1805985
24. Development and application of a method to classify airborne pollen taxa concentration using light scattering data K. Miki et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01919-7
25. What do spore particles look like - use of real-time measurements and holography imaging to view spore particles from four bioaerosol generators C. Pogner et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2024.2338544
26. Integration of reference data from different Rapid-E devices supports automatic pollen detection in more locations P. Matavulj et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158234
27. Calibration of optical particle size spectrometers against a primary standard: Counting efficiency profile of the TSI Model 3330 OPS and Grimm 11-D monitor in the particle size range from 300 nm to 10 μm K. Vasilatou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105818
28. Biodiversity, abundance, seasonal and diurnal airborne pollen distribution patterns at two different heights in Augsburg, Germany F. Kolek et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118774
29. The need for Pan‐European automatic pollen and fungal spore monitoring: A stakeholder workshop position paper F. Tummon et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/clt2.12015
30. The ability of automated fluorometry and holography to discern airborne grass pollen beyond family level I. Ullah et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-026-09902-3
31. Methoden und Standards des Pollenmonitorings - Aussagekraft von Pollenmessungen in unterschiedlichen Höhen M. Bastl et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s15007-023-5792-x
32. Optical measurement instrument for detection of powdery mildew and grey mould in protected crops G. Bouquet et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/jeos/2024024
33. Optimisation of bioaerosol sampling using an ultralight aircraft: A novel approach in determining the 3-D atmospheric biodiversity M. Plaza et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38924
34. Scaling number concentration measurements from bioaerosol monitors using Hirst-type samplers S. Horender et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-025-09889-3
35. How to select the optimal monitoring locations for an aerobiological network: A case of study in central northwest of Spain A. Rodríguez-Fernández et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154370
36. False positives: handling them operationally for automatic pollen monitoring B. Crouzy et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-022-09757-4
37. A Laboratory Evaluation of the New Automated Pollen Sensor Beenose: Pollen Discrimination Using Machine Learning Techniques H. El Azari et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23062964
38. Advances in automatic airborne fungal spore monitoring: detection-efficiency test of the BAA500 M. Žilka et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2026.128148
39. Tutorial: Aerosol characterization with digital in-line holography M. Berg https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2022.106023
40. Holographic Air‐Quality Monitor (HAM) N. Bravo-Frank et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/2210837
41. Estimation of pollen counts from light scattering intensity when sampling multiple pollen taxa – establishment of an automated multi-taxa pollen counting estimation system (AME system) K. Miki & S. Kawashima https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-685-2021
42. Pollen classification using a single particle fluorescence spectroscopy technique B. Swanson et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2022.2142510
43. On the measurement uncertainty of Hirst-type volumetric pollen and spore samplers S. Adamov et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-021-09724-5
44. The role of automatic pollen and fungal spore monitoring across major end-user domains F. Tummon et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-024-09820-2
45. Towards an Automatic Pollen Detection System in Ambient Air Using Scattering Functions in the Visible Domain J. Renard et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22134984
46. Toward Accurate Real-Time Bioaerosol Monitoring in the Particle Size Range 1 μm–70 μm K. Vasilatou et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00282
47. Visual classification of allergenic pollen in iteratively reconstructed lens-less DIHM images B. Cugmas et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36618-8
48. A portable flow tube homogenizer for aerosol mixing in the sub-micrometre and lower micrometre particle size range S. Horender et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ac81a1
49. Particle generation and dispersion from high-speed dental drilling M. Kumar et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05163-3
50. Methods and standards of pollen monitoring—significance of pollen measurements at different altitudes M. Bastl et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40629-023-00268-3
51. Testing the Raman parameters of pollen spectra in automatic identification S. Pereira et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-020-09669-1
52. A methodological framework for evaluating real-time bioaerosol classification algorithms M. Meurville et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-3427-2026
53. Regularized LSTM models for cleaning multivariate time series from low-cost sensors for pollen detection in the air M. Oudrane et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-026-03270-7
