Articles | Volume 14, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-71-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-71-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Facility level measurement of offshore oil and gas installations from a medium-sized airborne platform: method development for quantification and source identification of methane emissions
British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council,
Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK
Department of Earth Sciences, Royal Holloway, University of London,
Egham TW20 0EX, UK
Prudence Bateson
Department of Earth and Environmental Science, University of
Manchester, Manchester, M13 9L, UK
Pamela Dominutti
Wolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratories, Department of
Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, YO10 5DD, UK
Grant Allen
Department of Earth and Environmental Science, University of
Manchester, Manchester, M13 9L, UK
Stephen Andrews
Wolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratories, Department of
Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, YO10 5DD, UK
Stephane Bauguitte
FAAM Airborne Laboratory, National Centre for Atmospheric Science,
Cranfield, MK43 0AL, UK
Max Coleman
Department of Earth Sciences, Royal Holloway, University of London,
Egham TW20 0EX, UK
Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6BB, UK
Tom Lachlan-Cope
British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council,
Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK
Rebecca E. Fisher
Department of Earth Sciences, Royal Holloway, University of London,
Egham TW20 0EX, UK
Langwen Huang
Department of Earth and Environmental Science, University of
Manchester, Manchester, M13 9L, UK
Departement Mathematik, ETH Zurich, Rämistrasse 101, 8092
Zurich, Switzerland
Anna E. Jones
British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council,
Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK
James Lee
National Centre for Atmospheric Science, University
of York, York, YO10 5DQ, UK
David Lowry
Department of Earth Sciences, Royal Holloway, University of London,
Egham TW20 0EX, UK
Joseph Pitt
Department of Earth and Environmental Science, University of
Manchester, Manchester, M13 9L, UK
School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University,
Stony Brook, NY 11974, USA
Ruth Purvis
National Centre for Atmospheric Science, University
of York, York, YO10 5DQ, UK
John Pyle
Department of Chemistry,
University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, UK
National Centre for Atmospheric Science (NCAS), University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Jacob Shaw
Department of Earth and Environmental Science, University of
Manchester, Manchester, M13 9L, UK
Nicola Warwick
Department of Chemistry,
University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, UK
National Centre for Atmospheric Science (NCAS), University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Alexandra Weiss
British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council,
Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK
Shona Wilde
Wolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratories, Department of
Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, YO10 5DD, UK
Jonathan Witherstone
British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council,
Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK
Stuart Young
Wolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratories, Department of
Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, YO10 5DD, UK
Viewed
Total article views: 4,231 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 02 Jul 2020)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3,052 | 1,082 | 97 | 4,231 | 79 | 90 |
- HTML: 3,052
- PDF: 1,082
- XML: 97
- Total: 4,231
- BibTeX: 79
- EndNote: 90
Total article views: 3,666 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 05 Jan 2021)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2,776 | 807 | 83 | 3,666 | 64 | 69 |
- HTML: 2,776
- PDF: 807
- XML: 83
- Total: 3,666
- BibTeX: 64
- EndNote: 69
Total article views: 565 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 02 Jul 2020)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
276 | 275 | 14 | 565 | 15 | 21 |
- HTML: 276
- PDF: 275
- XML: 14
- Total: 565
- BibTeX: 15
- EndNote: 21
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 4,231 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,196 with geography defined
and 35 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 3,666 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,680 with geography defined
and -14 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 565 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 516 with geography defined
and 49 with unknown origin.
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
23 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Quantifying methane emissions from coal mining ventilation shafts using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based active AirCore system T. Andersen et al. 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2021.100135
- Advanced Leak Detection and Quantification of Methane Emissions Using sUAS D. Hollenbeck et al. 10.3390/drones5040117
- Direct measurement of methane emissions from the upstream oil and gas sector: Review of measurement results and technology advances (2018–2022) X. Yang et al. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137693
- Comparing airborne algorithms for greenhouse gas flux measurements over the Alberta oil sands B. Erland et al. 10.5194/amt-15-5841-2022
- Finale: impact of the ORCHESTRA/ENCORE programmes on Southern Ocean heat and carbon understanding A. Meijers et al. 10.1098/rsta.2022.0070
- Airborne quantification of net methane and carbon dioxide fluxes from European Arctic wetlands in Summer 2019 P. Barker et al. 10.1098/rsta.2021.0192
- Aircraft-based mass balance estimate of methane emissions from offshore gas facilities in the southern North Sea M. Pühl et al. 10.5194/acp-24-1005-2024
- Methane emissions in Kuwait: Plume identification, isotopic characterisation and inventory verification A. Al-Shalan et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118763
- Is the destruction or removal of atmospheric methane a worthwhile option? P. Nisbet-Jones et al. 10.1098/rsta.2021.0108
