Articles | Volume 14, issue 4
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 3071–3085, 2021
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 3071–3085, 2021

Research article 27 Apr 2021

Research article | 27 Apr 2021

Long-term NOx measurements in the remote marine tropical troposphere

Long-term NOx measurements in the remote marine tropical troposphere
Simone T. Andersen1, Lucy J. Carpenter1, Beth S. Nelson1, Luis Neves2, Katie A. Read1,3, Chris Reed4, Martyn Ward1, Matthew J. Rowlinson1,3, and James D. Lee1,3 Simone T. Andersen et al.
  • 1Wolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratories (WACL), Department of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
  • 2Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia e Geofísica, São Vicente (INMG), Mindelo, Cabo Verde
  • 3National Centre for Atmospheric Science (NCAS), University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
  • 4FAAM Airborne Laboratory, Building 146, Cranfield University, Cranfield, MK43 0AL, UK

Correspondence: Simone T. Andersen (


Atmospheric nitrogen oxides (NO + NO2= NOx) have been measured at the Cape Verde Atmospheric Observatory (CVAO) in the tropical Atlantic (1651 N, 2452 W) since October 2006. These measurements represent a unique time series of NOx in the background remote troposphere. Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) is measured via photolytic conversion to nitric oxide (NO) by ultraviolet light-emitting diode arrays followed by chemiluminescence detection. Since the measurements began, a blue light converter (BLC) has been used for NO2 photolysis, with a maximum spectral output of 395 nm from 2006 to 2015 and of 385 nm from 2015 onwards. The original BLC used was constructed with a Teflon-like material and appeared to cause an overestimation of NO2 when illuminated. To avoid such interferences, a new additional photolytic converter (PLC) with a quartz photolysis cell (maximum spectral output also 385 nm) was implemented in March 2017. Once corrections are made for the NO2 artefact from the original BLC, the two NO2 converters are shown to give comparable NO2 mixing ratios (BLC = 0.99 × PLC + 0.7 ppt, linear least-squares regression), giving confidence in the quantitative measurement of NOx at very low levels. Data analysis methods for the NOx measurements made at CVAO have been developed and applied to the entire time series to produce an internally consistent and high-quality long-term data set. NO has a clear diurnal pattern with a maximum mixing ratio of 2–10 ppt during the day depending on the season and  0 ppt during the night. NO2 shows a fairly flat diurnal signal, although a small increase in daytime NOx is evident in some months. Monthly average mixing ratios of NO2 vary between 5 and 30 ppt depending on the season. Clear seasonal trends in NO and NO2 levels can be observed with a maximum in autumn and winter and a minimum in spring and summer.

1 Introduction

Atmospheric nitrogen oxides play a key role in tropospheric chemistry. NOx helps to control the abundance of the two most important oxidants in the atmosphere, ozone (O3) and the hydroxyl radical (OH). The presence of NO is usually the key limiting factor in the production of tropospheric O3, which occurs via oxidation of NO to NO2 by peroxy radicals (RO2, HO2) as described in Reactions (R1)–(R2), followed by photolysis of NO2 and rapid conversion of the resulting O(3P) to O3.


Reaction (R2) also offers a route to the OH radical above its primary production via O3 photolysis (Reactions R5 and R6). If the NOx mixing ratio is sufficiently low, then peroxy radicals react with themselves instead of NO, and O3 depleting reactions (Reactions R5–R8) dominate over O3 production (Atkinson, 2000).


It is assumed that, under tropospheric conditions at the low mole fractions discussed, NO and NO2 behave as ideal gases and therefore mole fraction (picomole or mole, the appropriate SI unit) is equivalent to volumetric mixing ratio, represented by part per trillion (ppt). NOx mixing ratios below 10–30 ppt are generally sufficiently low for net tropospheric O3 depletion (Atkinson, 2000; Jaeglé et al., 1998; Logan, 1985). These conditions have previously been reported to apply most of the year in the remote Atlantic Ocean (Lee et al., 2009). The mixing ratio of NOx in the atmosphere varies from a few ppt in remote areas (Lee et al., 2009; Monks et al., 1998; Reed et al., 2017) to > 100 ppb in polluted areas (Berkes et al., 2018; Carslaw, 2005; Mazzeo et al., 2005; Pandey et al., 2008). It is therefore important to have representative NOx measurements in different regions of the world to be able to understand the chemistry occurring throughout the troposphere.

Long-term remote atmospheric NOx measurements are rare due to the difficulty measuring very low (ppt) mixing ratios. Many different methods of measuring NOx are available; however, very few have the limit of detection (LOD) and sensitivity needed to measure NOx in remote regions. The most widely used method is NO chemiluminescence, where NO in the presence of excess ozone is oxidized into excited state NO2, which emits photons that can be detected (Fontijn et al., 1970). NO2 is generally converted into NO either catalytically by a heated molybdenum converter or photolytically, followed by NO chemiluminescence (Kley and McFarland, 1980). The molybdenum converter has historically been preferred due to its high conversion efficiency of at least 95 %, but it also converts other reactive nitrogen species (NOz) such as peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN), peroxymethacryloyl nitrate (MPAN) and other acyl peroxy nitrates (APN), HNO3, p-HNO3, HO2NO2, and HONO, potentially giving an overestimation of NO2 (Dunlea et al., 2007; Grosjean and Harrison, 1985; Winer et al., 1974). Two separate studies have shown that photolytic converters (PLCs) with a wavelength of 385–395 nm have the smallest spectral overlap with interfering compounds (Pollack et al., 2010; Reed et al., 2016). Reed et al. (2016) showed that in some configurations the PLC can heat up the sampled air, making it possible for reactive nitrogen compounds such as PAN to decompose thermally and cause an overestimation of NO2. This, however, causes only a negligible interference in warm regions such as Cabo Verde where PAN levels are extremely low (Reed et al., 2016).

In this study we describe a NO2 converter, similar to that presented by Pollack et al. (2010), which has been implemented on an instrument to measure NOx at the CVAO. The data analysis procedure is explained in detail and the first 2 years of results with the new converter are presented and compared to the data obtained using a different converter.

2 Experimental

2.1 Location

The Cape Verde Atmospheric Observatory (CVAO; 1651 N, 2452 W) is located on the north eastern coast of São Vicente, Cabo Verde. The air masses arriving at the CVAO predominately come from the northeast (> 95 % of all wind direction measurements, see Fig. 1) and have travelled over the Atlantic Ocean for multiple days since their last exposure to anthropogenic emissions, with the potential exception of ship emissions (Carpenter et al., 2010; Read et al., 2008). The UK Meteorological Office NAME dispersion model (Ryall et al., 2001) has previously been used to investigate the origin of the air masses arriving at the CVAO, which have been shown to be very diverse: North America, Atlantic Ocean, Europe, Arctic, and African regions (Lee et al., 2009). During the spring and summer, the air masses predominantly originate from the Atlantic making it possible to investigate long-term remote marine tropospheric background measurements. During the winter, the CVAO receives air mainly from the Sahara, resulting in very high wintertime dust loadings (Chiapello et al., 1995; Fomba et al., 2014; Rijkenberg et al., 2008). The time zone of Cabo Verde is UTC1. A full description of the CVAO site and associated measurements is given in Carpenter et al. (2010).

