Articles | Volume 14, issue 1
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 557–566, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-557-2021
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 557–566, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-557-2021

Research article 26 Jan 2021

Research article | 26 Jan 2021

Accounting for the photochemical variation in stratospheric NO2 in the SAGE III/ISS solar occultation retrieval

Accounting for the photochemical variation in stratospheric NO2 in the SAGE III/ISS solar occultation retrieval
Kimberlee Dubé1, Adam Bourassa1, Daniel Zawada1, Douglas Degenstein1, Robert Damadeo2, David Flittner2, and William Randel3 Kimberlee Dubé et al.
  • 1Institute of Space and Atmospheric Studies, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan, Canada
  • 2NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA
  • 3National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA

Correspondence: Kimberlee Dubé (kimberlee.dube@usask.ca)

Abstract

The Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment (SAGE) III has been operating on the International Space Station (ISS) since mid-2017. Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) number density profiles are routinely retrieved from SAGE III/ISS solar occultation measurements in the middle atmosphere. Although NO2 density varies throughout the day due to photochemistry, the standard SAGE NO2 retrieval algorithm neglects these variations along the instrument's line of sight by assuming that the number density has a constant gradient within a given vertical layer of the atmosphere. This assumption will result in a retrieval bias for a species like NO2 that changes rapidly across the terminator. In this work we account for diurnal variations in retrievals of NO2 from the SAGE III/ISS measurements, and we determine the impact of this algorithm improvement on the resulting NO2 number densities. The first step in applying the diurnal correction is to use publicly available SAGE III/ISS products to convert the retrieved number density profiles to optical depth profiles. The retrieval is then re-performed with a new matrix that applies photochemical scale factors for each point along the line of sight according to the changing solar zenith angle. In general NO2 that is retrieved by accounting for these diurnal variations is more than 10 % lower than the standard algorithm below 30 km. This effect is greatest in winter at high latitudes and generally greater for sunrise occultations than sunset. Comparisons with coincident profiles from the Optical Spectrograph and InfraRed Imager System (OSIRIS) show that NO2 from SAGE III/ISS is generally biased high; however the agreement improves by up to 20 % in the mid-stratosphere when diurnal variations are accounted for in the retrieval. We conclude that diurnal variations along the SAGE III/ISS line of sight are an important term to consider for NO2 analyses at altitudes below 30 km.

1 Introduction

The Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment (SAGE) III on the International Space Station (ISS) uses solar occultation to measure the attenuation of sunlight through the middle atmosphere (Cisewski et al.2014). These measurements are used to retrieve vertical profiles of nitrogen dioxide (NO2), as well as other atmospheric constituents, mainly ozone and aerosol extinction coefficients. The SAGE III/ISS data complement that from the earlier SAGE II (McCormick1987) and SAGE III/Meteor-3M missions (Mauldin III et al.1998), as well as data from limb-viewing instruments such as the Optical Spectrograph and Infrared Imager System (OSIRIS; Llewellyn et al.2004), to provide a long-term record of NO2. It is important to have these data sets for understanding trends and variability in the stratosphere as NO2 plays a role in the chemical depletion of the ozone layer. Several studies of the long-term trends and variability in NO2 (Randel et al.1999; Liley et al.2000; Park et al.2017; Galytska et al.2019; Dubé et al.2020) have shown a consistent increase in NO2 and an associated decrease in O3.

NO2 is mainly destroyed by photolysis so the concentration, or density, of NO2 that is measured depends greatly on the position of the sun: there is a rapid decrease in NO2 at sunrise and a rapid increase at sunset. During solar occultation measurements, such as those taken by SAGE III/ISS, the solar zenith angle (SZA) is 90 at the tangent point but varies along the instrument's line of sight (LOS). The retrieved NO2 profile has contributions from the full LOS, so it includes contributions from both the day and night sides of the Earth, which can have substantially different amounts of NO2. The existing SAGE III/ISS retrieval neglects variations in SZA along the LOS by assuming the concentration of NO2 has a constant gradient at each altitude above the Earth's surface (SAGE III Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document2002). This is a source of systematic uncertainty in the retrieved NO2 that has not been quantified for SAGE III/ISS.

There have been several earlier cases in which diurnal variations were accounted for in NO2 retrievals, for both space- (e.g. Gordley et al.1996) and ground-based instruments (e.g. Preston et al.1997; Hendrick et al.2004). Studies focused on occultation instruments have examined the effect of the variation in SZA along the LOS on retrieved NO2 profiles and showed that ignoring it can result in a high bias, especially below 25 km (Gordley et al.1996; Newchurch et al.1996; Brohede et al.2007). The purpose of this work is to account for diurnal variations along the LOS, assess the impact, and provide an improved SAGE III/ISS NO2 data set for further study. This is done by adding correction factors to the retrieval that account for variations in NO2 due to changing solar zenith angle along the LOS. By comparing the NO2 concentration from this improved retrieval to that from the existing SAGE III/ISS retrieval, it is possible to determine the importance of the photochemical effect. The results are also compared to NO2 retrievals from OSIRIS limb scattering measurements to determine how the photochemical correction changes the bias between NO2 products from the two different instruments.

