Research article 30 Apr 2014
Research article | 30 Apr 2014
Field calibrations of a low-cost aerosol sensor at a regulatory monitoring site in California
D. M. Holstius et al.
Viewed
Total article views: 13,230 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 27 Jan 2014)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3,542 | 9,478 | 210 | 13,230 | 124 | 174 |
- HTML: 3,542
- PDF: 9,478
- XML: 210
- Total: 13,230
- BibTeX: 124
- EndNote: 174
Total article views: 4,658 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 30 Apr 2014)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2,328 | 2,155 | 175 | 4,658 | 111 | 160 |
- HTML: 2,328
- PDF: 2,155
- XML: 175
- Total: 4,658
- BibTeX: 111
- EndNote: 160
Total article views: 8,572 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 27 Jan 2014)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,214 | 7,323 | 35 | 8,572 | 13 | 14 |
- HTML: 1,214
- PDF: 7,323
- XML: 35
- Total: 8,572
- BibTeX: 13
- EndNote: 14
Cited
138 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Highly resolved spatiotemporal variability of fine particle number concentrations in an urban neighborhood Y. Etzion & D. Broday 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2018.01.004
- Air Quality Impacts at an E‐Waste Site in Ghana Using Flexible, Moderate‐Cost and Quality‐Assured Measurements L. Kwarteng et al. 10.1029/2020GH000247
- Exploring the applicability and limitations of selected optical scattering instruments for PM mass measurement J. Zhang et al. 10.5194/amt-11-2995-2018
- The influence of humidity on the performance of a low-cost air particle mass sensor and the effect of atmospheric fog R. Jayaratne et al. 10.5194/amt-11-4883-2018
- Incorporating Low-Cost Sensor Measurements into High-Resolution PM2.5 Modeling at a Large Spatial Scale J. Bi et al. 10.1021/acs.est.9b06046
- Field Evaluation of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors in Beijing H. Mei et al. 10.3390/s20164381
- Spatial calibration and PM2.5 mapping of low-cost air quality sensors H. Chu et al. 10.1038/s41598-020-79064-w
- Evaluating the feasibility of a personal particle exposure monitor in outdoor and indoor microenvironments in Shanghai, China K. Wang et al. 10.1080/09603123.2018.1533531
- Laboratory assessment of low-cost PM monitors A. Manikonda et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2016.08.010
- Node-to-node field calibration of wireless distributed air pollution sensor network F. Kizel et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.09.042
- Development of a calibration chamber to evaluate the performance of low-cost particulate matter sensors T. Sayahi et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113131
- Garbage in, gospel out? – Air quality assessment in the UK planning system A. Mills & S. Peckham 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.06.010
- Effects of spatial sensitivity on mass sensing with bulk acoustic mode resonators A. Zielinski et al. 10.1016/j.sna.2015.11.003
- Evaluation of low-cost optical particle counters for monitoring individual indoor aerosol sources P. Salimifard et al. 10.1080/02786826.2019.1697423
- A versatile low-cost sensing device for assessing PM2.5 spatiotemporal variation and quantifying source contribution S. Lung et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137145
- Observation of PM2.5 using a combination of satellite remote sensing and low-cost sensor network in Siberian urban areas with limited reference monitoring C. Lin et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117410
- Evaluation and environmental correction of ambient CO<sub>2</sub> measurements from a low-cost NDIR sensor C. Martin et al. 10.5194/amt-10-2383-2017
- Calibration of Portable Particulate Matter–Monitoring Device using Web Query and Machine Learning B. Loh & G. Choi 10.1016/j.shaw.2019.08.002
- Comparison of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors for Indoor Air Monitoring during COVID-19 Lockdown M. Kaliszewski et al. 10.3390/s20247290
- A Survey on Real-Time Communications in Wireless Sensor Networks B. Kim et al. 10.1155/2017/1864847
- Long-term field evaluation of the Plantower PMS low-cost particulate matter sensors T. Sayahi et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.11.065
- Mathematical Modelling and Parameter Optimization of Fine Particle Sensors based on Laser Light Scattering W. Shao et al. 10.1109/JSEN.2017.2747083
- Performance evaluation of ozone and particulate matter sensors H. DeWitt et al. 10.1080/10962247.2020.1713921
- Field Assessment of the Village Green Project: An Autonomous Community Air Quality Monitoring System W. Jiao et al. 10.1021/acs.est.5b01245
- A methodology for the characterization of portable sensors for air quality measure with the goal of deployment in citizen science B. Languille et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134698
- Low Cost Sensor With IoT LoRaWAN Connectivity and Machine Learning-Based Calibration for Air Pollution Monitoring S. Ali et al. 10.1109/TIM.2020.3034109
- What does the Shinyei PPD42NS Low-Cost Dust Sensor Really Measure? M. Canu et al. 10.18178/ijesd.2021.12.1.1310
- Investigating a Low-Cost Dryer Designed for Low-Cost PM Sensors Measuring Ambient Air Quality A. Samad et al. 10.3390/s21030804
- Assessing the accuracy of low-cost optical particle sensors using a physics-based approach D. Hagan & J. Kroll 10.5194/amt-13-6343-2020
- The evaluation and optimization of calibration methods for low-cost particulate matter sensors: Inter-comparison between fixed and mobile methods X. Qin et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136791
