Articles | Volume 17, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2089-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2089-2024
Research article
 | 
16 Apr 2024
Research article |  | 16 Apr 2024

Comparison of the imaginary parts of the atmospheric refractive index structure parameter and aerosol flux based on different measurement methods

Renmin Yuan, Hongsheng Zhang, Jiajia Hua, Hao Liu, Peizhe Wu, Xingyu Zhu, and Jianning Sun

Related authors

Modeling urban pollutant transport at multiple resolutions: impacts of turbulent mixing
Zining Yang, Qiuyan Du, Qike Yang, Chun Zhao, Gudongze Li, Zihan Xia, Mingyue Xu, Renmin Yuan, Yubin Li, Kaihui Xia, Jun Gu, and Jiawang Feng
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 8831–8857, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8831-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8831-2025, 2025
Short summary
Modeling diurnal variation of surface PM2.5 concentrations over East China with WRF-Chem: impacts from boundary-layer mixing and anthropogenic emission
Qiuyan Du, Chun Zhao, Mingshuai Zhang, Xue Dong, Yu Chen, Zhen Liu, Zhiyuan Hu, Qiang Zhang, Yubin Li, Renmin Yuan, and Shiguang Miao
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2839–2863, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2839-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2839-2020, 2020
Short summary
Aerosol vertical mass flux measurements during heavy aerosol pollution episodes at a rural site and an urban site in the Beijing area of the North China Plain
Renmin Yuan, Xiaoye Zhang, Hao Liu, Yu Gui, Bohao Shao, Xiaoping Tao, Yaqiang Wang, Junting Zhong, Yubin Li, and Zhiqiu Gao
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 12857–12874, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12857-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12857-2019, 2019
Short summary
A new method for estimating aerosol mass flux in the urban surface layer using LAS technology
Renmin Yuan, Tao Luo, Jianning Sun, Hao Liu, Yunfei Fu, and Zhien Wang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 1925–1937, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1925-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1925-2016, 2016
Short summary
A new method for measuring the imaginary part of the atmospheric refractive index structure parameter in the urban surface layer
R. Yuan, T. Luo, J. Sun, Z. Zeng, C. Ge, and Y. Fu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2521–2531, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2521-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2521-2015, 2015
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Seasonal effects in the application of the MOment MAtching (MOMA) remote calibration tool to outdoor PM2.5 air sensors
Lena Francesca Weissert, Geoff Stephen Henshaw, Andrea Lee Clements, Rachelle Monique Duvall, and Carry Croghan
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3635–3645, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3635-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3635-2025, 2025
Short summary
A view on recent ice-nucleating particle intercomparison studies: why the uncertainty of the activation temperature matters
Jann Schrod and Heinz G. Bingemer
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2591–2605, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2591-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2591-2025, 2025
Short summary
Performance of a low-cost optical particle counter (Alphasense OPC-N3) in estimating size-resolved dust emission flux using eddy covariance
Sylvain Dupont, Eric Lamaud, Mark R. Irvine, Jean-Marc Bonnefond, Adolfo González-Romero, Andrés Alastuey, Cristina González-Flórez, Xavier Querol, Konrad Kandler, Martina Klose, and Carlos Pérez García-Pando
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2183–2200, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2183-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2183-2025, 2025
Short summary
Intercomparison of online and offline XRF spectrometers for determining the PM10 elemental composition of ambient aerosol
Laura Cadeo, Beatrice Biffi, Benjamin Chazeau, Cristina Colombi, Rosario Cosenza, Eleonora Cuccia, Manousos-Ioannis Manousakas, Kaspar R. Daellenbach, André S. H. Prévôt, and Roberta Vecchi
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-110,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-110, 2025
Short summary
Field intercomparison of ice nucleation measurements: the Fifth International Workshop on Ice Nucleation Phase 3 (FIN-03)
Paul J. DeMott, Jessica A. Mirrielees, Sarah Suda Petters, Daniel J. Cziczo, Markus D. Petters, Heinz G. Bingemer, Thomas C. J. Hill, Karl Froyd, Sarvesh Garimella, A. Gannet Hallar, Ezra J. T. Levin, Ian B. McCubbin, Anne E. Perring, Christopher N. Rapp, Thea Schiebel, Jann Schrod, Kaitlyn J. Suski, Daniel Weber, Martin J. Wolf, Maria Zawadowicz, Jake Zenker, Ottmar Möhler, and Sarah D. Brooks
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 639–672, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-639-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-639-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Andrews, L. C. and Phillips, R. L.: Laser beam propagation through random media, SPIE, SPIE, Bellingham, Washington, USA, ISBN 0-8194-5948-8, 790 pp., 2005. 
Campbell, S. L.: CS120 Visibility Sensor User Guide, Campbell Scientific Ltd., Logan, Utah, 60 pp., 2012. 
Charlson, R. J.: Atmospheric visibility related to aerosol mass concentration – a review, Environ. Sci. Technol., 3, 913–918, https://doi.org/10.1021/es60033a002, 1969. 
Clifford, S. F.: Temporal-frequency spectra for a spherical wave propagating throught atmospheric turbulence, J. Opt. Soc. Am, 61, 1285–1292, 1971. 
Foken, T. and Wichura, B.: Tools for quality assessment of surface-based flux measurements, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 78, 83–105, https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(95)02248-1, 1996. 
Short summary
Previously, a new method for atmospheric aerosol flux was proposed, and a large-aperture scintillometer was developed for experimental measurements, but the method was consistently not validated. In this paper, eddy correlation experiments for aerosol vertical transport fluxes were conducted to verify the reliability of the previous large-aperture scintillometer method. The experimental results also show that urban green land is a sink area for aerosol particles.
Share