Figure 1The frequency of hourly averaged wind speed and direction from January 2014 to August 2019. Each square symbolizes 10 of wind direction and 1 m s−1 wind speed. Each dashed circle shows an increase in wind speed of 5 m s−1.


2.2 Measurement technique

NOx has been measured at the CVAO since 2006 using a NOx chemiluminescence instrument manufactured by Air Quality Design Inc. (AQD), USA. The chemiluminescence technique involves the oxidation of NO by excess O3 to excited NO2 (Reaction R9) (Clough and Thrush, 1967; Clyne et al., 1964; Fontijn et al., 1970). The excited NO2 molecules can be deactivated by emitting photons (Reaction R10) or by being quenched by other molecules (Reaction R11), such as N2, O2, and in particular H2O. The emitted photons are detected by a photomultiplier tube detector (PMT), which gives a signal that is linearly proportional to the mixing ratio of NO sampled. The measurement of NOx and NO2 requires photolytic conversion of NO2 to NO (Reaction R3) followed by NO chemiluminescence detection (Kley and McFarland, 1980).


Further details of the technique are documented in (Carpenter et al., 2010; Drummond et al., 1985; Fontijn et al., 1970; Lee et al., 2009; Peterson and Honrath, 1999; Reed et al., 2017; Val Martin et al., 2006).

2.3 Instrument setup

Ambient air is sampled from a downward-facing inlet placed into the prevailing wind with a fitted hood 10 m above the ground. A centrifugal pump at a flow rate of  750 L min−1 pulls the air into a 40 mm glass manifold, resulting in a linear sample flow of 10 m s−1, giving a residence time to the inlet of the NOx instrument of 2.3 s. To reduce the humidity and aerosol concentration in the sampled air, dead-end traps are placed at the lowest point of the manifold inside and outside the laboratory. A Nafion dryer (PD-50T-12-MKR, Permapure) is used to additionally dry the sampled air, using a constant sheath flow of zero air (PAG 003, Eco Physics AG) that has been filtered through a Sofnofil (Molecular Products) and activated charcoal (Sigma Aldrich) trap (dew point 15 C). The air is sampled perpendicular to the manifold through a 47 mm PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene) filter with a pore size of 1.2 µm.

Figure 2Flow diagram of the NOx instrument at the CVAO.


A schematic diagram of the instrument is shown in Fig. 2. Sampled air is passed through two different photolytic NO2 converters, which are placed in series. The first is a commercial unit known as a BLC (blue light converter) supplied by Air Quality Design, as described in Buhr (2007). An ultraviolet light-emitting diode (UV-LED, 3 W, LED Engin, Inc.) array is placed in each end of a reaction chamber made of Teflon-like barium-doped material (BLC, λ= 385 nm, volume = 16 cm3). The entire block surrounding the reaction chamber is irradiated, giving the highest possible conversion efficiency of NO2. Each array is cooled by a heat sink to maintain an approximately constant temperature inside of the converter when the diode arrays turn on. The second converter consists of two diodes (Hamamatsu Lightningcure L11921-500, λ= 385 nm) and a photolysis cell made of a quartz tube and two quartz windows glued to each end with a volume of 16 cm3 (PLC) following the design of Pollack et al. (2010). Aluminium foil is wrapped around the quartz tube to increase the reflectivity to give the highest conversion efficiency of NO2. The diodes are placed at each end of the quartz tube, as shown in Fig. S2 in the Supplement, without touching the windows to avoid increases in the temperature when the diodes turn on. BLCs have been used at the CVAO since the instrument was installed in 2006, with the most recent converter installed in April 2015 (a BLC2 model), where the wavelength was changed to 385 nm from 395 nm. The PLC was installed in March 2017. The air flow through the instrument is controlled at  1000 sccm by a mass flow controller (MKS, M100B) giving a residence time of 0.96 s through each of the converters.

To measure NO and NOx (NO + NO2 converted into NO) the air is introduced to the chemiluminescent detector (CLD), where NO is oxidized by excess O3 into excited NO2 in the reaction volume (241 mL, aluminium with gold coating; Ridley and Grahek, 1990) shown in Fig. 2. The reaction volume is kept at low pressure to minimize quenching of excited NO2 and thereby maximize the NO chemiluminescence lifetime. The photons emitted from the excited NO2 molecules when they relax to ground state are detected by the PMT (Hamamatsu R2257P) to give a signal for NO. NO2 is converted into NO by the BLC for 1 min, and then the PLC for 1 min, each period producing a signal due to NO + NO2. The signal detected by the PMT (SM) is caused by NO reacting with O3 (SNO), dark current from the thermionic emissions from the photocathode of the PMT (SD), and an interference (SI), which can be due to O3–surface reactions that cause light emissions in the reaction cell, other reactions creating chemiluminescence, and from illumination of the chamber walls during NO2 conversion (Drummond et al., 1985; Reed et al., 2016):

(1) S M = S NO + S D + S I .

The PMT is cooled to 30 C to reduce the dark current, giving the instrument a higher precision. Other molecules in the atmosphere such as alkenes also react with ozone and emit photons to reach their ground state but at a different timescale to that of NO2 (Alam et al., 2020; Finlayson et al., 1974). This can give an interfering signal causing the NO and NOx mixing ratios to be overestimated. However, most of these reactions emit photons at 400–600 nm and are therefore filtered by a red transmission cut-off filter (Schott RG-610) placed in front of the PMT (Alam et al., 2020). The filter transmits photons with a wavelength higher than 600 nm (Drummond et al., 1985). A background measurement is therefore required to account for the dark current of the PMT, O3–surface reactions, and for the remaining interfering reactions occurring at a different timescale to that of NO2. Background measurements are made by allowing ambient air to interact with O3 in the zero volume (180 mL, PFA, Savillex, LLC) before reaching the reaction volume (Fig. 2). Most excited NO2 molecules will reach their ground state before the sample reaches the PMT, meaning the signal from NO will not be measured. The efficiency of the reaction between NO and O3 in the zero volume is calculated from the calibration, as explained in Sect. 2.4.3. Background measurements are performed every 5 min to take changing ambient conditions such as humidity into account, which can affect the background signal for example via the quantity of light emitted from interference reactions (SI).

NO, NO2, and the background signal are all detected on the same channel, and the instrument cycle is 1 min of background, 2 min of NO (when the NO2 converters are off), 1 min of BLC NOx (the BLC converter is on), and 1 min of PLC NOx (the PLC is on).

