488 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Using reflectance to explain vegetation biochemical and structural effects on sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence P. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.11.039
2. Large spatial variation and stagnation of cropland gross primary production increases the challenges of sustainable grain production and food security in China F. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151408
3. Using High-Frequency PAR Measurements to Assess the Quality of the SIF Derived from Continuous Field Observations S. Han et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14092083
4. The 2013 FLEX—US Airborne Campaign at the Parker Tract Loblolly Pine Plantation in North Carolina, USA E. Middleton et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9060612
5. Evaluation of drought using satellite solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence during crop development stage over Xinjiang, China S. Pandiyan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110327
6. Role of climate in the rise and fall of the Neo-Assyrian Empire A. Sinha et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax6656
7. Unusual characteristics of the carbon cycle during the 2015−2016 El Niño K. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15669
8. Improving Winter Wheat Yield Forecasting Based on Multi-Source Data and Machine Learning Y. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12050571
9. Using enhanced vegetation index and land surface temperature to reconstruct the solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence of forests and grasslands across latitude and phenology P. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2023.1257287
10. A Method to Weaken Cloud Interference in Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF) Reconstruction by Using Satellite VOD Observations J. Ding et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2025.3576504
11. Continued Increases of Gross Primary Production in Urban Areas during 2000–2016 Y. Cui et al. https://doi.org/10.34133/2022/9868564
12. Performance of Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence in Estimating Water-Use Efficiency in a Temperate Forest X. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10050796
13. OCO‐2 Satellite‐Imposed Constraints on Terrestrial Biospheric CO2 Fluxes Over South Asia S. Philip et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035035
14. Comparison of Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Light Use Efficiency Models for Gross Primary Productivity Estimation on Three Mid-latitude Grassland Sites in North America Y. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41064-021-00171-y
15. A Spatially Downscaled TROPOMI SIF Product at 0.005° Resolution With Bias Correction J. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2024.3433371
16. Spectral biology across scales in changing environments J. Cavender‐Bares et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.70078
17. The Downscaled GOME-2 SIF Based on Machine Learning Enhances the Correlation with Ecosystem Productivity C. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17152642
18. Evaluating the benefits of chlorophyll fluorescence for in-season crop productivity forecasting L. Sloat et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112478
19. Review of Top-of-Canopy Sun-Induced Fluorescence (SIF) Studies from Ground, UAV, Airborne to Spaceborne Observations S. Bandopadhyay et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20041144
20. Combining GOSAT XCO2 observations over land and ocean to improve regional CO2 flux estimates F. Deng et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024157
21. Precipitation and carbon-water coupling jointly control the interannual variability of global land gross primary production Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39748
22. Divergent response of crops and natural vegetation to the record-breaking extreme precipitation event in 2020 modulated by topography J. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acdaae
23. Global patterns of water storage in the rooting zones of vegetation B. Stocker et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01125-2
24. Spatiotemporal Consistency of Four Gross Primary Production Products and Solar‐Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence in Response to Climate Extremes Across CONUS in 2012 X. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JG004484
25. Soil moisture dominates dryness stress on ecosystem production globally L. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18631-1
26. The spatial heterogeneity of the relationship between gross primary production and sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence regulated by climate conditions during 2007–2018 Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01721
27. The Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Imaging Spectrometer (SIFIS) Onboard the First Terrestrial Ecosystem Carbon Inventory Satellite (TECIS-1): Specifications and Prospects S. Du et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20030815
28. Monitoring drought impacts on crop productivity of the U.S. Midwest with solar-induced fluorescence: GOSIF outperforms GOME-2 SIF and MODIS NDVI, EVI, and NIRv R. Qiu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.109038
29. Global and Brazilian Carbon Response to El Niño Modoki 2011–2010 K. Bowman et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EA000204
30. Can Vegetation Indices Serve as Proxies for Potential Sun-Induced Fluorescence (SIF)? A Fuzzy Simulation Approach on Airborne Imaging Spectroscopy Data S. Bandopadhyay et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13132545
31. Process-based modeling of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence with VISIT-SIF version 1.0 T. Miyauchi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2329-2025
32. Upscaling Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence from an Instantaneous to Daily Scale Gives an Improved Estimation of the Gross Primary Productivity J. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10101663
33. Systematic Orbital Geometry-Dependent Variations in Satellite Solar-Induced Fluorescence (SIF) Retrievals J. Joiner et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12152346
34. Rainforest-initiated wet season onset over the southern Amazon J. Wright et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1621516114
35. Assessing the potential of sun-induced fluorescence and the canopy scattering coefficient to track large-scale vegetation dynamics in Amazon forests P. Köhler et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.09.025
36. TanSat-2: a new satellite for mapping solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence at both red and far-red bands with high spatiotemporal resolution D. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3647-2025
37. Effect of environmental factors on solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence across typical tree species in the Giant Panda National Park S. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2026.2626667
38. Effects of Drought on the Relationship Between Photosynthesis and Chlorophyll Fluorescence for Maize J. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3123111
39. Characteristics of Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence in the Three River Headwaters Region, Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau during 2001 to 2020 J. Miao et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914177
40. Reconstructed Solar‐Induced Fluorescence: A Machine Learning Vegetation Product Based on MODIS Surface Reflectance to Reproduce GOME‐2 Solar‐Induced Fluorescence P. Gentine & S. Alemohammad https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076294
41. Sensitivity of solar-induced fluorescence to spectral stray light in high resolution imaging spectroscopy L. Albert et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.113313
42. Spatio-temporal approach to moving window block kriging of satellite data v1.0 J. Tadić et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-709-2017
43. Kenyan tea is made with heat and water: how will climate change influence its yield? A. Rigden et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab70be
44. Application of satellite solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence to understanding large-scale variations in vegetation phenology and function over northern high latitude forests S. Jeong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.11.021
45. Sun‐Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence, Photosynthesis, and Light Use Efficiency of a Soybean Field from Seasonally Continuous Measurements G. Miao et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JG004180
46. Where Does Moisture Come From Over the Congo Basin? S. Worden et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG006024
47. Estimation of Chlorophyll Fluorescence at Different Scales: A Review Z. Ni et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19133000
48. Using different radiative transfer schemes for solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) in evergreen coniferous forests with a terrestrial biosphere model T. Thum et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-3541-2026
49. Temporal consistency between gross primary production and solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence in the ten most populous megacity areas over years Y. Cui et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13783-5
50. Amazon drought and forest response: Largely reduced forest photosynthesis but slightly increased canopy greenness during the extreme drought of 2015/2016 J. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14056
51. Contrasting Regional Carbon Cycle Responses to Seasonal Climate Anomalies Across the East‐West Divide of Temperate North America B. Byrne et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GB006598
52. Seasonality of Tropical Photosynthesis: A Pantropical Map of Correlations With Precipitation and Radiation and Comparison to Model Outputs M. Uribe et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG006123
53. Higher absorbed solar radiation partly offset the negative effects of water stress on the photosynthesis of Amazon forests during the 2015 drought X. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab0b1
54. Assessing the Potential of Downscaled Far Red Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence from the Canopy to Leaf Level for Drought Monitoring in Winter Wheat J. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14061357
55. Small anomalies in dry-season greenness and chlorophyll fluorescence for Amazon moist tropical forests during El Niño and La Niña R. Doughty et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112196
56. Modeling canopy conductance and transpiration from solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence N. Shan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.01.031
57. Photosynthetic productivity and its efficiencies in ISIMIP2a biome models: benchmarking for impact assessment studies A. Ito et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa7a19
58. Phenological Characteristics of Global Ecosystems Based on Optical, Fluorescence, and Microwave Remote Sensing M. Dannenberg et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12040671
59. Algae Blooms on the Greenland Ice Sheet Detected Through Solar-Induced Fluorescence C. Gerlein-Safdi et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2023.3305194
60. Retrieval of sun-induced fluorescence using advanced spectral fitting methods S. Cogliati et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.08.022
61. Soil moisture estimation in South Asia via assimilation of SMAP retrievals J. Ahmad et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2221-2022
62. Estimating Diurnal Courses of Gross Primary Production for Maize: A Comparison of Sun-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence, Light-Use Efficiency and Process-Based Models T. Cui et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9121267
