Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
AMT
Articles | Volume 17, issue 3
Articles | Volume 17, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1023-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1023-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 17, issue 3
Research article
 | 
12 Feb 2024
Research article |  | 12 Feb 2024

Derivation of depolarization ratios of aerosol fluorescence and water vapor Raman backscatters from lidar measurements

Igor Veselovskii, Qiaoyun Hu, Philippe Goloub, Thierry Podvin, William Boissiere, Mikhail Korenskiy, Nikita Kasianik, Sergey Khaykyn, and Robin Miri

Viewed

Total article views: 943 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
691 203 49 943 34 32
  • HTML: 691
  • PDF: 203
  • XML: 49
  • Total: 943
  • BibTeX: 34
  • EndNote: 32
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Oct 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 Oct 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 943 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 906 with geography defined and 37 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 26 Jul 2024
Download
Short summary

Measurements of transported smoke layers were performed with a lidar in Lille and a five-channel fluorescence lidar in Moscow. Results show the peak of fluorescence in the boundary layer is at 438 nm, while in the smoke layer it shifts to longer wavelengths. The fluorescence depolarization is 45 % to 55 %. The depolarization ratio of the water vapor channel is low (2 ± 0.5 %) in the absence of fluorescence and can be used to evaluate the contribution of fluorescence to water vapor signal.

Read more