A compact, high-purity source of HONO validated by Fourier transform infrared and thermal-dissociation cavity ring-down spectroscopy
- Department of Chemistry, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive N.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4
Correspondence: Hans D. Osthoff (firstname.lastname@example.org)
A well-characterized source of nitrous acid vapour (HONO) is essential for accurate ambient air measurements by instruments requiring external calibration. In this work, a compact HONO source is described in which gas streams containing dilute concentrations of HONO are generated by flowing hydrochloric acid (HCl) vapour emanating from a permeation tube over continuously agitated dry sodium nitrite (NaNO2) heated to 50 ∘C. Mixing ratios of HONO and potential by-products including NO, NO2, and nitrosyl chloride (ClNO) were quantified by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and thermal-dissociation cavity ring-down spectroscopy (TD-CRDS). A key parameter is the concentration of HCl, which needs to be kept small (<4 ppmv) to avoid ClNO formation. The source produces gas streams containing HONO in air in >95 % purity relative to other nitrogen oxides. The source output is rapidly tuneable and stabilizes within 90 min. Combined with its small size and portability, this source is highly suitable for calibration of HONO instruments in the field.
The generation of nitrous acid vapour (HONO(g)) free of other nitrogen oxides has been a long-standing challenge to atmospheric chemists (Table 1). Such sources are needed in kinetic studies, for absorption cross-section measurements, and for the calibration of field instruments. Nitrous acid is not suitable for permeation devices since HONO is difficult to prepare in low concentration and in high purity and dis-proportionates to nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide via equilibrium (1).
In fact, early experiments relied on the NO, NO2, and H2O vapour equilibrium to form HONO in situ (King and Moule, 1962; Cox, 1974; Stockwell and Calvert, 1978).
Cox and Derwent prepared HONO vapours in ∼50 % purity by flowing nitrogen over an aqueous solution containing 0.1 M sodium nitrite with 1.4 %–2.5 % sulfuric acid (Cox and Derwent, 1976).
Braman and de la Cantera sublimed oxalic acid onto solid sodium nitrite and were able to produce gas streams in > 50 % and up to 90 % purity as long as water was present (Braman and De la Cantera, 1986).
Subsequent refinements included a flow reactor design in solutions of sulfuric acid and sodium nitrite were dynamically mixed, producing a stable output in >90 % purity (Taira and Kanda, 1990).
Febo et al. (1995) developed a method in which gas-phase hydrochloric acid emitted from a permeation device was quantitatively reacted in a humidified gas stream with solid sodium nitrite, producing a stable and highly pure (>99.5 %) HONO output.
The output of sources based on Reaction (R4) has been characterized by differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS) (Febo et al., 1995; Stutz et al., 2000), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (Brust et al., 2000; Schiller et al., 2001), tuneable diode laser absorption spectroscopy (TLDAS) (Schiller et al., 2001), incoherent cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy (IBBCEAS) (Roberts et al., 2010), and long-path optical absorption photometry (LOPAP) (Ren et al., 2010). Stutz et al. (2000) noted that concentrations of HONO should be kept low (<1014 molecules cm−3; ∼ 4 ppmv) to avoid disproportionation of HONO via Reaction (R1).
Perez et al. (2007) examined a source based on the design by Febo et al. (1995) using thermal-dissociation chemiluminescence (TD-CL) detection of NO and reported that their source co-emitted nitrosyl chloride (ClNO); they opted to generate HONO from reaction of H2SO4 aerosol with NaNO2(s) instead. In contrast, Roberts et al. (2010) observed little or no production of ClNO (<4.5 %) and quantitative conversion of HCl to HONO, at odds with Perez et al. (2007) but in agreement with the original work by Febo et al. (1995). As far as we know, this inconsistency is unexplained to date.