63. Characterization of FIREFLY, an Imaging Spectrometer Designed for Remote Sensing of Solar Induced Fluorescence I. Paynter et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20174682
64. OCO-2 advances photosynthesis observation from space via solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence Y. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam5747
65. Relationship of surface soil moisture with solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and normalized difference vegetation index in different phenological stages: a case study of Northeast China Q. Shen et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd2f1
66. Solar‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence is strongly correlated with terrestrial photosynthesis for a wide variety of biomes: First global analysis based on OCO‐2 and flux tower observations X. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14297
67. Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF): Towards a Better Understanding of Vegetation Dynamics and Carbon Uptake in Arctic-Boreal Ecosystems R. Cheng https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-024-00194-8
68. New data‐driven estimation of terrestrial CO2 fluxes in Asia using a standardized database of eddy covariance measurements, remote sensing data, and support vector regression K. Ichii et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JG003640
69. Comparison of Phenological Parameters Extracted from SIF, NDVI and NIRv Data on the Mongolian Plateau C. Ersi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15010187
70. Satellite Observations of the Contrasting Response of Trees and Grasses to Variations in Water Availability S. Walther et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080535
71. Advantage of multi-band solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence to derive canopy photosynthesis in a temperate forest Z. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107691
72. Hybrid Machine Learning and Geostatistical Methods for Gap Filling and Predicting Solar-Induced Fluorescence Values J. Tadić et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16101707
73. Linking photosynthesis and sun-induced fluorescence at sub-daily to seasonal scales S. Wieneke et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.10.019
74. Exploring the use of satellite observations of soil moisture, solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and vegetation optical depth to monitor droughts across India M. Likith et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-022-01848-7
75. Seasonal patterns of canopy photosynthesis captured by remotely sensed sun-induced fluorescence and vegetation indexes in mid-to-high latitude forests: A cross-platform comparison X. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.269
76. Understanding the Land Carbon Cycle with Space Data: Current Status and Prospects J. Exbrayat et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-019-09506-2
77. Reply to Magnani et al.: Linking large-scale chlorophyll fluorescence observations with cropland gross primary production L. Guanter et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1406996111
78. Improved Methods for Retrieval of Chlorophyll Fluorescence from Satellite Observation in the Far-Red Band Using Singular Value Decomposition Algorithm K. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16183441
79. Monitoring and Assessing the 2012 Drought in the Great Plains: Analyzing Satellite-Retrieved Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence, Drought Indices, and Gross Primary Production S. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8020061
80. Detecting regional GPP variations with statistically downscaled solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) based on GOME-2 and MODIS data S. Hu & X. Mo https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2020.1798549
81. Spatially-explicit monitoring of crop photosynthetic capacity through the use of space-based chlorophyll fluorescence data Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.03.031
82. Seasonal Variations of Solar‐Induced Fluorescence, Precipitation, and Carbon Dioxide Over the Amazon R. Albright et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA002078
83. Connecting active to passive fluorescence with photosynthesis: a method for evaluating remote sensing measurements of Chl fluorescence T. Magney et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14662
84. Response of alpine vegetation function to climate change in the Tibetan Plateau: A perspective from solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence Y. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175845
85. Remote sensing of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) in vegetation: 50 years of progress G. Mohammed et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.04.030
86. Land–atmosphere interactions in the tropics – a review P. Gentine et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4171-2019
87. Uncertainties of soil organic carbon stock estimation caused by paleoclimate and human footprint on the Qinghai Plateau X. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-022-00203-z
88. UAVs challenge to assess water stress for sustainable agriculture J. Gago et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.01.020
89. Optical and Thermal Remote Sensing for Monitoring Agricultural Drought Q. Qin et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13245092
90. Model-based analysis of the relationship between sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and gross primary production for remote sensing applications Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.10.016
91. Spectral monitoring of wheat canopy under uncontrolled conditions for decision making purposes F. Rodriguez-Moreno et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2016.05.002
92. Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and its link to canopy photosynthesis in maize from continuous ground measurements Z. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111420
93. Responses of Australian Dryland Vegetation to the 2019 Heat Wave at a Subdaily Scale B. Qiu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086569
94. Estimation of Terrestrial Global Gross Primary Production (GPP) with Satellite Data-Driven Models and Eddy Covariance Flux Data J. Joiner et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10091346
95. Contrasting responses of vegetation productivity to intraseasonal rainfall in Earth system models B. Harris et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1019-2024
96. Sun-induced fluorescence as a proxy for primary productivity across vegetation types and climates M. Pickering et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-4833-2022
97. A spatially downscaled sun-induced fluorescence global product for enhanced monitoring of vegetation productivity G. Duveiller et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1101-2020
98. Partitioning Evapotranspiration Over the Continental United States Using Weather Station Data A. Rigden et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079121
99. Sun-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence III: Benchmarking Retrieval Methods and Sensor Characteristics for Proximal Sensing M. Cendrero-Mateo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11080962
100. On the relationship between sub-daily instantaneous and daily total gross primary production: Implications for interpreting satellite-based SIF retrievals Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.12.009
101. Bidirectional drought‐related canopy dynamics across pantropical forests: a satellite‐based statistical analysis L. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.229
102. Tundra photosynthesis captured by satellite‐observed solar‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence K. Luus et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070842
103. Differences Between OCO‐2 and GOME‐2 SIF Products From a Model‐Data Fusion Perspective C. Bacour et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JG004938
104. Spatial Heterogeneity and Complexity of the Impact of Extreme Climate on Vegetation in China S. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105748
105. Monitoring Carbon Stock Change at the Individual-Plant Scale: A Methodological Review and Integrative Framework R. Ren et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17050563
106. Progress and Perspectives of Crop Yield Forecasting With Remote Sensing: A review G. Xiao et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/MGRS.2025.3571906
107. Improved consistency in solar-induced fluorescence retrievals from GOME-2A with the SIFTER v3 algorithm J. Anema et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1961-2025
108. Global Relationships between Cropland Intensification and Summer Temperature Extremes over the Last 50 Years N. Mueller et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0096.1
109. Sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence is more strongly related to photosynthesis with hemispherical than nadir measurements: Evidence from field observations and model simulations Z. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.113118
110. Estimating Global Gross Primary Production from Sun-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Data and Auxiliary Information Using Machine Learning Methods Y. Bai et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13050963
111. The impact of alternative trait‐scaling hypotheses for the maximum photosynthetic carboxylation rate (Vcmax) on global gross primary production A. Walker et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14623
112. Moisture availability mediates the relationship between terrestrial gross primary production and solar‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence: Insights from global‐scale variations A. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15373
113. Photosynthetic seasonality of global tropical forests constrained by hydroclimate K. Guan et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2382
114. Adjustments to SIF Aid the Interpretation of Drought Responses at the Caatinga of Northeast Brazil E. Bontempo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12193264
115. Anatomy of the 2018 agricultural drought in the Netherlands using in situ soil moisture and satellite vegetation indices J. Buitink et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-6021-2020
116. A radiative transfer model for solar induced fluorescence using spectral invariants theory Y. Zeng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111678
117. An improved downscaled sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (DSIF) product of GOME-2 dataset Y. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2022.2028579
118. Exploring sandy vegetation sensitivities to water storage in China’s arid and semi-arid regions X. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108711
119. Light limitation regulates the response of autumn terrestrial carbon uptake to warming Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0806-0
120. Modelling sun-induced fluorescence for improved evaluation of forest carbon flux (GPP): Case study of tropical deciduous forest, India S. Sinha et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109552
121. Evaluating the Impact of Summer Drought on Vegetation Growth Using Space-Based Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Across Extensive Spatial Measures S. Pandiyan et al. https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2020.0350
122. Observed water and light limitation across global ecosystems F. Jonard et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-5575-2022
123. Spatial pattern and seasonal dynamics of the photosynthesis activity across Australian rainfed croplands J. Shen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105669
124. Response of Vegetation Productivity to Greening and Drought in the Loess Plateau Based on VIs and SIF X. Hou et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15020339
125. NIRVP: A robust structural proxy for sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis across scales B. Dechant et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112763