- Use of electrochemical sensors for measurement of air pollution: correcting interference response and validating measurements E. Cross et al. 10.5194/amt-10-3575-2017
- A tunable high-pass filter for simple and inexpensive size-segregation of sub-10-nm nanoparticles N. Surawski et al. 10.1038/srep45678
- A Survey on Sensor Calibration in Air Pollution Monitoring Deployments B. Maag et al. 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2853660
- Development of Low-Cost Air Quality Stations for Next Generation Monitoring Networks: Calibration and Validation of PM2.5 and PM10 Sensors A. Cavaliere et al. 10.3390/s18092843
- In-car particulate matter exposure across ten global cities P. Kumar et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141395
- Evaluation of the Performance of Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors at a High Mountain Station with Complex Meteorological Conditions H. Li et al. 10.3390/atmos11020212
- Comparison of methods for converting Dylos particle number concentrations to PM2.5 mass concentrations R. Franken et al. 10.1111/ina.12546
- Data Verification Tools for Minimizing Management Costs of Dense Air-Quality Monitoring Networks G. Miskell et al. 10.1021/acs.est.5b04421
- New Methods for Personal Exposure Monitoring for Airborne Particles K. Koehler & T. Peters 10.1007/s40572-015-0070-z
- Evaluation of two low-cost PM monitors under different laboratory and indoor conditions R. He et al. 10.1080/02786826.2020.1851649
- Ambient and laboratory evaluation of a low-cost particulate matter sensor K. Kelly et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.12.039
- A Statistical Calibration Framework for Improving Non-Reference Method Particulate Matter Reporting: A Focus on Community Air Monitoring Settings S. Commodore et al. 10.3390/atmos11080807
- Evaluation of a Low-Cost Aerosol Sensor to Assess Dust Concentrations in a Swine Building S. Jones et al. 10.1093/annhyg/mew009
- Re-calibrating DIY: Testing digital participation across dust sensors, fry pans and environmental pollution H. Pritchard et al. 10.1177/1461444818777473
- Estimating Hourly Concentrations of PM2.5 across a Metropolitan Area Using Low-Cost Particle Monitors N. Zikova et al. 10.3390/s17081922
- Characterising low-cost sensors in highly portable platforms to quantify personal exposure in diverse environments L. Chatzidiakou et al. 10.5194/amt-12-4643-2019
- Extensive evaluation and classification of low‐cost dust sensors in laboratory using a newly developed test method K. Ahn et al. 10.1111/ina.12615
- Observation and modeling of vertical carbon dioxide distribution in a heavily polluted suburban environment Z. BAO et al. 10.1080/16742834.2020.1746627
- Evaluation of PM2.5 measured in an urban setting using a low-cost optical particle counter and a Federal Equivalent Method Beta Attenuation Monitor B. Magi et al. 10.1080/02786826.2019.1619915
- The use of low-cost measuring devices for testing air quality in hard-to-reach locations M. Rogulski et al. 10.1051/e3sconf/20184400151
- Laboratory evaluation of particle-size selectivity of optical low-cost particulate matter sensors J. Kuula et al. 10.5194/amt-13-2413-2020
- Response Characterization of an Inexpensive Aerosol Sensor 10.3390/s17122915
- RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE CONCENTRATIONS OF PM2.5 INDOORS OBTAINED BY USING THE OPTICAL AND GRAVIMETRIC METHODS: PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS J. PASTUSZKA 10.21307/ACEE-2020-035
- An Integrated Sensor Data Logging, Survey, and Analytics Platform for Field Research and Its Application in HAPIN, a Multi-Center Household Energy Intervention Trial D. Wilson et al. 10.3390/su12051805
- Fine-Scale Spatiotemporal Air Pollution Analysis Using Mobile Monitors on Google Street View Vehicles Y. Guan et al. 10.1080/01621459.2019.1665526
- Performance of low-cost indoor air quality monitors for PM2.5 and PM10 from residential sources Z. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106654
- Evaluation of optical particulate matter sensors under realistic conditions of strong and mild urban pollution A. Masic et al. 10.5194/amt-13-6427-2020
- Experimental and modeling assessment of a novel automotive cabin PM2.5 removal system J. Vande Hey et al. 10.1080/02786826.2018.1490694
- Compositional Analysis of Adsorbed Organic Aerosol on a Microresonator Mass Sensor A. Zielinski et al. 10.1007/s41810-018-0029-1
- Usability of a Personal Air Pollution Monitor: Design-Feedback Iterative Cycle Study G. Duncan et al. 10.2196/12023
- Field testing a low-cost passive aerosol sampler for long-term measurement of ambient PM2.5 concentrations and particle composition M. Castillo et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116905
- Real-time particle monitoring of pesticide drift from an axial fan airblast orchard sprayer M. Blanco et al. 10.1038/s41370-018-0090-5
- Calibration of low-cost particulate matter sensors: Model development for a multi-city epidemiological study M. Zusman et al. 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105329
- Investigation of Low-Cost and Optical Particulate Matter Sensors for Ambient Monitoring M. Rogulski & A. Badyda 10.3390/atmos11101040
- Application of Machine Learning for the in-Field Correction of a PM2.5 Low-Cost Sensor Network W. Wang et al. 10.3390/s20175002
- Validation of a light-scattering PM2.5 sensor monitor based on the long-term gravimetric measurements in field tests J. Shi et al. 10.1371/journal.pone.0185700
