Articles | Volume 17, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2089-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2089-2024
Research article
 | 
16 Apr 2024
Research article |  | 16 Apr 2024

Comparison of the imaginary parts of the atmospheric refractive index structure parameter and aerosol flux based on different measurement methods

Renmin Yuan, Hongsheng Zhang, Jiajia Hua, Hao Liu, Peizhe Wu, Xingyu Zhu, and Jianning Sun

Related authors

Modeling diurnal variation of surface PM2.5 concentrations over East China with WRF-Chem: impacts from boundary-layer mixing and anthropogenic emission
Qiuyan Du, Chun Zhao, Mingshuai Zhang, Xue Dong, Yu Chen, Zhen Liu, Zhiyuan Hu, Qiang Zhang, Yubin Li, Renmin Yuan, and Shiguang Miao
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2839–2863, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2839-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2839-2020, 2020
Short summary
Aerosol vertical mass flux measurements during heavy aerosol pollution episodes at a rural site and an urban site in the Beijing area of the North China Plain
Renmin Yuan, Xiaoye Zhang, Hao Liu, Yu Gui, Bohao Shao, Xiaoping Tao, Yaqiang Wang, Junting Zhong, Yubin Li, and Zhiqiu Gao
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 12857–12874, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12857-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12857-2019, 2019
Short summary
A new method for estimating aerosol mass flux in the urban surface layer using LAS technology
Renmin Yuan, Tao Luo, Jianning Sun, Hao Liu, Yunfei Fu, and Zhien Wang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 1925–1937, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1925-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1925-2016, 2016
Short summary
A new method for measuring the imaginary part of the atmospheric refractive index structure parameter in the urban surface layer
R. Yuan, T. Luo, J. Sun, Z. Zeng, C. Ge, and Y. Fu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2521–2531, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2521-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2521-2015, 2015
Short summary
Lidar-based remote sensing of atmospheric boundary layer height over land and ocean
T. Luo, R. Yuan, and Z. Wang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 173–182, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-173-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-173-2014, 2014

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
A 2-year intercomparison of three methods for measuring black carbon concentration at a high-altitude research station in Europe
Sarah Tinorua, Cyrielle Denjean, Pierre Nabat, Véronique Pont, Mathilde Arnaud, Thierry Bourrianne, Maria Dias Alves, and Eric Gardrat
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3897–3915, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3897-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3897-2024, 2024
Short summary
Comparison of the LEO and CPMA-SP2 techniques for black-carbon mixing-state measurements
Arash Naseri, Joel C. Corbin, and Jason S. Olfert
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3719–3738, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3719-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3719-2024, 2024
Short summary
Aerosol trace element solubility determined using ultrapure water batch leaching: an intercomparison study of four different leaching protocols
Rui Li, Prema Piyusha Panda, Yizhu Chen, Zhenming Zhu, Fu Wang, Yujiao Zhu, He Meng, Yan Ren, Ashwini Kumar, and Mingjin Tang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3147–3156, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3147-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3147-2024, 2024
Short summary
Field comparison of dual- and single-spot Aethalometers: equivalent black carbon, light absorption, Ångström exponent and secondary brown carbon estimations
Liangbin Wu, Cheng Wu, Tao Deng, Dui Wu, Mei Li, Yong Jie Li, and Zhen Zhou
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2917–2936, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2917-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2917-2024, 2024
Short summary
Classification accuracy and compatibility across devices of a new Rapid-E+ flow cytometer
Branko Sikoparija, Predrag Matavulj, Isidora Simovic, Predrag Radisic, Sanja Brdar, Vladan Minic, Danijela Tesendic, Evgeny Kadantsev, Julia Palamarchuk, and Mikhail Sofiev
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-187,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-187, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Andrews, L. C. and Phillips, R. L.: Laser beam propagation through random media, SPIE, SPIE, Bellingham, Washington, USA, ISBN 0-8194-5948-8, 790 pp., 2005. 
Campbell, S. L.: CS120 Visibility Sensor User Guide, Campbell Scientific Ltd., Logan, Utah, 60 pp., 2012. 
Charlson, R. J.: Atmospheric visibility related to aerosol mass concentration – a review, Environ. Sci. Technol., 3, 913–918, https://doi.org/10.1021/es60033a002, 1969. 
Clifford, S. F.: Temporal-frequency spectra for a spherical wave propagating throught atmospheric turbulence, J. Opt. Soc. Am, 61, 1285–1292, 1971. 
Foken, T. and Wichura, B.: Tools for quality assessment of surface-based flux measurements, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 78, 83–105, https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(95)02248-1, 1996. 
Short summary
Previously, a new method for atmospheric aerosol flux was proposed, and a large-aperture scintillometer was developed for experimental measurements, but the method was consistently not validated. In this paper, eddy correlation experiments for aerosol vertical transport fluxes were conducted to verify the reliability of the previous large-aperture scintillometer method. The experimental results also show that urban green land is a sink area for aerosol particles.