126. Simplified physically based retrieval of sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence from GOSAT data P. Kohler et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2015.2407051
127. A convolutional neural network for spatial downscaling of satellite-based solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIFnet) J. Gensheimer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-1777-2022
128. Sensitivity of remote sensing-based vegetation proxies to climate and sea surface temperature variabilities in Australia and parts of Southeast Asia S. Arjasakusuma et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2020.1782509
129. Drought index revisited to assess its response to vegetation in different agro-climatic zones M. Abrar Faiz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128543
130. What is global photosynthesis? History, uncertainties and opportunities Y. Ryu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.01.016
131. Accounting for Changes in Radiation Improves the Ability of SIF to Track Water Stress‐Induced Losses in Summer GPP in a Temperate Deciduous Forest Z. Butterfield et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JG007352
132. Enhanced gross primary production and evapotranspiration in juniper‐encroached grasslands J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14441
133. Using satellite-based Sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and spectral reflectance for improving terrestrial CO2 flux estimates of India A. Ravi et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-664X/adabed
134. Multi-angular instrument for tower-based observations of canopy sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence S. Chou et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10739149.2019.1674326
135. A Machine Learning Approach for Mapping Chlorophyll Fluorescence at Inland Wetlands M. Bartold & M. Kluczek https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15092392
136. Evaluating the predictive power of sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence to estimate net photosynthesis of vegetation canopies: A SCOPE modeling study J. Verrelst et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.01.018
137. Contrasting responses of relationship between solar-induced fluorescence and gross primary production to drought across aridity gradients R. Qiu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2023.113984
138. Global retrieval of the spectrum of terrestrial chlorophyll fluorescence: First results with TROPOMI F. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2023.113903
139. Retrieval of Sun-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Using Statistical Method Without Synchronous Irradiance Data L. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2016.2644643
140. Response of dryland vegetation under extreme wet events with satellite measures of greenness and fluorescence S. Leng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156860
141. Exploring the Potential of Spatially Downscaled Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence to Monitor Drought Effects on Gross Primary Production in Winter Wheat Q. Shen et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2022.3148393
142. 植被日光诱导叶绿素荧光高光谱成像仪研究（特邀） 于. Yu Lei et al. https://doi.org/10.3788/LOP232182
143. Modelling sun-induced fluorescence and photosynthesis with a land surface model at local and regional scales in northern Europe T. Thum et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-1969-2017
144. The Novel Microwave Temperature Vegetation Drought Index (MTVDI) Captures Canopy Seasonality across Amazonian Tropical Evergreen Forests L. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13030339
145. Global Analysis of the Relationship between Reconstructed Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF) and Gross Primary Production (GPP) H. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13142824
146. Reflectance and chlorophyll fluorescence-based retrieval of photosynthetic parameters improves the estimation of subtropical forest productivity M. Amir et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108133
147. Combination of Vegetation Indices and SIF Can Better Track Phenological Metrics and Gross Primary Production C. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JG007315
148. Impacts of drought and heatwave on the terrestrial ecosystem in China as revealed by satellite solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence X. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133627
149. High-Resolution Satellite-Driven Estimation of Photosynthetic Carbon Sequestration in the Sundarbans Mangrove Forest, Bangladesh N. Hussain et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18030401
150. Simulating spatially distributed solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence using a BEPS-SCOPE coupling framework T. Cui et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108169
151. The TROPOSIF global sun-induced fluorescence dataset from the Sentinel-5P TROPOMI mission L. Guanter et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-5423-2021
152. Inconsistent Diurnal Patterns of Far-Red Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Retrieved with Different Algorithms from Tower-Based Observations X. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.34133/remotesensing.0429
153. Drone-based area scanning of vegetation fluorescence height profiles using a miniaturized hyperspectral lidar system X. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-018-7078-7
154. Unraveling the Scale Dependency of SIF-Based Phenology: Amplified Trends and Climate Responses X. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17122059
155. Sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and photochemical reflectance index improve remote-sensing gross primary production estimates under varying nutrient availability in a typical Mediterranean savanna ecosystem O. Perez-Priego et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-6351-2015
156. Comparison of Spring Phenology from Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence, Vegetation Index, and Ground Observations in Boreal Forests D. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17040627
157. Spatially varying relevance of hydrometeorological hazards for vegetation productivity extremes J. Kroll et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-477-2022
158. Integrating multi-source datasets in exploring the covariation of gross primary productivity (GPP) and solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) at an Indian tropical forest flux site M. Hari et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-024-11528-y
159. Investigating the usefulness of satellite-derived fluorescence data in inferring gross primary productivity within the carbon cycle data assimilation system E. Koffi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-4067-2015
160. Characterizing biospheric carbon balance using CO2 observations from the OCO-2 satellite S. Miller et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6785-2018
161. From Canopy‐Leaving to Total Canopy Far‐Red Fluorescence Emission for Remote Sensing of Photosynthesis: First Results From TROPOMI Z. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL084832
162. Comparative Analysis on the Estimation of Diurnal Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Dynamics for a Subtropical Evergreen Coniferous Forest J. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13163143
163. Canopy near-infrared reflectance and terrestrial photosynthesis G. Badgley et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1602244
164. Progress of studies on satellite-based terrestrial vegetation production models in China W. Yuan et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091333221114864
165. Diverse photosynthetic capacity of global ecosystems mapped by satellite chlorophyll fluorescence measurements L. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111344
166. Remotely Monitoring Vegetation Productivity in Two Contrasting Subtropical Forest Ecosystems Using Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence G. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14061328
167. Combining Sun-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Photochemical Reflectance Index Improves Diurnal Modeling of Gross Primary Productivity A. Schickling et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8070574
168. TCSIF: a temporally consistent global Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment-2A (GOME-2A) solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence dataset with the correction of sensor degradation C. Zou et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2789-2024
169. Downscaling of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence from canopy level to photosystem level using a random forest model X. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.05.035
170. The Effect of Principal Component Analysis Parameters on Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Signal Extraction Z. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11114883
171. Evaluating the Performance of the SCOPE Model in Simulating Canopy Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence J. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10020250
172. Estimation of methane emissions based on crop yield and remote sensing data in a paddy field Y. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.1946
173. A Spatial Downscaling Method for Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Product Using Random Forest Regression and Drought Monitoring in Henan Province Z. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16060963
174. Mapping Photosynthesis Solely from Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence: A Global, Fine-Resolution Dataset of Gross Primary Production Derived from OCO-2 X. Li & J. Xiao https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11212563
175. FLiES-SIF version 1.0: three-dimensional radiative transfer model for estimating solar induced fluorescence Y. Sakai et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4041-2020
176. Estimation of vegetation photosynthetic capacity from space‐based measurements of chlorophyll fluorescence for terrestrial biosphere models Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12664
177. Sun-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence I: Instrumental Considerations for Proximal Spectroradiometers J. Pacheco-Labrador et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11080960
178. Improved SIFTER v2 algorithm for long-term GOME-2A satellite retrievals of fluorescence with a correction for instrument degradation E. van Schaik et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4295-2020
179. Correcting Clear‐Sky Bias in Gross Primary Production Modeling From Satellite Solar‐Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Data Z. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG005822
180. Solar-induced fluorescence of terrestrial chlorophyll derived from the O2-A band of Hyperion hyperspectral images B. Raychaudhuri https://doi.org/10.1080/2150704X.2014.976884
181. Spatio‐Temporal Convergence of Maximum Daily Light‐Use Efficiency Based on Radiation Absorption by Canopy Chlorophyll Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017GL076354
182. Land cover change alters seasonal photosynthetic activity and transpiration of Amazon forest and Cerrado M. Uribe & J. Dukes https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abf60d
183. The relationship between spectral and integrated sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and its implication for photosynthesis estimation using fluorescence observations J. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2025.115113
184. Solar‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence that correlates with canopy photosynthesis on diurnal and seasonal scales in a temperate deciduous forest X. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063201
