Articles | Volume 19, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-1643-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-1643-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
06 Mar 2026
Research article |
| 06 Mar 2026
| 06 Mar 2026
Impact of reflected shortwave anisotropy on satellite radiometer measurements of the Earth's energy imbalance
Department of Meteorology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Linda Megner
Department of Meteorology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Maria Hakuba
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, USA
Thorsten Mauritsen
Department of Meteorology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Related authors
Kyriaki Bimpiri, Thomas Hocking, and Thorsten Mauritsen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-163, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-163, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Observations show an increasing imbalance between how much energy the Earth absorbs from the Sun and emits back to space, leading to climate change. We evaluate how well climate models simulate both the magnitude and trend of the imbalance. We find that models capture the magnitude but underestimate the trend, which is not related to how models handle volcanic aerosols when switching to future scenarios. The models that best simulate the magnitude are the ones with moderate climate sensitivity.
Thomas Hocking, Thorsten Mauritsen, and Linda Megner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 7077–7095, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-7077-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-7077-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The imbalance between the energy the Earth absorbs from the Sun and the energy the Earth emits back into space gives rise to climate change, but measuring the small imbalance is challenging. We simulate satellites in various orbits to investigate how well they sample the imbalance and find that the best option is to combine at least two satellites that see complementary parts of the Earth and cover the daily and annual cycles. This information is useful when planning future satellite missions.
Andrea Mosso, Thomas Hocking, and Thorsten Mauritsen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 12793–12806, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12793-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12793-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Clouds play a crucial role in the Earth's energy balance, as they can either warm up or cool down the area they cover depending on their height and depth. They are expected to alter their behaviour under climate change, affecting the warming generated by greenhouse gases. This paper proposes a new method to estimate their overall effect on this warming by simulating a climate where clouds are transparent. Results show that with the model used, clouds have a stabilising effect on climate.
Martin Renoult, Navjit Sagoo, Johannes Hörner, and Thorsten Mauritsen
Earth Syst. Dynam., 17, 303–318, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-303-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-303-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Geological evidence indicate persistent tropical sea-ice cover in the deep past, often called Snowball Earth. Using a climate model, we show here that clouds substantially cool down the tropics and facilitate the advance of sea-ice into lower latitudes. We identify a critical threshold temperature close to 0 °C from where cooling down the Earth is accelerated. This value can be used as a constraint on Earth's sensitivity to CO2, as recent cold paleoclimates never entered Snowball Earth.
Anastasia Romanou, Paul Lerner, Nancy Kiang, Igor Aleinov, Maxwell Kelley, Roland Miller, Gary Russell, Reto Ruedy, Gavin Schmidt, Maria Hakuba, and Ou Wang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4839, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4839, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
NASA GISS latest Earth System model description and evaluation paper. Major highlights is the capability to include complex interactions of the different components of the Earth System. The model compares well with observations but has shortcomings due to biases that propagate throughout the system between different components.
Paulo Ceppi, Alejandro Bodas-Salcedo, Mark D. Zelinka, Timothy Andrews, Florent Brient, Robin Chadwick, Jonathan M. Gregory, Yen-Ting Hwang, Sarah M. Kang, Jennifer E. Kay, Thorsten Mauritsen, Tomoo Ogura, George Tselioudis, Masahiro Watanabe, Mark J. Webb, and Allison A. Wing
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-398, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-398, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
Clouds constitute a key uncertainty for climate change projections. The Cloud Feedback Model Intercomparison Project (CFMIP) aims to address this challenge by evaluating and understanding clouds and their impacts on atmospheric circulation, precipitation, and climate sensitivity. The present paper describes the CFMIP experiment protocol for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 7 (CMIP7), and discusses the accompanying science questions and opportunities for progress.
Kyriaki Bimpiri, Thomas Hocking, and Thorsten Mauritsen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-163, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-163, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Observations show an increasing imbalance between how much energy the Earth absorbs from the Sun and emits back to space, leading to climate change. We evaluate how well climate models simulate both the magnitude and trend of the imbalance. We find that models capture the magnitude but underestimate the trend, which is not related to how models handle volcanic aerosols when switching to future scenarios. The models that best simulate the magnitude are the ones with moderate climate sensitivity.
