Articles | Volume 19, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-5525-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-5525-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
HailCam: an automated imaging system for real-time measurement of hail size distributions and fall rates
Huayun Sounding Meteorological Technology Co. Ltd, Beijing, 102200, China
Hui Wang
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
CMA Key Laboratory of Cloud-Precipitation Physics and Weather Modification (CPML), CMA Weather Modification Centre (WMC), Beijing 100081, China
Tianlei Gao
Huayun Sounding Meteorological Technology Co. Ltd, Beijing, 102200, China
Key Laboratory of Intelligent Meteorological Observation Technology, Beijing 100081, China
China Meteorological Administration Xiong'an Atmospheric Boundary Layer Key Laboratory, Xiong’an, 071000, China
Zhanfu Yin
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
CMA Key Laboratory of Cloud-Precipitation Physics and Weather Modification (CPML), CMA Weather Modification Centre (WMC), Beijing 100081, China
Xiaofeng Lou
CMA Key Laboratory of Cloud-Precipitation Physics and Weather Modification (CPML), CMA Weather Modification Centre (WMC), Beijing 100081, China
Yugang Duan
Huayun Sounding Meteorological Technology Co. Ltd, Beijing, 102200, China
Key Laboratory of Intelligent Meteorological Observation Technology, Beijing 100081, China
China Meteorological Administration Xiong'an Atmospheric Boundary Layer Key Laboratory, Xiong’an, 071000, China
Yihang Huang
Huayun Sounding Meteorological Technology Co. Ltd, Beijing, 102200, China
Key Laboratory of Intelligent Meteorological Observation Technology, Beijing 100081, China
Zhiqiang Zhao
CMA Key Laboratory of Cloud-Precipitation Physics and Weather Modification (CPML), CMA Weather Modification Centre (WMC), Beijing 100081, China
Related authors
Yunsong Du, Fumo Yang, Sijia Lou, Baolei Lyu, Ran Huang, Guangming Shi, Yongtao Hu, Yan Jiang, and Nan Wang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 6223–6241, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-6223-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-6223-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This study shows that using dynamically changing chemical boundary conditions is essential for accurately simulating summer ozone pollution in China. By integrating real-time global data, we improve model performance and reveal how large-scale weather patterns drive cross-border and stratospheric transport. These results support more reliable ozone forecasting and pollution mitigation.
Baolei Lyu, Ran Huang, Xinlu Wang, Weiguo Wang, and Yongtao Hu
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 6295–6312, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-6295-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-6295-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
FastCTM is a neural network model to simulate key criteria air pollution levels, offering an efficient alternative to traditional chemical transport models. Its structure is informed by the physical and chemical principles of the atmosphere, allowing it to learn and replicate complex atmospheric processes. FastCTM demonstrated matching accuracy to traditional models with less computational demand. It also provides analysis of how different atmospheric processes contribute to air quality changes.
Baolei Lyu, Ran Huang, Xinlu Wang, Weiguo Wang, and Yongtao Hu
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 1583–1594, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1583-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1583-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Data fusion is used to estimate spatially completed and smooth reanalysis fields from multiple data sources of observations and model simulations. We developed a well-designed deep-learning model framework to embed spatial correlation principles of atmospheric physics and chemical models. The deep-learning model has very high accuracy to predict reanalysis data fields from isolated observation data points. It is also feasible for operational applications due to computational efficiency.
Yunsong Du, Fumo Yang, Sijia Lou, Baolei Lyu, Ran Huang, Guangming Shi, Yongtao Hu, Yan Jiang, and Nan Wang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 6223–6241, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-6223-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-6223-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This study shows that using dynamically changing chemical boundary conditions is essential for accurately simulating summer ozone pollution in China. By integrating real-time global data, we improve model performance and reveal how large-scale weather patterns drive cross-border and stratospheric transport. These results support more reliable ozone forecasting and pollution mitigation.
Baolei Lyu, Ran Huang, Xinlu Wang, Weiguo Wang, and Yongtao Hu
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 6295–6312, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-6295-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-6295-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
FastCTM is a neural network model to simulate key criteria air pollution levels, offering an efficient alternative to traditional chemical transport models. Its structure is informed by the physical and chemical principles of the atmosphere, allowing it to learn and replicate complex atmospheric processes. FastCTM demonstrated matching accuracy to traditional models with less computational demand. It also provides analysis of how different atmospheric processes contribute to air quality changes.