As part of our development of an IBBCEAS for HONO measurement, our lab recently constructed a HONO source using an aqueous solution of NaNO2 buffered with oxalate to pH 3.74 (Jordan and Osthoff, 2020). This source generated HONO in trace amounts suitable to our needs but co-emitted NO and NO2 in similar ratios to those reported by Braman and De la Cantera (1986). Furthermore, this type of source could not be turned off (i.e., had to remain under continuous N2 flow) and required long times to stabilize, motivating us to develop an alternative HONO generation method. Ambient air HONO measurement techniques that need to be externally calibrated often poorly agree with each other (Crilley et al., 2019), further motivating the development of a well-characterized, compact, and portable HONO source and improved understanding of conditions needed to suppress formation of undesired side products such as ClNO.
In this work, we describe the implementation of a compact, high-purity HONO generation device based on R4 for field deployment and laboratory experiments and characterized its output by FTIR and thermal-dissociation cavity ring-down spectroscopy (TD-CRDS). Conditions to avoid generation of impurities such as ClNO are identified. The performance of this source in comparison to existing methods is discussed.
2.1 Generation of gas streams containing HONO
A practical challenge is the generation of stable and dilute gas streams containing HCl. Calibration gas cylinders are the most straightforward method to use for this purpose but may require periods of up to 10 d to stabilize (Roberts et al., 2010). Furthermore, low-concentration HCl gas cylinders are expensive to source, such that we chose to generate HCl gas through the use of relatively inexpensive permeation devices.
In the setup by Febo et al. (1995), which was also implemented by Brust et al. (2000), Stutz et al. (2000), and Ren et al. (2010), a gas stream of N2 is passed through Teflon tubing immersed in an HCl bath. This setup involved a rather large 1 L vessel containing liquid HCl, which is somewhat impractical and potentially hazardous in a field setting. With portability in mind, we decided to construct a permeation tube containing HCl(l). The literature does not inform as to suitable tube dimensions, which were determined through trial and error.
Three HONO sources were constructed and evaluated. In the first (“source 1”), a 24 cm long, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) permeation tube (Chromatographic Specialties C111LE; wall thickness 1.5 mm; outer diameter (o.d.) 7.8 mm) was filled with 2.5 mL of 37 % HCl (Sigma-Aldrich) and sealed at both ends with PTFE plugs held in place by stainless steel compression rings. The permeation tube was placed inside a glass chamber (VICI Dynacalibrator Model 120) whose temperature was controlled at 25.0 ∘C and which was continuously flushed at a flow rate of ∼ 0.15 L min−1 with room air scrubbed using activated charcoal for a period of several days into a fume hood. The use of scrubbed air ensured that the gas stream contained water to maintain efficient HONO production (Schiller et al., 2001). For the experiments shown in this paper, the relative humidity of the diluent gas stream was in the range of 15 % to 35 %.
The HCl output was diluted in a gas stream of O2 (∼ 20 mL min−1); this gas stream also served to continuously flush the connecting tubing when not in use. Roughly 1.5 g of solid NaNO2 was placed inside a 50 cm long loop of (0.476 cm) inner diameter (i.d.) and (0.635 cm) o.d. fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP) Teflon tubing downstream from the HCl addition point. This section could be manually bypassed with a pair of three-way valves (Entegris) to turn HONO production on or off. A Teflon filter (Pall, 2 µm pore size and 47 mm diameter) inside a Teflon filter holder (Cole-Parmer) was placed downstream of the NaNO2 powder.
In the second source (“source 2”), the NaNO2 was placed in a two-neck, 50 mL Pyrex round bottom flask which was covered in aluminium foil to prevent photolysis of nitrite and nitrous acid and was externally heated to a temperature of 50 ∘C using a water bath and mechanically agitated using a magnetic stir bar as described by Febo et al. (1995). Heating this vessel promotes dissociation of molecular clusters such as N2O4 and partitioning of wall-adsorbed molecules to the gas phase, which, if present, can drive HONO decomposition on borosilicate glass surfaces (Syomin and Finlayson-Pitts, 2003).
