Articles | Volume 14, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3631-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3631-2021
Research article
 | 
20 May 2021
Research article |  | 20 May 2021

The importance of size ranges in aerosol instrument intercomparisons: a case study for the Atmospheric Tomography Mission

Hongyu Guo, Pedro Campuzano-Jost, Benjamin A. Nault, Douglas A. Day, Jason C. Schroder, Dongwook Kim, Jack E. Dibb, Maximilian Dollner, Bernadett Weinzierl, and Jose L. Jimenez

Viewed

Total article views: 3,337 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,195 1,084 58 3,337 441 65 101
  • HTML: 2,195
  • PDF: 1,084
  • XML: 58
  • Total: 3,337
  • Supplement: 441
  • BibTeX: 65
  • EndNote: 101
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Jun 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Jun 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,337 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,335 with geography defined and 2 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
We utilize a set of high-quality datasets collected during the NASA Atmospheric Tomography Mission to investigate the impact of differences in observable particle sizes across aerosol instruments in aerosol measurement comparisons. Very good agreement was found between chemically and physically derived submicron aerosol volume. Results support a lack of significant unknown biases in the response of an Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS) when sampling remote aerosols across the globe.