Judit Pérez-Coll Jiménez, Nickolay Ivchenko, Ceona Lindstein, Lukas Krasauskas, Jonas Hedin, Donal P. Murtagh, Linda Megner, Björn Linder, and Jörg Gumbel
Ann. Geophys., 43, 701–707, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-701-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-701-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study uses images taken by the Swedish satellite MATS (Mesospheric Airglow Tomography and Spectroscopy) to conduct a statistical analysis of the molecular oxygen atmospheric band emissions in the aurora. This auroral emission can not be observed from the ground, making it one of the least understood auroral emissions. Our results provide a new dataset with information on the peak altitude, geomagnetic location, and auroral intensity of 378 events detected between February and April 2023.
Hans Segura, Xabier Pedruzo-Bagazgoitia, Philipp Weiss, Sebastian K. Müller, Thomas Rackow, Junhong Lee, Edgar Dolores-Tesillos, Imme Benedict, Matthias Aengenheyster, Razvan Aguridan, Gabriele Arduini, Alexander J. Baker, Jiawei Bao, Swantje Bastin, Eulàlia Baulenas, Tobias Becker, Sebastian Beyer, Hendryk Bockelmann, Nils Brüggemann, Lukas Brunner, Suvarchal K. Cheedela, Sushant Das, Jasper Denissen, Ian Dragaud, Piotr Dziekan, Madeleine Ekblom, Jan Frederik Engels, Monika Esch, Richard Forbes, Claudia Frauen, Lilli Freischem, Diego García-Maroto, Philipp Geier, Paul Gierz, Álvaro González-Cervera, Katherine Grayson, Matthew Griffith, Oliver Gutjahr, Helmuth Haak, Ioan Hadade, Kerstin Haslehner, Shabeh ul Hasson, Jan Hegewald, Lukas Kluft, Aleksei Koldunov, Nikolay Koldunov, Tobias Kölling, Shunya Koseki, Sergey Kosukhin, Josh Kousal, Peter Kuma, Arjun U. Kumar, Rumeng Li, Nicolas Maury, Maximilian Meindl, Sebastian Milinski, Kristian Mogensen, Bimochan Niraula, Jakub Nowak, Divya Sri Praturi, Ulrike Proske, Dian Putrasahan, René Redler, David Santuy, Domokos Sármány, Reiner Schnur, Patrick Scholz, Dmitry Sidorenko, Dorian Spät, Birgit Sützl, Daisuke Takasuka, Adrian Tompkins, Alejandro Uribe, Mirco Valentini, Menno Veerman, Aiko Voigt, Sarah Warnau, Fabian Wachsmann, Marta Wacławczyk, Nils Wedi, Karl-Hermann Wieners, Jonathan Wille, Marius Winkler, Yuting Wu, Florian Ziemen, Janos Zimmermann, Frida A.-M. Bender, Dragana Bojovic, Sandrine Bony, Simona Bordoni, Patrice Brehmer, Marcus Dengler, Emanuel Dutra, Saliou Faye, Erich Fischer, Chiel van Heerwaarden, Cathy Hohenegger, Heikki Järvinen, Markus Jochum, Thomas Jung, Johann H. Jungclaus, Noel S. Keenlyside, Daniel Klocke, Heike Konow, Martina Klose, Szymon Malinowski, Olivia Martius, Thorsten Mauritsen, Juan Pedro Mellado, Theresa Mieslinger, Elsa Mohino, Hanna Pawłowska, Karsten Peters-von Gehlen, Abdoulaye Sarré, Pajam Sobhani, Philip Stier, Lauri Tuppi, Pier Luigi Vidale, Irina Sandu, and Bjorn Stevens
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 7735–7761, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-7735-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-7735-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Next Generation of Earth Modeling Systems project (nextGEMS) developed two Earth system models that use horizontal grid spacing of 10 km and finer, giving more fidelity to the representation of local phenomena, globally. In its fourth cycle, nextGEMS simulated the Earth System climate over the 2020–2049 period under the SSP3-7.0 scenario. Here, we provide an overview of nextGEMS, insights into the model development, and the realism of multi-decadal, kilometer-scale simulations.
