153 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Spectral Super-Resolution Technology Based on Fabry–Perot Interferometer for Temporally and Spatially Modulated Fourier Transform Imaging Spectrometer Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25041201
2. Methane retrieval from MethaneAIR using the CO2 proxy approach: a demonstration for the upcoming MethaneSAT mission C. Chan Miller et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5429-2024
3. A Remote Sensing Technique for CO2 Column Density G. Hai et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2025.3579265
4. Retrieval anthropogenic CO2 emissions from OCO-2 and comparison with gridded emission inventories C. Jin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141418
5. Fugitive Methane Monitoring: A Systems Review of Physics, Technology, Economics, and Regulation P. Sobron https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18142433
6. Recent advances in TROPOMI-based methane source detection: a systematic review R. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2026.2650822
7. Accounting for the effect of aerosols in GHGSat methane retrieval Q. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3347-2024
8. Multisatellite Data Depicts a Record-Breaking Methane Leak from a Well Blowout L. Guanter et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.4c00399
9. Mapping methane plumes at very high spatial resolution with the WorldView-3 satellite E. Sánchez-García et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1657-2022
10. Joint Estimation of the Global Facility-Scale Oil–Gas Methane Emission Rate Distribution and Survey-Mode Detection Probabilities from Multiple Satellite Systems D. Jervis et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c17089
11. Determination of Greenhouse Gas Concentrations from the 16U CubeSat Spacecraft Using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy V. Mayorova et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23156794
12. Exploiting the Matched Filter to Improve the Detection of Methane Plumes with Sentinel-2 Data H. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16061023
13. Global satellite survey reveals uncertainty in landfill methane emissions M. Dogniaux et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09683-8
14. Ground-based remote sensing of CH4 and N2O fluxes from a wastewater treatment plant and nearby biogas production with discoveries of unexpected sources M. Gålfalk et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111978
15. Avoiding methane emission rate underestimates when using the divergence method C. Roberts et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad0252
16. Machine Learning for Methane Detection and Quantification From Space: A survey E. Tiemann et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/MGRS.2025.3599559
17. Comparison of Landfill Methane Emission Quantification Using Multiple Observation Methods L. Gillespie et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00127
18. A survey of methane point source emissions from coal mines in Shanxi province of China using AHSI on board Gaofen-5B Z. He et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2937-2024
19. Exploiting the entire near-infrared spectral range to improve the detection of methane plumes with high-resolution imaging spectrometers J. Roger et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1333-2024
20. Improved methane flux estimation from hyper-spectral imagery via log-domain matched filtering and background homogenization F. Masin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2026.100417
21. Rapid Methane Flux Estimation Combining MethaneSAT and Sentinel‐5P Observations: A Case Study of Turkmenistan Y. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025GL119369
22. Satellite Insights into methane Super-Emitters: Regional emissions and yearly growth on Turkmenistan’s west coast Z. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2025.104975
23. Global energy sector methane emissions estimated by using facility-level satellite observations D. Jervis et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adv3183
24. A High-Resolution Satellite Survey of Methane Emissions from 60 North American Municipal Solid Waste Landfills M. Krause et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c01409
25. The Space Carbon Observatory (SCARBO) concept: assessment of XCO2 and XCH4 retrieval performance M. Dogniaux et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4835-2022
26. Evaluation of methane emission from MSW landfills in China, India, and the U.S. from space using a two-tier approach S. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124705
27. A Review of Offshore Methane Quantification Methodologies S. Riddick et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16050626
28. U-Plume: automated algorithm for plume detection and source quantification by satellite point-source imagers J. Bruno et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2625-2024
29. A Multi-Sensor Framework for Methane Detection and Flux Estimation with Scale-Aware Plume Segmentation and Uncertainty Propagation from High-Resolution Spaceborne Imaging Spectrometers A. Ferrari et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/methane5010010
30. Utilizing Remote Sensing and Data Analytics Techniques to Detect Methane Emissions from the Oil and Gas Industry and Assist with Sustainability Metrics Á. Esparza et al. https://doi.org/10.2118/215818-PA