2.4 Calibration

Prior to June 2019, calibrations were performed every 73 h by standard addition in order to account for temperature and humidity changes in the ambient matrix. In June 2019, the calibration frequency was changed to every 61 h to ensure that during any given month calibrations are carried out for approximately equal periods during the night and the day. To calibrate the NO sensitivity, 8 sccm of 5 ppm NO calibration gas in nitrogen is added to the ambient air flow of  1000 sccm, giving an NO mixing ratio of approximately 40 ppb. The mixing ratio used for calibrations is approximately 10 000 times that of the ambient measurements; however, due to reduced cylinder stability for lower NO mixing ratios it is difficult to calibrate at much lower mixing ratios, and the chemiluminescence is expected to be linear across the range of expected mixing ratios (Drummond et al., 1985). The calibration gas is added between the PTFE filter and the NO2 converter as shown in Fig. 2. The conversion efficiency of the BLC and the PLC is calibrated by gas phase titration (GPT), where oxygen is added to the sampled NO calibration gas before entering the titration cell, which contains a UV lamp that converts oxygen to ozone. Between 60 % and 80 % of the NO calibration gas is oxidized into NO2, giving a known mixing ratio of NO2. A theoretical calibration sequence is shown in Fig. 3. The first cycle is to calibrate the sensitivity and the second is to calibrate the NO2 conversion efficiency. Each actual calibration includes three cycles of sensitivity calibration and two cycles of conversion efficiency calibration. The signal from NO2 observed in the NO sensitivity calibration is due to traces of NO2 in the calibration gas. Figure S3 shows the observed percentage of NO2 in the calibration cylinders from January 2014 to August 2019 calculated from the measured sensitivity (Sect. 2.4.1) and the conversion efficiencies (CE) of the two converters (Sect. 2.4.2):

(2)NO2in cylinder (ppt)=NO.c(1)-NO(1)Sensitivity×CE,(3)Percentage NO2=NO2in cylinderNO2in cylinder+NOcal conc..

The percentage is stable for both converters; however, the PLC shows approximately 3 %–4 % NO2 in the NO calibration gas compared to 5 %–10 % for the BLC, which is caused by a BLC artefact. The cylinders used were certified to  2 % NO2.

Figure 3A theoretical calibration cycle. “NO” is the measurement of only NO, i.e. when the converters are off; “NO.c” is when one of the converters are on therefore the measurement is NO + NO2; and (1) and (2) represent untitrated and titrated NO, respectively.


2.4.1 Sensitivity

The sensitivity of the instrument is calculated from the increase in counts per second caused by the calibration gas during NO calibration (untitrated, i.e. without O3) and from the mixing ratio of the calibration gas as shown by Eq. (4). The NO counts per second from the previous measurement cycle before the calibration is subtracted to give the increase due to the calibration gas. The previous cycle needs to be stable and low in NO to give an accurate sensitivity, which is the case at the CVAO.

(4) Sensitivity = Counts per second during calibration - Counts per second in previous cycle Mixing ratio of calibration gas

The sensitivity of the instrument depends on the pressure of the reaction chamber, the ozone mixing ratio in the reaction chamber, the flow of the sample through the reaction chamber, and the temperature of the reaction chamber. To maintain a stable sensitivity, all four parameters should be kept stable (Galbally, 2020). From January 2014 to August 2019, the sensitivity varied between 2.7 and 7.4 counts s−1 ppt−1 with changes of less than 5 % between subsequent calibrations (see Fig. S4), unless the instrument was turned off for a long period of time due to instrumental problems.

2.4.2 Conversion efficiencies

The conversion efficiency of the BLC and the PLC is calculated based on the titrated (with added O3) and the untitrated (without added O3) NO calibration gas, as described in Eq. (5). The numerator gives how much of the NO is titrated into NO2, and the denominator represents the NO2 measured when taking the NO2 content in the NO calibration gas into account. In Eq. (5), “NO” is the measurement of only NO, i.e. when the converters are off; “NO.c” is when one of the converters are on and thus the measurement is NO + NO2; and (1) and (2) represent untitrated and titrated NO, respectively.

(5) CE = NO . c ( 2 ) - NO ( 2 ) - NO . c ( 1 ) - NO ( 1 ) NO ( 1 ) - NO ( 2 ) = 1 - NO . c ( 1 ) - NO . c ( 2 ) NO ( 1 ) - NO ( 2 )

The conversion efficiency of the BLC has varied from 82 % to 91 % between its installation in April 2015 and August 2019 (j 3 s−1). Prior to April 2015, an older-generation BLC (λ= 395 nm) with a conversion efficiency of 30 %–35 % was used (j 0.5 s−1). The conversion efficiency of the PLC has varied between 50 % and 55 % from its installation in March 2017 to August 2019 (j 1 s−1). See Fig. S5 for all the calculated conversion efficiencies.

2.4.3 Efficiency of the zero volume

Background measurements are made by reacting NO and interference compounds with O3 in the zero volume (Fig. 2). The system is set up so that NO2 produced from NO will relax to the ground state before it is measured in the downstream reaction chamber, whereas it is assumed that any interfering compounds will emit photons when reaching the reaction chamber and be measured as a background signal (Drummond et al., 1985; Galbally, 2020). If the zero volume is too small or the O3 mixing ratio is too low, some untitrated NO may lead to NO2 chemiluminescence within the reaction chamber, and the background will be overestimated. On the other hand, if the zero volume is too large, some of the interfering compounds may have relaxed to their ground state before the reaction chamber and the background signal will be underestimated. The residence time of the zero volume is 10.8 s compared to 14.5 s for the reaction volume. The efficiency of the zero volume can be calculated from the calibration cycle. The difference in background counts from before a calibration cycle to during the calibration cycle shows how much of the added NO from the calibration cylinder does not react with O3 in the zero volume. By dividing this difference by the signal due to NO during the NO measurement of the calibration cycle, which is obtained by subtracting the NO measurement from the previous measurement cycle, the inefficiency of the zero volume is obtained. The efficiency is determined for each calibration cycle (Eq. 6) and plotted in Fig. S6. It is consistently above 98 %.

(6) Efficiency ZV = 1 - cal zero - measurement zero NO cal - previous NO cycle

2.4.4 Artefact measurements

As described in Sect. 2.3, NOx measurements may have artefacts from chemiluminescence caused by interfering gas-phase reactions and/or from compounds produced by illumination of the reaction chamber walls and pressure differences in the instrument (Drummond et al., 1985; Reed et al., 2016). To estimate artefacts, it is necessary to measure the signal from NOx-free air. The calibration sequence is followed by sampling NOx-free air generated from a pure air generator (PAG 003, Eco Physics AG) for 30 min. According to the manufacturer, the PAG not only scrubs NO, NO2, and NOy from the ambient air but also removes SO2, VOCs, H2O, and O3. An overflow of PAG air is introduced between the aerosol filter and the NO2 converters as shown in Fig. 2 and the cycle of background, NO, NOx BLC, and NOx PLC is used to estimate artefact NO and NO2 measured by the instrument. The artefacts are estimated using the sensitivity and conversion efficiencies measured in ambient air, where humidity is expected to be higher. This could cause the artefacts to be either underestimated or overestimated.

NO artefact

The NO artefact can be caused by two things: alkenes reacting with O3 and giving chemiluminescence above 600 nm at approximately the same rate as NO2 or a difference in pressure between the zero volume and the reaction volume. An artefact caused by alkenes will be positive and overestimate the NO mixing ratio, where an artefact due to a pressure difference can be either negative or positive. It can be estimated as the offset from 0 ppt when the mixing ratio sampled is 0 ppt. The NO mixing ratio is expected to be 0 ppt when sampling NOx-free air or between 22:00 and 04:00 UTC at night. NO generated during the day is rapidly oxidized into NO2 through reactions with O3 and RO2 after sunset. During the night, NO is not generated from photolysis of NO2, and there are no significant local sources of NO at Cabo Verde when the air masses come from over the ocean (which is > 95 % of the time). The average NO mixing ratio between 22:00 and 04:00 UTC and the average NO mixing ratio from the PAG zero air tend to be very similar, with the PAG artefact (3.7 ± 22.9 ppt, 2σ; January 2014–August 2019) being generally lower than the night-time artefact (0.4 ± 11.9 ppt, 2σ; January 2014–August 2019). Time series of both NO artefact measurements can be found in Fig. S7 in the Supplement. The night-time NO artefact is used as it is measured more frequently, as it contains the same ambient matrix with nothing scrubbed, and to eliminate the possibility of residual NO influencing background measurements determined from the PAG. Since the PAG scrubs VOCs it will also not give an estimate of the artefacts caused by fast-reacting alkenes.