- Laboratory evaluation of low-cost PurpleAir PM monitors and in-field correction using co-located portable filter samplers J. Tryner et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117067
- Fusion of Environmental Sensing on PM2.5 and Deep Learning on Vehicle Detecting for Acquiring Roadside PM2.5 Concentration Increments W. Wang et al. 10.3390/s20174679
- Particulate matter pollution in an informal settlement in Nairobi: Using citizen science to make the invisible visible S. West et al. 10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.102133
- Evaluation of a low-cost optical particle counter (Alphasense OPC-N2) for ambient air monitoring L. Crilley et al. 10.5194/amt-11-709-2018
- Health Benefit Assessment of Running in Urban Areas against the Background of Particulate Matter 2.5 Concentration: The Munich Olympic Park L. Zeindl & J. Koenigstorfer 10.3390/urbansci4040062
- Evaluation and Application of a Novel Low-Cost Wearable Sensing Device in Assessing Real-Time PM2.5 Exposure in Major Asian Transportation Modes W. Wang et al. 10.3390/atmos12020270
- Measuring Micrometers of Matter and Inventing Indices: Entangling Social Perception within Discrete and Continuous Measurements of Air Quality E. Schmitt 10.3390/socsci8020048
- Long-term evaluation of air sensor technology under ambient conditions in Denver, Colorado S. Feinberg et al. 10.5194/amt-11-4605-2018
- Real-time sensors for indoor air monitoring and challenges ahead in deploying them to urban buildings P. Kumar et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.032
- Low-cost PM monitors as an opportunity to increase the spatiotemporal resolution of measurements of air quality M. Rogulski 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.026
- Potential of a low-cost gas sensor for atmospheric methane monitoring M. van den Bossche et al. 10.1016/j.snb.2016.07.092
- Field and Laboratory Evaluations of the Low-Cost Plantower Particulate Matter Sensor M. Levy Zamora et al. 10.1021/acs.est.8b05174
- Field performance of a low-cost sensor in the monitoring of particulate matter in Santiago, Chile M. Tagle et al. 10.1007/s10661-020-8118-4
- Small, Smart, Fast, and Cheap: Microchip-Based Sensors to Estimate Air Pollution Exposures in Rural Households A. Pillarisetti et al. 10.3390/s17081879
- Effects of fireworks on particulate matter concentration in a narrow valley: the case of the Medellín metropolitan area C. Hoyos et al. 10.1007/s10661-019-7838-9
- Evaluation and calibration of a low-cost particle sensor in ambient conditions using machine-learning methods M. Si et al. 10.5194/amt-13-1693-2020
- Particulate Matter Sensors Mounted on a Robot for Environmental Aerosol Measurements A. Cashikar et al. 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001569
- Humidity, density, and inlet aspiration efficiency correction improve accuracy of a low-cost sensor during field calibration at a suburban site in the North-Western Indo-Gangetic plain (NW-IGP) H. Pawar & B. Sinha 10.1080/02786826.2020.1719971
- Review of the Performance of Low-Cost Sensors for Air Quality Monitoring F. Karagulian et al. 10.3390/atmos10090506
- Can commercial low-cost sensor platforms contribute to air quality monitoring and exposure estimates? N. Castell et al. 10.1016/j.envint.2016.12.007
- Contribution of low-cost sensor measurements to the prediction of PM2.5 levels: A case study in Imperial County, California, USA J. Bi et al. 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108810
- A feasible experimental framework for field calibration of portable light-scattering aerosol monitors: Case of TSI DustTrak Z. Li et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113136
- Review of smoke taint in wine: smoke-derived volatile phenols and their glycosidic metabolites in grapes and vines as biomarkers for smoke exposure and their role in the sensory perception of smoke taint M. Krstic et al. 10.1111/ajgw.12183
- Smart homes and the control of indoor air quality A. Schieweck et al. 10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.057
- Flow rate-independent electrical aerosol sensor A. Rostedt & J. Keskinen 10.1080/02786826.2018.1498586
- Characterization of a commercial lower-cost medium-precision non-dispersive infrared sensor for atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> monitoring in urban areas E. Arzoumanian et al. 10.5194/amt-12-2665-2019
- Response of eight low-cost particle sensors and consumer devices to typical indoor emission events in a real home (ASHRAE 1756-RP) Y. Zou et al. 10.1080/23744731.2019.1676094
- Enhanced performance of pocket-sized nanoparticle exposure monitor for healthy indoor environment H. Wasisto et al. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.09.013
- FeinPhone: Low-cost Smartphone Camera-based 2D Particulate Matter Sensor M. Budde et al. 10.3390/s19030749
- Evaluation of new low-cost particle monitors for PM2.5 concentrations measurements N. Zikova et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2016.11.010
- The BErkeley Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> Observation Network: field calibration and evaluation of low-cost air quality sensors J. Kim et al. 10.5194/amt-11-1937-2018
- Assessment of PM2.5 monitoring using MicroPEM: A validation study in a city with elevated PM2.5 levels Y. Du et al. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.01.002
- Identification of technical problems affecting performance of DustTrak DRX aerosol monitors I. Rivas et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.129
- Performance of low-cost monitors to assess household air pollution A. Curto et al. 10.1016/j.envres.2018.01.024