The third source (“optimized source”) used the same setup as source 2, except that a shorter permeation tube (length 6 cm) containing 0.35 mL of HCl was used. This setup is depicted in Fig. 1. The overall dimensions are 28 cm × 28 cm × 36 cm and its modular design ensures easy transport to and from the field.
To deliver HONO in atmospheric concentrations (i.e., < 10 ppbv), a portion of the source output was directed towards waste with the aid of a pump and a needle valve. The output concentration could be rapidly changed (typically by factors between 5 and 200) by adjusting the position of the needle valve. The remaining output was diluted using scrubbed air and directed towards the instruments at a final flow rate slightly larger than the sampling requirement of the instruments.
2.2 Analysis of HONO source output by FTIR
Gas streams exiting the HONO sources (prior to dilution) were analysed using an FTIR spectrometer (Bruker Tensor 27) equipped with a liquid nitrogen cooled mercury cadmium telluride (MCT) detector and a White multi-pass gas cell with a 6.4 m optical path length and an internal volume of 0.75 L (Gemini Scientific Instruments, Venus series) in a similar fashion to that described earlier (Taha et al., 2013). Room-temperature spectra were acquired continuously at a time resolution of 30 s. Background spectra were recorded with HCl inline but with the NaNO2 bypassed, which resulted in the observed spectra showing the change in trace gas concentrations.
Mixing ratios of trace gases were determined from fits (by least squares error minimization over a selected wavelength range) of room-temperature reference spectra from the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (Sharpe et al., 2004), multiplied by the respective mixing ratios as variables, to the observed spectra. The reference spectra are provided in units of ppmv at atmospheric pressure per meter of optical length, necessitating a correction factor of 6.4 accounting for the actual path length and a pressure correction factor for which the pressure inside the multi-pass cell (which was equal to that of the room) was monitored using a pressure transducer (Omegadyne PX419–015A5V).
The FTIR limits of detection (LODs) are specific to each molecule (due to differing absorption cross sections) and are in the 100 to 300 parts-per-billion (by volume; ppbv; 10−9) range. For example, the 1σ precision of NO2 data was ±100 ppbv, yielding a 3σ LOD of 300 ppbv.
The spectral resolution of the FTIR was ∼0.5 cm−1, which does not suffice to fully resolve the absorption lines of HCl, H2O, and NO; their FTIR-derived mixing ratios are hence lower limits.
2.3 Analysis of HONO source output by TD-CRDS
The (diluted) HONO source output was also analysed using a four-channel TD-CRDS instrument (Odame-Ankrah, 2015). Briefly, mixing ratios of NO2 are quantified by absorption at 405 nm. Ring-down time constants in the absence (τ0) and presence (τ) of NO2 are converted to concentrations (N) using Eq. (2), where c is the speed of light, σ is the NO2 absorption cross section, and RL is a correction factor (∼1.2) accounting for mirror purge flows (Paul and Osthoff, 2010).
Concentrations are converted to mixing ratios using the ideal gas law. Other NOy components are converted to NO2 in separate channels and are quantified by difference.
For this study, the instrument was operated as follows: mixing ratios of NO2 were monitored using a room temperature, (0.64 cm) o.d., and (0.32 cm) i.d. FEP Teflon inlet. Mixing ratios of NOx were quantified on a second channel with a room temperature Teflon inlet and by adding O3 (mixing ratio after addition of ∼3 ppmv) to titrate NO to NO2 (Odame-Ankrah, 2015; Fuchs et al., 2009). A third channel was operated with a (0.64 cm) o.d. quartz inlet heated to 600 ∘C. Ozone was added between the quartz inlet and the CRDS cell to quantify NOy, including HONO (Jordan and Osthoff, 2020; Wild et al., 2014; Perez et al., 2007). The fourth inlet was operated at 350 ∘C and with added O3. This channel quantified and was used as a HONO reference channel. Each channel sampled at a flow rate of ∼0.8 slpm through ∼5 cm short, i.d. Teflon flow restrictors placed inline after the heated quartz sections (if existing) and before a 50 mm Teflon (Pall Teflo, 2 µm pore size) housed in a Teflon filter holder (Cole Parmer). The laser pulse repetition rate was 1500 Hz, and 1500 ring-down events were averaged to produce 1 s data.
