Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
AMT
Articles | Volume 14, issue 5
Articles | Volume 14, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3217-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3217-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 14, issue 5
Research article
 | 
03 May 2021
Research article |  | 03 May 2021

Intercomparison of thermal–optical carbon measurements by Sunset and Desert Research Institute (DRI) analyzers using the IMPROVE_A protocol

Xiaolu Zhang, Krystyna Trzepla, Warren White, Sean Raffuse, and Nicole Pauly Hyslop

Viewed

Total article views: 3,228 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,158 993 77 3,228 81 112
  • HTML: 2,158
  • PDF: 993
  • XML: 77
  • Total: 3,228
  • BibTeX: 81
  • EndNote: 112
Views and downloads (calculated since 30 Nov 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 30 Nov 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,228 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,092 with geography defined and 136 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 26 Oct 2025
Download
Short summary
Three models of carbon analyzer were used in the past decade to measure carbonaceous particles from samples collected within the Chemical Speciation Network. This study compares results from these analyzer models to investigate the impact on long-term data from instrument differences. Good agreement was found among the three models for total carbon, organic carbon, and elemental carbon, while the reasons for and implications of some notable differences in their subtractions are investigated.
Read more
Share