- Gaussian process regression model for dynamically calibrating and surveilling a wireless low-cost particulate matter sensor network in Delhi T. Zheng et al. 10.5194/amt-12-5161-2019
- End-user perspective of low-cost sensors for outdoor air pollution monitoring A. Rai et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.266
- Response of consumer and research grade indoor air quality monitors to residential sources of fine particles B. Singer & W. Delp 10.1111/ina.12463
- Improving accuracy of air pollution exposure measurements: Statistical correction of a municipal low-cost airborne particulate matter sensor network E. Considine et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115833
- Assessment of air quality microsensors versus reference methods: The EuNetAir joint exercise C. Borrego et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.09.050
- Measurements of PM<sub>2.5</sub> with PurpleAir under atmospheric conditions K. Ardon-Dryer et al. 10.5194/amt-13-5441-2020
- Development and evaluation of a palm-sized optical PM2.5 sensor T. Nakayama et al. 10.1080/02786826.2017.1375078
- An efficient spatiotemporal data calibration approach for the low-cost PM2.5 sensing network: A case study in Taiwan C. Lee et al. 10.1016/j.envint.2019.05.032
- A systematic investigation on the effects of temperature and relative humidity on the performance of eight low-cost particle sensors and devices Y. Zou et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2020.105715
- Performance calibration of low-cost and portable particular matter (PM) sensors D. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2017.05.011
- Evaluation of low-cost sensors for quantitative personal exposure monitoring S. Mahajan & P. Kumar 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102076
- Mobile phones as monitors of personal exposure to air pollution: Is this the future? M. Nyarku et al. 10.1371/journal.pone.0193150
- Integrating low-cost air quality sensor networks with fixed and satellite monitoring systems to study ground-level PM2.5 J. Li et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117293
- Real-Time Monitoring of Spray Drift from Three Different Orchard Sprayers M. Blanco et al. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.092
- Hourly land-use regression models based on low-cost PM monitor data M. Masiol et al. 10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.052
- In Situ Calibration Algorithms for Environmental Sensor Networks: A Review F. Delaine et al. 10.1109/JSEN.2019.2910317
- Measurement of PM10 concentration using hybrid cyclone separator and particle counter R. Purbakawaca et al. 10.1088/1755-1315/622/1/012025
- Community Air Sensor Network (CAIRSENSE) project: evaluation of low-cost sensor performance in a suburban environment in the southeastern United States W. Jiao et al. 10.5194/amt-9-5281-2016
- Field evaluation of low-cost particulate matter sensors in high- and low-concentration environments T. Zheng et al. 10.5194/amt-11-4823-2018
- Using a gradient boosting model to improve the performance of low-cost aerosol monitors in a dense, heterogeneous urban environment N. Johnson et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.019
- Portable, Ambient PM2.5 Sensor for Human and/or Animal Exposure Studies T. Cao & J. Thompson 10.1080/00032719.2016.1190736
- Outlier detection and gap filling methodologies for low-cost air quality measurements T. Ottosen & P. Kumar 10.1039/C8EM00593A
- Effect of micropillars with varying geometry and density on the efficiency of impaction-based quartz crystal microbalance aerosol sensors M. Hajizadehmotlagh & I. Paprotny 10.1063/1.5125895
- Aerosol Health Effects from Molecular to Global Scales M. Shiraiwa et al. 10.1021/acs.est.7b04417
- Laboratory Evaluation of the Shinyei PPD42NS Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensor E. Austin et al. 10.1371/journal.pone.0137789
- Personal exposure monitoring of PM 2.5 in indoor and outdoor microenvironments S. Steinle et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.12.003
- Biomass-fuelled improved cookstove intervention to prevent household air pollution in Northwest Ethiopia: a cluster randomized controlled trial M. Adane et al. 10.1186/s12199-020-00923-z
- Sensor Selection to Improve Estimates of Particulate Matter Concentration from a Low-Cost Network S. Sousan et al. 10.3390/s18093008
- A Review of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors from the Developers’ Perspectives B. Alfano et al. 10.3390/s20236819
- A distributed network of low-cost continuous reading sensors to measure spatiotemporal variations of PM2.5 in Xi'an, China M. Gao et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2015.01.013
- How Sensors Might Help Define the External Exposome M. Loh et al. 10.3390/ijerph14040434
- Air pollution and child obesity: Assessing the feasibility of measuring personal PM2.5 exposures and behaviours related to BMI in preschool-aged children in China H. Ong et al. 10.1016/j.obmed.2019.100149
- Inter-comparison of low-cost sensors for measuring the mass concentration of occupational aerosols S. Sousan et al. 10.1080/02786826.2016.1162901
- Crowd-sourced air quality studies: A review of the literature & portable sensors J. Thompson 10.1016/j.teac.2016.06.001
- Use of Low-Cost Ambient Particulate Sensors in Nablus, Palestine with Application to the Assessment of Regional Dust Storms A. Khader & R. Martin 10.3390/atmos10090539
- Laboratory Evaluation and Calibration of Three Low-Cost Particle Sensors for Particulate Matter Measurement Y. Wang et al. 10.1080/02786826.2015.1100710