Björn Linder, Lukas Krasauskas, Linda Megner, and Donal P. Murtagh
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 12843–12851, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-12843-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-12843-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Swedish satellite MATS (Mesospheric Airglow/Aerosol Tomography and Spectroscopy) conducts global measurements of atmospheric airglow in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere. In this article, we present the first global results from the mission. Observations from February to April 2023 show that the emission strength is largely controlled by atmospheric tides and by perturbations introduced by a propagating planetary wave.
Björn Linder, Jörg Gumbel, Donal P. Murtagh, Linda Megner, Lukas Krasauskas, Doug Degenstein, Ole Martin Christensen, and Nickolay Ivchenko
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 4453–4466, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4453-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4453-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, the primary instrument carried by the satellite MATS is compared to the OSIRIS instrument on board the Odin satellite. A total of 36 close approaches between December 2022 and February 2023 were identified and analysed. The comparison reveals that the two instruments have good structural agreement and that MATS detects a signal that is ~20 % stronger than what is measured by OSIRIS.
Thomas Hocking, Thorsten Mauritsen, and Linda Megner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 7077–7095, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-7077-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-7077-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The imbalance between the energy the Earth absorbs from the Sun and the energy the Earth emits back into space gives rise to climate change, but measuring the small imbalance is challenging. We simulate satellites in various orbits to investigate how well they sample the imbalance and find that the best option is to combine at least two satellites that see complementary parts of the Earth and cover the daily and annual cycles. This information is useful when planning future satellite missions.
Alejandro Uribe, Frida A.-M. Bender, and Thorsten Mauritsen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 13371–13384, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13371-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13371-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Our study explores climate feedbacks, vital for understanding global warming. It links them to shifts in Earth's energy balance at the atmosphere's top due to natural temperature variations. It takes roughly 50 years to establish this connection. Combined satellite observations and reanalysis suggest that Earth cools more than expected under carbon dioxide influence. However, continuous satellite data until at least the mid-2030s are crucial for refining our understanding of climate feedbacks.
Andrea Mosso, Thomas Hocking, and Thorsten Mauritsen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 12793–12806, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12793-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12793-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Clouds play a crucial role in the Earth's energy balance, as they can either warm up or cool down the area they cover depending on their height and depth. They are expected to alter their behaviour under climate change, affecting the warming generated by greenhouse gases. This paper proposes a new method to estimate their overall effect on this warming by simulating a climate where clouds are transparent. Results show that with the model used, clouds have a stabilising effect on climate.
Antoine Hermant, Linnea Huusko, and Thorsten Mauritsen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 10707–10715, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10707-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10707-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosol particles, from natural and human sources, have a cooling effect on the climate, partially offsetting global warming. They do this through direct (sunlight reflection) and indirect (cloud property alteration) mechanisms. Using a global climate model, we found that, despite declining emissions, the direct effect of human aerosols has increased while the indirect effect has decreased, which is attributed to the shift in emissions from North America and Europe to Southeast Asia.
James D. Annan, Julia C. Hargreaves, Thorsten Mauritsen, Erin McClymont, and Sze Ling Ho
Clim. Past, 20, 1989–1999, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-20-1989-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-20-1989-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We have created a new global surface temperature reconstruction of the climate of the mid-Pliocene Warm Period, representing the period roughly 3.2 million years before the present day. We estimate that the globally averaged mean temperature was around 3.9 °C warmer than it was in pre-industrial times, but there is significant uncertainty in this value.
Raphael Grodofzig, Martin Renoult, and Thorsten Mauritsen
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 913–927, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-913-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-913-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate whether the Amazon rainforest has lost substantial resilience since 1990. This assertion is based on trends in the observational record of vegetation density. We calculate the same metrics in a large number of climate model simulations and find that several models behave indistinguishably from the observations, suggesting that the observed trend could be caused by internal variability and that the cause of the ongoing rapid loss of Amazon rainforest is not mainly global warming.
Clare Marie Flynn, Linnea Huusko, Angshuman Modak, and Thorsten Mauritsen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 15121–15133, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15121-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15121-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The latest-generation climate models show surprisingly cold mid-20th century global-mean temperatures, often despite exhibiting more realistic late 20th/early 21st century temperatures. A too-strong aerosol forcing in many models was thought to the be primary cause of these too-cold mid-century temperatures, but this was found to only be a partial explanation. This also partly undermines the hope to construct a strong relationship between the mid-century temperatures and aerosol forcing.