31. On-Orbit Wavelength Calibration Error Analysis of the Spaceborne Hyperspectral Greenhouse Gas Monitoring Instrument Using the Solar Fraunhofer Lines Y. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16183367
32. Adaptive background suppression-based plume identification, emission estimation, and ground validation of coal mine methane in Changzhi, Shanxi, China X. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2026.105587
33. Robust and Reconfigurable On-Board Processing for a Hyperspectral Imaging Small Satellite D. Langer et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15153756
34. Quantifying methane emissions from the global scale down to point sources using satellite observations of atmospheric methane D. Jacob et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9617-2022
35. Improving quantification of methane point source emissions from imaging spectroscopy Z. Pei et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2023.113652
36. Assessing the Relative Importance of Satellite-Detected Methane Superemitters in Quantifying Total Emissions for Oil and Gas Production Areas in Algeria S. Naus et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c04746
37. High-resolution dual-band triple-grating spectrometer for atmospheric CO2 detection H. Yuan et al. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.563970
38. Direct measurement of plume velocity to characterize point source emissions M. Eastwood et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2507350122
39. 大气甲烷卫星传感器和遥感算法研究综述 何. He Zhuo et al. https://doi.org/10.3788/AOS230429
40. First results of cloud retrieval from the Geostationary Environmental Monitoring Spectrometer B. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-453-2024
41. Single-blind test of nine methane-sensing satellite systems from three continents E. Sherwin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-765-2024
42. Methane detection and emission estimation from space: Benchmarking PRISMA and EnMAP with the GHGSat constellation D. Settembre et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2026.105557
43. Multi-level perception of forest resource information based on UAV hyperspectral remote sensing P. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-026-08742-7
44. Evaluating the detectability of methane point sources from satellite observing systems using microscale modeling P. Bhardwaj et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20567-z
45. Global Satellite Monitoring of Exothermic Industrial Activity via Infrared Emissions C. Elvidge et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15194760
46. Review and perspective of remote sensing research on global greenhouse gas monitoring and stocktaking L. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1360/TB-2024-1033
47. Manufacturability-Based COTS Imaging Spectrometer Implementation by Sensitivity Minimization Design Procedure H. Vu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-025-01221-w
48. Selection and Justification of Optimal Spectral Wavelengths for Control of Methane Emission from an Advanced Nanosatellite V. Karasik et al. https://doi.org/10.33383/2022-123
49. Beyond Production-Based Accounting: A Comparative SWOT Analysis of GHG Inventory Frameworks and Their Policy Implications R. Gil et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli13120240
50. Satellite-Derived Approaches for Coal Mine Methane Estimation: A Review A. Chauhan & S. Raval https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17213652
51. Methane point source quantification using MethaneAIR: a new airborne imaging spectrometer A. Chulakadabba et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5771-2023
52. Detecting Methane Emissions from Space Over India: Analysis Using EMIT and Sentinel-5P TROPOMI Datasets A. Siddiqui et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-024-01925-y
53. Daily detection and quantification of methane leaks using Sentinel-3: a tiered satellite observation approach with Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-5p S. Pandey et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2023.113716
54. Attributing GHG emissions to individual facilities using multi-temporal hyperspectral images: Methodology and applications Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2026.01.014
55. Evaluation of the High Altitude Lidar Observatory (HALO) methane retrievals during the summer 2019 ACT-America campaign R. Barton-Grimley et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4623-2022
56. Performance evaluation of spaceborne combined IPDA LIDAR and DIAL for simultaneous measurement of methane column concentrations and water vapor density profile Z. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-025-08460-9
57. The Carbon Mapper emissions monitoring system R. Duren et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-6933-2025
58. 基于阵列法布里-珀罗干涉仪温室气体探测系统灵敏度分析 余. Yu Miao et al. https://doi.org/10.3788/AOS240833
59. Satellite remote sensing and artificial intelligence for livestock greenhouse gas benchmarking: measurement, attribution, and verification challenges P. Prajesh et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5VA00425J
60. Recent Advances Toward Transparent Methane Emissions Monitoring: A Review B. Erland et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c02136
61. Robust probabilities of detection and quantification uncertainty for aerial methane detection: Examples for three airborne technologies B. Conrad et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2023.113499
