Articles | Volume 14, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7405-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7405-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
TROPOMI tropospheric ozone column data: geophysical assessment and comparison to ozonesondes, GOME-2B and OMI
Atmospheric Data Synergies, Atmospheric Reactive Gases, Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (BIRA-IASB), Ringlaan 3, 1180 Uccle (Brussels), Belgium
Klaus-Peter Heue
German Aerospace Centre (DLR), Münchener Straße 20, 82234 Weßling, Germany
Technische Universität München, Arcisstrasse 21, 80333 Munich, Germany
Jean-Christopher Lambert
Atmospheric Data Synergies, Atmospheric Reactive Gases, Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (BIRA-IASB), Ringlaan 3, 1180 Uccle (Brussels), Belgium
Tijl Verhoelst
Atmospheric Data Synergies, Atmospheric Reactive Gases, Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (BIRA-IASB), Ringlaan 3, 1180 Uccle (Brussels), Belgium
Marc Allaart
Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), Utrechtseweg 297, 3730 AE De Bilt, the Netherlands
Steven Compernolle
Atmospheric Data Synergies, Atmospheric Reactive Gases, Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (BIRA-IASB), Ringlaan 3, 1180 Uccle (Brussels), Belgium
Patrick D. Cullis
NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory (NOAA/ESRL/GML), 1325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80305-3337, USA
Angelika Dehn
European Space Agency/Centre for Earth Observation (ESA/ESRIN), Largo Galileo Galilei 1, 00044 Frascati, Rome, Italy
Christian Félix
Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology, MeteoSwiss, Payerne, Switzerland
Bryan J. Johnson
NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory (NOAA/ESRL/GML), 1325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80305-3337, USA
Arno Keppens
Atmospheric Data Synergies, Atmospheric Reactive Gases, Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (BIRA-IASB), Ringlaan 3, 1180 Uccle (Brussels), Belgium
Debra E. Kollonige
Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Lanham, MD, USA
Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
Christophe Lerot
Atmospheric Data Synergies, Atmospheric Reactive Gases, Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (BIRA-IASB), Ringlaan 3, 1180 Uccle (Brussels), Belgium
Diego Loyola
German Aerospace Centre (DLR), Münchener Straße 20, 82234 Weßling, Germany
Matakite Maata
School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, University of the South Pacific, Suva, Fiji
Sukarni Mitro
Meteorological Service of Suriname, Paramaribo, Suriname
Maznorizan Mohamad
Atmospheric Science and Cloud Seeding Division, Malaysian Meteorological Department, Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
Ankie Piters
Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), Utrechtseweg 297, 3730 AE De Bilt, the Netherlands
Fabian Romahn
German Aerospace Centre (DLR), Münchener Straße 20, 82234 Weßling, Germany
Henry B. Selkirk
Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
Universities Space Research Association, Columbia, MD, USA
Francisco R. da Silva
Laboratory of Environmental and Tropical Variables, Brazilian Institute of Space Research, Natal, Brazil
Ryan M. Stauffer
Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
Anne M. Thompson
Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
J. Pepijn Veefkind
Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), Utrechtseweg 297, 3730 AE De Bilt, the Netherlands
Holger Vömel
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
Jacquelyn C. Witte
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
Claus Zehner
European Space Agency/Centre for Earth Observation (ESA/ESRIN), Largo Galileo Galilei 1, 00044 Frascati, Rome, Italy
Viewed
Total article views: 5,362 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Jul 2020)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3,434 | 1,831 | 97 | 5,362 | 355 | 124 | 147 |
- HTML: 3,434
- PDF: 1,831
- XML: 97
- Total: 5,362
- Supplement: 355
- BibTeX: 124
- EndNote: 147
Total article views: 3,585 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 30 Nov 2021)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,907 | 600 | 78 | 3,585 | 173 | 94 | 124 |
- HTML: 2,907
- PDF: 600
- XML: 78
- Total: 3,585
- Supplement: 173
- BibTeX: 94
- EndNote: 124
Total article views: 1,777 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Jul 2020)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 527 | 1,231 | 19 | 1,777 | 182 | 30 | 23 |
- HTML: 527
- PDF: 1,231
- XML: 19
- Total: 1,777
- Supplement: 182
- BibTeX: 30
- EndNote: 23
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 5,362 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 5,327 with geography defined
and 35 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 3,585 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,547 with geography defined
and 38 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,777 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,777 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Latest update: 08 Nov 2025
Short summary
We assess the first 2 years of TROPOMI tropical tropospheric ozone column data. Comparisons to reference measurements by ozonesonde and satellite sensors show that TROPOMI bias (−0.1 to +2.3 DU) and precision (1.5 to 2.5 DU) meet mission requirements. Potential causes of bias and its spatio-temporal structure are discussed, as well as ways to identify sampling errors. Our analysis of known geophysical patterns demonstrates the improved performance of TROPOMI with respect to its predecessors.
We assess the first 2 years of TROPOMI tropical tropospheric ozone column data. Comparisons to...