Sushant Das, Frida Bender, and Thorsten Mauritsen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1605, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1605, 2023
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
Quantifying global and Indian precipitation responses to anthropogenic aerosol and CO2 forcings using multiple models is needed for reducing climate uncertainty. The response to global warming from CO2 increases precipitation both globally and over India, whereas the cooling response to sulfate aerosol leads to a reduction in precipitation in both cases. An opposite response to black carbon is noted i.e., a global decrease but an increase of precipitation over India implying changes in dynamics.
Jake J. Gristey, K. Sebastian Schmidt, Hong Chen, Daniel R. Feldman, Bruce C. Kindel, Joshua Mauss, Mathew van den Heever, Maria Z. Hakuba, and Peter Pilewskie
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 3609–3630, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3609-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3609-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The concept of a satellite-based camera is demonstrated for sampling the angular distribution of outgoing radiance from Earth needed to generate data products for new radiation budget spectral channels.
Angshuman Modak and Thorsten Mauritsen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 7535–7549, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7535-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7535-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We provide an improved estimate of equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) constrained based on the instrumental temperature record including the corrections for the pattern effect. The improved estimate factors in the uncertainty caused by the underlying sea-surface temperature datasets used in the estimates of pattern effect. This together with the inter-model spread lifts the corresponding IPCC AR6 estimate to 3.2 K [1.8 to 11.0], which is lower and better constrained than in past studies.
Karina von Schuckmann, Audrey Minière, Flora Gues, Francisco José Cuesta-Valero, Gottfried Kirchengast, Susheel Adusumilli, Fiammetta Straneo, Michaël Ablain, Richard P. Allan, Paul M. Barker, Hugo Beltrami, Alejandro Blazquez, Tim Boyer, Lijing Cheng, John Church, Damien Desbruyeres, Han Dolman, Catia M. Domingues, Almudena García-García, Donata Giglio, John E. Gilson, Maximilian Gorfer, Leopold Haimberger, Maria Z. Hakuba, Stefan Hendricks, Shigeki Hosoda, Gregory C. Johnson, Rachel Killick, Brian King, Nicolas Kolodziejczyk, Anton Korosov, Gerhard Krinner, Mikael Kuusela, Felix W. Landerer, Moritz Langer, Thomas Lavergne, Isobel Lawrence, Yuehua Li, John Lyman, Florence Marti, Ben Marzeion, Michael Mayer, Andrew H. MacDougall, Trevor McDougall, Didier Paolo Monselesan, Jan Nitzbon, Inès Otosaka, Jian Peng, Sarah Purkey, Dean Roemmich, Kanako Sato, Katsunari Sato, Abhishek Savita, Axel Schweiger, Andrew Shepherd, Sonia I. Seneviratne, Leon Simons, Donald A. Slater, Thomas Slater, Andrea K. Steiner, Toshio Suga, Tanguy Szekely, Wim Thiery, Mary-Louise Timmermans, Inne Vanderkelen, Susan E. Wjiffels, Tonghua Wu, and Michael Zemp
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 1675–1709, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1675-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1675-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Earth's climate is out of energy balance, and this study quantifies how much heat has consequently accumulated over the past decades (ocean: 89 %, land: 6 %, cryosphere: 4 %, atmosphere: 1 %). Since 1971, this accumulated heat reached record values at an increasing pace. The Earth heat inventory provides a comprehensive view on the status and expectation of global warming, and we call for an implementation of this global climate indicator into the Paris Agreement’s Global Stocktake.
Martin Renoult, Navjit Sagoo, Jiang Zhu, and Thorsten Mauritsen
Clim. Past, 19, 323–356, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-323-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-323-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The relationship between the Last Glacial Maximum and the sensitivity of climate models to a doubling of CO2 can be used to estimate the true sensitivity of the Earth. However, this relationship has varied in successive model generations. In this study, we assess multiple processes at the Last Glacial Maximum which weaken this relationship. For example, how models respond to the presence of ice sheets is a large contributor of uncertainty.