185. Estimating Chlorophyll Fluorescence Parameters Using the Joint Fraunhofer Line Depth and Laser-Induced Saturation Pulse (FLD-LISP) Method in Different Plant Species P. Rahimzadeh-Bajgiran et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9060599
186. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Remote Sensing in Grassland Ecosystem Monitoring: A Systematic Review X. Lyu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14051096
187. A comprehensive framework for seasonal controls of leaf abscission and productivity in evergreen broadleaved tropical and subtropical forests X. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100154
188. Variability, Trend, and Extremes of the South American Vegetation‐Climate System: Results From a Coupled Regional Model A. Erfanian et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035691
189. Spaceborne Sun-Induced Vegetation Fluorescence Time Series from 2007 to 2015 Evaluated with Australian Flux Tower Measurements A. Sanders et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8110895
190. Indications of Surface and Sub-Surface Hydrologic Properties from SMAP Soil Moisture Retrievals P. Dirmeyer & H. Norton https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology5030036
191. Improving the monitoring of crop productivity using spaceborne solar‐induced fluorescence K. Guan et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13136
192. A Review of Crop Water Stress Assessment Using Remote Sensing U. Ahmad et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13204155
193. 3D-CNN based UAV hyperspectral imagery for grassland degradation indicator ground object classification research W. Pi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101278
194. Covariation of Airborne Biogenic Tracers (CO2, COS, and CO) Supports Stronger Than Expected Growing Season Photosynthetic Uptake in the Southeastern US N. Parazoo et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GB006956
195. Sun‐induced fluorescence – a new probe of photosynthesis: First maps from the imaging spectrometer HyPlant U. Rascher et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13017
196. Global observed and modelled impacts of irrigation on surface temperature L. Chen & P. Dirmeyer https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5973
197. Satellite Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Reveals Heat Stress Impacts on Wheat Yield in India Y. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12203277
198. Prospects for Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Remote Sensing from the SIFIS Payload Onboard the TECIS-1 Satellite S. Du et al. https://doi.org/10.34133/2022/9845432
199. Limited capability of current satellite solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence reconstructions to capture stomatal responses to environmental stresses J. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-03035-0
200. Partitioning eddy covariance CO2 fluxes into ecosystem respiration and gross primary productivity through a new hybrid four sub-deep neural network H. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2023.108810
201. Soil moisture retrieval by a novel hybrid model based on CYGNSS and Sun-induced fluorescence data Y. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130845
202. High sensitivity of gross primary production in the Rocky Mountains to summer rain M. Berkelhammer et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL072495
203. Assessing the benefit of satellite-based Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence in crop yield prediction B. Peng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2020.102126
204. Modeling of inelastically scattered radiation: Rotational Raman scattering in the spherical Earth’s atmosphere A. Rozanov et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107611
205. Comparison of solar‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence, light‐use efficiency, and process‐based GPP models in maize P. Wagle et al. https://doi.org/10.1890/15-1434
206. Directly estimating diurnal changes in GPP for C3 and C4 crops using far-red sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence L. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.06.014
207. Global Retrievals of Solar‐Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence at Red Wavelengths With TROPOMI P. Köhler et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL087541
208. The 2012 Flash Drought Threatened US Midwest Agroecosystems C. Jin et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-019-1066-7
209. How well do light-use efficiency models capture large-scale drought impacts on vegetation productivity compared with data-driven estimates? Y. Lv et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109739
210. An integrated solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence model for more accurate soil organic carbon content estimation in an Alpine agricultural area Q. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-022-05863-x
211. Drought detection and assessment with solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence in summer maize growth period over North China Plain X. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.05.017
212. Quantifying the accuracy of cos(SZA)-based upscaling from instantaneous to daily GPP: Implications for improving satellite-based SIF and GPP retrievals F. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2025.105541
213. Earth Observation for agricultural drought monitoring in the Pannonian Basin (southeastern Europe): current state and future directions L. Crocetti et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-020-01710-w
214. Spatially downscaling sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence leads to an improved temporal correlation with gross primary productivity G. Duveiller & A. Cescatti https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.04.027
215. A Novel Principal Component Analysis Method for the Reconstruction of Leaf Reflectance Spectra and Retrieval of Leaf Biochemical Contents L. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9111113
216. Spatiotemporal Patterns and Phenology of Tropical Vegetation Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence across Brazilian Biomes Using Satellite Observations T. Merrick et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11151746
217. Angular normalization of GOME‐2 Sun‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence observation as a better proxy of vegetation productivity L. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073708
218. Difference in seasonal peak timing of soybean far-red SIF and GPP explained by canopy structure and chlorophyll content G. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.113104
219. Ground far-red sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and vegetation indices in the US Midwestern agroecosystems G. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03004-w
220. Estimating sowing dates from satellite data over the U.S. Midwest: A comparison of multiple sensors and metrics D. Urban et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.03.039
221. Satellite-observed solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence reveals higher sensitivity of alpine ecosystems to snow cover on the Tibetan Plateau B. Qiu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.02.045
222. Emerging opportunities and challenges in phenology: a review J. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1436
223. Downscaling Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Based on Convolutional Neural Network Method to Monitor Agricultural Drought Z. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2020.2999371
224. Global GOSAT, OCO-2, and OCO-3 solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence datasets R. Doughty et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-1513-2022
225. The greenhouse gas observation mission with Global Observing SATellite for Greenhouse gases and Water cycle (GOSAT-GW): objectives, conceptual framework and scientific contributions H. Tanimoto et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-025-00684-9
226. Deriving seasonal dynamics in ecosystem properties of semi-arid savanna grasslands from in situ-based hyperspectral reflectance T. Tagesson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-4621-2015
227. A Global, 0.05-Degree Product of Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Derived from OCO-2, MODIS, and Reanalysis Data X. Li & J. Xiao https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11050517
228. Capability of Existing Drought Indices in Reflecting Agricultural Drought in China Z. Zhao & K. Wang https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG006064
229. Forests dominate the interannual variability of the North American carbon sink Y. Shiga et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aad505
230. The efficiency-level inconsistency of the SIF–GPP relationship in a subtropical evergreen forest in Okinawa, Japan J. Fu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2026.111050
231. The SMAP Level 4 Carbon Product for Monitoring Ecosystem Land–Atmosphere CO2 Exchange L. Jones et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2017.2729343
232. Satellite Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Soil Moisture Observations Lead to Advances in the Predictive Understanding of Global Terrestrial Coupled Carbon‐Water Cycles B. Qiu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GB005744
233. The High-Performance Airborne Imaging Spectrometer HyPlant—From Raw Images to Top-of-Canopy Reflectance and Fluorescence Products: Introduction of an Automatized Processing Chain B. Siegmann et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11232760
234. Multi-sensor remote sensing for drought characterization: current status, opportunities and a roadmap for the future W. Jiao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112313
235. A linear method for the retrieval of sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence from GOME-2 and SCIAMACHY data P. Köhler et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2589-2015
236. The role of continental evapotranspiration on water vapour isotopic variability in the troposphere N. Singh et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10256016.2023.2212834
237. Agricultural Green Revolution as a driver of increasing atmospheric CO2 seasonal amplitude N. Zeng et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13893
238. The Relationship of Gross Primary Productivity with NDVI Rather than Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Is Weakened under the Stress of Drought W. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16030555
239. Integrating satellite and climate data to predict wheat yield in Australia using machine learning approaches Y. Cai et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.03.010
240. Retrieval of Terrestrial Plant Fluorescence Based on the In-Filling of Far-Red Fraunhofer Lines Using SCIAMACHY Observations N. Khosravi et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2015.00078
241. A high-resolution satellite-based solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence dataset for China from 2000 to 2022 S. Tao et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-04101-6
242. Development of a filter-based near-surface remote sensing system to retrieve far-red sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence J. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.113311
243. Upscaling GOME-2 SIF from clear-sky instantaneous observations to all-sky sums leading to an improved SIF–GPP correlation J. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108439
244. Tracking Seasonal and Interannual Variability in Photosynthetic Downregulation in Response to Water Stress at a Temperate Deciduous Forest L. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JG005002
245. Peak growing season patterns and climate extremes-driven responses of gross primary production estimated by satellite and process based models over North America W. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108292
246. Assessing the dynamics of vegetation productivity in circumpolar regions with different satellite indicators of greenness and photosynthesis S. Walther et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-6221-2018
