59 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Diesel Soot and Amine-Containing Organic Sulfate Aerosols in an Arctic Oil Field M. Gunsch et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b04825
2. Effects of ozone and relative humidity in secondary inorganic aerosol formation during haze events in Beijing, China P. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105855
3. Long-term real-time measurements of aerosol particle composition in Beijing, China: seasonal variations, meteorological effects, and source analysis Y. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10149-2015
4. Regional new particle formation as modulators of cloud condensation nuclei and cloud droplet number in the eastern Mediterranean P. Kalkavouras et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6185-2019
5. Chemical Composition of Fresh and Aged Asphalt-Related Organic Aerosols: From Ambient Observations to Laboratory Experiments P. Khare et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.4c00193
6. Sources and processes that control the submicron organic aerosol composition in an urban Mediterranean environment (Athens): a high temporal-resolution chemical composition measurement study I. Stavroulas et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-901-2019
7. Laboratory and field evaluation of the Aerosol Dynamics Inc. concentrator (ADIc) for aerosol mass spectrometry S. Saarikoski et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-3907-2019
8. Review of online source apportionment research based on observation for ambient particulate matter F. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144095
9. Impacts of primary emissions and secondary aerosol formation on air pollution in an urban area of China during the COVID-19 lockdown J. Tian et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106426
10. Response of atmospheric composition to COVID-19 lockdown measures during spring in the Paris region (France) J. Petit et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17167-2021
11. Characterization of anthropogenic organic aerosols by TOF-ACSM with the new capture vaporizer Y. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2457-2020
12. Towards reliable retrievals of cloud droplet number for non-precipitating planetary boundary layer clouds and their susceptibility to aerosol R. Foskinis et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsen.2022.958207
13. Evaluation of the Sequential Spot Sampler (S3) for time-resolved measurement of PM2.5 sulfate and nitrate through lab and field measurements A. Hecobian et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-525-2016
14. Temporal and spatial variability of traffic-related PM2.5 sources: Comparison of exhaust and non-exhaust emissions C. Jeong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.10.038
15. Two years of near real-time chemical composition of submicron aerosols in the region of Paris using an Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM) and a multi-wavelength Aethalometer J. Petit et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2985-2015
16. Evaluation of the Semi-Continuous OCEC analyzer performance with the EUSAAR2 protocol A. Karanasiou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141266
17. Review of Sunset OC/EC Instrument Measurements During the EPA’s Sunset Carbon Evaluation Project S. Brown et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10050287
18. Aerosol composition and sources during the Chinese Spring Festival: fireworks, secondary aerosol, and holiday effects Q. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6023-2015
19. Chemical characterization of PM2.5 and source apportionment of organic aerosol in New Delhi, India A. Tobler et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140924
20. Improved chloride quantification in quadrupole aerosol chemical speciation monitors (Q-ACSMs) A. Tobler et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-5293-2020
21. Droplet activation behaviour of atmospheric black carbon particles in fog as a function of their size and mixing state G. Motos et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2183-2019
22. Characteristics, evolution, and potential source regions of submicron aerosol in Beijing, China L. Han et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118061
23. Size-segregated particle number and mass concentrations from different emission sources in urban Beijing J. Cai et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12721-2020
24. The second ACTRIS inter-comparison (2016) for Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitors (ACSM): Calibration protocols and instrument performance evaluations E. Freney et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1608901
25. Evaluation of aerosol chemical speciation monitor response to different mixtures of organic and inorganic aerosols L. Mărmureanu et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2024.2412999
26. Submicron aerosol pollution in Greater Cairo (Egypt): A new type of urban haze? A. Christodoulou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2024.108610
27. Organic aerosol source apportionment in London 2013 with ME-2: exploring the solution space with annual and seasonal analysis E. Reyes-Villegas et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15545-2016
