Articles | Volume 15, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4785-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4785-2022
Research article
 | 
24 Aug 2022
Research article |  | 24 Aug 2022

Turbulence parameters measured by the Beijing mesosphere–stratosphere–troposphere radar in the troposphere and lower stratosphere with three models: comparison and analyses

Ze Chen, Yufang Tian, Yinan Wang, Yongheng Bi, Xue Wu, Juan Huo, Linjun Pan, Yong Wang, and Daren Lü

Related authors

Innovative cloud quantification: deep learning classification and finite-sector clustering for ground-based all-sky imaging
Jingxuan Luo, Yubing Pan, Debin Su, Jinhua Zhong, Lingxiao Wu, Wei Zhao, Xiaoru Hu, Zhengchao Qi, Daren Lu, and Yinan Wang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3765–3781, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3765-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3765-2024, 2024
Short summary
Stratospheric gravity waves excited by Hurricane Joaquin in 2015: 3-D characteristics and the correlation with hurricane intensification
Xue Wu, Lars Hoffmann, Corwin J. Wright, Neil P. Hindley, M. Joan Alexander, Silvio Kalisch, Xin Wang, Bing Chen, Yinan Wang, and Daren Lyu
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-3008,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-3008, 2024
Preprint archived
Short summary
Improved representation of volcanic sulfur dioxide depletion in Lagrangian transport simulations: a case study with MPTRAC v2.4
Mingzhao Liu, Lars Hoffmann, Sabine Griessbach, Zhongyin Cai, Yi Heng, and Xue Wu
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5197–5217, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5197-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5197-2023, 2023
Short summary
Retrievals of precipitable water vapor and aerosol optical depth from direct sun measurements with EKO MS711 and MS712 spectroradiometers
Congcong Qiao, Song Liu, Juan Huo, Xihan Mu, Ping Wang, Shengjie Jia, Xuehua Fan, and Minzheng Duan
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 1539–1549, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-1539-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-1539-2023, 2023
Short summary
Retrieval of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) from satellite measurements: comparison of SIF between TanSat and OCO-2
Lu Yao, Yi Liu, Dongxu Yang, Zhaonan Cai, Jing Wang, Chao Lin, Naimeng Lu, Daren Lyu, Longfei Tian, Maohua Wang, Zengshan Yin, Yuquan Zheng, and Sisi Wang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2125–2137, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2125-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2125-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Others (Wind, Precipitation, Temperature, etc.) | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Closing the gap in the tropics: the added value of radio-occultation data for wind field monitoring across the Equator
Julia Danzer, Magdalena Pieler, and Gottfried Kirchengast
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4979–4995, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4979-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4979-2024, 2024
Short summary
Verification of weather-radar-based hail metrics with crowdsourced observations from Switzerland
Jérôme Kopp, Alessandro Hering, Urs Germann, and Olivia Martius
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4529–4552, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4529-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4529-2024, 2024
Short summary
Enhanced Quantitative Precipitation Estimation (QPE) through the opportunistic use of Ku TV-sat links via a Dual-Channel Procedure
Louise Gelbart, Laurent Barthès, François Mercier-Tigrine, Aymeric Chazottes, and Cecile Mallet
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-88,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-88, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for AMT
Short summary
Atmospheric motion vector (AMV) error characterization and bias correction by leveraging independent lidar data: a simulation using an observing system simulation experiment (OSSE) and optical flow AMVs
Hai Nguyen, Derek Posselt, Igor Yanovsky, Longtao Wu, and Svetla Hristova-Veleva
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3103–3119, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3103-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3103-2024, 2024
Short summary
Description and validation of the Japanese algorithm for radiative flux and heating rate products with all four EarthCARE instruments: Pre-launch test with A-Train
Akira Yamauchi, Kentaroh Suzuki, Eiji Oikawa, Miho Sekiguchi, Takashi Nagao, and Haruma Ishida
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-78,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-78, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for AMT
Short summary

Cited articles

Batchelor, G. K.: The theory of homogeneous turbulence, Cambridge university press, 1953. 
Birner, T.: Fine-scale structure of the extratropical tropopause region, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D04104, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006301, 2006. 
Chen, Z., Tian, Y., and Lü, D.: Improving the processing algorithm of Beijing MST radar power spectral density data, J. Appl. Meteor. Sci., 31, 694–705, https://doi.org/10.11898/1001-7313.20200605, 2020. 
Dehghan, A. and Hocking, W. K.: Instrumental errors in spectral-width turbulence measurements by radars, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phy., 73, 1052–1068, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2010.11.011, 2011. 
Delage, D., Roca, R., Bertin, F., Delcourt, J., Cremieu, A., Massebeuf, M., Ney, R., and VanVelthoven, P.: A consistency check of three radar methods for monitoring eddy diffusion and energy dissipation rates through the tropopause, Radio Sci., 32, 757–767, https://doi.org/10.1029/96rs03543, 1997. 
Download
Short summary
Small-scale turbulence plays a vital role in the vertical exchange of heat, momentum and mass in the atmosphere. There are currently three models that can use spectrum width data of MST radar to calculate turbulence parameters. However, few studies have explored the applicability of the three calculation models. We compared and analysed the turbulence parameters calculated by three models. These results can provide a reference for the selection of models for calculating turbulence parameters.