Cathy Hohenegger, Peter Korn, Leonidas Linardakis, René Redler, Reiner Schnur, Panagiotis Adamidis, Jiawei Bao, Swantje Bastin, Milad Behravesh, Martin Bergemann, Joachim Biercamp, Hendryk Bockelmann, Renate Brokopf, Nils Brüggemann, Lucas Casaroli, Fatemeh Chegini, George Datseris, Monika Esch, Geet George, Marco Giorgetta, Oliver Gutjahr, Helmuth Haak, Moritz Hanke, Tatiana Ilyina, Thomas Jahns, Johann Jungclaus, Marcel Kern, Daniel Klocke, Lukas Kluft, Tobias Kölling, Luis Kornblueh, Sergey Kosukhin, Clarissa Kroll, Junhong Lee, Thorsten Mauritsen, Carolin Mehlmann, Theresa Mieslinger, Ann Kristin Naumann, Laura Paccini, Angel Peinado, Divya Sri Praturi, Dian Putrasahan, Sebastian Rast, Thomas Riddick, Niklas Roeber, Hauke Schmidt, Uwe Schulzweida, Florian Schütte, Hans Segura, Radomyra Shevchenko, Vikram Singh, Mia Specht, Claudia Christine Stephan, Jin-Song von Storch, Raphaela Vogel, Christian Wengel, Marius Winkler, Florian Ziemen, Jochem Marotzke, and Bjorn Stevens
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 779–811, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-779-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-779-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Models of the Earth system used to understand climate and predict its change typically employ a grid spacing of about 100 km. Yet, many atmospheric and oceanic processes occur on much smaller scales. In this study, we present a new model configuration designed for the simulation of the components of the Earth system and their interactions at kilometer and smaller scales, allowing an explicit representation of the main drivers of the flow of energy and matter by solving the underlying equations.
James D. Annan, Julia C. Hargreaves, and Thorsten Mauritsen
Clim. Past, 18, 1883–1896, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-18-1883-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-18-1883-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We have created a new global surface temperature reconstruction of the climate of the Last Glacial Maximum, representing the period 19–23 000 years before the present day. We find that the globally averaged mean temperature was roughly 4.5 °C colder than it was in pre-industrial times, albeit there is significant uncertainty on this value.
Cited articles
Barkstrom, B. R.: The Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE), Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 65, 1170–1185, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1984)065<1170:TERBE>2.0.CO;2, 1984. a
Davies, J. H. and Davies, D. R.: Earth's surface heat flux, Solid Earth, 1, 5–24, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-1-5-2010, 2010. a
Forster, P., Storelvmo, T., Armour, K., Collins, W., Dufresne, J.-L., Frame, D., Lunt, D., Mauritsen, T., Palmer, M., Watanabe, M., Wild, M., and Zhang, H.: The Earth's Energy Budget, Climate Feedbacks, and Climate Sensitivity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 943–1054, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.009, 2021. a
Green, R. N., House, F. B., Stackhouse, P. W., Wu, X., Ackerman, S. A., Smith, W. L., and Johnson, M. J.: Intercomparison of scanner and nonscanner measurements for the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 95, 11785–11798, https://doi.org/10.1029/JD095iD08p11785, 1990. a
Gristey, J. J., Chiu, J. C., Gurney, R. J., Han, S.-C., and Morcrette, C. J.: Determination of global Earth outgoing radiation at high temporal resolution using a theoretical constellation of satellites, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 122, 1114–1131, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025514, 2017. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k
Gristey, J. J., Su, W., Loeb, N. G., Vonder Haar, T. H., Tornow, F., Schmidt, K. S., Hakuba, M. Z., Pilewskie, P., and Russell, J. E.: Shortwave Radiance to Irradiance Conversion for Earth Radiation Budget Satellite Observations: A Review, Remote Sensing, 13, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13132640, 2021. a, b, c