2.4 Field deployment
The HONO source was utilized during the “Study of nitrogen oxides in winter downwind from oil and gas sands” (SNOWDOGS) field campaign in Fort McKay, Alberta, Canada, in January 2020. Its output was quantified in parallel by TD-CRDS and a Thermo 42i-Y NO-NOy CL instrument equipped with a Mo converter heated to 325 ∘C. This converter and the TD-CRDS quartz inlets were mounted on the roof of a trailer which housed the instruments and the HONO source. The TD-CRDS sampled at a flow rate of ∼1.2 slpm per channel through ∼5 cm short, 300 µm i.d. stainless steel flow restrictors placed inline after the heated quartz sections and before the Teflon filter assembly. The HONO source output was delivered via a 5 m long, (0.64 cm) o.d. and (0.48 cm) i.d. FEP Teflon tube to both instruments.
3.1 Development of a compact, high-purity HONO source
The first design tested (source 1) produced an output of ∼38 ppmv of HONO from a similar amount (>38 ppmv) of HCl (Fig. S1a in the Supplement). This HONO mixing ratio is a factor of ∼10 larger than the maximum recommended by Stutz et al. (2000) to avoid partial conversion of HONO to NO2 and NO via Reaction (R1). Consistently, the source output contained ∼4.0 ppmv of NO2 (Fig. S1a) and an analogous amount of NO (Fig. S1b). Furthermore, the spectrum contained an absorption feature around 1808 cm−1, reproduced by ∼15.5 ppmv of ClNO.
Nitrosyl chloride can be produced by reaction of HONO with gas-phase or wall-adsorbed HCl (Zhang et al., 1996; Wingen et al., 2000) or by reaction of two equivalents of NO2 with particulate-phase Cl− (Weis and Ewing, 1999), though the relatively low mixing ratios of NO2 in this system make this reaction less likely.
The FTIR spectrum contained ∼50 ppmv more H2O than the reference spectrum, i.e., more moisture than emitted by the permeation tube with NaNO2 bypassed. While this is consistent with ClNO production via R5, the H2O data are likely not meaningful since the H2O mixing ratios changed slowly over time (data not shown), possibly because of slow equilibration with the inner walls of the tubing and multi-pass cell and perhaps also because of water's presence in the FTIR optical path outside the multi-pass cell at a concentration that may have drifted.
Febo et al. (1995) reported lower production of NOx by mechanically agitating the NaNO2 using a stir bar (to break up pockets of high [HONO]) and by heating the reaction vessel to 50 ∘C; these steps were incorporated into the second design (source 2). The FTIR spectrum of its output showed a consumption of ppmv HCl and production of ∼48 ppmv of HONO, ∼8.0 ppmv of NO2, ∼6.5 ppmv of ClNO, ∼8 ppmv of NO, and ∼50 ppmv of H2O (Fig. S2), an improvement over source 1 in terms of unwanted ClNO production, but still inadequate.
A shorter HCl permeation tube was used in the third design, with the expectation that the lower HCl concentrations result in reduced generation of side products via R5 and R6. A sample FTIR spectrum of this source's output is shown in Fig. 2. With a freshly prepared HCl permeation tube and an estimated relative humidity in the round bottom flask of ∼25 %, ppmv HCl was consumed and ∼3.0 ppmv of HONO was produced. The mixing ratios of undesired side products (i.e., NO, NO2, ClNO, and HNO3) were below their respective FTIR detection limits (Figs. 2, S3, and S4).