- On the use of small and cheaper sensors and devices for indicative citizen-based monitoring of respirable particulate matter M. Jovašević-Stojanović et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2015.08.035
- The Silver Lining of COVID‐19: Estimation of Short‐Term Health Impacts Due to Lockdown in the Yangtze River Delta Region, China L. Huang et al. 10.1029/2020GH000272
124 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Highly resolved spatiotemporal variability of fine particle number concentrations in an urban neighborhood Y. Etzion & D. Broday 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2018.01.004
- Air Quality Impacts at an E‐Waste Site in Ghana Using Flexible, Moderate‐Cost and Quality‐Assured Measurements L. Kwarteng et al. 10.1029/2020GH000247
- Exploring the applicability and limitations of selected optical scattering instruments for PM mass measurement J. Zhang et al. 10.5194/amt-11-2995-2018
- The influence of humidity on the performance of a low-cost air particle mass sensor and the effect of atmospheric fog R. Jayaratne et al. 10.5194/amt-11-4883-2018
- Incorporating Low-Cost Sensor Measurements into High-Resolution PM2.5 Modeling at a Large Spatial Scale J. Bi et al. 10.1021/acs.est.9b06046
- Field Evaluation of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors in Beijing H. Mei et al. 10.3390/s20164381
- Spatial calibration and PM2.5 mapping of low-cost air quality sensors H. Chu et al. 10.1038/s41598-020-79064-w
- Evaluating the feasibility of a personal particle exposure monitor in outdoor and indoor microenvironments in Shanghai, China K. Wang et al. 10.1080/09603123.2018.1533531
- Laboratory assessment of low-cost PM monitors A. Manikonda et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2016.08.010
- Node-to-node field calibration of wireless distributed air pollution sensor network F. Kizel et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.09.042
- Development of a calibration chamber to evaluate the performance of low-cost particulate matter sensors T. Sayahi et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113131
- Garbage in, gospel out? – Air quality assessment in the UK planning system A. Mills & S. Peckham 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.06.010
- Effects of spatial sensitivity on mass sensing with bulk acoustic mode resonators A. Zielinski et al. 10.1016/j.sna.2015.11.003
- Evaluation of low-cost optical particle counters for monitoring individual indoor aerosol sources P. Salimifard et al. 10.1080/02786826.2019.1697423
- A versatile low-cost sensing device for assessing PM2.5 spatiotemporal variation and quantifying source contribution S. Lung et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137145
- Observation of PM2.5 using a combination of satellite remote sensing and low-cost sensor network in Siberian urban areas with limited reference monitoring C. Lin et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117410
- Evaluation and environmental correction of ambient CO<sub>2</sub> measurements from a low-cost NDIR sensor C. Martin et al. 10.5194/amt-10-2383-2017
- Calibration of Portable Particulate Matter–Monitoring Device using Web Query and Machine Learning B. Loh & G. Choi 10.1016/j.shaw.2019.08.002
- Comparison of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors for Indoor Air Monitoring during COVID-19 Lockdown M. Kaliszewski et al. 10.3390/s20247290
- A Survey on Real-Time Communications in Wireless Sensor Networks B. Kim et al. 10.1155/2017/1864847
- Long-term field evaluation of the Plantower PMS low-cost particulate matter sensors T. Sayahi et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.11.065
- Mathematical Modelling and Parameter Optimization of Fine Particle Sensors based on Laser Light Scattering W. Shao et al. 10.1109/JSEN.2017.2747083
- Performance evaluation of ozone and particulate matter sensors H. DeWitt et al. 10.1080/10962247.2020.1713921
- Field Assessment of the Village Green Project: An Autonomous Community Air Quality Monitoring System W. Jiao et al. 10.1021/acs.est.5b01245
- A methodology for the characterization of portable sensors for air quality measure with the goal of deployment in citizen science B. Languille et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134698
- Low Cost Sensor With IoT LoRaWAN Connectivity and Machine Learning-Based Calibration for Air Pollution Monitoring S. Ali et al. 10.1109/TIM.2020.3034109
- What does the Shinyei PPD42NS Low-Cost Dust Sensor Really Measure? M. Canu et al. 10.18178/ijesd.2021.12.1.1310
- Investigating a Low-Cost Dryer Designed for Low-Cost PM Sensors Measuring Ambient Air Quality A. Samad et al. 10.3390/s21030804
- Assessing the accuracy of low-cost optical particle sensors using a physics-based approach D. Hagan & J. Kroll 10.5194/amt-13-6343-2020
- The evaluation and optimization of calibration methods for low-cost particulate matter sensors: Inter-comparison between fixed and mobile methods X. Qin et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136791
- Use of electrochemical sensors for measurement of air pollution: correcting interference response and validating measurements E. Cross et al. 10.5194/amt-10-3575-2017
- A tunable high-pass filter for simple and inexpensive size-segregation of sub-10-nm nanoparticles N. Surawski et al. 10.1038/srep45678
- A Survey on Sensor Calibration in Air Pollution Monitoring Deployments B. Maag et al. 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2853660