Hakuba, M. Z., Stephens, G. L., Christophe, B., Nash, A. E., Foulon, B., Bettadpur, S. V., Tapley, B. D., and Webb, F. H.: Earth’s Energy Imbalance Measured From Space, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 57, 32–45, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2018.2851976, 2019. a, b
Hakuba, M. Z., Frederikse, T., and Landerer, F. W.: Earth's Energy Imbalance From the Ocean Perspective (2005–2019), Geophysical Research Letters, 48, e2021GL093624, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093624, 2021. a
Hakuba, M. Z., Fourest, S., Boyer, T., Meyssignac, B., Carton, J. A., Forget, G., Cheng, L., Giglio, D., Johnson, G. C., Kato, S., Killick, R. E., Kolodziejczyk, N., Kuusela, M., Landerer, F., Llovel, W., Locarnini, R., Loeb, N., Lyman, J. M., Mishonov, A., Pilewskie, P., Reagan, J., Storto, A., Sukianto, T., and von Schuckmann, K.: Trends and Variability in Earth’s Energy Imbalance and Ocean Heat Uptake Since 2005, Surveys in Geophysics, 45, 1721–1756, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-024-09849-5, 2024a. a
Hakuba, M. Z., Kindel, B., Gristey, J., Bodas-Salcedo, A., Stephens, G., and Pilewskie, P.: Simulated variability in visible and near-IR irradiances in preparation for the upcoming Libera mission, AIP Conference Proceedings, 2988, 050006, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0183869, 2024b. a, b
Hocking, T.: Scripts for simulating anisotropic shortwave reflection for wide-field-of-view satellite measurements of top-of-atmosphere radiation fields, Software version 1.0.0, Bolin Centre Code Repository [code], https://doi.org/10.57669/hocking-2026-eei-shortwave-anisotropy-1.0.0, 2026. a
Hocking, T., Mauritsen, T., and Megner, L.: Sampling the diurnal and annual cycles of the Earth's energy imbalance with constellations of satellite-borne radiometers, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 17, 7077–7095, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-7077-2024, 2024. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p, q, r, s, t, u
Hocking, T., Megner, L., Hakuba, M., and Mauritsen, T.: Idealised wide-field-of-view synthetic satellite measurement data for the Earth's energy imbalance, 2001–2005, Dataset version 1, Bolin Centre Database [data set], https://doi.org/10.17043/hocking-2026-eei-shortwave-anisotropy-1, 2026. a
House, F. B., Gruber, A., Hunt, G. E., and Mecherikunnel, A. T.: History of satellite missions and measurements of the Earth Radiation Budget (1957–1984), Reviews of Geophysics, 24, 357–377, https://doi.org/10.1029/RG024i002p00357, 1986. a
Huang, J., Guo, H., Liu, G., and Ye, H.: Characteristics Analysis of Earth’s Reflected Radiation Viewed From a Moon-Based Platform, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 20, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2022.3222505, 2023. a
Inman, H. F. and Bradley, Edwin L., J.: The overlapping coefficient as a measure of agreement between probability distributions and point estimation of the overlap of two normal densities, Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods, 18, 3851–3874, https://doi.org/10.1080/03610928908830127, 1989. a
Kato, S. and Loeb, N. G.: Twilight Irradiance Reflected by the Earth Estimated from Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) Measurements, Journal of Climate, 16, 2646–2650, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016<2646:TIRBTE>2.0.CO;2, 2003. a
Loeb, N. G., Loukachine, K., Manalo-Smith, N., Wielicki, B. A., and Young, D. F.: Angular Distribution Models for Top-of-Atmosphere Radiative Flux Estimation from the Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System Instrument on the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission Satellite. Part II: Validation, Journal of Applied Meteorology, 42, 1748–1769, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2003)042<1748:ADMFTR>2.0.CO;2, 2003a. a
Loeb, N. G., Manalo-Smith, N., Kato, S., Miller, W. F., Gupta, S. K., Minnis, P., and Wielicki, B. A.: Angular Distribution Models for Top-of-Atmosphere Radiative Flux Estimation from the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System Instrument on the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission Satellite. Part I: Methodology, Journal of Applied Meteorology, 42, 240–265, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2003)042<0240:ADMFTO>2.0.CO;2, 2003b. a, b, c