54. Pollen and spores as proxies for palaeoenvironment reconstruction: A review of sediment-based research M. ZARGAR et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/05529360251318072
55. Neural networks for increased accuracy of allergenic pollen monitoring M. Polling et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90433-x
56. Backscatter multiple wavelength digital holography for color micro-particle imaging R. Giri & M. Berg https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.441509
57. Explainable AI for unveiling deep learning pollen classification model based on fusion of scattered light patterns and fluorescence spectroscopy S. Brdar et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30064-6
58. Advancing automated identification of airborne fungal spores: guidelines for cultivation and reference dataset creation N. Bruffaerts et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-025-09864-y
59. Traceable methods for calibrating condensation particle counters at concentrations down to 1 cm−3 H. Sakurai et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/acf5f1
60. Towards standardisation of automatic pollen and fungal spore monitoring: best practises and guidelines F. Tummon et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-022-09755-6
61. Aeroallergen Monitoring by the National Allergy Bureau: A Review of the Past and a Look Into the Future E. Levetin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2022.11.026
62. Review article: how emerging technologies could reshape pollen monitoring for epidemic thunderstorm asthma K. Hanoun et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-025-09874-w
63. Laboratory evaluation of the (VIS, IR) scattering matrix of complex-shaped ragweed pollen particles D. Cholleton et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2020.107223
64. A first evaluation of multiple automatic pollen monitors run in parallel F. Tummon et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-021-09729-0
65. The EUMETNET AutoPollen programme: establishing a prototype automatic pollen monitoring network in Europe B. Clot et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-020-09666-4
66. Constructing a pollen proxy from low-cost Optical Particle Counter (OPC) data processed with Neural Networks and Random Forests S. Mills et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161969
67. High-order spatial phase shift method realizes modulation analysis through a single-frame image Y. Long et al. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.488041
68. Pollen image manipulation and projection using latent space B. Mills et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1539128
69. In-line holographic droplet imaging: accelerated classification with convolutional neural networks and quantitative experimental validation B. Thiede et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-6291-2025
70. Extending traceability in airborne particle size distribution measurements beyond 10 µm: Counting efficiency and unit-to-unit variability of four aerodynamic particle size spectrometers K. Vasilatou et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2022.2139659
71. Comparison of computer vision models in application to pollen classification using light scattering G. Daunys et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-022-09769-0
72. Merging holography, fluorescence, and machine learning for in situ continuous characterization and classification of airborne microplastics N. Beres et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6945-2024
73. Towards European automatic bioaerosol monitoring: Comparison of 9 automatic pollen observational instruments with classic Hirst-type traps J. Maya-Manzano et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161220
74. Advancing in the pollen frontier: a comprehensive evaluation and meta-analysis of automatic pollen monitoring systems Q. Farooq et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-025-09865-x
75. Verifying the viable particle counts of biofluorescent particle counters by using inkjet aerosol generators K. Iida et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2024.2316836
76. Variational Bayesian calibration of low-cost gas sensor systems in air quality monitoring G. Tancev & F. Toro https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2021.100365
77. Laboratory evaluation of the scattering matrix of ragweed, ash, birch and pine pollen towards pollen classification D. Cholleton et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1021-2022
78. The color of aerosol particles R. Giri & M. Berg https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28823-6
79. Real-time pollen identification using holographic imaging and fluorescence measurements S. Erb et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-441-2024
80. An exploration of temporal coherence of light through holography A. Escarguel & C. Martin https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/ad7a41
81. A Two-Stage, Semi-Supervised Deep Learning Framework for the Detection and Classification of Ambient Pollen using Evanescent Wave Scattering S. Dhawan et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6c06126
82. Imaging atmospheric aerosol particles from a UAV with digital holography O. Kemppinen et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72411-x