3.2 Analysis of source output by TD-CRDS
To better constrain the mole fractions of impurities, the source output was analysed by TD-CRDS. Figure 3 shows an example experiment. The TD-CRDS sampled scrubbed air before 21:38 UTC and after 21:58 UTC to determine the ring-down time constants in the absence of absorbers, τ0. In the time periods in between, varying amounts of the HONO output were sampled. There was little response other than in the NOy channel, the only channel sensitive to HONO. Scatter plots of NO2, NOx, and (“HONO ref”) against NOy (Fig. 3, inserts) have slopes of (1.29±0.06) %, (1.54±0.06) %, and (2.28±0.04) %, respectively, from which a source purity of >97.3 % was deduced.
When concentrations changed, the 90 %–10 % rise (and fall) times of the TD-CRDS were <3 s, a time constant identical to changes in NOx concentration and indicating a “well-behaved” inlet, i.e., the absence of inlet memory effects and fast equilibration with the inner walls of the inlet. The fast response contrasts with the rise (and fall) times of HNO3 of >180 s (data not shown). Furthermore, the response in a channel sampling from an inlet heated to 600 ∘C without added O3 was the same as that of the NO2 channel (data not shown), consistent with the absence of HNO3 observed by FTIR spectroscopy (Fig. S4).
A quartz inlet temperature scan when the TD-CRDS was sampling a constant concentration of HONO is shown in Fig. 4. The experimental TD curve was reproduced by a fit to Eq. (2), which is based on Eq. (4) by Paul et al. (2009).
Here, AHONO and EA,HONO are Arrhenius parameters for the TD of HONO taken from Tsang (1991), AClNO and EA,ClNO are from Baulch et al. (1981), and tres is the residence time of the gas in the converter at the converter set temperature T. A fit of Eq. (2) to the observation (superimposed as a black line in Fig. 4) using the Igor Pro software package (Wavemetrics) gave ms, ppbv, ppbv, and ppbv, suggesting a source purity of (99.4±0.9) %.
In our experience, the TD inflection points vary between TD-CRDS channels (and depend on sample flow rates), captured by the tres parameter that is specific to each channel. For the data shown in Fig. 4, HONO fully dissociates at a temperature of ∼570 ∘C, and the inflection point is at ∼500 ∘C. Nitrosyl chloride is predicted to fully dissociate at ∼330 ∘C (inflection point at ∼288 ∘C), such that the temperature of 350 ∘C chosen for the HONO ref channel (Fig. 3) is justified. The blue, dashed line superimposed in Fig. 4 shows a simulation of 5 ppbv ClNO and 45 ppbv HONO to demonstrate the relative positions of the TD of ClNO and HONO. We attempted to verify the ClNO TD profile experimentally, but the unoptimized source's ClNO outputs were not sufficiently stable, and those attempts were abandoned. Regardless, it is clear from Fig. 4 that the contribution of ClNO to the total source output is negligible.
As can be seen from the insert in Fig. 4, HONO contributes a tiny amount to the TD-CRDS signal at 350 ∘C (∼4 pptv in the simulation of 50 ppbv HONO). This contribution may differ between quartz heaters and channels and could have been impacted by TD-CRDS using multiple parallel channels presented at the beginning of this section and in Fig. 3, leading to an overestimation of the total amount of impurities present in that experiment. The temperature scan data shown in Fig. 4, on the other hand, were collected using a single quartz heater and are thus more accurate.
3.3 Source stability
The source output gradually decreased over a timescale of weeks of continuous use, which was rationalized by the visible depletion of the HCl permeation tube. However, the source output remained stable and reproducible on shorter timescales. An example FTIR time series is shown in Fig. 5, which was acquired after 1 month of intermittent use. After a 1.5 h stabilization period, the source produced a stable output of 1.57 ppmv of HONO (from > 1.0 ppmv of HCl) with a precision of ±35 ppbv.
