Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
AMT
Articles | Volume 17, issue 12
Articles | Volume 17, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3719-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3719-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 17, issue 12
Research article
 | 
20 Jun 2024
Research article |  | 20 Jun 2024

Comparison of the LEO and CPMA-SP2 techniques for black-carbon mixing-state measurements

Arash Naseri, Joel C. Corbin, and Jason S. Olfert

Viewed

Total article views: 727 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
469 224 34 727 27 26
  • HTML: 469
  • PDF: 224
  • XML: 34
  • Total: 727
  • BibTeX: 27
  • EndNote: 26
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Oct 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Oct 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 727 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 717 with geography defined and 10 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 29 Jun 2024
Download
Short summary
It is crucial to accurately measure the mixing states of light-absorbing carbon particles from emission sources like wildfires and biomass combustion to decrease climate forcing uncertainties. This study compares methods that measure light-absorbing carbon in the atmosphere. The CPMA-SP2 method offers more accurate results than traditional light-scattering methods, such as the leading-edge-only (LEO) method, thereby enhancing the accuracy of measuring the mixing states of light-absorbing carbon.
Read more