83. Machine learning methods for low-cost pollen monitoring – Model optimisation and interpretability S. Mills et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165853
84. Pollen holographic images and light-induced fluorescence measurements at the species level S. Erb et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-05139-w
85. DNA metabarcoding using nrITS2 provides highly qualitative and quantitative results for airborne pollen monitoring M. Polling et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150468
86. Advanced CNN Architectures for Pollen Classification: Design and Comprehensive Evaluation P. Matavulj et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2022.2157593
87. Aerosol physical characterization: A review on the current state of aerosol documentary standards and calibration strategies K. Vasilatou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2024.106483
88. Analysis of quality control outcomes of grass pollen identification and enumeration: experience matters A. Milic et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-021-09723-6
89. In-flight sensing of pollen grains via laser scattering and deep learning J. Grant-Jacob et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/abfdf8
90. In situ biological particle analyzer based on digital inline holography D. Sanborn et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.28338
91. Variability between Hirst-type pollen traps is reduced by resistance-free flow adjustment M. Triviño et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-023-09790-x
92. High-Resolution Fluorescence Spectra of Airborne Biogenic Secondary Organic Aerosols: Comparisons to Primary Biological Aerosol Particles and Implications for Single-Particle Measurements M. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c02536
93. Towards automatic airborne pollen monitoring: From commercial devices to operational by mitigating class-imbalance in a deep learning approach J. Schaefer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148932
94. Intercomparison of holographic imaging and single-particle forward light scattering in situ measurements of liquid clouds in changing atmospheric conditions P. Tiitta et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2993-2022
95. Profiling pollen and biomass burning particles over Payerne, Switzerland using laser-induced fluorescence lidar and in situ techniques during the 2023 PERICLES campaign M. Gidarakou et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-923-2026
96. Desert dust has a notable impact on aerobiological measurements in Europe B. Šikoparija https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2020.100636
97. Monitoring techniques for pollen allergy risk assessment C. Suanno et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111109
98. Automatic detection of airborne pollen: an overview J. Buters et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-022-09750-x
99. Airborne DNA: State of the art – Established methods and missing pieces in the molecular genetic detection of airborne microorganisms, viruses and plant particles C. Pogner et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177439
100. Spatial Variation of Airborne Pollen Concentrations Locally around Brussels City, Belgium, during a Field Campaign in 2022–2023, Using the Automatic Sensor Beenose J. Renard et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24123731
101. Bioaerosols in the atmosphere at two sites in Northern Europe in spring 2021: Outline of an experimental campaign M. Sofiev et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.113798
102. Domain adaptation for improving automatic airborne pollen classification with expert-verified measurements P. Matavulj et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-024-06021-9
103. Automatic particle detectors lead to a new generation in plant diversity investigation I. ŠAULIENĖ et al. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha49312444
104. Sensors and Analytical Technologies for Air Quality: Particulate Matters and Bioaerosols X. Su et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/asia.202001051
105. Isolating the species element in grass pollen allergy: A review C. Frisk et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163661
106. Recent developments in monitoring and modelling airborne pollen, a review J. Maya-Manzano et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/00173134.2020.1769176
107. Self-supervised and few-shot learning for robust bioaerosol monitoring A. Willi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-025-09850-4
108. Flow cytometric analysis of pollen and spores: An overview of applications and methodology P. Kron et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.24330
109. Automatic real-time monitoring of fungal spores: the case of Alternaria spp. S. Erb et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-023-09780-z
110. Counting pollen instead of sheep? Investigating the relationship between pollen exposure and sleep A. Alonso Hellweg et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2026.124442
111. RealForAll: real-time system for automatic detection of airborne pollen D. Tešendić et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2020.1793391
112. Pollen observations at four EARLINET stations during the ACTRIS-COVID-19 campaign X. Shang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3931-2022
113. Manual and automatic quantification of airborne fungal spores during wheat harvest period I. Simović et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-023-09788-5