3.4 Source purity and day-to-day reproducibility
The optimized source routinely delivered HONO in high purity (range 96.0 %–98.7 %) as long as scrubbed, moisture-containing room air was used as diluent gas (Table 2). When dry cylinder gas was used instead, the source output was stable but contained a larger amount of undesired side products; for example, on 25 July 2019, the output contained 4.6 % NO2 and 8.8 % NO + ClNO (Table 2). When used in the field, the performance was similar: with scrubbed air, the HONO purity was 98.5 %, whereas with dry cylinder gas, the purity was merely 81.3 % (Table 2 and Fig. S5).
In this work, a small-footprint, portable, stable, rapidly tuneable, and high-purity (>97 % on average) HONO source has been described. The source achieves compactness by using a diffusion tube containing 0.35 mL concentrated HCl rather than a 1 L HCl bath. The latter is a considerable hazard since an HCl spill can cause severe burns of skin or permanent eye damage, and hydrochloric acid vapours are toxic to inhale. Hence, smaller volumes are preferred when deploying to the field. The source stabilizes within a time frame of 1.5 h (Fig. 5), which is fast compared to, for example, the 10 d stabilization period reported by Roberts et al. (2010). The source output is also rapidly tuneable (Fig. 3), which allows expedient generation of calibration plots. These properties make it a useful setup for in-field instrument calibrations.
The combination of FTIR and TD-CRDS provided a unique and powerful tool set to analyse the purity of the source's output. This work has shown that HONO sources based on Reaction (R4) can generate NO, NO2, and ClNO as by-products via Reactions (R1) and (R5). Febo et al. (1995) and Roberts et al. (2010) have presented HONO sources based on R4 and demonstrated stoichiometric conversion of HCl to HONO. The results in this work suggest that devices relying solely on loss of HCl for calibration of HONO output should be used with caution as co-production of NO, NO2, and ClNO is a real possibility. In our setup, formation of ClNO could be avoided by keeping the HCl concentration low (i.e., <4 ppmv), which puts an important constraint on sources generating HONO by Reaction (R4). With this in mind, it is instructive to scrutinize the earlier work in regard to side product formation. It has generally been noted that the presence of moisture is needed to ensure a high HONO output. We suggest that water is needed in part because ClNO is prone to hydrolysis (Karlsson and Ljungstrom, 1996), such that the product distribution is shifted towards HONO.
Roberts et al. (2010) observed no ClNO production, likely because they kept their concentrations relatively low (< 900 ppbv) and humidified their gas streams, though they appear to be just below the threshold of possible ClNO production. Perez et al. (2007), on the other hand, observed ClNO but did not disclose details as to how they operated their source, i.e., whether they worked under trace conditions and with humidified gases, though it is likely that either or both conditions were not met. Schiller et al. (2001) bubbled N2 through liquid HCl and would have certainly achieved a high enough HCl concentration to generate ClNO with their setup. However, they reported achieving higher HONO output in the presence of moisture. Hydrolysis of ClNO (Reaction R7) may be a (partial) explanation why the presence of H2O improved the output of their HONO.
The present HONO source has a large dynamic range (0–1 ppmv), well above the HONO concentrations found in ambient air. For field calibrations in future, it may be desirable to construct a permeation tube with lower HCl output, for example by lowering the HCl concentration in the permeation tube.
The data used in this study are available from the corresponding author upon request (email@example.com).
The supplement related to this article is available online at: https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4159-2020-supplement.
NJG and HDO designed the experiments and carried them out.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Nicholas J. Gingerysty is grateful for an Alberta Graduate Excellence Scholarship (AGES).
This research has been supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC, grant no. RGPIN/03849-2016) and Environment and Climate Change Canada (project no. GCXE19S036).
This paper was edited by Andreas Hofzumahaus and reviewed by two anonymous referees.
