Articles | Volume 16, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3959-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3959-2023
Research article
 | 
30 Aug 2023
Research article |  | 30 Aug 2023

First-time comparison between NO2 vertical columns from Geostationary Environmental Monitoring Spectrometer (GEMS) and Pandora measurements

Serin Kim, Daewon Kim, Hyunkee Hong, Lim-Seok Chang, Hanlim Lee, Deok-Rae Kim, Donghee Kim, Jeong-Ah Yu, Dongwon Lee, Ukkyo Jeong, Chang-Kuen Song, Sang-Woo Kim, Sang Seo Park, Jhoon Kim, Thomas F. Hanisco, Junsung Park, Wonei Choi, and Kwangyul Lee

Viewed

Total article views: 1,809 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,152 604 53 1,809 35 46
  • HTML: 1,152
  • PDF: 604
  • XML: 53
  • Total: 1,809
  • BibTeX: 35
  • EndNote: 46
Views and downloads (calculated since 08 Mar 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 08 Mar 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,809 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,759 with geography defined and 50 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 23 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
A first evaluation of the Geostationary Environmental Monitoring Spectrometer (GEMS) NO2 was carried out via comparison with the NO2 data obtained from the ground-based Pandora direct-sun measurements at four sites in Seosan, Republic of Korea. Comparisons between GEMS NO2 and Pandora NO2 were performed according to GEMS cloud fraction. GEMS NO2 showed good agreement with that of Pandora NO2 under less cloudy conditions.