Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
AMT
Articles | Volume 17, issue 23
Articles | Volume 17, issue 23
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6889-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6889-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 17, issue 23
Research article
 | 
06 Dec 2024
Research article |  | 06 Dec 2024

The differences between remote sensing and in situ air pollutant measurements over the Canadian oil sands

Xiaoyi Zhao, Vitali Fioletov, Debora Griffin, Chris McLinden, Ralf Staebler, Cristian Mihele, Kevin Strawbridge, Jonathan Davies, Ihab Abboud, Sum Chi Lee, Alexander Cede, Martin Tiefengraber, and Robert Swap

Viewed

Total article views: 676 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
482 155 39 676 32 29
  • HTML: 482
  • PDF: 155
  • XML: 39
  • Total: 676
  • BibTeX: 32
  • EndNote: 29
Views and downloads (calculated since 26 Feb 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 26 Feb 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 676 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 653 with geography defined and 23 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 11 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
This study explores differences between remote sensing and in situ instruments in terms of their vertical, horizontal, and temporal sampling differences. Understanding and resolving these differences are critical for future analyses linking satellite, ground-based remote sensing, and in situ observations in air quality monitoring. It shows that the meteorological conditions (wind directions, speed, and boundary layer conditions) will strongly affect the agreement between the two measurements.
Read more