Baulch, D. L., Duxbury, J., Grant, S. J., and Montague, D. C.: Evaluated kinetic data for high-temperature reactions, vol. 4: Homogeneous gas-phase reactions of halogen-containing and cyanide-containing species, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 10, Supplement 1, 1–721, 1981.
Braman, R. S. and De la Cantera, M. A.: Sublimation sources for nitrous acid and other nitrogen compounds in air, Anal. Chem., 58, 1533–1537, https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00298a059, 1986.
Brust, A. S., Becker, K. H., Kleffmann, J., and Wiesen, P.: UV absorption cross sections of nitrous acid, Atmos. Environ., 34, 13–19, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00322-2, 2000.
Cox, R. A.: The photolysis of gaseous nitrous acid, J. Photochem., 3, 175–188, https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2670(74)80018-3, 1974.
Cox, R. A. and Derwent, R. G.: The ultra-violet absorption spectrum of gaseous nitrous acid, J. Photochem., 6, 23–34, https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2670(76)87004-9, 1976.
Crilley, L. R., Kramer, L. J., Ouyang, B., Duan, J., Zhang, W., Tong, S., Ge, M., Tang, K., Qin, M., Xie, P., Shaw, M. D., Lewis, A. C., Mehra, A., Bannan, T. J., Worrall, S. D., Priestley, M., Bacak, A., Coe, H., Allan, J., Percival, C. J., Popoola, O. A. M., Jones, R. L., and Bloss, W. J.: Intercomparison of nitrous acid (HONO) measurement techniques in a megacity (Beijing), Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 6449–6463, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6449-2019, 2019.
Febo, A., Perrino, C., Gherardi, M., and Sparapani, R.: Evaluation of a High-Purity and High-Stability Continuous Generation System for Nitrous Acid, Environm. Sci. Technol., 29, 2390–2395, https://doi.org/10.1021/es00009a035, 1995.
Fuchs, H., Dubé, W. P., Lerner, B. M., Wagner, N. L., Williams, E. J., and Brown, S. S.: A Sensitive and Versatile Detector for Atmospheric NO2 and NOx Based on Blue Diode Laser Cavity Ring-Down Spectroscopy, Environm. Sci. Technol., 43, 7831–7836, https://doi.org/10.1021/es902067h, 2009.
Jordan, N. and Osthoff, H. D.: Quantification of nitrous acid (HONO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) in ambient air by broadband cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy (IBBCEAS) between 361 and 388 nm, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 273–285, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-273-2020, 2020.
Karlsson, R. S. and Ljungstrom, E. B.: Laboratory study of ClNO: Hydrolysis, Environm. Sci. Technol., 30, 2008–2013, https://doi.org/10.1021/es950801f, 1996.
King, G. W. and Moule, D.: The ultraviolet absorption spectrum of nitrous acid in the vapor state, Can. J. Chem., 40, 2057–2065, https://doi.org/10.1139/v62-316, 1962.
Odame-Ankrah, C. A.: Improved detection instrument for nitrogen oxide species, PhD, Chemistry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada, https://doi.org/10.5072/PRISM/26475, 2015.
Paul, D., Furgeson, A., and Osthoff, H. D.: Measurements of total peroxy and alkyl nitrate abundances in laboratory-generated gas samples by thermal dissociation cavity ring-down spectroscopy, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 80, 114101, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3258204, 2009.
Paul, D. and Osthoff, H. D.: Absolute Measurements of Total Peroxy Nitrate Mixing Ratios by Thermal Dissociation Blue Diode Laser Cavity Ring-Down Spectroscopy, Anal. Chem., 82, 6695–6703, https://doi.org/10.1021/ac101441z, 2010.
Perez, I. M., Wooldridge, P. J., and Cohen, R. C.: Laboratory evaluation of a novel thermal dissociation chemiluminescence method for in situ detection of nitrous acid, Atmos. Environm., 41, 3993–4001, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.01.060, 2007.