247. Modelling the influence of incident radiation on the SIF-based GPP estimation for maize X. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108522
248. The Greenhouse gas Observations of Biospheric and Local Emissions from the Upper sky (GOBLEU): a mission overview, instrument description, and results from the first flight H. Suto et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-024-00273-1
249. Enhanced peak growth of global vegetation and its key mechanisms K. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0714-0
250. A New Global Solar-induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF) Data Product from TanSat Measurements L. Yao et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-020-0204-6
251. Variability of Remotely Sensed Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence in Relation to Climate Indices K. He et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments9090121
252. How well do recently reconstructed solar-induced fluorescence datasets model gross primary productivity? A. Shekhar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.113282
253. Measurement and Correction of Atmospheric Effects at Different Altitudes for Remote Sensing of Sun-Induced Fluorescence in Oxygen Absorption Bands F. Daumard et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2015.2418992
254. Leaf shedding of Pan-Asian tropical evergreen forests depends on the synchrony of seasonal variations of rainfall and incoming solar radiation J. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108691
255. Potential of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) to access long-term dynamics of soil salinity using OCO-2 satellite data and machine learning method R. Du et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.116855
256. A long-term reconstructed TROPOMI solar-induced fluorescence dataset using machine learning algorithms X. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01520-1
257. Globally Consistent Patterns of Asynchrony in Vegetation Phenology Derived From Optical, Microwave, and Fluorescence Satellite Data X. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG005732
258. A fast and sensitive new satellite SO2 retrieval algorithm based on principal component analysis: Application to the ozone monitoring instrument C. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058134
259. Drought monitoring based on a new combined remote sensing index across the transitional area between humid and arid regions in China Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105850
260. Widespread reduction in sun-induced fluorescence from the Amazon during the 2015/2016 El Niño G. Koren et al. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0408
261. Investigation of Atmospheric Effects on Retrieval of Sun-Induced Fluorescence Using Hyperspectral Imagery Z. Ni et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16040480
262. Exposure to cold temperature affects the spring phenology of Alaskan deciduous vegetation types M. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab6502
263. Hyperspectral radiative transfer modeling to explore the combined retrieval of biophysical parameters and canopy fluorescence from FLEX – Sentinel-3 tandem mission multi-sensor data W. Verhoef et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.08.006
264. Consistency between sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and gross primary production of vegetation in North America Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.05.015
265. Global observations of land-atmosphere interactions during flash drought B. Harris et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-6917-2025
266. Airborne based spectroscopy of red and far-red sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence: Implications for improved estimates of gross primary productivity S. Wieneke et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.07.025
267. Land surface phenology detections from multi-source remote sensing indices capturing canopy photosynthesis phenology across major land cover types in the Northern Hemisphere L. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108579
268. Advancing Terrestrial Ecosystem Science With a Novel Automated Measurement System for Sun‐Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence for Integration With Eddy Covariance Flux Networks L. Gu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JG004742
269. Generation of a Global Spatially Continuous TanSat Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Product by Considering the Impact of the Solar Radiation Intensity Y. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12132167
270. Is satellite Sun-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence more indicative than vegetation indices under drought condition? J. Cao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148396
271. On what scales can GOSAT flux inversions constrain anomalies in terrestrial ecosystems? B. Byrne et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13017-2019
272. Chlorophyll fluorescence observed by OCO-2 is strongly related to gross primary productivity estimated from flux towers in temperate forests X. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.09.034
273. Monitoring and Assessment of Agricultural Drought Based on Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence During Growing Season in North China Plain Z. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2020.3032414
274. Data-driven estimates of evapotranspiration and its controls in the Congo Basin M. Burnett et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4189-2020
275. A double peak in the seasonality of California's photosynthesis as observed from space A. Turner et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-405-2020
276. Large biases in the frequency of water limitation across Earth system models F. Giardina et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02426-7
277. Improving Estimates of Gross Primary Productivity by Assimilating Solar‐Induced Fluorescence Satellite Retrievals in a Terrestrial Biosphere Model Using a Process‐Based SIF Model C. Bacour et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JG005040
278. Satellite and In Situ Observations for Advancing Global Earth Surface Modelling: A Review G. Balsamo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10122038
279. Two for one: Partitioning CO2 fluxes and understanding the relationship between solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and gross primary productivity using machine learning W. Zhan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.108980
280. Impact of physiological and phenological change on carbon uptake on the Tibetan Plateau revealed through GPP estimation based on spaceborne solar-induced fluorescence S. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.324
281. Satellite Monitoring of Natural Reforestation Efforts in China's Drylands C. Gerlein-Safdi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2019.12.015
282. A model and measurement comparison of diurnal cycles of sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence of crops C. van der Tol et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.09.021
283. Dry‐Season Greening and Water Stress in Amazonia: The Role of Modeling Leaf Phenology G. Manoli et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JG004282
284. Validation of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence products derived from OCO-2/3 observations using tower-based in situ measurements S. Du et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/2150704X.2023.2234551
285. Estimation of global transpiration from remotely sensed solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence J. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2024.113998
286. Impact of Atmospheric Inversion Effects on Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence: Exploitation of the Apparent Reflectance as a Quality Indicator N. Sabater et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9060622
287. Remote sensing of the terrestrial carbon cycle: A review of advances over 50 years J. Xiao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111383
288. Progress in Remote Sensing of Photosynthetic Activity over the Amazon Basin C. De Sousa et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9010048
289. Evaluation of the Spatial Representativeness of In Situ SIF Observations for the Validation of Medium-Resolution Satellite SIF Products M. Rossini et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14205107
290. Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence captures photosynthetic phenology better than traditional vegetation indices J. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2023.07.021
291. Performance of a two-leaf light use efficiency model for mapping gross primary productivity against remotely sensed sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence data M. Zan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.002
292. Comparison of Sun-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Estimates Obtained from Four Portable Field Spectroradiometers T. Julitta et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8020122
293. A new method for global retrievals of HCHO total columns from the Suomi National Polar‐orbiting Partnership Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite C. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063204
294. Patterns of Arctic Tundra Greenness Based on Spatially Downscaled Solar-Induced Fluorescence D. Fu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11121460
295. The potential of satellite FPAR product for GPP estimation: An indirect evaluation using solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence Z. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111686
296. Deriving photosystem-level red chlorophyll fluorescence emission by combining leaf chlorophyll content and canopy far-red solar-induced fluorescence: Possibilities and challenges L. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2024.114043
297. Evaluation on spatiotemporal consistency between solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and vegetation indices in grassland ecosystems L. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313258
298. Vegetation photosynthesis changes and response to water constraints in the Yangtze River and Yellow River Basin, China A. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109331
299. Chlorophyll-based canopy photosynthesis model: Development and global synergy analysis D. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2026.115468
300. Optimized Spectrometers Characterization Procedure for Near Ground Support of ESA FLEX Observations: Part 1 Spectral Calibration and Characterisation L. Mihai et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10020289
301. Remote‐sensing constraints on South America fire traits by Bayesian fusion of atmospheric and surface data A. Bloom et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062584
302. Tall Amazonian forests are less sensitive to precipitation variability F. Giardina et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0133-5
303. The Ability of Sun-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence From OCO-2 and MODIS-EVI to Monitor Spatial Variations of Soybean and Maize Yields in the Midwestern USA Y. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12071111
304. Synergistic use of SMAP and OCO-2 data in assessing the responses of ecosystem productivity to the 2018 U.S. drought X. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112062
305. Diurnal and Seasonal Solar Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Photosynthesis in a Boreal Scots Pine Canopy C. Nichol et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11030273
306. Drought onset mechanisms revealed by satellite solar‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence: Insights from two contrasting extreme events Y. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JG003150
307. Remote sensing of terrestrial gross primary productivity: a review of advances in theoretical foundation, key parameters and methods W. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2024.2318846
