Articles | Volume 14, issue 5
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 3631–3655, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3631-2021
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 3631–3655, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3631-2021
Research article
20 May 2021
Research article | 20 May 2021

The importance of size ranges in aerosol instrument intercomparisons: a case study for the Atmospheric Tomography Mission

Hongyu Guo et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 2,312 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,519 764 29 2,312 286 34 58
  • HTML: 1,519
  • PDF: 764
  • XML: 29
  • Total: 2,312
  • Supplement: 286
  • BibTeX: 34
  • EndNote: 58
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Jun 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Jun 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,312 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,314 with geography defined and -2 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 31 Jan 2023
Download
Short summary
We utilize a set of high-quality datasets collected during the NASA Atmospheric Tomography Mission to investigate the impact of differences in observable particle sizes across aerosol instruments in aerosol measurement comparisons. Very good agreement was found between chemically and physically derived submicron aerosol volume. Results support a lack of significant unknown biases in the response of an Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS) when sampling remote aerosols across the globe.