Articles | Volume 7, issue 4
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1057–1064, 2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1057-2014
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1057–1064, 2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1057-2014

Research article 25 Apr 2014

Research article | 25 Apr 2014

Net ecosystem CO2 exchange measurements by the closed chamber method and the eddy covariance technique and their dependence on atmospheric conditions

M. Riederer1,*, A. Serafimovich1,**, and T. Foken1,2 M. Riederer et al.
  • 1Department of Micrometeorology, University of Bayreuth, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany
  • 2Member of Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), University of Bayreuth, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany
  • *now at: Regensburg Center of Energy and Resources, Regensburg University of Applied Sciences, 93049 Regensburg, Germany
  • **now at: German Research Centre for Geosciences, Helmholtz Centre, 14473 Potsdam, Germany

Abstract. Carbon dioxide flux measurements in ecosystem sciences are mostly conducted by eddy covariance technique or the closed chamber method. But there is a lack of detailed comparisons that assess present differences and uncertainties. To determine underlying processes, a 10-day, side-by-side measurement of the net ecosystem exchange with both techniques was evaluated with regard to various atmospheric conditions during the diurnal cycle. It was found that, depending on the particular atmospheric condition, the chamber carbon dioxide flux was either (i) equal to the carbon dioxide flux measured by the reference method eddy covariance, by day with well-developed atmospheric turbulence; (ii) higher, in the afternoon in times of oasis effect; (iii) lower, predominantly at night while large coherent structure fluxes or high wind velocities prevailed; or (iv) showed less variation in the flux pattern, at night while stable stratification was present. At night – when respiration forms the net ecosystem exchange – lower chamber carbon dioxide fluxes were found. In the afternoon – when the ecosystem is still a net carbon sink – the carbon dioxide fluxes measured by the chamber prevailed. These two complementary aspects resulted in an overestimation of the ecosystem sink capacity by the chamber of 40% in this study.