NO2 artefact

NO2 converters have previously been shown to have artefacts caused by thermal or photolytic conversion of reactive nitrogen compounds (NOz) other than NO2 and illumination of the chamber walls (Drummond et al., 1985; Reed et al., 2016; Ryerson et al., 2000). Fast-reacting alkenes, which can cause overestimations of the NO mixing ratios, will not cause the NO2 mixing ratio to be overestimated, since the NO signal is subtracted from the NO2 signal.

The spectral output of an NO2 converter with a wavelength of 385 nm was compared to absorption cross sections of NO2 and potential interfering species such as BrONO2, HONO, and NO3 (Reed et al., 2016). The photolytic converter was shown to have good spectral overlap with the NO2 cross section and minimal spectral overlap with other NOz species, except for a small overlap with the absorption cross section of HONO. The interferences from BrONO2, HONO, and NO3 have additionally been evaluated previously for a similar setup using a Hg lamp (Ryerson et al., 2000). At equal concentrations of NO2 and NOz species, BrONO2 and NO3 were estimated to have a maximum interference of 5 % and 10 %, respectively, using a lamp with a wider spectral overlap with the interfering species than what is observed for the LEDs used at the CVAO (Ryerson et al., 2000). At the CVAO, HONO levels have previously been measured to peak at  3.5 ppt (at noon; Reed et al., 2017). For the typical Gaussian output of a UV-LED, this interference is calculated to be 2.0 %, 12.6 %, and 25.7 % for UV-LEDs with principle outputs of 395, 385, and 365 nm respectively, resulting in a maximum interference of < 0.5 ppt during peak daylight hours. Photolytic conversion of NOz species is therefore not expected to be an important contributor to the NO2 artefact at the CVAO due to the narrow spectral output of the LEDs.

Each converter is only on for 1 min in a 5 min cycle. For thermal conversion to be a major contributor to the artefact, the converter would have to increase in temperature during that 1 min and not the rest of the cycle, otherwise an increase in signal should be constant since the air continues to flow through the converters when they are turned off. Thermal decomposition of NOz species is therefore not expected to have an effect in a climate like the one in Cabo Verde, where the sample temperatures are similar to the ambient temperatures.

It has been shown that the walls of a BLC, made out of a porous Teflon-like doped block, become contaminated from the ambient air over time, and when the walls are illuminated reactions take place on the surface, causing an artefact (Reed et al., 2016; Ryerson et al., 2000). The BLC is similar to the one used by Reed et al. (2016) and it is therefore expected to have an artefact due to reactions taking place on the surface. The PLC is not expected to be contaminated in the same way as it does not have porous chamber walls. Ryerson et al. (2000) observed an increase in artefact over time when sampling ambient air for a similar PLC; however, this is not observed for the PLC in the very clean environment at the CVAO (0–10 ppt between August 2017 and August 2019; see below), and surface reactions are therefore expected to give a negligible artefact for the PLC.

The total artefact can be determined by measuring the NO2 signal when the NO2 mixing ratio is 0 ppt; however, it is virtually impossible to scrub all NOx from the ambient air and nothing else. To estimate the NO2 artefact, PAG zero air is measured using both converters. The PLC measures between 0–10 ppt compared to 10–60 ppt using the BLC. Since, as discussed above, the NO2 artefact of the PLC is assumed to be negligible, the measurement of PAG zero air by the PLC is assumed to represent the remaining NO2 in the zero air after scrubbing. If the PLC does have an artefact, then both NO2 measurements will be overestimated by the amount of this artefact. The signal from the BLC when measuring PAG zero air is expected to be due to the illumination of the chamber walls in addition to the traces of NO2 left in the zero air. The artefact due to wall reactions in the BLC can therefore be estimated by subtracting the signal measured by the PLC.

3 Data analysis

Time periods with known problems such as maintenance on the manifold, ozone leaks, and periods when the PMT has not reached <28 C are not included in the data set. The mean and standard deviation of the zero (background), NO, NO2 BLC, and PLC are determined for each 5 min measurement cycle. To avoid averaging over the time it takes the detector to change and stabilize between the different types of measurements, the last 50 s of the measurement cycle are used for the background, the last 110 s for the NO counts, and the last 30 s for the BLC NOx and the PLC NOx counts. Each cycle is filtered based on the percentage standard deviations and differences in counts between subsequent cycles. If the standard deviation or the difference in counts are outside the mean ± 2σ (see Table 1) calculated from a 5-year period between 2014 and 2019, the cycle is not used for further analysis. This removes noisy data and sharp spikes but keeps data with sustained increases lasting more than 5 min.

Table 1Evaluation parameters of the measurements. When a measurement falls outside any of the intervals it will not be used for further data analysis. The mean ±xσ is calculated for 2014–2019 for the zero and NO measurements and 2017–2019 for both NO2 measurements.

a The percentage standard deviation for each measurement cycle is determined as the standard deviation of a cycle divided by the mean of the same cycle. b Extreme measurements are determined to be mixing ratios that are outside the hourly mean ± 4 standard deviations of the hourly mixing ratio. c Extreme differences between the hourly mean and median of the mixing ratios are determined to be differences outside the hourly mean ± 4 standard deviations of the differences between the mean and median.

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

To obtain the signals due to NO and NO2, the interpolated zero and NO measurements are subtracted from the NO and NOx measurements, respectively. They are converted to a mixing ratio by using the interpolated sensitivity and conversion efficiency as shown in Eqs. (7) and (8).

(7)NO mixing ratio=NO measurement-background measurementSensitivity(8)NO2mixing ratio=NOxmeasurement-NO measurementSensitivity×CE

The NO and NO2 BLC mixing ratios are corrected by subtracting the interpolated artefacts described in Sect. 2.4.4. If the difference between two subsequent NO artefact measurements vary by more than the mean ± 2σ of the differences in NO artefacts determined from January 2014 to August 2019 (0.0 ± 6.2 ppt), the measurements made between are not used for further analysis due to a potential step change between the determinations.

Hourly averages of all the measurements are determined. If data coverage during the hour is less than 50 %, the hour is flagged and discarded from the data analysis. The hourly NOx (NO + NO2 PLC) mixing ratios between June 2017 and August 2019 are plotted as a function of wind speed and direction in Fig. 4. It can be observed that the concentrations are enhanced at low wind speed and when the air crosses the island (from the southwest). Measurements made at a wind speed < 2 m s−1 or from a wind direction 100-360 are, therefore, flagged as suspected of local contamination and are not used in the analysis. Extreme mixing ratios outside the mean  ± 4σ of the 5-year period for NO and 2-year period for NO2 are flagged as suspicious (see Table 1 for boundaries). Lastly, inconsistency in the measurements, such as differences outside the mean  ± 4σ between the mean and median of a measurement (see Table 1 for boundaries) and differences between the two NO2 measurements, are flagged as suspicious (0.4  ± 32.2 ppt). The data remaining after these removals are 88 % of the original NO and NO2 BLC data set and 83 % of the NO2 PLC data set.