62. Spectral calibration of the MethaneAIR instrument C. Staebell et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3737-2021
63. Methane Emissions from Underground Coal Mines M. Guzman et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00346
64. Report on Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2B observations of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline methane leak M. Dogniaux et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2777-2024
65. 轻小型短波红外自准直高光谱成像仪设计 刘. Liu Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.3788/AOS231623
66. Monitoring greenhouse gases (GHGs) in China: status and perspective Y. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4819-2022
67. Volcanic Diffuse Volatile Emissions Tracked by Plant Responses Detectable From Space R. Bogue et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GC010938
68. Tolerance Analysis and Desensitization to Parallelism in Afocal Systems of Fabry-Perot Spectrometers L. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2024.3406536
69. Quick Unsupervised Hyperspectral Dimensionality Reduction for Earth Observation: A Comparison D. Lupu et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCI.2025.3555137
70. Discovery of Large Methane Emissions Using a Complementary Method Based on Multispectral and Hyperspectral Data X. Cai et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16050532
71. Photon flux-based radiometric calibration of HgCdTe detector for greenhouse gas sensing on ThaparSat microsatellite T. Sharma et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2026.133455
72. High-Resolution Global Methane Mapping: Advances in Satellite Remote Sensing, Machine Learning, and Policy Frameworks A. Singh & . Madhubala https://doi.org/10.3390/methane5030021
73. Detection of elevated CO₂ and CH₄ emissions from power plant and landfill sites using airborne and spaceborne imaging spectroscopy H. Varchand et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2025.102607
74. Considering the observation and illumination angular configuration for an improved detection and quantification of methane emissions J. Gorroño et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-1245-2026
75. Automated detection and monitoring of methane super-emitters using satellite data B. Schuit et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9071-2023
76. Toward a versatile spaceborne architecture for immediate monitoring of the global methane pledge Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5233-2023
77. Satellite-Based Methane Emission Monitoring: A Review Across Industries S. Mehrdad & K. Du https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17223674
78. Characterizing Global Methane Point-Source Emission Structures from Multi-Source Satellite Data and National Inventories: Implications for Differentiated Mitigation Pathways X. Su et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18111765
79. SSRMF: A sparse spectral reconstruction enhanced matched filter for improving point-source methane emission detection in complex terrain K. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2025.04.034
80. Improved Quantification of Methane Point-Source Emissions from Hyperspectral Imagery Using a Spectrally Corrected Levenberg–Marquardt Matched Filter Z. He et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18081195
81. Methane retrievals from airborne HySpex observations in the shortwave infrared P. Hochstaffl et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4195-2023
82. Separating and quantifying facility-level methane emissions with overlapping plumes for spaceborne methane monitoring Y. Pang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-455-2025
83. Assessing the Detection of Methane Plumes in Offshore Areas Using High-Resolution Imaging Spectrometers J. Roger et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-5545-2025
84. 环境参数对CO2敏感波段光谱辐射强度的影响 杨. YANG Jun et al. https://doi.org/10.3788/IRLA20250096
85. Worldwide inference of national methane emissions by inversion of satellite observations with UNFCCC prior estimates J. East et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-67122-8
86. N-BPMSNet: An NDMI-Guided Bitemporal Network for Methane Plume Detection and Segmentation From Sentinel-2 Multispectral Observations D. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2026.3689118
87. Insights into Elevated Methane Emissions from an Australian Open-Cut Coal Mine Using Two Independent Airborne Techniques J. Borchardt et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.4c01063
88. Investigation of spectral bands and sensor parameters for methane emission detection imaging spectrometer H. Varchand et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2024.109100
89. First validation of high-resolution satellite-derived methane emissions from an active gas leak in the UK E. Dowd et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1599-2024
90. Relating Multi-Scale Plume Detection and Area Estimates of Methane Emissions: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis S. Pandey et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c07415
91. Data assimilation method for quantifying controlled methane releases using a drone and ground-sensors Z. Darynova et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2023.100210