2NO2 photochemistry

The NO2 number density depends on local solar time (LST) and equivalently SZA (Fig. 1). There is a sharp decrease in the NO2 concentration at sunrise as NO2 is photolyzed to become NO. Throughout the daylight hours NO2 and NO are in approximate equilibrium. At sunset NO production ceases, resulting in a rapid increase in NO2. Overnight NO2 decreases more slowly as it is converted to nitrogen-containing reservoir species. The exact shape of this diurnal cycle depends on altitude: the NO2 concentration at 40 km stays roughly constant during the day and night, while at altitudes with more NO2 there is a steady increase during the day and decrease at night.

https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/557/2021/amt-14-557-2021-f01

Figure 1Daily cycle in NO2 at the Equator as a function of local solar time (top axis) and solar zenith angle (bottom axis) for four altitudes. NO2 number density calculated with the PRATMO photochemical box model.

Download

The values in Fig. 1 were calculated with the photochemical box model originally developed by Prather and Jaffe (1990), which has been successively updated and is now often referred to as PRATMO (McLinden et al.2000; Adams et al.2017). PRATMO takes an input atmospheric state consisting of specified ozone, temperature, pressure, and air density profiles for a set latitude, longitude, and date. These input parameters are kept constant. The model then calculates a set of chemical reactions over a single day, iterating until the start and end values converge (Prather1992). This results in a 24 h steady-state system of each species in the model. The model outputs are the NO2 profiles at any predetermined SZAs. These values can be used to scale the measured NO2 to different solar times in order to account for variations in SZA along the measurement LOS (Sect. 4). PRATMO scaling was used in several previous studies (e.g. Adams et al.2017; Park et al.2017; Dubé et al.2020) to compare NO2 from instruments that measure at different times of day.

3 Instruments

3.1 SAGE III/ISS

SAGE III has been in orbit on the ISS since March 2017. Level 2 data are available from June 2017 onwards. The ISS has an inclination of 51.6, allowing SAGE III/ISS to view latitudes from 70 N to 70 S. The charge-coupled device (CCD) spectrometer is configurable and currently observes wavelengths between ∼280 and ∼1035 nm with a resolution of 1–2 nm. A separate photodiode covers ∼1542 nm ± 15 nm. During each occultation SAGE III/ISS continuously scans back and forth across the sun to measure the irradiance. There are 15 sunrise and 15 sunset events per day. The coverage of SAGE III/ISS is very similar to that of SAGE II. The sunrise and sunset measurements progress in opposing directions, with each requiring about 1 month to achieve near-global coverage.

The irradiances are used in the standard SAGE III/ISS retrieval (version 5.1,  SAGE III Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document2002) to determine the number density of several species, as well as the aerosol extinction at several wavelengths. The first step in the algorithm is to calculate slant path transmission profiles for each wavelength channel from the measured irradiance. Each slant path transmission profile is converted to a slant path optical depth profile that contains contributions from Rayleigh scattering, aerosol extinction, and absorption by at least one species. With this information NO2 and O3 slant path number density profiles are solved for simultaneously using multiple linear regression. NO2 is retrieved from channel S3, covering 433 to 450 nm. The slant path number density is converted to vertical number density profiles using a global fit method that assumes each layer of the atmosphere is a spherical shell with a constant gradient. The final NO2 number density is available from 10 to 45 km on a 0.5 km grid with a vertical resolution of about 1.5 km. The reported uncertainty in the SAGE III/ISS NO2 is around 5 % at 30 km and increases to up to 20 % at 10 and 40 km. This uncertainty is due to measurement noise only and does not account for systematic bias due to the horizontal homogeneity assumption.

3.2 OSIRIS

OSIRIS has been in sun-synchronous orbit on the Odin satellite since October 2001 (Murtagh et al.2002; Llewellyn et al.2004). There are 100 to 400 vertical profiles of limb-scattered solar irradiance measured each day, at wavelengths from 280 to 800 nm. NO2 is retrieved by spectral fitting in the wavelength range from 435 to 477 nm for altitudes from the cloud top to 39.5 km with a resolution of 2 km.

Earlier versions of the OSIRIS NO2 retrieval were developed by Haley et al. (2004), Bourassa et al. (2011), and Sioris et al. (2017). The most recent data, version 7.0, are used here for validation of SAGE III/ISS NO2. Version 7.0 improves upon version 6.0 by using solar Fraunhofer lines to fit the spectral point spread function of OSIRIS rather than using pre-flight calibration values. Cloud and aerosol discrimination is also refined to better detect cloudy scenes and to push the retrieval farther into the UTLS (upper troposphere–lower stratosphere) following the method of Rieger et al. (2019).