308. Estimating Plant Physiological Parameters for Vitis vinifera L. Using In Situ Hyperspectral Measurements and Ensemble Machine Learning M. Lutz et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17233918
309. Atmospheric Correction for Tower-Based Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Observations at O2-A Band X. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11030355
310. A Mechanistic Model for Estimating Rice Photosynthetic Capacity and Stomatal Conductance from Sun-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence H. Ding et al. https://doi.org/10.34133/plantphenomics.0047
311. Chlorophyll Fluorescence Data Reveals Climate-Related Photosynthesis Seasonality in Amazonian Forests G. Bertani et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9121275
312. Seasonal changes in GPP/SIF ratios and their climatic determinants across the Northern Hemisphere A. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15775
313. The seasonal cycle of satellite chlorophyll fluorescence observations and its relationship to vegetation phenology and ecosystem atmosphere carbon exchange J. Joiner et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.06.022
314. Challenges in the atmospheric characterization for the retrieval of spectrally resolved fluorescence and PRI region dynamics from space N. Sabater et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112226
315. tri-PRI: A three band reflectance index tracking dynamic photoprotective mechanisms in a mature eucalypt forest W. Woodgate et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.03.020
316. A Reconstructed Global Daily Seamless SIF Product at 0.05 Degree Resolution Based on TROPOMI, MODIS and ERA5 Data J. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14061504
317. Sensitivity of Estimated Total Canopy SIF Emission to Remotely Sensed LAI and BRDF Products Z. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.34133/2021/9795837
318. Simulation of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence in a heterogeneous forest using 3-D radiative transfer modelling and airborne LiDAR S. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2022.07.004
319. Sensing Plant Photosynthesis Using Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence: From Chloroplasts to the Globe X. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-090324-115537
320. Characterization and Evaluation of Global Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Products: Estimation of Gross Primary Productivity and Phenology X. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.34133/remotesensing.0173
321. The superiority of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence sensitivity over other vegetation indices to drought Q. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2022.104787
322. Satellite-Based Observations Reveal the Altitude-Dependent Patterns of SIFyield and Its Sensitivity to Ambient Temperature in Tibetan Meadows R. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13071400
323. Precipitation thresholds regulate net carbon exchange at the continental scale Z. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05948-1
324. Improved slant column density retrieval of nitrogen dioxide and formaldehyde for OMI and GOME-2A from QA4ECV: intercomparison, uncertainty characterisation, and trends M. Zara et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4033-2018
325. Towards effective drought monitoring in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region: implications from assimilating leaf area index and soil moisture into the Noah-MP land surface model for Morocco W. Nie et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2365-2022
326. Global retrieval of marine and terrestrial chlorophyll fluorescence at its red peak using hyperspectral top of atmosphere radiance measurements: Feasibility study and first results A. Wolanin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.05.018
327. The Global Influence of Cloud Optical Thickness on Terrestrial Carbon Uptake P. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/EI-D-17-0035.1
328. Climate‐Driven Variability and Trends in Plant Productivity Over Recent Decades Based on Three Global Products M. O'Sullivan et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GB006613
329. A model for urban biogenic CO2 fluxes: Solar-Induced Fluorescence for Modeling Urban biogenic Fluxes (SMUrF v1) D. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3633-2021
330. Use of Sun-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Obtained by OCO-2 and GOME-2 for GPP Estimates of the Heihe River Basin, China X. Wei et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10122039
331. Addressing validation challenges for TROPOMI solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence products using tower-based measurements and an NIRv-scaled approach S. Du et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2023.113547
332. Radiance-based NIRv as a proxy for GPP of corn and soybean G. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab65cc
333. OCO-2 Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Variability across Ecoregions of the Amazon Basin and the Extreme Drought Effects of El Niño (2015–2016) A. Castro et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12071202
334. Global climatic controls on interannual variability of ecosystem productivity: Similarities and differences inferred from solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and enhanced vegetation index X. Li & J. Xiao https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108018
335. Prediction of Satellite-Based Column CO2 Concentration by Combining Emission Inventory and LULC Information S. Bhattacharjee & J. Chen https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2020.2985047
336. Using Satellite-Derived Vegetation Products to Evaluate LDAS-Monde over the Euro-Mediterranean Area D. Leroux et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10081199
337. Simulation framework for solar-induced fluorescence retrieval and application to DESIS and HyPlant M. Pato et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2025.114944
338. Spatiotemporal patterns of terrestrial gross primary production: A review A. Anav et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RG000483
339. Global solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence reconstruction crossing three platforms Y. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2026.111217
340. Multiangular Observation of Canopy Sun-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence by Combining Imaging Spectroscopy and Stereoscopy F. Pinto et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9050415
341. Evaluation of the FluorWPS Model and Study of the Parameter Sensitivity for Simulating Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence C. Tong et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13061091
342. The role of satellite observations in understanding the impact of El Niño on the carbon cycle: current capabilities and future opportunities P. Palmer https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0407
343. Identifying Crop Growth Stages from Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Data in Maize and Winter Wheat from Ground and Satellite Measurements Y. Hou et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15245689
344. Monitoring the impact of forest changes on carbon uptake with solar-induced fluorescence measurements from GOME-2A and TROPOMI for an Australian and Chinese case study J. Anema et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2297-2024
345. The 2010 Russian drought impact on satellite measurements of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence: Insights from modeling and comparisons with parameters derived from satellite reflectances Y. Yoshida et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.06.008
346. P-model v1.0: an optimality-based light use efficiency model for simulating ecosystem gross primary production B. Stocker et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1545-2020
347. Assessing the relationship between microwave vegetation optical depth and gross primary production I. Teubner et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2017.10.006
348. Response of Dryland Vegetation Under Extreme Wet Events with Satellite Measures of Greenness and Fluorescence S. LENG et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4062582
349. 基于多源遥感数据的贵州喀斯特地区太阳诱导叶绿素荧光的时空特征及归因分析 吕. Lü Jiamin et al. https://doi.org/10.3788/LOP251999
350. Mapping of satellite Earth observations using moving window block kriging J. Tadić et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3311-2015
351. Coupling the Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (CTEM v. 2.0) to Environment and Climate Change Canada's greenhouse gas forecast model (v.107-glb) B. Badawy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-631-2018
352. Drought did not change the linear relationship between chlorophyll fluorescence and terrestrial gross primary production under universal biomes L. Jia et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2023.1157340
353. Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence imaging spectrometer: design, manufacture, and evaluation L. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.473782
354. A global spatially contiguous solar-induced fluorescence (CSIF) dataset using neural networks Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-5779-2018
355. Estimating Crop and Grass Productivity over the United States Using Satellite Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence, Precipitation and Soil Moisture Data M. Halubok & Z. Yang https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12203434
356. Investigating the Potential Accuracy of Spaceborne Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Retrieval for 12 Capable Satellites Based on Simulation Data C. Zou et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2022.3210185
357. The role of satellite remote sensing in mitigating and adapting to global climate change S. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166820
358. Drought impacts on photosynthesis, isoprene emission and atmospheric formaldehyde in a mid-latitude forest Y. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.08.017
359. Spatial Variation of Leaf Optical Properties in a Boreal Forest Is Influenced by Species and Light Environment J. Atherton et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00309
360. Incorporating environmental variables into a MODIS-based crop yield estimation method for United States corn and soybeans through the use of a random forest regression algorithm T. Sakamoto https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.12.012
361. Uncertainty analysis of SVD-based spaceborne far–red sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence retrieval using TanSat satellite data S. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2021.102517
362. Widespread increase of boreal summer dry season length over the Congo rainforest Y. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0512-y
363. Optimizing the Empirical Parameters of the Data-Driven Algorithm for SIF Retrieval for SIFIS Onboard TECIS-1 Satellite C. Zou et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21103482
364. A new space-borne perspective of crop productivity variations over the US Corn Belt P. Somkuti et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107826
365. Multivariate random forest prediction of poverty and malnutrition prevalence C. Browne et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255519
366. Comparison of a UAV- and an airborne-based system to acquire far-red sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence measurements over structurally different crops N. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.109081
367. Red and far red Sun‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence as a measure of plant photosynthesis M. Rossini et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062943
