Articles | Volume 18, issue 17
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4325-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4325-2025
Research article
 | 
09 Sep 2025
Research article |  | 09 Sep 2025

Intercomparison of wind speed, temperature, and humidity data between dropsondes and aircraft in situ measurements

Soodabeh Namdari, Sanja Dmitrovic, Gao Chen, Yonghoon Choi, Ewan Crosbie, Joshua P. DiGangi, Glenn S. Diskin, Richard A. Ferrare, Johnathan W. Hair, Simon Kirschler, John B. Nowak, Kenneth L. Thornhill, Christiane Voigt, Holger Vömel, Xubin Zeng, and Armin Sorooshian

Viewed

Total article views: 672 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
523 80 69 672 42 25 49
  • HTML: 523
  • PDF: 80
  • XML: 69
  • Total: 672
  • Supplement: 42
  • BibTeX: 25
  • EndNote: 49
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Oct 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Oct 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 672 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 672 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 09 Sep 2025
Download
Short summary
We conducted this study to assess the accuracy of airborne measurements of wind, temperature, and humidity, essential for understanding atmospheric processes. Using data from NASA's ACTIVATE campaign, we compared measurements from the Turbulent Air Motion Measurement System (TAMMS) and diode laser hygrometer (DLH) aboard a Falcon aircraft with dropsondes from a King Air, matching data points based on location and time using statistical methods. The study showed strong agreement, confirming the reliability of these methods for advancing climate models.
Share