Articles | Volume 19, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-813-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-813-2026
Research article
 | 
05 Feb 2026
Research article |  | 05 Feb 2026

Uncertainty and retrieval sensitivity in TROPOMI-based methane inversions over the North Slope of Alaska

Rebecca H. Ward, Luke M. Western, Rachel L. Tunnicliffe, Elena Fillola, Aki Tsuruta, Tuula Aalto, and Anita L. Ganesan

Related authors

GATES-Background 0.2.0: Emulating background greenhouse gas mole fractions for regional atmospheric inverse modelling with graph neural networks
Nawid Keshtmand, Elena Fillola, Jeff Clark, Raul Santos-Rodriguez, and Matthew Rigby
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3361,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3361, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Evaluation of the LandscapeDNDC model for drained peatland forest managements, LDNDC v1.35.2 (revision 11434)
Ahmed Hasan Shahriyer, David Kraus, Tiina Markkanen, Mika Korkiakoski, Helena Rautakoski, Suvi Orttenvuori, Yao Gao, Henri Kajasilta, Rüdiger Grote, Annalea Lohila, and Tuula Aalto
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 8815–8838, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-8815-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-8815-2026, 2026
Short summary
Methane Inversion inter-Comparison (MICA): A Multi-model Estimation of Regional and National Emissions in Asia
Fenjuan Wang, Shamil Maksyutov, Rajesh Janardanan, Dmitry A. Belikov, Prabir K. Patra, Ruosi Liang, Yuzhong Zhang, Ge Ren, Hong Lin, Nicole Montenegro, Antoine Berchet, Marielle Saunois, Adrien Martinez, Sara Hyvärinen, Aki Tsuruta, Samuel Takele Kenea, Miao Liang, Xin Lan, Yukio Terao, M. Kawser Ahmed, Manish Naja, Akihiko Ito, Isamu Morino, Yukio Yoshida, Yu Someya, Tazu Saeki, and Tsuneo Matsunaga
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-420,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-420, 2026
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
The air-sea CO2 fluxes and ship CO2 emissions in the Baltic Sea during 2019–2021, using in-situ and inversion methods
Vertti Kettunen, Tuula Aalto, Henry C. Bittig, Jukka-Pekka Jalkanen, Lauri Laakso, Anteneh Mengistu, Gregor Rehder, Maria Tenkanen, and Martti Honkanen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5442,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5442, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Ocean Science (OS).
Short summary
High-resolution inversion of methane emissions over Europe using the Community Inversion Framework and FLEXPART
Anteneh Getachew Mengistu, Aki Tsuruta, Antoine Berchet, Rona Thompson, Maria Tenkanen, Hannakaisa Lindqvist, Tiina Markkanen, Antti Leppänen, Antti Laitinen, Adrien Martinez, Audrey Fortems-Cheiney, Lena Höglund-Isaksson, and Tuula Aalto
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 12295–12327, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-12295-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-12295-2026, 2026
Short summary

Cited articles

Alexe, M., Bergamaschi, P., Segers, A., Detmers, R., Butz, A., Hasekamp, O., Guerlet, S., Parker, R., Boesch, H., Frankenberg, C., Scheepmaker, R. A., Dlugokencky, E., Sweeney, C., Wofsy, S. C., and Kort, E. A.: Inverse modelling of CH4 emissions for 2010–2011 using different satellite retrieval products from GOSAT and SCIAMACHY, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 113–133, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-113-2015, 2015. a, b
Berchet, A., Pison, I., Chevallier, F., Paris, J.-D., Bousquet, P., Bonne, J.-L., Arshinov, M. Y., Belan, B. D., Cressot, C., Davydov, D. K., Dlugokencky, E. J., Fofonov, A. V., Galanin, A., Lavrič, J., Machida, T., Parker, R., Sasakawa, M., Spahni, R., Stocker, B. D., and Winderlich, J.: Natural and anthropogenic methane fluxes in Eurasia: a mesoscale quantification by generalized atmospheric inversion, Biogeosciences, 12, 5393–5414, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-5393-2015, 2015. a
Bergamaschi, P., Frankenberg, C., Meirink, J. F., Krol, M., Villani, M. G., Houweling, S., Dentener, F., Dlugokencky, E. J., Miller, J. B., Gatti, L. V., Engel, A., and Levin, I.: Inverse modeling of global and regional CH4 emissions using SCIAMACHY satellite retrievals, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 114, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012287, 2009. a, b
Box, J. E., Colgan, W. T., Christensen, T. R., Schmidt, N. M., Lund, M., Parmentier, F.-J. W., Brown, R., Bhatt, U. S., Euskirchen, E. S., Romanovsky, V. E., Walsh, J. E., Overland, J. E., Wang, M., Corell, R. W., Meier, W. N., Wouters, B., Mernild, S., Mård, J., Pawlak, J., and Olsen, M. S.: Key indicators of Arctic climate change: 1971–2017, Environ. Res. Lett., 14, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aafc1b, 2019. a
Buchwitz, M., de Beek, R., Noël, S., Burrows, J. P., Bovensmann, H., Bremer, H., Bergamaschi, P., Körner, S., and Heimann, M.: Carbon monoxide, methane and carbon dioxide columns retrieved from SCIAMACHY by WFM-DOAS: year 2003 initial data set, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 3313–3329, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-3313-2005, 2005. a
Download
Short summary
We studied methane emissions in Arctic Alaska using satellite observations to assess how well they can monitor this important greenhouse gas. We found that emission estimates varied depending on the satellite data product and were strongly affected by assumptions in the model. Our results highlight the need for careful interpretation of emissions from Arctic satellite data and thorough testing of models, with implications for reliable climate monitoring.
Share