Loeb, N. G., Doelling, D. R., Wang, H., Su, W., Nguyen, C., Corbett, J. G., Liang, L., Mitrescu, C., Rose, F. G., and Kato, S.: Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) Energy Balanced and Filled (EBAF) Top-of-Atmosphere (TOA) Edition-4.0 Data Product, Journal of Climate, 31, 895–918, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0208.1, 2018. a, b
Loeb, N. G., Mayer, M., Kato, S., Fasullo, J. T., Zuo, H., Senan, R., Lyman, J. M., Johnson, G. C., and Balmaseda, M.: Evaluating Twenty-Year Trends in Earth's Energy Flows From Observations and Reanalyses, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 127, e2022JD036686, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD036686, 2022. a
Meyssignac, B., Boyer, T., Zhao, Z., Hakuba, M. Z., Landerer, F. W., Stammer, D., Köhl, A., Kato, S., L’Ecuyer, T., Ablain, M., Abraham, J. P., Blazquez, A., Cazenave, A., Church, J. A., Cowley, R., Cheng, L., Domingues, C. M., Giglio, D., Gouretski, V., Ishii, M., Johnson, G. C., Killick, R. E., Legler, D., Llovel, W., Lyman, J., Palmer, M. D., Piotrowicz, S., Purkey, S. G., Roemmich, D., Roca, R., Savita, A., Schuckmann, K. v., Speich, S., Stephens, G., Wang, G., Wijffels, S. E., and Zilberman, N.: Measuring Global Ocean Heat Content to Estimate the Earth Energy Imbalance, Frontiers in Marine Science, 6, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00432, 2019. a
Meyssignac, B., Ablain, M., Guérou, A., Prandi, P., Barnoud, A., Blazquez, A., Fourest, S., Rousseau, V., Bonnefond, P., Cazenave, A., Chenal, J., Dibarboure, G., Donlon, C., Benveniste, J., Sylvestre-Baron, A., and Vinogradova, N.: How accurate is accurate enough for measuring sea-level rise and variability, Nature Climate Change, 13, 796–803, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01735-z, 2023. a
NASA Langley Research Center: Angular Distribution Models: ERBE ADMs, https://ceres.larc.nasa.gov/data/angular-distribution-models/#erbe-adms (last access: 15 September 2023), 2023. a
NASA/LARC/SD/ASDC: CERES and GEO-Enhanced TOA, Within-Atmosphere and Surface Fluxes, Clouds and Aerosols 1-Hourly Terra-Aqua Edition4A, Atmospheric Science Data Center [data set], https://doi.org/10.5067/TERRA+AQUA/CERES/SYN1DEG-1HOUR_L3.004A, 2017. a, b
Rhodes, B.: Skyfield: Generate high precision research-grade positions for stars, planets, moons, and Earth satellites, astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1907.024, http://rhodesmill.org/skyfield/ (last access: 1 January 2023), 2019. a
Rhodes, B.: Python sgp4 library, https://pypi.org/project/sgp4/ (last access: 12 June 2023), 2023. a
Robock, A.: The Seasonal Cycle of Snow Cover, Sea Ice and Surface Albedo, Monthly Weather Review, 108, 267–285, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1980)108<0267:TSCOSC>2.0.CO;2, 1980. a
Schifano, L., Smeesters, L., Geernaert, T., Berghmans, F., and Dewitte, S.: Design and Analysis of a Next-Generation Wide Field-of-View Earth Radiation Budget Radiometer, Remote Sensing, 12, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030425, 2020. a, b
Seneviratne, S., Zhang, X., Adnan, M., Badi, W., Dereczynski, C., Luca, A. D., Ghosh, S., Iskandar, I., Kossin, J., Lewis, S., Otto, F., Pinto, I., Satoh, M., Vicente-Serrano, S., Wehner, M., and Zhou, B.: Weather and Climate Extreme Events in a Changing Climate, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1513–1766, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.013, 2021. a
Su, W., Corbett, J., Eitzen, Z., and Liang, L.: Next-generation angular distribution models for top-of-atmosphere radiative flux calculation from CERES instruments: methodology, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 8, 611–632, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-611-2015, 2015. a, b
Suttles, J. T., Green, R. N., Minnis, P., Smith, G. L., Staylor, W. F., Wielicki, B. A., Walker, I. J., Young, D. F., Taylor, V. R., and Stowe, L. L.: Angular Radiation Models for Earth-Atmosphere System Volume 1: Shortwave Radiation, NASA Reference Publication NASA-RP-1184, NASA Scientific and Technical Information Division, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19880018293 (last access: 24 November 2024), 1988. a, b, c, d, e, f