Figure 4Total NOx from June 2017 to August 2019 plotted as a function of wind speed and direction.



As described above, excited NO2 can be quenched by other sampled molecules, giving a lower observed mixing ratio than the real value. Water molecules are effective quenchers and therefore a correction is usually applied depending on the humidity (Matthews et al., 1977; Ridley et al., 1992). However, since the calibrations at the CVAO are performed by standard addition and a Nafion dryer is placed in front of the instrument, this is not necessary.

Additionally, NO can react with O3 in the ambient air in the inlet and manifold giving an overestimation of NO2 and an underestimation of NO. To correct for this the following equations are used (Gilge et al., 2014):


where [NO]0 is the corrected NO mixing ratio, [NO]E1 is the uncorrected NO mixing ratio, [NO2]0 is the corrected NO2 mixing ratio, [NO]E2 is the uncorrected NO mixing ratio when the converter is on, kO3 is the rate of the reaction between NO and O3 (k(O3+NO) × [O3] × 10−9× M), tE1 is the sum of the residence time from the inlet to entry of the converter and the time the air is in the converter, tC1 and tC2 are the time the air is in the converter when the converter is on and off, respectively, and JC is the photolysis rate inside the converter. The residence time from the inlet to the entry of the converter has been 2.3 s since 2015, and the time the air is in each of the converters is 1.0 s (with and without the converter on). The O3 mixing ratio measured at the CVAO varied between 5 and 60 ppb (with an uncertainty of 0.07 ppb) between 2014 and 2019. The ozone correction is calculated for each hour using a rate coefficient of 1.8 × 10−14 cm3 molecule−1 s−1 at 298K (Atkinson et al., 2004). This gives an average O3 correction ±2σ of 6.8 ± 3.0 %, 1.7 ± 11.0 %, and 1.3 ± 7.1 % for NO, NO2 BLC, and NO2 PLC, respectively, when the mixing ratio measured is above 0.1 ppt (See Supplement for an example of the calculation). Thus, at the low mixing ratios of O3 present at Cabo Verde and the short residence time for sampling, the corrections for O3 are well within the noise of the measurements (see below) but are still included in the final calculated mixing ratios.

4 Uncertainty analysis

To be able to evaluate the NOx measurements made at the CVAO an extensive uncertainty analysis is performed. A summary of the analysis can be found in Table 2, and a detailed description is given in the Supplement. The hourly precision and uncertainty of the instrument are estimated to characterize the uncertainties at the 95 % confidence interval (Bell, 2001). The hourly precision is estimated from the zero count variability, which is directly related to the photon-counting precision of the PMT. The uncertainty of the hourly measurements is estimated by combining all the uncertainties associated with the measurements. This includes uncertainties in the calibrations, artefact determinations, and O3 corrections, as well as the precision of the instrument. The precision of the NO and NO2 measurements are both included in the total uncertainty of the NO2 measurements as the NO measurements are subtracted from the NO2 measurements. Each term is converted into ppt to be able to combine them using error propagation.

Table 2Calculated uncertainties associated with the NOx measurements. The values in bold are the combined uncertainties for each type of measurement. Each uncertainty is given as the mean uncertainty ±2 standard deviations of the data between January 2014 and August 2019 for NO and from March 2017 to August 2019 for both NO2 measurements.

a The individual uncertainties associated with the calibration can be found in Table S1. b The individual uncertainties associated with the artefact determination can be found in Table S2.

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

The 2σ precision for hourly averaged NO data between January 2014 and August 2019 is 1.0 ± 0.9 ppt. The hourly precisions reported here are in good agreement with our previously reported 1σ precision of the instrument of 0.30 ppt (Reed et al., 2017) and the 2σ precision of 0.6–1.7 ppt (Lee et al., 2009). The NO2 precisions are determined by taking the conversion efficiency of the respective converters into account. The hourly 2σ precision for hourly averaged NO2 data between March 2017 and August 2019 becomes 1.5 ± 0.8 and 2.7 ± 2.2 ppt for the BLC and PLC, respectively. The determined NO2 precisions are within the interval of previously reported precisions for the same instrument (Lee et al., 2009; Reed et al., 2017).

Figure 5Panel (a) shows the time series for filtered O3-corrected NO from 1 August 2017 to 31 July 2018. Panels (b), (c), and (d) zoom in on October 2017, December 2017, and April 2018, respectively. Panels (e), (f), and (g) show the average diurnal of NO for October 2017, December 2017, and April 2018, respectively, with the coloured areas being ±2 standard errors. If there are fewer than 15 measurements available for the hour, it is not included in the diurnal.


Figure 6Panel (a) shows the time series of filtered O3-corrected NO2 from 1 August 2017 to 31 July 2018 for the BLC (black) and PLC (red). Panels (b), (c), and (d) zoom in on October 2017, December 2017, and April 2018, respectively, with the red line being the PLC and the black line the BLC. Panels (e), (f), and (g) show the average diurnal of NO2 for October 2017, December 2017, and April 2018, respectively, with the red line being the PLC, the black line being the BLC, and the coloured areas being ±2 standard errors. If there are fewer than 15 measurements available for the hour, it is not included in the diurnal.


The total hourly uncertainty for each of the three measurements are determined by combining all the uncertainties described using propagation of uncertainties. The precisions are already calculated as hourly precisions in ppt. The calibration uncertainties are interpolated between each calibration and multiplied by the hourly mixing ratios of NO and NO2 to calculate hourly uncertainties in ppt. The artefact uncertainties are interpolated between each artefact determination, and the uncertainty due to ozone corrections is determined by multiplying the percentage uncertainties by the hourly mixing ratios of NO and NO2. The hourly uncertainties are determined to be 1.4 ± 1.5, 8.4 ± 7.5, and 4.4 ± 5.8 ppt for NO, NO2 BLC, and NO2 PLC, respectively.

5 Results: examples of data

The first year of data (1 August 2017 to 31 July 2018) is chosen as an example of the resulting NO and NO2 data sets. October 2017, December 2017, and April 2018 are used to highlight the seasonality in the mixing ratios observed during a year of measurements. Figures 5a and 6a show the full O3-corrected time series for NO and NO2, respectively. Figures 5b–d and 6b–d show the time series for the 3 chosen months, and Figs. 5e–g and 6e–g show the 3 h rolling average diurnals for the same months. Monthly diurnals for NO and NO2 for the entire year can be found in Figs. S9 and S10, respectively.

Figure 7The BLC NO2 mixing ratio is plotted against the PLC NO2 mixing ratio. The dashed black line shows the one-to-one relationship. The red line is the linear least-squares regression of the hourly data with uncertainty in the y axis, and the blue line is the orthogonal distance regression with uncertainties in both the x and y axes.


Figure 8Back trajectories estimated for October 2017, December 2017, and April 2018. FLEXPART version 10.4 is used in backwards mode, driven by pressure level data from Global Forecast System (GFS) reanalyses at 0.5× 0.5 resolution (Pisso et al., 2019; Stohl et al., 1998). The 10 d back-trajectory simulations are initialized every 6 h, releasing 1000 particles from the CVAO site.