368. Photosynthesis phenology, as defined by solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence, is overestimated by vegetation indices in the extratropical Northern Hemisphere A. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.109027
369. Overview of Solar-Induced chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF) from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2: Retrieval, cross-mission comparison, and global monitoring for GPP Y. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.02.016
370. Enhancing Transpiration Estimates: A Novel Approach Using SIF Partitioning and the TL-LUE Model T. Gemechu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16213924
371. Reduction of structural impacts and distinction of photosynthetic pathways in a global estimation of GPP from space-borne solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence Z. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111722
372. Synchronous Modes of Terrestrial and Marine Productivity in the North Pacific M. Berkelhammer https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00073
373. Observing Severe Drought Influences on Ozone Air Pollution in California M. Demetillo et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b04852
374. Greenhouse gases Observing SATellite 2 (GOSAT-2): mission overview R. Imasu et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-023-00562-2
375. A framework for harmonizing multiple satellite instruments to generate a long-term global high spatial-resolution solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) J. Wen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111644
376. Identification of Bias in Satellite Measurements Using its Geospatial Properties J. Tadic & S. Biraud https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2020.3015174
377. Inference of photosynthetic capacity parameters from chlorophyll a fluorescence is affected by redox state of PSII reaction centers J. Han et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.14271
378. A Direct Estimate of the Seasonal Cycle of Evapotranspiration over the Amazon Basin A. Swann & C. Koven https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-17-0004.1
379. Retrieval of Red Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence With TROPOMI on the Sentinel-5 Precursor Mission F. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2022.3162726
380. Retrieval of global terrestrial solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence from TanSat satellite S. Du et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2018.10.003
381. Analysis of Red and Far-Red Sun-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Their Ratio in Different Canopies Based on Observed and Modeled Data M. Rossini et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8050412
382. WAFER: A new method to retrieve sun-induced fluorescence based on spectral wavelet decompositions V. Oehl & A. Damm https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2023.113786
383. Global assessment of lagged and cumulative effects of drought on grassland gross primary production X. Wei et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108646
384. TROPOMI observations allow for robust exploration of the relationship between solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and terrestrial gross primary production X. Li & J. Xiao https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112748
385. Measuring the dynamic photosynthome E. Murchie et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcy087
386. The rising impact of urbanization-caused CO2 emissions on terrestrial vegetation S. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110079
387. Value of sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence for quantifying hydrological states and fluxes: Current status and challenges F. Jonard et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108088
388. Deficit in carbon uptake of vegetation on the British Iles during the 2018 European summer drought M. Queißer https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2021.06.001
389. Achieving Breakthroughs in Global Hydrologic Science by Unlocking the Power of Multisensor, Multidisciplinary Earth Observations M. Durand et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021AV000455
390. Evaluating the Capability of Low-Configuration Spectrometers to Retrieve Far-Red Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Its Application for Identifying Crop Growth Stages L. Pei et al. https://doi.org/10.34133/remotesensing.0369
391. Evaluation of photosynthesis estimation from machine learning-based solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence downscaling from canopy to leaf level H. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112439
392. Detecting drought-induced GPP spatiotemporal variabilities with sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence during the 2009/2010 droughts in China S. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107092
393. Synchronous Changes of GPP and Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence in a Subtropical Evergreen Coniferous Forest M. Wang & L. Zhang https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12112224
394. Evaluating the relationship between sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and transpiration in sparse Australian floodplain woodlands using sap flow measurements S. Gao & T. Doody https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2025.1419.19
395. Evaluating GPP and Respiration Estimates Over Northern Midlatitude Ecosystems Using Solar‐Induced Fluorescence and Atmospheric CO2 Measurements B. Byrne et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JG004472
396. Spatial Representativeness of Eddy Covariance Measurements in a Coniferous Plantation Mixed with Cropland in Southeastern China W. Xiang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14195022
397. The relationship between solar-induced fluorescence and gross primary productivity under different growth conditions: global analysis using satellite and biogeochemical model data H. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2020.1763507
398. Integrating SIF and Clearness Index to Improve Maize GPP Estimation Using Continuous Tower-Based Observations J. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20092493
399. Advances in hyperspectral remote sensing of vegetation traits and functions Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112121
400. Estimation of global GPP from GOME-2 and OCO-2 SIF by considering the dynamic variations of GPP-SIF relationship J. Bai et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.109180
401. PhotoSpec: A new instrument to measure spatially distributed red and far-red Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence K. Grossmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.07.002
402. Global Retrievals of Solar‐Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence With TROPOMI: First Results and Intersensor Comparison to OCO‐2 P. Köhler et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079031
403. Globally rising soil heterotrophic respiration over recent decades B. Bond-Lamberty et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0358-x
404. Bidirectional sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence emission is influenced by leaf structure and light scattering properties — A bottom-up approach S. Van Wittenberghe et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.11.012
405. Carbon Monitoring System Flux Net Biosphere Exchange 2020 (CMS-Flux NBE 2020) J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-299-2021
406. Remote Sensing of Ecosystem Water Use Efficiency: A Review of Direct and Indirect Estimation Methods W. Cai et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13122393
407. Vapor Pressure Deficit and Sunlight Explain Seasonality of Leaf Phenology and Photosynthesis Across Amazonian Evergreen Broadleaved Forest X. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GB006893
408. Modeling transpiration using solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and photochemical reflectance index synergistically in a closed-canopy winter wheat ecosystem C. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2023.113981
409. Satellite footprint data from OCO-2 and TROPOMI reveal significant spatio-temporal and inter-vegetation type variabilities of solar-induced fluorescence yield in the U.S. Midwest C. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111728
410. Enhanced drought detection and monitoring using sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence over Hulun Buir Grassland, China Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145271
411. Dryland evapotranspiration from remote sensing solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence: Constraining an optimal stomatal model within a two-source energy balance model J. Bu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2024.113999
412. CO2 Concentration, A Critical Factor Influencing the Relationship between Solar-induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Gross Primary Productivity R. Qiu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12091377
413. Satellite sun‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence detects early response of winter wheat to heat stress in the Indian Indo‐Gangetic Plains L. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14302
414. A carbon sink-driven approach to estimate gross primary production from microwave satellite observations I. Teubner et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.04.022
415. Global‐Scale Consistency of Spaceborne Vegetation Indices, Chlorophyll Fluorescence, and Photosynthesis R. Doughty et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG006136
416. Potential of the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) onboard the Sentinel-5 Precursor for the monitoring of terrestrial chlorophyll fluorescence L. Guanter et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1337-2015
417. Tropospheric emissions: Monitoring of pollution (TEMPO) P. Zoogman et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.05.008
418. Monitoring Drought Effects on Vegetation Productivity Using Satellite Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence L. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11040378
419. A more precise retrieval of sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence from satellite data using artificial neural networks D. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2025.114987
420. Large-scale land restoration improved drought resilience in Ethiopia’s degraded watersheds S. Constenla-Villoslada et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00861-4
421. Fusing Multisensor Data to Generate a Highly Integrated Global Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence (FSIF) Time Series Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2026.3664846
422. Photosynthetic Performance of Tidally Flooded Spartina Alterniflora Salt Marshes L. Mao et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JG007161
423. Retrieving Sun-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence from Hyperspectral Data with TanSat Satellite S. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21144886
424. Assessing the response of satellite sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and MODIS vegetation products to soil moisture from 2010 to 2017: a case in Yunnan Province of China Z. Ni et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2018.1506186
425. Improving Global Gross Primary Productivity Estimates by Computing Optimum Light Use Efficiencies Using Flux Tower Data N. Madani et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JG004142
426. Widespread Decline in Vegetation Photosynthesis in Southeast Asia Due to the Prolonged Drought During the 2015/2016 El Niño X. Qian et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11080910
427. Meta-analysis assessing potential of steady-state chlorophyll fluorescence for remote sensing detection of plant water, temperature and nitrogen stress A. Ač et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.07.022
428. Downscaled Satellite Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Detects the Early Response of Sugarcane to Drought Stress in a Major Sugarcane-Planting Region of China N. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15163937