- Development of Low-Cost Air Quality Stations for Next Generation Monitoring Networks: Calibration and Validation of PM2.5 and PM10 Sensors A. Cavaliere et al. 10.3390/s18092843
- In-car particulate matter exposure across ten global cities P. Kumar et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141395
- Evaluation of the Performance of Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors at a High Mountain Station with Complex Meteorological Conditions H. Li et al. 10.3390/atmos11020212
- Comparison of methods for converting Dylos particle number concentrations to PM2.5 mass concentrations R. Franken et al. 10.1111/ina.12546
- Data Verification Tools for Minimizing Management Costs of Dense Air-Quality Monitoring Networks G. Miskell et al. 10.1021/acs.est.5b04421
- New Methods for Personal Exposure Monitoring for Airborne Particles K. Koehler & T. Peters 10.1007/s40572-015-0070-z
- Evaluation of two low-cost PM monitors under different laboratory and indoor conditions R. He et al. 10.1080/02786826.2020.1851649
- Ambient and laboratory evaluation of a low-cost particulate matter sensor K. Kelly et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.12.039
- A Statistical Calibration Framework for Improving Non-Reference Method Particulate Matter Reporting: A Focus on Community Air Monitoring Settings S. Commodore et al. 10.3390/atmos11080807
- Evaluation of a Low-Cost Aerosol Sensor to Assess Dust Concentrations in a Swine Building S. Jones et al. 10.1093/annhyg/mew009
- Re-calibrating DIY: Testing digital participation across dust sensors, fry pans and environmental pollution H. Pritchard et al. 10.1177/1461444818777473
- Estimating Hourly Concentrations of PM2.5 across a Metropolitan Area Using Low-Cost Particle Monitors N. Zikova et al. 10.3390/s17081922
- Characterising low-cost sensors in highly portable platforms to quantify personal exposure in diverse environments L. Chatzidiakou et al. 10.5194/amt-12-4643-2019
- Extensive evaluation and classification of low‐cost dust sensors in laboratory using a newly developed test method K. Ahn et al. 10.1111/ina.12615
- Observation and modeling of vertical carbon dioxide distribution in a heavily polluted suburban environment Z. BAO et al. 10.1080/16742834.2020.1746627
- Evaluation of PM2.5 measured in an urban setting using a low-cost optical particle counter and a Federal Equivalent Method Beta Attenuation Monitor B. Magi et al. 10.1080/02786826.2019.1619915
- The use of low-cost measuring devices for testing air quality in hard-to-reach locations M. Rogulski et al. 10.1051/e3sconf/20184400151
- Laboratory evaluation of particle-size selectivity of optical low-cost particulate matter sensors J. Kuula et al. 10.5194/amt-13-2413-2020
- Response Characterization of an Inexpensive Aerosol Sensor 10.3390/s17122915
- RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE CONCENTRATIONS OF PM2.5 INDOORS OBTAINED BY USING THE OPTICAL AND GRAVIMETRIC METHODS: PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS J. PASTUSZKA 10.21307/ACEE-2020-035
- An Integrated Sensor Data Logging, Survey, and Analytics Platform for Field Research and Its Application in HAPIN, a Multi-Center Household Energy Intervention Trial D. Wilson et al. 10.3390/su12051805
- Fine-Scale Spatiotemporal Air Pollution Analysis Using Mobile Monitors on Google Street View Vehicles Y. Guan et al. 10.1080/01621459.2019.1665526
- Performance of low-cost indoor air quality monitors for PM2.5 and PM10 from residential sources Z. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106654
- Evaluation of optical particulate matter sensors under realistic conditions of strong and mild urban pollution A. Masic et al. 10.5194/amt-13-6427-2020
- Experimental and modeling assessment of a novel automotive cabin PM2.5 removal system J. Vande Hey et al. 10.1080/02786826.2018.1490694
- Compositional Analysis of Adsorbed Organic Aerosol on a Microresonator Mass Sensor A. Zielinski et al. 10.1007/s41810-018-0029-1
- Usability of a Personal Air Pollution Monitor: Design-Feedback Iterative Cycle Study G. Duncan et al. 10.2196/12023
- Field testing a low-cost passive aerosol sampler for long-term measurement of ambient PM2.5 concentrations and particle composition M. Castillo et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116905
- Real-time particle monitoring of pesticide drift from an axial fan airblast orchard sprayer M. Blanco et al. 10.1038/s41370-018-0090-5
- Calibration of low-cost particulate matter sensors: Model development for a multi-city epidemiological study M. Zusman et al. 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105329
- Investigation of Low-Cost and Optical Particulate Matter Sensors for Ambient Monitoring M. Rogulski & A. Badyda 10.3390/atmos11101040
- Application of Machine Learning for the in-Field Correction of a PM2.5 Low-Cost Sensor Network W. Wang et al. 10.3390/s20175002
- Validation of a light-scattering PM2.5 sensor monitor based on the long-term gravimetric measurements in field tests J. Shi et al. 10.1371/journal.pone.0185700
- Laboratory evaluation of low-cost PurpleAir PM monitors and in-field correction using co-located portable filter samplers J. Tryner et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117067
- Fusion of Environmental Sensing on PM2.5 and Deep Learning on Vehicle Detecting for Acquiring Roadside PM2.5 Concentration Increments W. Wang et al. 10.3390/s20174679
- Particulate matter pollution in an informal settlement in Nairobi: Using citizen science to make the invisible visible S. West et al. 10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.102133
