Articles | Volume 18, issue 20
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-5321-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-5321-2025
Research article
 | 
15 Oct 2025
Research article |  | 15 Oct 2025

The AquaVIT-4 intercomparison of atmospheric hygrometers

Simone Brunamonti, Harald Saathoff, Albert Hertzog, Glenn Diskin, Masatomo Fujiwara, Karen Rosenlof, Ottmar Möhler, Béla Tuzson, Lukas Emmenegger, Nadir Amarouche, Georges Durry, Fabien Frérot, Jean-Christophe Samake, Claire Cenac, Julio Lopez, Paul Monnier, and Mélanie Ghysels

Viewed

Total article views: 1,189 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,021 128 40 1,189 50 38 57
  • HTML: 1,021
  • PDF: 128
  • XML: 40
  • Total: 1,189
  • Supplement: 50
  • BibTeX: 38
  • EndNote: 57
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Apr 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 28 Apr 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,189 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,189 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 25 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
Water vapor is a strong greenhouse gas, and accurate measurements of its concentration in the upper atmosphere (~8–25 km altitude) are crucial for reliable climate predictions. We investigated the performance of four airborne hygrometers, deployed on aircraft or stratospheric balloon platforms and based on different techniques, in a climate simulation chamber. The results demonstrate the high accuracy and reliability of the involved sensors for atmospheric monitoring and research applications.
Share