The OSIRIS LOS is approximately aligned with the terminator so the variation in SZA along the LOS is much smaller than for occultation instruments. McLinden et al. (2006) studied the effect of the diurnal error on NO2 from OSIRIS and found that it is only significant when the SZA is near 90 and the solar azimuth angle varies significantly from 90. These extreme conditions occurred in 16 % of profiles from 2004, resulting in errors of up to 35 % in the OSIRIS NO2 below 25 km. Sioris et al. (2017) used PRATMO to create a 2D OSIRIS NO2 retrieval to further assess the impact of diurnal variations on the results. They found minimally improved agreement between OSIRIS NO2 and NO2 from balloon measurements, particularly below 20 km. Owing to the minimal effect for OSIRIS, the standard NO2 data product is produced neglecting the NO2 photochemical gradient.

4 Retrieval

During each occultation SAGE III/ISS looks through multiple layers of the atmosphere, called shells. Each shell is defined by its altitude. Figure 2 illustrates this geometry. The black arrow represents the LOS, pointing from the instrument to the sun. The SZA at a given location is the angle between the dotted line and the LOS. At the tangent point this angle, θtan, is 90. For some other shell with an altitude n, the SZA θn is greater than 90 on the instrument side of the tangent point, as shown in the figure. For this same shell altitude the SZA is less than 90 on the sun side of the tangent point.

https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/557/2021/amt-14-557-2021-f02

Figure 2Geometry of a SAGE III occultation. The green semi-circle represents the Earth, and the blue semi-circles represent layers of the atmosphere. The angle θtan is the SZA at the tangent point, and the angle θn is the SZA angle for a shell at altitude n.

Download

The SAGE III/ISS retrieval assumes that the number density of each chemical constituent is either constant or has a constant gradient within a shell (SAGE III Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document2002). This assumption is generally valid for species such as ozone that undergo minimal diurnal variation in the stratosphere; however it is not true for NO2. This can be understood by considering Fig. 3. For both lines of sight in the figure the SZA at the tangent point is 90. To retrieve the NO2 concentration at the tangent point of a given LOS, we need to know the NO2 concentration at each shell altitude that the LOS passes through. For example, the retrieved NO2 at 22 km depends on the NO2 at 32 km. The NO2 at 32 km is retrieved at the tangent point, where the SZA is 90, but the 22 km line of sight passes through the 32 km shell when the SZA is around 86.8 on the near side of the tangent point and 93.2 on the far side (left panel of Fig. 3). The right panel of Fig. 3 shows that the NO2 concentration at 32 km and the two SZAs where the 22 km LOS passes through that shell are both different from the concentration when the SZA is 90. In addition, the NO2 does not change linearly across the terminator, so deviations from linearity on either side of the LOS do not cancel out. Therefore using the 32 km NO2 at 90 to retrieve the 22 km NO2 is inaccurate, and it cannot be assumed that the number density has a constant gradient across the terminator within a layer of the atmosphere when performing the retrieval. This lack of spherical homogeneity can be accounted for by adding factors to the retrieval that scale the NO2 according to SZA, at each location along the LOS.

https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/557/2021/amt-14-557-2021-f03

Figure 3(a) Change in SZA with shell altitude along two lines of sight for a simulated sunset occultation. (b) Change in NO2 at tangent altitudes of 22 and 32 km for the same simulated sunset occultation. The dark, dotted lines correspond to the lines of sight from (a).

Download

Ideally we would incorporate the scale factors by redoing the conversion of slant path optical depth, obtained directly from the solar transmission measurements, to number density. As the SAGE III/ISS NO2 optical depth profiles are not publicly available, we instead start by undoing the SAGE III/ISS retrieval to revert the number densities to optical depths. This is done using the matrix equation

(1) τ = σ X 0 n 0 ,

where τ is the vertical profile of slant path optical depths from NO2, σ is the NO2 cross section, and n0 is the number density profile. X0 is the path length matrix where each row represents a LOS for a particular tangent point altitude, and each column represents a different altitude through which the LOS passes. Each element of X0 is the path length distance between subsequent shells along the LOS. The path lengths on opposite sides of the tangent point are the same (i.e. the distance from shell 1 to 2 on the instrument side of the tangent point is the same as the distance from shell 1 to 2 on the sun side), which allows X0 to be written as an upper triangular matrix where values from opposite sides of the tangent point are added together.

These optical depths are used to find the number densities accounting for diurnal variations, ndv, using a new matrix, Xdv,

(2) n dv = σ - 1 X dv - 1 τ .

