Articles | Volume 14, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1379-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1379-2021
Research article
 | 
23 Feb 2021
Research article |  | 23 Feb 2021

Comparison of co-located refractory black carbon (rBC) and elemental carbon (EC) mass concentration measurements during field campaigns at several European sites

Rosaria E. Pileci, Robin L. Modini, Michele Bertò, Jinfeng Yuan, Joel C. Corbin, Angela Marinoni, Bas Henzing, Marcel M. Moerman, Jean P. Putaud, Gerald Spindler, Birgit Wehner, Thomas Müller, Thomas Tuch, Arianna Trentini, Marco Zanatta, Urs Baltensperger, and Martin Gysel-Beer

Viewed

Total article views: 2,494 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,681 758 55 2,494 315 57 71
  • HTML: 1,681
  • PDF: 758
  • XML: 55
  • Total: 2,494
  • Supplement: 315
  • BibTeX: 57
  • EndNote: 71
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Jun 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 25 Jun 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,494 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,388 with geography defined and 106 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 26 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
Black carbon (BC), which is an important constituent of atmospheric aerosols, remains difficult to quantify due to various limitations of available methods. This study provides an extensive comparison of co-located field measurements, applying two methods based on different principles. It was shown that both methods indeed quantify the same aerosol property – BC mass concentration. The level of agreement that can be expected was quantified, and some reasons for discrepancy were identified.