Figure 9Panel (a) shows the time series for total NOx (NO + NO2 PLC) from 1 August 2017 to 31 July 2018. Panels (b), (c), and (d) zoom in on October 2017, December 2017, and April 2018, respectively. Panels (e), (f), and (g) show the average diurnal of NOx for October 2017, December 2017, and April 2018, respectively, with the coloured areas being ±2 standard errors. If there are fewer than 15 measurements available for the hour, it is not included in the diurnal.


Clear seasonality can be observed in the diurnal cycles of NO measurements with a maximum of  10 ppt in winter and a minimum of  2 ppt in the spring and summer. This is in good agreement with that reported for previous years (Lee et al., 2009; Reed et al., 2017). The two NO2 measurements are in general in good agreement when looking at the time series in Fig. 6. Offsets of up to 10 ppt between the two measurements can be seen over some time periods (e.g. April, Fig. 6d), which are most likely caused by the calculated BLC artefact for those periods either being too high or too low. This is supported by the diurnals having the same shape but with an offset. Monthly diurnals of the two NO2 measurements agree within 2 standard errors, except in August 2017, where the offset between the two measurements is larger than for the remaining months. NO2 shows a fairly flat diurnal signal, although a small increase in daytime NO2 is evident in some months, which is in agreement with that reported for previous years (Lee et al., 2009; Reed et al., 2017). Spikes in the early morning are noticeable in the NO2 diurnals for July–November, which correspond to the months with an average lower wind speed than the rest of the year (the diurnal for April also shows a spike; however, it is caused by data from one morning). These spikes could be caused by local fishing boats passing upwind of the observatory in the morning hours, which will give a more prominent spike at low wind speed. Monthly wind speed diurnals can be found in Fig. S11. The good agreement between the two NO2 measurements observed in Fig. 6 can also be observed in Fig. 7, where the two are plotted against each other. The data points are scattered around the 1 : 1 line shown in black. A linear least-squares regression (with uncertainty in the BLC measurements) and an orthogonal distance regression (ODR) (with uncertainty in both measurements) are performed to evaluate the scatter of the data points between August 2017 and 2019. The resulting regression lines are displayed in red (BLC = 0.99 × PLC + 0.7 ppt) and blue (BLC = 1.08 × PLC  0.6 ppt). The deviation in the slope from 1 for both regressions are consistent with the uncertainty in the measured NO2 artefact, which has been determined to be 7.2 ± 7.2 ppt.

The seasonality of the NO measurements can be explained by a combination of the variation of the origin of the air masses arriving at the CVAO, meteorology, photolysis rates, and seasonality of emissions. Back trajectories of the 3 months used as examples are shown in Fig. 8. FLEXPART version 10.4 is used in backwards mode, driven by pressure level data from Global Forecast System (GFS) reanalyses at 0.5× 0.5 resolution (Pisso et al., 2019; Stohl et al., 1998). The 10 d back-trajectory simulations are initialized every 6 h, releasing 1000 particles from the CVAO site. Further information on FLEXPART can be found in the Supplement. During the winter maximum (December) the back trajectories indicate that the air reaching CVAO is largely dominated by African air, compared to during the spring minimum (April), which is dominated by Atlantic marine air. Large West African cities such as Dakar and Nouakchott and/or the shipping lanes to the east–northeast of Cabo Verde are potential candidates for the source of elevated NOx. The NO mixing ratios measured in October are higher than those in April and lower than in December. This may be due in part to the influence of polluted African air arriving at Cabo Verde, which is more prominent in October than in April but less so than in December. The NO2 and the total NOx (NO + PLC NO2, Fig. 9) similarly show higher levels in December than April, but the mixing ratios observed in October are similar to those in April. It should be noted that some of the days with high percentages of African air have missing data or wind directions from other places than the northeast.

Table 3NO, NO2, and NOx mixing ratios at different low NOx sites.

a Measurements made during the SOAPEX (Southern Ocean Atmospheric Photochemistry EXperiment) campaign during austral summer in 1995. b Measurements from the Soviet-American Gases and Aerosols (SAGA) campaign between Hawaii and American Samoa between February and March. c Measurements from 6 clean days on the Atlantic Stratocumulus Transition Experiment (ASTEX). d Measurements from the World Ocean Circulation Experiment (WOCE) between South Africa and Sri Lanka. e Measurements made during 24 h darkness and in spring. f Measurements made from January–March 1997 at the German Antarctic research station, Neumayer. g Measurements made during the Mauna Loa Observatory Photochemistry Experiment (MLOPEX) in May 1988. h Measurements made at Mount Pico between July 2002 and August 2005. i Measurements made in the upper marine boundary layer from 13 flights between California and west of Hawaii. j Measurements made at the Ny-Ålesund Zeppelin mountain station on Svalbard during a spring campaign in 1994. k Daytime values.

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

From Table 3 it can be observed that the NO, NO2, and NOx measurements at the CVAO compare well to the few other measurements in the remote marine boundary layer as well as background sites in Alert, Canada, and measurements in the free troposphere. A wintertime seasonal increase in NO, NO2, and NOx can be observed during December–February, which corresponds to the months when surface air masses arrive at Cabo Verde from western Africa (Carpenter et al., 2010; Lee et al., 2009).

6 Conclusion

NO2 was measured at a remote marine site by photolytic conversion to NO followed by chemiluminescence detection, using two different methods for conversion. A photolytic NO2 converter with external diodes and a quartz photolysis cell (PLC) have been installed at the Cape Verde Atmospheric Observatory, and the NO2 measurements have been compared to those of the historical BLC used at the site, which has internal diodes and a reaction chamber made of Teflon-like barium-doped material. The two measurements show good agreement (BLC = 0.99 × PLC + 0.7 ppt, linear least-squares analysis) with small differences due to uncertainties in the estimations of the BLC NO2 artefact. Even though the PLC has a lower conversion efficiency (CE = 52 ± 4 %) than the BLC (CE = 85 ± 4 %), it is preferred due to its assumed negligible artefact as a consequence of having non-porous and non-reactive walls. The assumption of a zero artefact causes the hourly uncertainty of the NO2 measurements to be roughly halved. With 2σ hourly precisions of 1.0 ± 0.9, 1.5 ± 0.8, and 2.7 ± 2.2 ppt and 2σ hourly uncertainties of 1.4 ± 1.5, 8.4 ± 7.5, and 4.4 ± 5.8 ppt for NO, NO2 BLC, and NO2 PLC, respectively, the instrument has a high repeatability and low uncertainties for all the measurements. The mixing ratios observed at the CVAO (NO: 2–10 ppt; NO2: 5–50 ppt; and NOx: 7–60 ppt at midday) are in good agreement with previous measurements at the CVAO as well as other remote measurements around the world.

Data availability

The processed data is available through Ebas (, Andersen, 2021).


The supplement related to this article is available online at:

Author contributions

LN and KAR run the instrument and site on a day-to-day basis. MW and STA wrote the script processing the data. MJR ran the back-trajectory analysis. BSN developed the photolytic converter setup. All authors were involved in the analysis, data evaluation, and discussion of the results. STA, LJC, JDL, and CR wrote the paper with contributions from all coauthors. All coauthors proofread and commented on the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


The authors would like to thank Franz Rohrer (Forschungzentrum Jülich) and Tomás Sherwen (University of York) for scientific discussions.