In this matrix each path length includes a factor, explained below, that depends on the SZA at that location. Note that the NO2 cross section is the same in both Eqs. (1) and (2) and so it cancels out when finding ndv. Although this is not strictly the case, using a constant cross section is a reasonable approximation as the cross section has a weak temperature and pressure dependence. The equations also assume that optical depth is constant within each layer of the atmosphere.

For a given SAGE III/ISS scan we know the date and time, the tangent point position, the spacecraft position, and the NO2 number density from the SAGE v5.1 retrieval. This information is all that is needed to construct X0. To build the matrix we iterate through each LOS, moving from the tangent point to the top of the atmosphere. The LOS is the vector from the satellite to the tangent point. The effect of refraction is neglected as it is small at the altitudes being considered.

The LOS for a particular tangent altitude intersects all of the shells above it. To find the scale factors for a given LOS, we first find the apparent local solar time at the midpoint of each path created by the intersection of that LOS with the shells. PRATMO is then run with input ozone, temperature, and pressure from the SAGE III/ISS Level 2 scan data. The model NO2 is computed at each calculated LST and at a SZA of 90, corresponding to the exact time of sunrise or sunset. For each shell altitude along the LOS, the scale factor is the PRATMO NO2 at that altitude (corresponding to the LST at that location) divided by the PRATMO NO2 at the tangent point altitude for that LOS (the scale factor is 1 for the shell containing the tangent point). There is no scaling done above 40 km as the low amount of NO2 can lead to unphysically large-scale factors, despite small absolute differences in NO2 along the LOS. The uncertainty in the SAGE III/ISS NO2 also becomes large above 40 km, and we want to prevent abnormal values from influencing the results at lower altitudes.

Figure 4 shows the photochemical scale factor matrix for a simulated event. The values in the figure are not multiplied by the path lengths. The matrix is created such that the scale factors from opposite sides of the tangent point need to be added together. This results in a scale factor that is equal to 1 along the diagonal, corresponding to unscaled values at the tangent point, and greater than 1 everywhere else. The scale factors increase as the path length component of the LOS gets further away from the tangent point.

https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/557/2021/amt-14-557-2021-f04

Figure 4Scale factor matrix for a sunset occultation at the Equator in March, simulated with PRATMO. The scale factors from either side of the tangent point are added together, resulting in an upper triangular matrix.

Download

It is also useful to look at the scale factor as a function of altitude along each LOS (Fig. 5). Lower lines of sight pass through more layers of the atmosphere, resulting in greater scale factors. For lines of sight below about 30 km the change in scale factor with altitude becomes non-linear. This is because the shape of the NO2 cycle across the terminator changes with altitude (right panel of Fig. 3). At higher altitudes the NO2 increases along the whole LOS; below about 30 km the NO2 starts to level out on the night side (the curve on either side of the terminator becomes different), changing the slope of the scale factor curves in Fig. 5.

https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/557/2021/amt-14-557-2021-f05

Figure 5Scale factors along each line of sight for a sunset occultation at the Equator in March, simulated with PRATMO.

Download

The scaled path length matrix, Xdv, is equal to the initial path length matrix, X0, where each element has been multiplied by the corresponding element from the scale factor matrix shown in Fig. 4. Xdv is used along with the calculated slant path optical depths in Eq. (2) to get the NO2 number density, accounting for diurnal variations. The resulting values of ndv will be smaller than the original retrieved values. This is because the gradient on the near side of the LOS is smaller than the gradient on the far side, resulting in scale factors greater than 1 and therefore lower NO2. Figure 6 shows the results for a sample SAGE III/ISS event. The left panel contains the optical depth profile, while the center panel compares the SAGE III/ISS NO2 number density with the diurnally varying number density, and the right panel shows the percent difference between the two number density profiles. For this SAGE III/ISS event the percent difference between the two profiles becomes greater as altitude decreases to 17 km. Below this point the difference starts to become smaller again.

https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/557/2021/amt-14-557-2021-f06

Figure 6(a) NO2 optical depth. (b) NO2 number density for both the diurnally varying and SAGE v5.1 retrievals. (c) Percent difference between the two number density profiles. Calculated for SAGE III/ISS event 967110.