92. Assessing daytime variations in methane emissions from landfills and impact on whole-landfill emission estimates T. Raaz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2026.115752
93. Modelling wetland methane emission estimates by leveraging new observations of anthropogenic point-source plumes A. Campbell et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-5603-2026
94. Scattering graph method for 3D radiative transfer A. Mikkonen et al. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.562216
95. Evaluation of satellite-derived methane emissions from coal mines using the Gaussian plume model in a topographically complex area Y. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2026.122004
96. A Review of City-Scale Methane Flux Inversion Based on Top-Down Methods X. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17183152
97. Instrument Performance Analysis for Methane Point Source Retrieval and Estimation Using Remote Sensing Technique Y. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17040634
98. Assessing Greenhouse Gas Monitoring Capabilities Using SolAtmos End-to-End Simulator: Application to the Uvsq-Sat NG Mission C. Clavier et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16081442
99. Monitoring Persistent Methane Emissions from the Secunda CTL Synthetic Fuel Plant Using Satellite Observations H. Virta et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.5c01140
100. Coordinated satellite, aircraft, and ground-based observations of a large transient methane release T. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2603595123
101. Near infra-red black silicon pushbroom hyperspectral imager F. Sigernes et al. https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTCON.549308
102. Methane intensity and emissions across major oil and gas basins and individual jurisdictions using MethaneSAT observations J. Williams et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-5961-2026
103. CO2 concentration retrieval and emission rate estimation over Indian thermal power plants using radiative transfer approach and AVIRIS-NG data H. Varchand et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2024.101138
104. Assessing the design of integrated methane sensing networks L. Patel & J. Zenker https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad893d
105. Improved monitoring of methane emissions for the oil and gas sector with Sentinel-2 satellite observations B. Zambrano-Luna et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121594
106. Towards Supporting Satellite Design Through the Top-Down Approach: A General Model for Assessing the Ability of Future Satellite Missions to Quantify Point Source Emissions L. Yao et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16234503
107. Detecting methane emissions from palm oil mills with airborne and spaceborne imaging spectrometers A. Valverde et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad8806
108. PRISMethaNet: A novel deep learning model for landfill methane detection using PRISMA satellite data M. Marjani et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2024.10.003
109. Global observational coverage of onshore oil and gas methane sources with TROPOMI M. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41914-8
110. Offshore methane detection and quantification from space using sun glint measurements with the GHGSat constellation J. MacLean et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-863-2024
111. TROPOMI/WFMD v2.0: Improved retrievals of XCH4 and XCO with XGBoost-based quality filtering O. Schneising et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-2407-2026
112. Methane Column Estimation Using PRISMA Hyperspectral Data and Comparison With Other Earth Observation Products D. Settembre et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2025.3539870
113. Ocean Color Hyperspectral Remote Sensing With High Resolution and Low Latency—The HYPSO-1 CubeSat Mission M. Grotte et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2021.3080175
114. Impact of atmospheric turbulence on the accuracy of point source emission estimates using satellite imagery M. Gałkowski et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-13831-2025
115. Benzene and other hazardous air pollutants in consumer-grade natural gas in Europe T. Sparks et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ae499f
116. FI-SCAPE: A Divergence Theorem Based Emission Quantification Model for Air/Spaceborne Imaging Spectrometer Derived XCH4 Observations Y. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2024.3490896
117. Mapping methane point emissions with the PRISMA spaceborne imaging spectrometer L. Guanter et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112671
118. Research on Fabry-Pérot imaging spectrometer based on field-of-view partitioned order mapping S. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2026.133235
119. Use of Differential Optical Spectroscopy for Satellite Diagnostics of Methane Content in a Scattering Atmosphere A. Bril et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10812-023-01635-2
120. Strong methane point sources contribute a disproportionate fraction of total emissions across multiple basins in the United States D. Cusworth et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2202338119
121. Methane measurement method based on F-P angle-dependent correlation spectroscopy Y. Lv et al. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.526026
122. Quantifying key drivers of atmospheric methane across Pakistan using a machine learning approach F. Altaf et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-025-14952-0