Baolei Lyu, Ran Huang, Xinlu Wang, Weiguo Wang, and Yongtao Hu
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 1583–1594, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1583-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1583-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Data fusion is used to estimate spatially completed and smooth reanalysis fields from multiple data sources of observations and model simulations. We developed a well-designed deep-learning model framework to embed spatial correlation principles of atmospheric physics and chemical models. The deep-learning model has very high accuracy to predict reanalysis data fields from isolated observation data points. It is also feasible for operational applications due to computational efficiency.
Cited articles
Allen, J. T., Giammanco, I. M., Kumjian, M. R., Jurgen Punge, H., Zhang, Q., Groenemeijer, P., Kunz, M., and Ortega, K. L.: Understanding Hail in the Earth System, Rev. Geophys., 58, e2019RG000665, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000665, 2020.
Barras, H., Hering, A., Martynov, A., Noti, P.-A., Germann, U., and Martius, O.: Experiences with > 50 000 Crowdsourced Hail Reports in Switzerland, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 100, 1429–1440, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0090.1, 2019.
Bhandari, S., Vajpayee, G., da Silva, L. L., Hinterstein, M., Franchin, G., and Colombo, P.: A review on additive manufacturing of piezoelectric ceramics: From feedstock development to properties of sintered parts, Mater. Sci. Eng.- R. Rep., 162, 100877, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2024.100877, 2025.
Changnon, S. A.: Hailstreaks, J. Atmos. Sci., 27, 109–125, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1970)027<0109:H>2.0.CO;2, 1970.
Cheng, L. and English, M.: A Relationship Between Hailstone Concentration and Size, J. Atmos. Sci., 40, 204–213, 1983.
Dessens, J., Berthet, C., and Sanchez, J. L.: A point hailfall classification based on hailpad measurements, Atmos. Res., 83, 132–139, 2007.
Dessens, J., Berthet, C., and Sanchez, J. L.: Change in hailstone size distributions with an increase in the melting level height, Atmos. Res., 158, 245–253, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.07.004, 2015.
Federer, B. and Waldvogel, A.: Hail and Raindrop Size Distributions from a Swiss Multicell Storm, J. App. Meteorol. Climatol., 14, 91–97, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1975)014<0091:HARSDF>2.0.CO;2, 1975.
Fonseca-Cerda, M. d. S., de Moel, H., van Ederen, D., Schmid, T., Wouters, L., Aerts, J. C. J. H., Botzen, W. J. W., and Haer, T.: Hailstorm prediction and loss assessment using high-resolution hazard and claims data, Atmos. Res., 329, 108501, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2025.108501, 2026.
Knight, C. A.: On the Mechanism of Spongy Hailstone Growth, J. Atmos. Sci., 25, 440–444, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1968)025<0440:OTMOSH>2.0.CO;2, 1968.
Kopp, J., Manzato, A., Hering, A., Germann, U., and Martius, O.: How observations from automatic hail sensors in Switzerland shed light on local hailfall duration and compare with hailpad measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 3487–3503, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3487-2023, 2023a.
Kopp, J., Schröer, K., Schwierz, C., Hering, A., Germann, U., and Martius, O.: The summer 2021 Switzerland hailstorms: weather situation, major impacts and unique observational data, Weather, 78, 184–191, https://doi.org/10.1002/wea.4306, 2023b.
Li, Y., Mou, X., Kang, J., Zhu, S., Fan, Y., Fan, H., Wei, X., Chen, D., Ren, S., Jia, S., Li, J., Li, N., Ran, L., Zhou, K., and Zhang, J.: The Development of a Hailstone Disdrometer and Its Preliminary Observation in Aksu, Xinjiang, Atmosphere, 15, 823, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15070823, 2024.
List, R., Cantin, J. G., and Ferland, M. G.: Structural Properties of Two Hailstone Samples, J. Atmos. Sci., 27, 1080–1090, 2010a.
List, R., Rentsch, U. W., Byram, A. C., and Lozowski, E. P.: On the Aerodynamics of Spheroidal Hailstone Models, J. Atmos. Sci., 30, 653–661, 2010b.
Liu, Z., Mao, H., Wu, C. Y., Feichtenhofer, C., Darrell, T., and Xie, S.: A ConvNet for the 2020s, 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 18–24 June 2022, 11966–11976, https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01167,2022.