Download

5 Results

The effect of accounting for diurnal variations on the retrieved SAGE III/ISS NO2 is quantified by the difference between the SAGE v5.1 retrieval and the diurnally varying retrieval (Fig. 7). In general the difference between the retrievals becomes greater than 20 % below 25 km, which is larger than the reported random uncertainty in the SAGE III/ISS NO2. Including the diurnal variations is more important in the winter at high latitudes; at these times the relative NO2 decrease at sunrise and increase at sunset are larger. The bias between the retrievals is not consistent between the sunrise and sunset NO2 due to the differences in NO2 chemistry at these times. This can be seen by looking at Fig. 1: the change in NO2 across the terminator has a different shape at sunrise than at sunset. Including diurnal variations along the LOS in the retrieval has a greater effect on sunrise than sunset above 25 km in the tropics and everywhere at higher latitudes.

https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/557/2021/amt-14-557-2021-f07

Figure 7Mean difference between the SAGE v5.1 and diurnally varying (dv) retrievals for SAGE III/ISS sunset and sunrise NO2. The error bars are the standard deviation. NO2 values more than 5 standard deviations from the mean are not included.

Download

The results presented in Fig. 7 are very similar to those in Brohede et al. (2007), where they estimated the magnitude of neglecting diurnal variations in NO2 for a simulated occultation instrument (not specific to SAGE II or III). They found that the bias increases rapidly below 25 km (below the peak in NO2 density) and is larger at low latitudes for sunset. They also found that at high latitudes the bias is largest near equinoxes, and sunrise values are slightly larger than sunset values. It was determined that this effect was enough to explain most of the difference between SAGE III/Meteor-3M and OSIRIS NO2 at low altitudes (although they did not actually apply the correction to the SAGE III/Meteor-3M data).

The magnitude of the photochemical effect is also similar to that used in the Halogen Occultation Experiment (HALOE;  Russell III et al.1993) retrieval. HALOE is one occultation instrument that does include diurnal effects in the retrieval (Gordley et al.1996). They use a factor based on results from the previous layer and a model that provides the NO2 mixing ratio as a function of SZA and season. This is less accurate than the scale factors used in the present study, which are modelled for each NO2 profile individually. The effect of the HALOE scaling is considered significant below 25 hPa ( 27 km). They also found the diurnal effect in sunrise to be 2–3 times larger than in sunset, which is greater than the difference between sunrise and sunset observed here for SAGE III/ISS.

Accounting for diurnal variations in the retrieval changes the SAGE III/ISS NO2 time series. This is shown in Fig. 8 for several latitude bins at 25.5 km. The sunset NO2 number density decreases by about 5 % to 20 %, with the largest decreases occurring in the tropics. The effect of the diurnal variations on the sunrise NO2 has a more pronounced seasonal cycle than sunset, with a greater decrease in the winter and a difference ranging from 5 % to 30 %. During winter months the diurnal effect is about 2 times greater at sunrise than at sunset, which is comparable to the difference reported for HALOE NO2 in Gordley et al. (1996). However during the summer the bias is similar for both sunrise and sunset. These variations in the time series should be considered when using the SAGE III/ISS NO2 data.

https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/557/2021/amt-14-557-2021-f08

Figure 8Mean difference between the SAGE v5.1 and diurnally varying (dv) retrievals for SAGE III/ISS sunset and sunrise NO2 at 25.5 km. The error bars are the standard deviation.

Download

https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/557/2021/amt-14-557-2021-f09

Figure 9(a) Zonal mean percent differences of SAGE III/ISS sunset and sunrise NO2 and OSIRIS NO2 coincident measurements for the SAGE v5.1 and diurnally varying (dv) retrievals. The contour spacing is 5 %. The bold dashed line is the mean tropopause location. (b) Difference between the columns in (a).

Download

Both the diurnally varying and SAGE v5.1 retrievals were compared with OSIRIS NO2 as a way to validate the data (panel a of Fig. 9). Only the morning (ascending node) OSIRIS measurements are used as a drift in the OSIRIS orbit affects the descending node sampling. The comparisons were done for events within 24 h, 10 longitude, and 2 latitude, although the exact choice of coincidence criteria has minimal effect on the results. The SAGE III/ISS profiles were shifted from sunrise and sunset to the OSIRIS measurement time using PRATMO. The SAGE III/ISS NO2 is generally biased high compared to the OSIRIS NO2, with a difference of up to 50 % at low altitudes or high latitudes. The differences between SAGE III/ISS and OSIRIS are within the combined uncertainties of the instruments. In general the SAGE III/ISS sunrise measurements agree better with OSIRIS than sunset, which could be because OSIRIS measures close to sunrise. The comparison was also performed excluding OSIRIS profiles with a SZA angle greater than 86, where the diurnal effect is significant. This had a negligible effect on the difference with SAGE III/ISS.

Accounting for diurnal variations in the SAGE III/ISS retrieval improves agreement with OSIRIS by up to 20 % in the mid-stratosphere (panel b of Fig. 9). Overall the diurnally varying SAGE III/ISS NO2 agrees better with the OSIRIS NO2 than the SAGE v5.1 NO2. The only region where this is not true is near the tropical tropopause. This area is where the diurnal effect becomes large (Fig. 7), resulting in much smaller SAGE III/ISS NO2 values. The sunset NO2 in particular decreases by up to 50 % below 25 km in the tropics. This is larger than the initial difference between SAGE III/ISS and OSIRIS, resulting in the negative bias that is observed from 15 to 25 km at low latitudes.

