Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
AMT
Articles | Volume 15, issue 22
Articles | Volume 15, issue 22
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6837-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6837-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 15, issue 22
Research article
 | 
24 Nov 2022
Research article |  | 24 Nov 2022

A comparison of carbon monoxide retrievals between the MOPITT satellite and Canadian high-Arctic ground-based NDACC and TCCON FTIR measurements

Ali Jalali, Kaley A. Walker, Kimberly Strong, Rebecca R. Buchholz, Merritt N. Deeter, Debra Wunch, Sébastien Roche, Tyler Wizenberg, Erik Lutsch, Erin McGee, Helen M. Worden, Pierre Fogal, and James R. Drummond

Viewed

Total article views: 1,689 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,279 355 55 1,689 151 48 50
  • HTML: 1,279
  • PDF: 355
  • XML: 55
  • Total: 1,689
  • Supplement: 151
  • BibTeX: 48
  • EndNote: 50
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 May 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 16 May 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,689 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,683 with geography defined and 6 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 23 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
This study validates MOPITT version 8 carbon monoxide measurements over the Canadian high Arctic for the period 2006 to 2019. The MOPITT products from different detector pixels and channels are compared with ground-based measurements from the Polar Environment Atmospheric Research Laboratory (PEARL) in Eureka, Nunavut, Canada. These results show good consistency between the satellite and ground-based measurements and provide guidance on the usage of these MOPITT data at high latitudes.
Read more