Löffler-Mang, M. and Joss, J.: An Optical Disdrometer for Measuring Size and Velocity of Hydrometeors, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 17, 130–139, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2000)017<0130:AODFMS>2.0.CO;2, 2000.
Löffler-Mang, M., Schön, D., and Landry, M.: Characteristics of a new automatic hail recorder, Atmos. Res., 100, 439–446, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.10.026, 2011.
Lyu, B.: HailCam: An Automated Imaging System for Real-Time Measurement of Hail Size Distributions and Fall Rates, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18585359, 2026.
Martius, O., Hering, A., Kunz, M., Manzato, A., Mohr, S., Nisi, L., and Trefalt, S.: Challenges and Recent Advances in Hail Research, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 99, ES51–ES54, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0207.1, 2018.
Mroz, K., Battaglia, A., Lang, T. J., Cecil, D. J., Tanelli, S., and Tridon, F.: Hail-Detection Algorithm for the GPM Core Observatory Satellite Sensors, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 56, 1939–1957, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-16-0368.1, 2017.
Nisi, L., Hering, A., Germann, U., and Martius, O.: A 15-year hail streak climatology for the Alpine region, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 144, 1429–1449, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3286, 2018.
Pflaum, J. C.: New Clues for Decoding Hailstone Structure, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 65, 583–593, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1984)065<0583:NCFDHS>2.0.CO;2, 1984.
Pilorz, W., Zięba, M., Szturc, J., and Łupikasza, E.: Large hail detection using radar-based VIL calibrated with isotherms from the ERA5 reanalysis, Atmos. Res., 274, 106185, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106185, 2022.
Punge, H. J. and Kunz, M.: Hail observations and hailstorm characteristics in Europe: A review, Atmos. Res., 176–177, 159–184, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.02.012, 2016.
Raupach, T. H., Martius, O., Allen, J. T., Kunz, M., Lasher-Trapp, S., Mohr, S., Rasmussen, K. L., Trapp, R. J., and Zhang, Q.: The effects of climate change on hailstorms, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 2, 213–226, 2021.
Ravinder, A., Reddy, P. K., and Prasad, N.: Detection of Wavelengths for Hail Identification Using Satellite Imagery of Clouds, 2013 Fifth International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Communication Systems and Networks, 5–7 June 2013, 205–211, https://doi.org/10.1109/CICSYN.2013.14, 2013.
Sánchez, J. L., Gil-Robles, B., Dessens, J., Martin, E., Lopez, L., Marcos, J. L., Berthet, C., Fernández, J. T., and García-Ortega, E.: Characterization of hailstone size spectra in hailpad networks in France, Spain, and Argentina, Atmos. Res., 93, 641–654, 2009.
Skripnikova, K. and Rezacova, D.: Radar-based hail detection, Atmos. Res., 144, 175–185, 2014.
Smyth, T. J., Blackman, T. M., and Illingworth, A. J.: Observations of oblate hail using dual polarization radar and implications for hail-detection schemes, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 125, 993–1016, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712555512, 1999.
Soderholm, J. S., Kumjian, M. R., McCarthy, N., Maldonado, P., and Wang, M.: Quantifying hail size distributions from the sky – application of drone aerial photogrammetry, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 747–754, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-747-2020, 2020.
Tokay, A., Wolff, D. B., and Petersen, W. A.: Evaluation of the New Version of the Laser-Optical Disdrometer, OTT Parsivel2, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 31, 1276–1288, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00174.1, 2014.
Wang, P. K., Greenwald, T. J., and Wang, J.: A Three Parameter Representation of the Shape and Size Distributions of Hailstones – A Case Study, J. Atmos. Sci., 44, 1062–1070, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1987)044<1062:ATPROT>2.0.CO;2, 1987.
Wobrock, W., Flossmann, A. I., and Farley, R. D.: Comparison of observed and modelled hailstone spectra during a severe storm over the Northern Pyrenean foothills, Atmos. Res., 67, 685–703, 2003.
Short summary
Hailstorms cause significant damage, yet measuring hail accurately remains difficult because current sensors have small sampling area and often confuse hail with rain. To solve this, we developed HailCam, a smart camera system, that counts and measures hail size every minute. Tests of the system prove that it is highly accurate and better than existing tools at ignoring rain. This technology is crucial to improve forecasts, warn communities earlier, and help scientists better understand storms.
Hailstorms cause significant damage, yet measuring hail accurately remains difficult because...