Financial support

This research has been supported by the UK National Environment Research Council/National Centre for Atmospheric Science (NERC/NCAS) (grant no. NE/S000518/1). Simone T. Andersen's PhD was funded through the NERC SPHERES Doctoral Training Partnership and the University of York.

Review statement

This paper was edited by Hendrik Fuchs and reviewed by two anonymous referees.


Alam, M. S., Crilley, L. R., Lee, J. D., Kramer, L. J., Pfrang, C., Vázquez-Moreno, M., Ródenas, M., Muñoz, A., and Bloss, W. J.: Interference from alkenes in chemiluminescent NOx measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 5977–5991,, 2020. 

Andersen, S. T.: NOx measurements at the CVAO, EBAS, available at:, last access: 18 February 2021. 

Atkinson, R.: Atmospheric chemistry of VOCs and NOx, Atmos. Environ., 34, 2063–2101,, 2000. 

Atkinson, R., Baulch, D. L., Cox, R. A., Crowley, J. N., Hampson, R. F., Hynes, R. G., Jenkin, M. E., Rossi, M. J., and Troe, J.: Evaluated kinetic and photochemical data for atmospheric chemistry: Volume I - gas phase reactions of Ox, HOx, NOx and SOx species, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 1461–1738,, 2004. 

Buhr, M. P.: Solid-state light source photolytic nitrogen dioxide converter, US 7238328 B2, USA, USPTO, available at: (last access: 18 February 2021), 2007. 

Beine, H. J., Engardt, M., Jaffe, D. A., Hov, Ø., Holmén, K., and Stordal, F.: Measurements of NOx and aerosol particles at the NY-Ålesund Zeppelin mountain station on Svalbard: Influence of regional and local pollution sources, Atmos. Environ., 30, 1067–1079,, 1996. 

Beine, H. J., Honrath, R. E., Dominé, F., Simpson, W. R., and Fuentes, J. D.: NOx during background and ozone depletion periods at Alert: Fluxes above the snow surface, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, 7–12,, 2002. 

Bell, S.: A Beginner's Guide to Uncertainty of Measurement, National Physical Laboratory (NPL), Teddington, Middlesex, United Kingdom, 43 pp., 2001. 

Berkes, F., Houben, N., Bundke, U., Franke, H., Pätz, H.-W., Rohrer, F., Wahner, A., and Petzold, A.: The IAGOS NOx instrument – design, operation and first results from deployment aboard passenger aircraft, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 3737–3757,, 2018. 

Carpenter, L. J., Fleming, Z. L., Read, K. A., Lee, J. D., Moller, S. J., Hopkins, J. R., Purvis, R. M., Lewis, A. C., Müller, K., Heinold, B., Herrmann, H., Fomba, K. W., van Pinxteren, D., Müller, C., Tegen, I., Wiedensohler, A., Müller, T., Niedermeier, N., Achterberg, E. P., Patey, M. D., Kozlova, E. A., Heimann, M., Heard, D. E., Plane, J. M. C., Mahajan, A., Oetjen, H., Ingham, T., Stone, D., Whalley, L. K., Evans, M. J., Pilling, M. J., Leigh, R. J., Monks, P. S., Karunaharan, A., Vaughan, S., Arnold, S. R., Tschritter, J., Pöhler, D., Frieß, U., Holla, R., Mendes, L. M., Lopez, H., Faria, B., Manning, A. J., and Wallace, D. W. R.: Seasonal characteristics of tropical marine boundary layer air measured at the Cape Verde Atmospheric Observatory, J. Atmos. Chem., 67, 87–140,, 2010. 

Carroll, M. A., Ridley, B. A., Montzka, D. D., Hubler, G., Walega, J. G., Norton, R. B., Huebert, B. J., and Grahek, F. E.: Measurements of nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide during the Mauna Loa Observatory Photochemistry Experiment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 97, 10361–10374,, 1992. 

Carsey, T. P., Churchill, D. D., Farmer, M. L., Fischer, C. J., Pszenny, A. A., Ross, V. B., Saltzman, E. S., Springer-Young, M., and Bonsang, B.: Nitrogen oxides and ozone production in the North Atlantic marine boundary layer, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102, 10653–10665,, 1997. 

Carslaw, D. C.: Evidence of an increasing NO2/ NOx emissions ratio from road traffic emissions, Atmos. Environ., 39, 4793–4802,, 2005. 

Chiapello, I., Bergametti, G., Gomes, L., Chatenet, B., Dulac, F., Pimenta, J., and Suares, E. S.: An additional low layer transport of Sahelian and Saharan dust over the north-eastern Tropical Atlantic, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 3191–3194,, 1995. 

Clough, P. and Thrush, B. A.: Mechanism of chemiluminescent reaction between nitric oxide and ozone, T. Faraday Soc., 63, 915–925, 1967. 

Clyne, M. A. A., Thrush, B. A., and Wayne, R. P.: Kinetics of the chemiluminescent reaction between nitric oxide and ozone, T. Faraday Soc., 60, 359–370,, 1964. 

Drummond, J. W., Volz, A., and Ehhalt, D. H.: An optimized chemiluminescence detector for tropospheric NO measurements, J. Atmos. Chem., 2, 287–306, 1985. 

Dunlea, E. J., Herndon, S. C., Nelson, D. D., Volkamer, R. M., San Martini, F., Sheehy, P. M., Zahniser, M. S., Shorter, J. H., Wormhoudt, J. C., Lamb, B. K., Allwine, E. J., Gaffney, J. S., Marley, N. A., Grutter, M., Marquez, C., Blanco, S., Cardenas, B., Retama, A., Ramos Villegas, C. R., Kolb, C. E., Molina, L. T., and Molina, M. J.: Evaluation of nitrogen dioxide chemiluminescence monitors in a polluted urban environment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 2691–2704,, 2007. 

Finlayson, B. J., Pitts, J. N., and Atkinson, R.: Low-pressure gas-phase ozone-olefin reactions, Chemiluminescence, kinetics, and mechanisms, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 96, 5356–5367,, 1974. 

Fomba, K. W., Müller, K., van Pinxteren, D., Poulain, L., van Pinxteren, M., and Herrmann, H.: Long-term chemical characterization of tropical and marine aerosols at the Cape Verde Atmospheric Observatory (CVAO) from 2007 to 2011, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 8883–8904,, 2014. 

Fontijn, A., Sabadell, A. J., and Ronco, R. J.: Homogeneous chemiluminescent measurement of nitric oxide with ozone, Implications for continuous selective monitoring of gaseous air pollutants, Anal. Chem., 42, 575–579, 1970. 

Galbally, I. E.: Nitrogen Oxides (NO, NO2, NOy) measurements at Cape Grim: A technical manual, CSIRO, Australia, 119 pp.,, 2020. 

Gilge, S., Plass-Dülmer, C., Rohrer, F., Steinbacher, M., Fjaeraa, A. M., Lagler, F., and Walden, J.: WP4-NA4: Trace gases networking: Volatile organic carbon and nitrogen oxides Deliverable D4.10: Standardized operating procedures (SOPs) for NOxy measurements, ACTRIS, 22 pp., available at: (last access: 16 April 2021), 2014. 

Grosjean, D. and Harrison, J.: Response of chemiluminescence NOx analyzers and ultraviolet ozone analyzers to organic air pollutants, Environ. Sci. Technol., 19, 862–865,, 1985. 