Reed, C., Brumby, C. A., Crilley, L. R., Kramer, L. J., Bloss, W. J., Seakins, P. W., Lee, J. D., and Carpenter, L. J.: HONO measurement by differential photolysis, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 2483–2495, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2483-2016, 2016.
Ren, X., Gao, H., Zhou, X., Crounse, J. D., Wennberg, P. O., Browne, E. C., LaFranchi, B. W., Cohen, R. C., McKay, M., Goldstein, A. H., and Mao, J.: Measurement of atmospheric nitrous acid at Bodgett Forest during BEARPEX2007, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 6283–6294, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6283-2010, 2010.
Roberts, J. M., Veres, P. R., Warneke, C., Neuman, J. A., Washenfelder, R. A., Brown, S. S., Baasandorj, M., Burkholder, J. B., Burling, I. R., Johnson, T. J., Yokelson, R. J., and de Gouw, J.: Measurement of HONO, HNCO, and other inorganic acids by negative-ion proton-transfer chemical-ionization mass spectrometry (NI-PT-CIMS): application to biomass burning emissions, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 981–990, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-981-2010, 2010.
Schiller, C. L., Locquiao, S., Johnson, T. J., and Harris, G. W.: Atmospheric measurements of HONO by tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy, J. Atmos. Chem., 40, 275–293, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012264601306, 2001.
Sharpe, S. W., Johnson, T. J., Sams, R. L., Chu, P. M., Rhoderick, G. C., and Johnson, P. A.: Gas-phase databases for quantitative infrared spectroscopy, Appl. Spectrosc., 58, 1452–1461, 2004.
Stockwell, W. R. and Calvert, J. G.: The near ultraviolet absorption spectrum of gaseous HONO and N2O3, J. Photochem., 8, 193–203, https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2670(78)80019-7, 1978.
Stutz, J., Kim, E. S., Platt, U., Bruno, P., Perrino, C., and Febo, A.: UV-visible absorption cross sections of nitrous acid, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 14585–14592, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900003, 2000.
Taha, Y. M., Odame-Ankrah, C. A., and Osthoff, H. D.: Real-time vapor detection of nitroaromatic explosives by catalytic thermal dissociation blue diode laser cavity ring-down spectroscopy, Chem. Phys. Lett., 582, 15–20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2013.07.040, 2013.
Taira, M. and Kanda, Y.: Continuous generation system for low-concentration gaseous nitrous acid, Anal. Chem., 62, 630–633, https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00205a018, 1990.
Tsang, W. and Herron, J. T.: Chemical Kinetic Data Base for Propellant Combustion I. Reactions Involving NO, NO2, HNO, HNO2, HCN and N2O, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 20, 609–663, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.555890, 1991.
Weis, D. D. and Ewing, G. E.: The Reaction of Nitrogen Dioxide with Sea Salt Aerosol, J. Phys. Chem. A, 103, 4865–4873, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp984488q, 1999.
Wild, R. J., Edwards, P. M., Dube, W. P., Baumann, K., Edgerton, E. S., Quinn, P. K., Roberts, J. M., Rollins, A. W., Veres, P. R., Warneke, C., Williams, E. J., Yuan, B., and Brown, S. S.: A Measurement of Total Reactive Nitrogen, NOy, together with NO2, NO, and O3 via Cavity Ring-down Spectroscopy, Environm. Sci. Technol., 48, 9609–9615, https://doi.org/10.1021/es501896w, 2014.
Wingen, L. M., Barney, W. S., Lakin, M. J., Brauers, T., and Finlayson-Pitts, B. J.: A unique method for laboratory quantification of gaseous nitrous acid (HONO) using the reaction , J. Phys. Chem. A, 104, 329–335, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp992890e, 2000.
Zhang, R., Leu, M.-T., and Keyser, L. F.: Heterogeneous Chemistry of HONO on Liquid Sulfuric Acid:? A New Mechanism of Chlorine Activation on Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosols, J. Phys. Chem. A, 100, 339–345, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp952060a, 1996.