6 Conclusions

We have developed a retrieval algorithm that uses publicly available SAGE III/ISS data to account for changes in NO2 along the occultation line of sight that come from the photochemically driven diurnal cycle. The retrieval relies upon scaling factors derived from a photochemical box model with input ozone, temperature, and pressure profiles taken from the reported SAGE III/ISS scan.

It was determined that the neglect of diurnal variations in the SAGE v5.1 retrieval always biases the results high. Note that this high bias is present in NO2 retrieved from any occultation instrument that neglects diurnal variability. In the case of SAGE III/ISS NO2, we found that carefully accounting for diurnal variations in the retrieval is quite important below 30 km, with an effect nearing 20 % on the resulting values. The correction has the greatest effect at high winter latitudes and is more important for sunrise occultations than sunset. These are potentially important differences in the reported NO2 densities in the lower stratosphere, where several interesting chemical and dynamical science questions remain. Including diurnal variations in the NO2 retrieval also has an impact on the monthly zonal mean time series which should be considered when studying long-term variability.

Accounting for these diurnal variations in the SAGE III/ISS retrieval improves the agreement with OSIRIS NO2 by up to 20 % at lower altitudes. While there is a remaining bias between SAGE III/ISS and OSIRIS that is not well understood, it has a reasonable magnitude considering the very different measurement and retrieval techniques and is within their combined uncertainties.

Data availability

The SAGE III/ISS Level 1 and 2 data are available through https://search.earthdata.nasa.gov/ (last access: 1 August 2019) (NASA/LARC/SD/ASDC2017a, b). DOI links are https://doi.org/10.5067/ISS/SAGEIII/SOLAR_HDF4_L1B-V5.1 and https://doi.org/10.5067/ISS/SAGEIII/SOLAR_HDF4_L2-V5.1 respectively. The SAGE III/ISS NO2 that was retrieved by accounting for diurnal variations is available at https://research-groups.usask.ca/osiris/data-products.php (Dubé2020). OSIRIS NO2 is also available at the previous link.

Author contributions

KD performed the analysis and prepared the manuscript. DZ assisted with writing the retrieval code. AB and DD proposed the original idea for the project and provided guidance throughout. RD provided assistance with using the SAGE III/ISS data. DF and WR, along with the other authors, provided significant feedback on the analysis and the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Swedish National Space Agency and the Canadian Space Agency for the continued operation and support of Odin-OSIRIS. We also thank the SAGE III/ISS science team for providing the SAGE III/ISS data. We thank Emmanuel Dekemper and the one anonymous referee for their helpful comments on the manuscript.

Financial support

Kimberlee Dubé, Adam Bourassa, and Douglas Degenstein are funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. SAGE III/ISS is a NASA Langley-managed mission funded by the NASA Science Mission Directorate within the Earth Systematic Mission 30 Program. Enabling partners are the NASA Human Exploration and Operations Mission Directorate, International Space Station Program, and European Space Agency. The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the US National Science Foundation.

Review statement

This paper was edited by Michel Van Roozendael and reviewed by Emmanuel Dekemper and one anonymous referee.

References

Adams, C., Bourassa, A. E., McLinden, C. A., Sioris, C. E., von Clarmann, T., Funke, B., Rieger, L. A., and Degenstein, D. A.: Effect of volcanic aerosol on stratospheric NO2 and N2O5 from 2002–2014 as measured by Odin-OSIRIS and Envisat-MIPAS, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 8063–8080, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8063-2017, 2017. a, b

Bourassa, A. E., McLinden, C. A., Sioris, C. E., Brohede, S., Bathgate, A. F., Llewellyn, E. J., and Degenstein, D. A.: Fast NO2 retrievals from Odin-OSIRIS limb scatter measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 965–972, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-965-2011, 2011. a

Brohede, S. M., Haley, C. S., McLinden, C. A., Sioris, C. E., Murtagh, D. P., Petelina, S. V., Llewellyn, E. J., Bazureau, A., Goutail, F., Randall, C. E., Lumpe, J. D., Taha, G., Thomasson, L. W., and Gordley, L. L.: Validation of Odin/OSIRIS stratospheric NO2profiles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D07310, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007586, 2007. a, b

Cisewski, M., Zawodny, J., Gasbarre, J., Eckman, R., Topiwala, N., Rodriguez-Alvarez, O., Cheek, D., and Hall, S.: The Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment (SAGE III) on the International Space Station (ISS) Mission, in: Sensors, Systems, and Next-Generation Satellites XVIII, vol. 9241, p. 924107, International Society for Optics and Photonics, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 2014. a