123. Estimating Drivers and Pathways for Hydroelectric Reservoir Methane Emissions Using a New Mechanistic Model K. Delwiche et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JG006908
124. Atmospheric remote sensing for anthropogenic methane emissions: Applications and research opportunities S. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164701
125. First Investigation of Long-Term Methane Emissions from Wastewater Treatment Using Satellite Remote Sensing S. Mehrdad et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16234422
126. Identifying and quantifying greenhouse gas emissions with the AVIRIS-3 airborne imaging spectrometer R. Coleman et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2025.115058
127. Investigation and experimental validation of a CH₄ point-source detection method based on a Fabry-Pérot interferometer Q. ZHANG et al. https://doi.org/10.7498/aps.75.20260051
128. Small Satellite Electro-Optical System (EOS) Technological and Commercial Expansion D. Gadisa & H. Bang https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.09.010
129. Observation-based mine-level methane emission factors uncover inventory biases and constrain emissions from Shanxi’s Coal Mines S. Fu et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ae9e4e
130. Evaluating CO2 and CH4 absorption models with open-path dual-comb spectroscopy at the mauna loa observatory N. Malarich et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2025.109567
131. Methane Retrieval Algorithms Based on Satellite: A Review Y. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15040449
132. MPSUNet: A Deep Learning-Based Segmentation Framework for Methane Plume Detection With Space-Based Hyperspectral and Multispectral Imagery C. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2025.3563599
133. A taxonomy of earth observation data for sustainable finance S. Rapach et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclimf.2023.100029
134. An Effective Quantification of Methane Point-Source Emissions with the Multi-Level Matched Filter from Hyperspectral Imagery M. Liang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17050843
135. Versatile and Targeted Validation of Space-Borne XCO2, XCH4 and XCO Observations by Mobile Ground-Based Direct-Sun Spectrometers A. Butz et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsen.2021.775805
136. Greenhouse Gases Monitoring Instrument on GaoFen-5 Satellite-II: Optical Design and Evaluation H. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15041105
137. Hydropower Reservoir Greenhouse Gas Emissions: State of the Science and Roadmap for Further Research to Improve Emission Accounting and Mitigation S. Karambelkar et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135794
138. Tightening up methane plume source rate estimation in EnMAP and PRISMA images E. Ouerghi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4611-2025
139. Monitoring Methane Emissions from Oil and Gas Operations W. Collins et al. https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXEnergy.1.017001
140. Optical design and experimental validation of a spaceborne high-precision main greenhouse gas imager for small- and medium-scale hotspot monitoring Q. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.604108
141. CELNet: A comprehensive efficient learning network for atmospheric plume identification from remotely sensed methane concentration images F. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2025.114828
142. Analysis of a tiered top-down approach using satellite and aircraft platforms to monitor oil and gas facilities in the Permian basin Á. Esparza et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113265
143. High-frequency monitoring of anomalous methane point sources with multispectral Sentinel-2 satellite observations D. Varon et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2771-2021
144. Using satellites to uncover large methane emissions from landfills J. Maasakkers et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abn9683
145. Analysis of sampling biases and drift correction of interferograms for the array-based Fabry–Pérot greenhouse gas detector M. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2026.109895
146. Monitoring oil and gas field CH4 leaks by Sentinel-5P and Sentinel-2 B. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2024.133889
147. Machine learning-based emission rate estimates of global methane super-emissions C. Roberts et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-5659-2026
148. Monitoring fossil fuel CO2 emissions from co-emitted NO2 observed from space: progress, challenges, and future perspectives H. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-025-1922-x
149. 基于自由曲面的轻小型温室气体点源监测成像光谱仪设计 陈. Chen Huiying et al. https://doi.org/10.3788/AOS250628
150. Physics-informed regression-residual reconstruction and group fusion dual-attention transformer for methane plume detection L. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2026.08.017
151. 基于F-P干涉仪CH4气体点源探测关键参数仿真分析 张. ZHANG Qiang et al. https://doi.org/10.3788/gzxb20245301.0130001
152. Quantifying methane emission baselines with high-resolution satellite data to support China’s emission control H. Zhong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2025.04.047
153. Optical Gas Imaging with Cooled and Uncooled Thermal Infrared Cameras G. Jobert et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26103270