429. Carbon cycle responses to climate change across China's terrestrial ecosystem: Sensitivity and driving process K. Jiao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170053
430. Coupling between the terrestrial carbon and water cycles—a review P. Gentine et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab22d6
431. Midwest US Croplands Determine Model Divergence in North American Carbon Fluxes W. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020AV000310
432. Satellite observations reveal seasonal redistribution of northern ecosystem productivity in response to interannual climate variability Z. Butterfield et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111755
433. A review on solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence of vegetation and its ecological process modeling J. Qin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecofro.2025.09.015
434. Understanding Soil and Plant Interaction by Combining Ground‐Based Quantitative Electromagnetic Induction and Airborne Hyperspectral Data C. von Hebel et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL078658
435. Large global-scale vegetation sensitivity to daily rainfall variability A. Feldman et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08232-z
436. On the zero-level offset in the GOSAT TANSO-FTS O2 A band and the quality of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF): comparison of SIF between GOSAT and OCO-2 H. Oshio et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6721-2019
437. Using solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence to estimate forest evapotranspiration X. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133595
438. Amazon rainforest photosynthesis increases in response to atmospheric dryness J. Green et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abb7232
439. Autumn Crop Yield Prediction using Data-Driven Approaches:- Support Vector Machines, Random Forest, and Deep Neural Network Methods C. Dang et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2020.1833186
440. Globally synchronized changes in the biosphere, atmosphere, and society identified using public data W. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2025.101559
441. Measurement and Analysis of Bidirectional SIF Emissions in Wheat Canopies L. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2015.2504089
442. Diurnal variation of sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence of agricultural crops observed from a point-based spectrometer on a UAV N. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2020.102276
443. Retrieval of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) from satellite measurements: comparison of SIF between TanSat and OCO-2 L. Yao et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2125-2022
444. Chlorophyll fluorescence tracks seasonal variations of photosynthesis from leaf to canopy in a temperate forest H. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13590
445. Application of the Reconstructed Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence by Machine Learning in Agricultural Drought Monitoring of Henan Province, China from 2010 to 2022 G. Cai et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14091941
446. An exploration of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) factors simulated by SCOPE for capturing GPP across vegetation types S. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110079
447. The Sensitivity of Satellite Solar‐Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence to Meteorological Drought W. Jiao et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF001087
448. Combining geometric-optical and spectral invariants theories for modeling canopy fluorescence anisotropy Y. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2025.114716
449. Assessing consistency of spring phenology of snow-covered forests as estimated by vegetation indices, gross primary production, and solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence Q. Chang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.06.002
450. Machine learning methods for assessing photosynthetic activity: environmental monitoring applications S. Khruschev et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12551-022-00982-2
451. Spatial-temporal consistency between gross primary productivity and solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence of vegetation in China during 2007–2014 J. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.245
452. Improved understanding of the spatially-heterogeneous relationship between satellite solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and ecosystem productivity Y. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107949
453. Water, Energy, and Carbon with Artificial Neural Networks (WECANN): a statistically based estimate of global surface turbulent fluxes and gross primary productivity using solar-induced fluorescence S. Alemohammad et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-4101-2017
454. Improving Red Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Retrieval Using a Data-Driven Reflectance Reconstruction Method S. Du et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2024.3478248
455. Assessing the wavelength-dependent ability of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence to estimate the GPP of winter wheat at the canopy level L. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2017.1320449
456. Development of the long-term harmonized multi-satellite SIF (LHSIF) dataset at 0.05° resolution (1995–2024) C. Zou et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-55-2026
457. Large‐Scale Droughts Responsible for Dramatic Reductions of Terrestrial Net Carbon Uptake Over North America in 2011 and 2012 W. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JG004520
458. Comparison of Phenology Estimated from Reflectance-Based Indices and Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF) Observations in a Temperate Forest Using GPP-Based Phenology as the Standard X. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10060932
459. New methods for the retrieval of chlorophyll red fluorescence from hyperspectral satellite instruments: simulations and application to GOME-2 and SCIAMACHY J. Joiner et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-3939-2016
460. First Investigation of the Relationship Between Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Observed by TanSat and Gross Primary Productivity S. Du et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3128355
461. Seasonal peak photosynthesis is hindered by late canopy development in northern ecosystems Q. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-022-01278-9
462. Increased high‐latitude photosynthetic carbon gain offset by respiration carbon loss during an anomalous warm winter to spring transition Z. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14863
463. Warmer spring alleviated the impacts of 2018 European summer heatwave and drought on vegetation photosynthesis S. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108195
464. NIRP as a remote sensing proxy for measuring gross primary production across different biomes and climate zones: Performance and limitations S. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2023.103437
465. Reviews and syntheses: Systematic Earth observations for use in terrestrial carbon cycle data assimilation systems M. Scholze et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-3401-2017
466. Revisiting Global Vegetation Controls Using Multi‐Layer Soil Moisture W. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL092856
467. Impact of the 2015 El Niño event on Borneo: Detection of drought damage using solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence K. MURAKAMI et al. https://doi.org/10.2480/agrmet.D-24-00012
468. Four years of global carbon cycle observed from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 (OCO-2) version 9 and in situ data and comparison to OCO-2 version 7 H. Peiro et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1097-2022
469. Upscaling dryland carbon and water fluxes with artificial neural networks of optical, thermal, and microwave satellite remote sensing M. Dannenberg et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-383-2023
470. Spatial-temporal heterogeneity of spring phenology in boreal forests as estimated by satellite solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and vegetation index D. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.109888
471. SIFSpec: Measuring Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Observations for Remote Sensing of Photosynthesis S. Du et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19133009
472. Plant gross primary production, plant respiration and carbonyl sulfide emissions over the globe inferred by atmospheric inverse modelling M. Remaud et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2525-2022
473. Exploring the spatial relationship between airborne-derived red and far-red sun-induced fluorescence and process-based GPP estimates in a forest ecosystem G. Tagliabue et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111272
474. A cloud-computing framework for downscaled global 300 m SIF retrieval from Sentinel-3 and TROPOSIF Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2026.105330
475. TROPOMI SIF reveals large uncertainty in estimating the end of plant growing season from vegetation indices data in the Tibetan Plateau J. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.113209
476. Increasing Ecosystem Fluxes Observed from Eddy Covariance and Solar-Induced Fluorescence Data J. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17122064
477. A Spatiotemporal Constrained Machine Learning Method for OCO-2 Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF) Reconstruction H. Shen et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2022.3204885
478. Temporally corrected long-term satellite solar-induced fluorescence leads to improved estimation of global trends in vegetation photosynthesis during 1995–2018 S. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2022.10.018
479. CNSIF: A reconstructed monthly 500-meter spatial resolution solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence dataset in China K. Du et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110869
480. Assessment of SMAP soil moisture for global simulation of gross primary production L. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JG003603
481. Gross primary productivity of terrestrial ecosystems: a review of observations, remote sensing, and modelling studies over South Asia V. Pandey et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-024-05158-4
482. What are the greenhouse gas observing system requirements for reducing fundamental biogeochemical process uncertainty? Amazon wetland CH4 emissions as a case study A. Bloom et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15199-2016
483. A model for estimating transpiration from remotely sensed solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence N. Shan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112134
484. Improved Global Maps of the Optimum Growth Temperature, Maximum Light Use Efficiency, and Gross Primary Production for Vegetation Y. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG005651
485. The Negative Impact of Excessive Moisture Contributes to the Seasonal Dynamics of Photosynthesis in Amazon Moist Forests R. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002306
486. Response of Canopy Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence to the Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation Absorbed by Chlorophyll S. Du et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9090911
487. Effects of the Temporal Aggregation and Meteorological Conditions on the Parameter Robustness of OCO-2 SIF-Based and LUE-Based GPP Models for Croplands X. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11111328
488. Multisatellite Analyses of Spatiotemporal Variability in Photosynthetic Activity Over the Tibetan Plateau X. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JG005249