Articles | Volume 18, issue 22
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-7021-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-7021-2025
Research article
 | 
25 Nov 2025
Research article |  | 25 Nov 2025

Xact625i vs. PX-375: a comparative study of online XRF ambient multi-metal monitors vs. ICP-MS

Laurence C. Windell, Saliou Mbengue, Petra Pokorná, Jaroslav Schwarz, André S. H. Prévôt, Manousos I. Manousakas, Stefanos Papagiannis, Jakub Ondráček, Roman Prokeš, and Vladimir Ždímal

Related authors

Drone-based vertical profiling of particulate matter size distribution and carbonaceous aerosols: urban vs. rural environment
Kajal Julaha, Vladimír Ždímal, Saliou Mbengue, David Brus, and Naděžda Zíková
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 17933–17951, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-17933-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-17933-2025, 2025
Short summary
Chemical sparsity in Bayesian receptor models for aerosol source apportionment
Marta Via, Jure Demšar, Yufang Hao, Manousos Manousakas, Anton Rusanen, Jianhui Jiang, Stuart K. Grange, Jean-Luc Jaffrezo, Vy Ngoc Thuy Dinh, Gaëlle Uzu, Griša Močnik, and Kaspar R. Daellenbach
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5253,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5253, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).
Short summary
Global fields of daily accumulation-mode particle number concentrations using in situ observations, reanalysis data, and machine learning
Aino Ovaska, Elio Rauth, Daniel Holmberg, Paulo Artaxo, John Backman, Benjamin Bergmans, Don Collins, Marco Aurélio Franco, Shahzad Gani, Roy M. Harrison, Rakesh K. Hooda, Tareq Hussein, Antti-Pekka Hyvärinen, Kerneels Jaars, Adam Kristensson, Markku Kulmala, Lauri Laakso, Ari Laaksonen, Nikolaos Mihalopoulos, Colin O'Dowd, Jakub Ondracek, Tuukka Petäjä, Kristina Plauškaitė, Mira Pöhlker, Ximeng Qi, Peter Tunved, Ville Vakkari, Alfred Wiedensohler, Kai Puolamäki, Tuomo Nieminen, Veli-Matti Kerminen, Victoria A. Sinclair, and Pauli Paasonen
Aerosol Research, 3, 589–618, https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-3-589-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-3-589-2025, 2025
Short summary
Intercomparison of online and offline XRF spectrometers for determining the PM10 elemental composition of ambient aerosol
Laura Cadeo, Beatrice Biffi, Benjamin Chazeau, Cristina Colombi, Rosario Cosenza, Eleonora Cuccia, Manousos-Ioannis Manousakas, Kaspar R. Daellenbach, André S. H. Prévôt, and Roberta Vecchi
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 6435–6448, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-6435-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-6435-2025, 2025
Short summary
Modelling anthropogenic aerosol sources and secondary organic aerosol formation: a wintertime study in central Europe
Hanna Wiedenhaus, Roland Schrödner, Ralf Wolke, Marie L. Luttkus, Shubhi Arora, Laurent Poulain, Radek Lhotka, Petr Vodička, Jaroslav Schwarz, Petra Pokorna, Jakub Ondráček, Vladimir Ždímal, Hartmut Herrmann, and Ina Tegen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 12893–12922, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-12893-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-12893-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Alleman, L. Y., Lamaison, L., Perdrix, E., Robache, A., and Galloo, J.-C.: PM10 metal concentrations and source identification using positive matrix factorization and wind sectoring in a French industrial zone, Atmos. Res., 96, 612–625, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.02.008, 2010. 
Andreae, M. O.: Soot carbon and excess fine potassium: long-range transport of combustion-derived aerosols, Science, 220, 1148–1151, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.220.4602.1148, 1983. 
Bilo, F., Cirelli, P., and Borgese, L.: Elemental analysis of particulate matter by X-ray fluorescence methods: A green approach to air quality monitoring, TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem., 170, 117427, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2023.117427, 2024. 
Camman, J., Chazeau, B., Marchand, N., Durand, A., Gille, G., Lanzi, L., Jaffrezo, J.-L., Wortham, H., and Uzu, G.: Oxidative potential apportionment of atmospheric PM1: a new approach combining high-sensitive online analysers for chemical composition and offline OP measurement technique, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 3257–3278, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3257-2024, 2024. 
Download
Short summary
In this work, we compare the two most widely used online XRF monitors for ambient elemental analysis, the Xact625i and PX-375. We found strong correlations between the online instruments and the reference method (better so for the Xact625i), while in terms of absolute concentrations, some elements were over- and underestimated. Overall, we determined both instruments can be used as powerful tools to produce high-time resolution elemental data for use in air quality monitoring.
Share