Jaeglé, L., Jacob, D. J., Brune, W. H., Tan, D., Faloona, I. C., Weinheimer, A. J., Ridley, B. A., Campos, T. L., and Sachse, G. W.: Sources of HOx and production of ozone in the upper troposphere over the United States, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 1709–1712,, 1998. 

Jones, A. E., Weller, R., Minikin, A., Wolff, E. W., Sturges, W. T., McIntyre, H. P., Leonard, S. R., Schrems, O., and Bauguitte, S.: Oxidized nitrogen chemistry and speciation in the Antarctic troposphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 21355–21366,, 1999. 

Kley, D. and McFarland, M.: Chemiluminescence detector for NO and NO2, Atmos. Technol., 12, 63–69, 1980. 

Lee, J. D., Moller, S. J., Read, K. A., Lewis, A. C., Mendes, L., and Carpenter, L. J.: Year-round measurements of nitrogen oxides and ozone in the tropical North Atlantic marine boundary layer, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D21302,, 2009. 

Logan, J. A.: Tropospheric ozone: Seasonal behavior, trends, and anthropogenic influence, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 10463–10482,, 1985. 

Matthews, R. D., Sawyer, R. F., and Schefer, R. W.: Interferences in chemiluminescent measurement of nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide emissions from combustion systems, Environ. Sci. Technol., 11, 1092–1096,, 1977. 

Mazzeo, N. A., Venegas, L. E., and Choren, H.: Analysis of NO, NO2, O3 and NOx concentrations measured at a green area of Buenos Aires City during wintertime, Atmos. Environ., 39, 3055–3068,, 2005. 

Monks, P. S., Carpenter, L. J., Penkett, S. A., Ayers, G. P., Gillett, R. W., Galbally, I. E., and Meyer, C. P.: Fundamental ozone photochemistry in the remote marine boundary layer: the soapex experiment, measurement and theory, Atmos. Environ., 32, 3647–3664,, 1998. 

Pandey, S. K., Kim, K.-H., Chung, S.-Y., Cho, S. J., Kim, M. Y., and Shon, Z.-H.: Long-term study of NOx behavior at urban roadside and background locations in Seoul, Korea, Atmos. Environ., 42, 607–622,, 2008. 

Peterson, M. C. and Honrath, R. E.: NOx and NOy over the northwestern North Atlantic: Measurements and measurement accuracy, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 11695–11707, 1999. 

Pisso, I., Sollum, E., Grythe, H., Kristiansen, N. I., Cassiani, M., Eckhardt, S., Arnold, D., Morton, D., Thompson, R. L., Groot Zwaaftink, C. D., Evangeliou, N., Sodemann, H., Haimberger, L., Henne, S., Brunner, D., Burkhart, J. F., Fouilloux, A., Brioude, J., Philipp, A., Seibert, P., and Stohl, A.: The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 10.4, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4955–4997,, 2019. 

Pollack, I. B., Lerner, B. M., and Ryerson, T. B.: Evaluation of ultraviolet light-emitting diodes for detection of atmospheric NO2 by photolysis – chemiluminescence, J. Atmos. Chem., 65, 111–125,, 2010. 

Read, K. A., Mahajan, A. S., Carpenter, L. J., Evans, M. J., Faria, B. V. E., Heard, D. E., Hopkins, J. R., Lee, J. D., Moller, S. J., Lewis, A. C., Mendes, L., McQuaid, J. B., Oetjen, H., Saiz-Lopez, A., Pilling, M. J., and Plane, J. M. C.: Extensive halogen-mediated ozone destruction over the tropical Atlantic Ocean, Nature, 453, 1232–1235,, 2008. 

Reed, C., Evans, M. J., Di Carlo, P., Lee, J. D., and Carpenter, L. J.: Interferences in photolytic NO2 measurements: explanation for an apparent missing oxidant?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4707–4724,, 2016. 

Reed, C., Evans, M. J., Crilley, L. R., Bloss, W. J., Sherwen, T., Read, K. A., Lee, J. D., and Carpenter, L. J.: Evidence for renoxification in the tropical marine boundary layer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 4081–4092,, 2017. 

Rhoads, K. P., Kelley, P., Dickerson, R. R., Carsey, T. P., Farmer, M., Savoie, D. L., and Prospero, J. M.: Composition of the troposphere over the Indian Ocean during the monsoonal transition, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102, 18981–18995,, 1997. 

Ridley, B. A. and Grahek, F. E.: A Small, Low Flow, High Sensitivity Reaction Vessel for NO Chemiluminescence Detectors, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 7, 307–311,<0307:Aslfhs>2.0.Co;2, 1990. 

Ridley, B. A., Carroll, M. A., and Gregory, G. L.: Measurements of nitric oxide in the boundary layer and free troposphere over the Pacific Ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 92, 2025–2047,, 1987. 

Ridley, B. A., Grahek, F. E., and Walega, J. G.: A Small High-Sensitivity, Medium-Response Ozone Detector Suitable for Measurements from Light Aircraft, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 9, 142–148,<0142:Ashsmr>2.0.Co;2, 1992. 

Rijkenberg, M. J. A., Powell, C. F., Dall'Osto, M., Nielsdottir, M. C., Patey, M. D., Hill, P. G., Baker, A. R., Jickells, T. D., Harrison, R. M., and Achterberg, E. P.: Changes in iron speciation following a Saharan dust event in the tropical North Atlantic Ocean, Mar. Chem., 110, 56–67,, 2008. 

Ryall, D. B., Derwent, R. G., Manning, A. J., Simmonds, P., and O'Doherty, S.: Estimating source regions of European emissions of trace gases from observations at Mace Head, Atmos. Environ., 35, 2507–2523,, 2001. 

Ryerson, T. B., Williams, E. J., and Fehsenfeld, F. C.: An efficient photolysis system for fast-response NO2 measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 26447–26461,, 2000. 

Stohl, A., Hittenberger, M., and Wotawa, G.: Validation of the lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART against large-scale tracer experiment data, Atmos. Environ., 32, 4245–4264,, 1998. 

Torres, A. L. and Thompson, A. M.: Nitric oxide in the equatorial Pacific boundary layer: SAGA 3 measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 98, 16949–16954,, 1993. 

Val Martin, M., Honrath, R., Owen, R. C., Pfister, G., Fialho, P., and Barata, F.: Significant enhancements of nitrogen oxides, black carbon, and ozone in the North Atlantic lower free troposphere resulting from North American boreal wildfires, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D23S60,, 2006. 

Val Martin, M., Honrath, R. E., Owen, R. C., and Li, Q. B.: Seasonal variation of nitrogen oxides in the central North Atlantic lower free troposphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D17307,, 2008. 

Winer, A. M., Peters, J. W., Smith, J. P., and Pitts, J. N.: Response of commercial chemiluminescent nitric oxide-nitrogen dioxide analyzers to other nitrogen-containing compounds, Environ. Sci. Technol., 8, 1118–1121,, 1974. 

Short summary
NOx has been measured in remote marine air via chemiluminescence detection using two different methods for NO2 to NO photolytic conversion: (a) internal diodes and a reaction chamber made of Teflon-like barium-doped material, which causes a NO2 artefact, and (b) external diodes and a quartz photolysis cell. Once corrections are made for the artefact of (a), the two converters are shown to give comparable NO2 mixing ratios, giving confidence in the quantitative measurement of NOx at low levels.