Dubé, K.: SAGE III/ISS NO2 profiles retrieved by accounting for diurnal variations, University of Saskatchewan Atmospheric Research Group, available at: https://research-groups.usask.ca/osiris/data-products.php, last access: 6 August 2020. a

Dubé, K., Randel, W., Bourassa, A., Zawada, D., McLinden, C., and Degenstein, D.: Trends and Variability in Stratospheric NOx Derived From Merged SAGE II and OSIRIS Satellite Observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD031798, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031798, 2020. a, b

Galytska, E., Rozanov, A., Chipperfield, M. P., Dhomse, Sandip. S., Weber, M., Arosio, C., Feng, W., and Burrows, J. P.: Dynamically controlled ozone decline in the tropical mid-stratosphere observed by SCIAMACHY, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 767–783, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-767-2019, 2019. a

Gordley, L. L., Russell III, J. M., Mickley, L. J., Frederick, J. E., Park, J. H., Stone, K. A., Beaver, G. M., McInerney, J. M., Deaver, L. E., Toon, G. C., Murcray, F. J., Blatherwick, R. D., Gunson, M. R., Abbatt, J. P. D., Mauldin III, R. L., Mount, G. H., Sen, B., and Blavier, J.-F.: Validation of nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide measurements made by the Halogen Occultation Experiment for UARS platform, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 10241–10266, 1996. a, b, c, d

Haley, C. S., Brohede, S. M., Sioris, C. E., Griffioen, E., Murtagh, D. P., McDade, I. C., Eriksson, P., Llewellyn, E. J., Bazureau, A., and Goutail, F.: Retrieval of stratospheric O3 and NO2 profiles from Odin Optical Spectrograph and Infrared Imager System (OSIRIS) limb-scattered sunlight measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D16303, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004588, 2004. a

Hendrick, F., Barret, B., Van Roozendael, M., Boesch, H., Butz, A., De Mazière, M., Goutail, F., Hermans, C., Lambert, J.-C., Pfeilsticker, K., and Pommereau, J.-P.: Retrieval of nitrogen dioxide stratospheric profiles from ground-based zenith-sky UV-visible observations: validation of the technique through correlative comparisons, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 2091–2106, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-2091-2004, 2004. a

Liley, J. B., Johnston, P. V., McKenzie, R. L., Thomas, A. J., and Boyd, I. S.: Stratospheric NO2 variations from a long time series at Lauder, New Zealand, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 11633–11640, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD901157, 2000. a

Llewellyn, E. J., Lloyd, N. D., Degenstein, D. A., Gattinger, R. L., Petelina, S. V., Bourassa, A. E., Wiensz, J. T., Ivanov, E. V., McDade, I. C., Solheim, B. H., McConnell, J. C., Haley, C. S., von Savigny, C., Sioris, C. E., McLinden, C. A., Griffioen, E., Kaminski, J., Evans, W. F., Puckrin, E., Strong, K., Wehrle, V., Hum, R. H., Kendall, D. J., Matsushita, J., Murtagh, D. P., Brohede, S., Stegman, J., Witt, G., Barnes, G., Payne, W. F., Piché, L., Smith, K., Warshaw, G., Deslauniers, D. L., Marchand, P., Richardson, E. H., King, R. A., Wevers, I., McCreath, W., Kyrölä, E., Oikarinen, L., Leppelmeier, G. W., Auvinen, H., Mégie, G., Hauchecorne, A., Lefèvre, F., de La Nöe, J., Ricaud, P., Frisk, U., Sjoberg, F., von Schéele, F., and Nordh, L.: The OSIRIS instrument on the Odin spacecraft, Can. J. Phys., 82, 411–422, https://doi.org/10.1139/p04-005, 2004. a, b

Mauldin III, L. E., Salikhov, R., Habib, S., Vladimirov, A. G., Carraway, D., Petrenko, G., and Comella, J.: Meteor-3M (1)/Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment III (SAGE III) jointly sponsored by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the Russian Space Agency, in: Optical Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere and Clouds, vol. 3501, pp. 355–365, International Society for Optics and Photonics, Beijing, China, 1998. a

McCormick, M.: Sage II: An overview, Adv. Space Res., 7, 219–226, https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1177(87)90151-7, 1987. a

McLinden, C. A., Olsen, S. C., Hannegan, B., Wild, O., Prather, M. J., and Sundet, J.: Stratospheric ozone in 3-D models: A simple chemistry and the cross-tropopause flux, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 14653–14665, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900124, 2000. a

McLinden, C. A., Haley, C. S., and Sioris, C. E.: Diurnal effects in limb scatter observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D14302, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006628, 2006. a