- Evaluation of a low-cost optical particle counter (Alphasense OPC-N2) for ambient air monitoring L. Crilley et al. 10.5194/amt-11-709-2018
- Health Benefit Assessment of Running in Urban Areas against the Background of Particulate Matter 2.5 Concentration: The Munich Olympic Park L. Zeindl & J. Koenigstorfer 10.3390/urbansci4040062
- Evaluation and Application of a Novel Low-Cost Wearable Sensing Device in Assessing Real-Time PM2.5 Exposure in Major Asian Transportation Modes W. Wang et al. 10.3390/atmos12020270
- Measuring Micrometers of Matter and Inventing Indices: Entangling Social Perception within Discrete and Continuous Measurements of Air Quality E. Schmitt 10.3390/socsci8020048
- Long-term evaluation of air sensor technology under ambient conditions in Denver, Colorado S. Feinberg et al. 10.5194/amt-11-4605-2018
- Real-time sensors for indoor air monitoring and challenges ahead in deploying them to urban buildings P. Kumar et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.032
- Low-cost PM monitors as an opportunity to increase the spatiotemporal resolution of measurements of air quality M. Rogulski 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.026
- Potential of a low-cost gas sensor for atmospheric methane monitoring M. van den Bossche et al. 10.1016/j.snb.2016.07.092
- Field and Laboratory Evaluations of the Low-Cost Plantower Particulate Matter Sensor M. Levy Zamora et al. 10.1021/acs.est.8b05174
- Field performance of a low-cost sensor in the monitoring of particulate matter in Santiago, Chile M. Tagle et al. 10.1007/s10661-020-8118-4
- Small, Smart, Fast, and Cheap: Microchip-Based Sensors to Estimate Air Pollution Exposures in Rural Households A. Pillarisetti et al. 10.3390/s17081879
- Effects of fireworks on particulate matter concentration in a narrow valley: the case of the Medellín metropolitan area C. Hoyos et al. 10.1007/s10661-019-7838-9
- Evaluation and calibration of a low-cost particle sensor in ambient conditions using machine-learning methods M. Si et al. 10.5194/amt-13-1693-2020
- Particulate Matter Sensors Mounted on a Robot for Environmental Aerosol Measurements A. Cashikar et al. 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001569
- Humidity, density, and inlet aspiration efficiency correction improve accuracy of a low-cost sensor during field calibration at a suburban site in the North-Western Indo-Gangetic plain (NW-IGP) H. Pawar & B. Sinha 10.1080/02786826.2020.1719971
- Review of the Performance of Low-Cost Sensors for Air Quality Monitoring F. Karagulian et al. 10.3390/atmos10090506
- Can commercial low-cost sensor platforms contribute to air quality monitoring and exposure estimates? N. Castell et al. 10.1016/j.envint.2016.12.007
- Contribution of low-cost sensor measurements to the prediction of PM2.5 levels: A case study in Imperial County, California, USA J. Bi et al. 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108810
- A feasible experimental framework for field calibration of portable light-scattering aerosol monitors: Case of TSI DustTrak Z. Li et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113136
- Review of smoke taint in wine: smoke-derived volatile phenols and their glycosidic metabolites in grapes and vines as biomarkers for smoke exposure and their role in the sensory perception of smoke taint M. Krstic et al. 10.1111/ajgw.12183
- Smart homes and the control of indoor air quality A. Schieweck et al. 10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.057
- Flow rate-independent electrical aerosol sensor A. Rostedt & J. Keskinen 10.1080/02786826.2018.1498586
- Characterization of a commercial lower-cost medium-precision non-dispersive infrared sensor for atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> monitoring in urban areas E. Arzoumanian et al. 10.5194/amt-12-2665-2019
- Response of eight low-cost particle sensors and consumer devices to typical indoor emission events in a real home (ASHRAE 1756-RP) Y. Zou et al. 10.1080/23744731.2019.1676094
- Enhanced performance of pocket-sized nanoparticle exposure monitor for healthy indoor environment H. Wasisto et al. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.09.013
- FeinPhone: Low-cost Smartphone Camera-based 2D Particulate Matter Sensor M. Budde et al. 10.3390/s19030749
- Evaluation of new low-cost particle monitors for PM2.5 concentrations measurements N. Zikova et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2016.11.010
- The BErkeley Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> Observation Network: field calibration and evaluation of low-cost air quality sensors J. Kim et al. 10.5194/amt-11-1937-2018
- Assessment of PM2.5 monitoring using MicroPEM: A validation study in a city with elevated PM2.5 levels Y. Du et al. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.01.002
- Identification of technical problems affecting performance of DustTrak DRX aerosol monitors I. Rivas et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.129
- Performance of low-cost monitors to assess household air pollution A. Curto et al. 10.1016/j.envres.2018.01.024
- Gaussian process regression model for dynamically calibrating and surveilling a wireless low-cost particulate matter sensor network in Delhi T. Zheng et al. 10.5194/amt-12-5161-2019
- End-user perspective of low-cost sensors for outdoor air pollution monitoring A. Rai et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.266
- Response of consumer and research grade indoor air quality monitors to residential sources of fine particles B. Singer & W. Delp 10.1111/ina.12463