- Atmospheric methane and nitrous oxide: challenges alongthe path to Net Zero E. Nisbet et al. 10.1098/rsta.2020.0457
- Likely substantial underestimation of reported methane emissions from United Kingdom upstream oil and gas activities S. Riddick & D. Mauzerall 10.1039/D2EE03072A
- Quantifying fossil fuel methane emissions using observations of atmospheric ethane and an uncertain emission ratio A. Ramsden et al. 10.5194/acp-22-3911-2022
- Flaring efficiencies and NOx emission ratios measured for offshore oil and gas facilities in the North Sea J. Shaw et al. 10.5194/acp-23-1491-2023
- Blinded evaluation of airborne methane source detection using Bridger Photonics LiDAR M. Johnson et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112418
- Satellites Detect a Methane Ultra-emission Event from an Offshore Platform in the Gulf of Mexico I. Irakulis-Loitxate et al. 10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00225
- Methane remote sensing and emission quantification of offshore shallow water oil and gas platforms in the Gulf of Mexico A. Ayasse et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac8566
- Quantification and assessment of methane emissions from offshore oil and gas facilities on the Norwegian continental shelf A. Foulds et al. 10.5194/acp-22-4303-2022
- Atmospheric methane isotopes identify inventory knowledge gaps in the Surat Basin, Australia, coal seam gas and agricultural regions B. Kelly et al. 10.5194/acp-22-15527-2022
- δ 13 C methane source signatures from tropical wetland and rice field emissions J. France et al. 10.1098/rsta.2020.0449
- A measurement system for CO2 and CH4 emissions quantification of industrial sites using a new in situ concentration sensor operated on board uncrewed aircraft vehicles J. Bonne et al. 10.5194/amt-17-4471-2024
- Methane emission rate estimates of offshore oil platforms in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada A. Khaleghi et al. 10.1525/elementa.2024.00025
- Speciation of VOC emissions related to offshore North Sea oil and gas production S. Wilde et al. 10.5194/acp-21-3741-2021
- Methods for quantifying methane emissions using unmanned aerial vehicles: a review J. Shaw et al. 10.1098/rsta.2020.0450
23 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Quantifying methane emissions from coal mining ventilation shafts using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based active AirCore system T. Andersen et al. 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2021.100135
- Advanced Leak Detection and Quantification of Methane Emissions Using sUAS D. Hollenbeck et al. 10.3390/drones5040117
- Direct measurement of methane emissions from the upstream oil and gas sector: Review of measurement results and technology advances (2018–2022) X. Yang et al. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137693
- Comparing airborne algorithms for greenhouse gas flux measurements over the Alberta oil sands B. Erland et al. 10.5194/amt-15-5841-2022
- Finale: impact of the ORCHESTRA/ENCORE programmes on Southern Ocean heat and carbon understanding A. Meijers et al. 10.1098/rsta.2022.0070
- Airborne quantification of net methane and carbon dioxide fluxes from European Arctic wetlands in Summer 2019 P. Barker et al. 10.1098/rsta.2021.0192
- Aircraft-based mass balance estimate of methane emissions from offshore gas facilities in the southern North Sea M. Pühl et al. 10.5194/acp-24-1005-2024
- Methane emissions in Kuwait: Plume identification, isotopic characterisation and inventory verification A. Al-Shalan et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118763
- Is the destruction or removal of atmospheric methane a worthwhile option? P. Nisbet-Jones et al. 10.1098/rsta.2021.0108
- Atmospheric methane and nitrous oxide: challenges alongthe path to Net Zero E. Nisbet et al. 10.1098/rsta.2020.0457
- Likely substantial underestimation of reported methane emissions from United Kingdom upstream oil and gas activities S. Riddick & D. Mauzerall 10.1039/D2EE03072A
- Quantifying fossil fuel methane emissions using observations of atmospheric ethane and an uncertain emission ratio A. Ramsden et al. 10.5194/acp-22-3911-2022
- Flaring efficiencies and NOx emission ratios measured for offshore oil and gas facilities in the North Sea J. Shaw et al. 10.5194/acp-23-1491-2023
- Blinded evaluation of airborne methane source detection using Bridger Photonics LiDAR M. Johnson et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112418
- Satellites Detect a Methane Ultra-emission Event from an Offshore Platform in the Gulf of Mexico I. Irakulis-Loitxate et al. 10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00225
- Methane remote sensing and emission quantification of offshore shallow water oil and gas platforms in the Gulf of Mexico A. Ayasse et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac8566
- Quantification and assessment of methane emissions from offshore oil and gas facilities on the Norwegian continental shelf A. Foulds et al. 10.5194/acp-22-4303-2022
- Atmospheric methane isotopes identify inventory knowledge gaps in the Surat Basin, Australia, coal seam gas and agricultural regions B. Kelly et al. 10.5194/acp-22-15527-2022
- δ 13 C methane source signatures from tropical wetland and rice field emissions J. France et al. 10.1098/rsta.2020.0449
- A measurement system for CO2 and CH4 emissions quantification of industrial sites using a new in situ concentration sensor operated on board uncrewed aircraft vehicles J. Bonne et al. 10.5194/amt-17-4471-2024
- Methane emission rate estimates of offshore oil platforms in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada A. Khaleghi et al. 10.1525/elementa.2024.00025
- Speciation of VOC emissions related to offshore North Sea oil and gas production S. Wilde et al. 10.5194/acp-21-3741-2021
- Methods for quantifying methane emissions using unmanned aerial vehicles: a review J. Shaw et al. 10.1098/rsta.2020.0450
Latest update: 01 Nov 2024
Short summary
Measuring emission rates of methane from installations is tricky, and it is even more so when those installations are located offshore. Here, we show the aircraft set-up and demonstrate an effective methodology for surveying emissions from UK and Dutch offshore oil and gas installations. We present example data collected from two campaigns to demonstrate the challenges and solutions encountered during these surveys.
Measuring emission rates of methane from installations is tricky, and it is even more so when...