Suttles, J. T., Green, R. N., Smith, G. L., Wielicki, B. A., Walker, I. J., Taylor, V. R., and Stowe, L. L.: Angular Radiation Models for Earth-Atmosphere System Volume I1: Longwave Radiation, NASA Reference Publicatio NASA-RP-1184-VOL-2, NASA Scientific and Technical Information Division, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19890011216 (last access: 6 December 2024), 1989. a
Tornow, F., Domenech, C., Cole, J. N. S., Madenach, N., and Fischer, J.: Changes in TOA SW Fluxes over Marine Clouds When Estimated via Semiphysical Angular Distribution Models, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 38, 669–684, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-20-0107.1, 2021. a
Vallado, D. and Crawford, P.: SGP4 Orbit Determination, AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit, Honolulu, Hawaii, 18–21 August 2008, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2008-6770, 2008. a
Vallado, D., Crawford, P., Hujsak, R., and Kelso, T.: Revisiting Spacetrack Report #3, AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit, Keystone, Colorado, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2006-6753, 2006. a
van den Heever, M., Gristey, J. J., and Pilewskie, P.: Optimizing the Sampling Strategy for Future Libera Radiance to Irradiance Conversions, Remote Sensing, 17, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17152540, 2025. a
von Schuckmann, K., Minière, A., Gues, F., Cuesta-Valero, F. J., Kirchengast, G., Adusumilli, S., Straneo, F., Ablain, M., Allan, R. P., Barker, P. M., Beltrami, H., Blazquez, A., Boyer, T., Cheng, L., Church, J., Desbruyeres, D., Dolman, H., Domingues, C. M., García-García, A., Giglio, D., Gilson, J. E., Gorfer, M., Haimberger, L., Hakuba, M. Z., Hendricks, S., Hosoda, S., Johnson, G. C., Killick, R., King, B., Kolodziejczyk, N., Korosov, A., Krinner, G., Kuusela, M., Landerer, F. W., Langer, M., Lavergne, T., Lawrence, I., Li, Y., Lyman, J., Marti, F., Marzeion, B., Mayer, M., MacDougall, A. H., McDougall, T., Monselesan, D. P., Nitzbon, J., Otosaka, I., Peng, J., Purkey, S., Roemmich, D., Sato, K., Sato, K., Savita, A., Schweiger, A., Shepherd, A., Seneviratne, S. I., Simons, L., Slater, D. A., Slater, T., Steiner, A. K., Suga, T., Szekely, T., Thiery, W., Timmermans, M.-L., Vanderkelen, I., Wjiffels, S. E., Wu, T., and Zemp, M.: Heat stored in the Earth system 1960–2020: where does the energy go?, Earth System Science Data, 15, 1675–1709, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1675-2023, 2023. a
Wielicki, B. A., Barkstrom, B. R., Harrison, E. F., Lee, R. B., Smith, G. L., and Cooper, J. E.: Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES): An Earth Observing System Experiment, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 77, 853–868, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<0853:CATERE>2.0.CO;2, 1996. a
Wong, T., Smith, G. L., Kato, S., Loeb, N. G., Kopp, G., and Shrestha, A. K.: On the Lessons Learned From the Operations of the ERBE Nonscanner Instrument in Space and the Production of the Nonscanner TOA Radiation Budget Data Set, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 56, 5936–5947, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2018.2828783, 2018. a
Wu, J., Guo, H., Ding, Y., Shang, H., Li, T., Li, L., and Lv, M.: The Influence of Anisotropic Surface Reflection on Earth’s Outgoing Shortwave Radiance in the Lunar Direction, Remote Sensing, 14, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14040887, 2022. a
Wylie, D.: Diurnal Cycles of Clouds and How They Affect Polar-Orbiting Satellite Data, Journal of Climate, 21, 3989–3996, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI2027.1, 2008. a
Short summary
The imbalance between the energy the Earth absorbs from the Sun and emits back to space gives rise to climate change, but measuring the small imbalance is challenging. The Earth surface reflects sunlight more in some directions than in others, as with e.g. ocean sunglint. We simulate satellites to investigate how this uneven reflection impacts estimates of the imbalance. We identify orbits that cover all directions well, so that the impact is small.
The imbalance between the energy the Earth absorbs from the Sun and emits back to space gives...