Murtagh, D., Frisk, U., Merino, F., Ridal, M., Jonsson, A., Stegman, J., Witt, G., Eriksson, P., Jiménez, C., Megie, G., de la Noë, J., Ricaud, P., Baron, P., Pardo, J. R., Hauchcorne, A., Llewellyn, E. J., Degenstein, D. A., Gattinger, R. L., Lloyd, N. D., Evans, W. F., McDade, I. C., Haley, C. S., Sioris, C., von Savigny, C., Solheim, B. H., McConnell, J. C., Strong, K., Richardson, E. H., Leppelmeier, G. W., Kyrölä, E., Auvinen, H., and Oikarinen, L.: An overview of the Odin atmospheric mission, Can. J. Phys., 80, 309–319, https://doi.org/10.1139/p01-157, 2002. a

NASA/LARC/SD/ASDC: SAGE III/ISS L1B Solar Event Transmission Data (HDF-EOS) V051, NASA Langley Atmospheric Science Data Center DAAC, https://doi.org/10.5067/ISS/SAGEIII/SOLAR_HDF4_L1B-V5.1, 2017a. a

NASA/LARC/SD/ASDC: SAGE III/ISS L2 Solar Event Species Profiles (HDF-EOS) V051, NASA Langley Atmospheric Science Data Center DAAC, https://doi.org/10.5067/ISS/SAGEIII/SOLAR_HDF4_L2-V5.1, 2017b.  a

Newchurch, M. J., Allen, M., Gunson, M. R., Salawitch, R. J., Collins, G. B., Huston, K. H., Abbas, M. M., Abrams, M. C., Chang, A. Y., Fahey, D. W., Gao, R. S., Irion, F. W., Loewenstein, M., Manney, G. L., Michelsen, H. A., Podolske, J. R., Rinsland, C. P., and Zander, R.: Stratospheric NO and NO2 abundances from ATMOS Solar-Occultation Measurements, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 2373–2376, https://doi.org/10.1029/96GL01196, 1996. a

Park, M., Randel, W. J., Kinnison, D. E., Bourassa, A. E., Degenstein, D. A., Roth, C. Z., McLinden, C. A., Sioris, C. E., Livesey, N. J., and Santee, M. L.: Variability of Stratospheric Reactive Nitrogen and Ozone Related to the QBO, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 10103–10118, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027061, 2017. a, b

Prather, M.: Catastrophic loss of stratospheric ozone in dense volcanic clouds, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 97, 10187–10191, https://doi.org/10.1029/92JD00845, 1992. a

Prather, M. and Jaffe, A. H.: Global impact of the Antarctic ozone hole: Chemical propagation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 95, 3473–3492, https://doi.org/10.1029/JD095iD04p03473, 1990. a

Preston, K. E., Jones, R. L., and Roscoe, H. K.: Retrieval of NO2 vertical profiles from ground-based UV-visible measurements: Method and validation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102, 19089–19097, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00603, 1997. a

Randel, W. J., Wu, F., Russell III, J. M., and Waters, J.: Space-time patterns of trends in stratospheric constituents derived from UARS measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 3711–3727, https://doi.org/10.1029/1998JD100044, 1999. a

Rieger, L. A., Zawada, D. J., Bourassa, A. E., and Degenstein, D. A.: A Multiwavelength Retrieval Approach for Improved OSIRIS Aerosol Extinction Retrievals, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 7286–7307, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029897, 2019. a

Russell III, J. M., Gordley, L. L., Park, J. H., Drayson, S. R., Hesketh, W. D., Cicerone, R. J., Tuck, A. F., Frederick, J. E., Harries, J. E., and Crutzen, P. J.: The Halogen Occultation Experiment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 98, 10777–10797, https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD00799, 1993. a

SAGE III Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document: SAGE III Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document (ATBD) Solar and Lunar Algorithm, Tech. Rep., LaRC 475-00-109, available at: https://eospso.gsfc.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atbd/atbd-sage-solar-lunar.pdf (last access: 19 January 2021), 2002. a, b, c

Sioris, C. E., Rieger, L. A., Lloyd, N. D., Bourassa, A. E., Roth, C. Z., Degenstein, D. A., Camy-Peyret, C., Pfeilsticker, K., Berthet, G., Catoire, V., Goutail, F., Pommereau, J.-P., and McLinden, C. A.: Improved OSIRIS NO2 retrieval algorithm: description and validation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 1155–1168, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-1155-2017, 2017. a, b

Download
Short summary
SAGE III/ISS measures profiles of NO2; however the algorithm to convert raw measurements to NO2 concentration neglects variations caused by changes in chemistry over the course of a day. We devised a procedure to account for these diurnal variations and assess their impact on NO2 measurements from SAGE III/ISS. We find that the new NO2 concentration is more than 10 % lower than NO2 from the standard algorithm below 30 km, showing that this effect is important to consider at lower altitudes.