- Improving accuracy of air pollution exposure measurements: Statistical correction of a municipal low-cost airborne particulate matter sensor network E. Considine et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115833
- Assessment of air quality microsensors versus reference methods: The EuNetAir joint exercise C. Borrego et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.09.050
- Measurements of PM<sub>2.5</sub> with PurpleAir under atmospheric conditions K. Ardon-Dryer et al. 10.5194/amt-13-5441-2020
- Development and evaluation of a palm-sized optical PM2.5 sensor T. Nakayama et al. 10.1080/02786826.2017.1375078
- An efficient spatiotemporal data calibration approach for the low-cost PM2.5 sensing network: A case study in Taiwan C. Lee et al. 10.1016/j.envint.2019.05.032
- A systematic investigation on the effects of temperature and relative humidity on the performance of eight low-cost particle sensors and devices Y. Zou et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2020.105715
- Performance calibration of low-cost and portable particular matter (PM) sensors D. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2017.05.011
- Evaluation of low-cost sensors for quantitative personal exposure monitoring S. Mahajan & P. Kumar 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102076
- Mobile phones as monitors of personal exposure to air pollution: Is this the future? M. Nyarku et al. 10.1371/journal.pone.0193150
- Integrating low-cost air quality sensor networks with fixed and satellite monitoring systems to study ground-level PM2.5 J. Li et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117293
- Real-Time Monitoring of Spray Drift from Three Different Orchard Sprayers M. Blanco et al. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.092
- Hourly land-use regression models based on low-cost PM monitor data M. Masiol et al. 10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.052
- In Situ Calibration Algorithms for Environmental Sensor Networks: A Review F. Delaine et al. 10.1109/JSEN.2019.2910317
- Measurement of PM10 concentration using hybrid cyclone separator and particle counter R. Purbakawaca et al. 10.1088/1755-1315/622/1/012025
- Community Air Sensor Network (CAIRSENSE) project: evaluation of low-cost sensor performance in a suburban environment in the southeastern United States W. Jiao et al. 10.5194/amt-9-5281-2016
- Field evaluation of low-cost particulate matter sensors in high- and low-concentration environments T. Zheng et al. 10.5194/amt-11-4823-2018
- Using a gradient boosting model to improve the performance of low-cost aerosol monitors in a dense, heterogeneous urban environment N. Johnson et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.019
- Portable, Ambient PM2.5 Sensor for Human and/or Animal Exposure Studies T. Cao & J. Thompson 10.1080/00032719.2016.1190736
- Outlier detection and gap filling methodologies for low-cost air quality measurements T. Ottosen & P. Kumar 10.1039/C8EM00593A
- Effect of micropillars with varying geometry and density on the efficiency of impaction-based quartz crystal microbalance aerosol sensors M. Hajizadehmotlagh & I. Paprotny 10.1063/1.5125895
- Aerosol Health Effects from Molecular to Global Scales M. Shiraiwa et al. 10.1021/acs.est.7b04417
14 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Laboratory Evaluation of the Shinyei PPD42NS Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensor E. Austin et al. 10.1371/journal.pone.0137789
- Personal exposure monitoring of PM 2.5 in indoor and outdoor microenvironments S. Steinle et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.12.003
- Biomass-fuelled improved cookstove intervention to prevent household air pollution in Northwest Ethiopia: a cluster randomized controlled trial M. Adane et al. 10.1186/s12199-020-00923-z
- Sensor Selection to Improve Estimates of Particulate Matter Concentration from a Low-Cost Network S. Sousan et al. 10.3390/s18093008
- A Review of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors from the Developers’ Perspectives B. Alfano et al. 10.3390/s20236819
- A distributed network of low-cost continuous reading sensors to measure spatiotemporal variations of PM2.5 in Xi'an, China M. Gao et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2015.01.013
- How Sensors Might Help Define the External Exposome M. Loh et al. 10.3390/ijerph14040434
- Air pollution and child obesity: Assessing the feasibility of measuring personal PM2.5 exposures and behaviours related to BMI in preschool-aged children in China H. Ong et al. 10.1016/j.obmed.2019.100149
- Inter-comparison of low-cost sensors for measuring the mass concentration of occupational aerosols S. Sousan et al. 10.1080/02786826.2016.1162901
- Crowd-sourced air quality studies: A review of the literature & portable sensors J. Thompson 10.1016/j.teac.2016.06.001
- Use of Low-Cost Ambient Particulate Sensors in Nablus, Palestine with Application to the Assessment of Regional Dust Storms A. Khader & R. Martin 10.3390/atmos10090539
- Laboratory Evaluation and Calibration of Three Low-Cost Particle Sensors for Particulate Matter Measurement Y. Wang et al. 10.1080/02786826.2015.1100710
- On the use of small and cheaper sensors and devices for indicative citizen-based monitoring of respirable particulate matter M. Jovašević-Stojanović et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2015.08.035
- The Silver Lining of COVID‐19: Estimation of Short‐Term Health Impacts Due to Lockdown in the Yangtze River Delta Region, China L. Huang et al. 10.1029/2020GH000272
Saved (final revised paper)
Saved (final revised paper)
Latest update: 26 Feb 2021