28. Modelling of atmospheric variability in gas and aerosols during the ACROSS campaign 2022 of the greater Paris area: evaluation of the meteorology, dynamics and chemistry L. Di Antonio et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4803-2025
29. Collocated observations of cloud condensation nuclei, particle size distributions, and chemical composition J. Schmale et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.3
30. Development and application of a mass closure PM2.5 composition online monitoring system C. Su et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-5407-2020
31. Aerosol spectral optical properties in the Paris urban area and its peri-urban and forested surroundings during summer 2022 from ACROSS surface observations L. Di Antonio et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3161-2025
32. Seasonal characterization of submicron aerosol chemical composition and organic aerosol sources in the southeastern United States: Atlanta, Georgia,and Look Rock, Tennessee S. Budisulistiorini et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5171-2016
33. An interlaboratory comparison of aerosol inorganic ion measurements by ion chromatography: implications for aerosol pH estimate J. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6325-2020
34. A searchable database and mass spectral comparison tool for the Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (AMS) and the Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM) S. Jeon et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-6075-2023
35. Characteristics and sources of submicron aerosols above the urban canopy (260 m) in Beijing, China, during the 2014 APEC summit C. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12879-2015
36. Characterization of particulate and gaseous pollutants from a French dairy and sheep farm J. Kammer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135598
37. Aging of biomass burning emissions in the Indo-Gangetic Plain outflow: Implications for black carbon light-absorption enhancement S. Kompalli et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2023.106949
38. Chemical characterization of sub-micron aerosols over the East Sea (Sea of Japan) A. Loh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159173
39. Examining the effects of anthropogenic emissions on isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol formation during the 2013 Southern Oxidant and Aerosol Study (SOAS) at the Look Rock, Tennessee ground site S. Budisulistiorini et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8871-2015
40. Organic functional groups in the submicron aerosol at 82.5° N, 62.5° W from 2012 to 2014 W. Leaitch et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3269-2018
41. Aerosol source apportionment from 1-year measurements at the CESAR tower in Cabauw, the Netherlands P. Schlag et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8831-2016
42. Long-term real-time chemical characterization of submicron aerosols at Montsec (southern Pyrenees, 1570 m a.s.l.) A. Ripoll et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2935-2015
43. Field characterization of the PM2.5 Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor: insights into the composition, sources, and processes of fine particles in eastern China Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14501-2017
44. Large-scale particulate air pollution and chemical fingerprint of volcanic sulfate aerosols from the 2014–2015 Holuhraun flood lava eruption of Bárðarbunga volcano (Iceland) M. Boichu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-14253-2019
45. Chemical Differences Between PM1 and PM2.5 in Highly Polluted Environment and Implications in Air Pollution Studies Y. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086288
46. Submicron aerosol source apportionment of wintertime pollution in Paris, France by double positive matrix factorization (PMF2) using an aerosol chemical speciation monitor (ACSM) and a multi-wavelength Aethalometer J. Petit et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13773-2014
47. Multi-year ACSM measurements at the central European research station Melpitz (Germany) – Part 1: Instrument robustness, quality assurance, and impact of upper size cutoff diameter L. Poulain et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4973-2020
48. Evaluation of a New Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM) System at an Urban Site in Atlanta, GA: The Use of Capture Vaporizer and PM2.5 Inlet T. Joo et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00173
49. Source apportionment of submicron organic aerosol collected from Atlanta, Georgia, during 2014–2015 using the aerosol chemical speciation monitor (ACSM) W. Rattanavaraha et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.07.055
50. Chemical characterization and source apportionment of submicron aerosols measured in Senegal during the 2015 SHADOW campaign L. Rivellini et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10291-2017
51. Mineral dust scavenges anthropogenic aerosols in polluted environment Y. Pan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119938
52. Chemical characterization of submicron regional background aerosols in the western Mediterranean using an Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor M. Minguillón et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6379-2015
53. Variations in the chemical composition of the submicron aerosol and in the sources of the organic fraction at a regional background site of the Po Valley (Italy) M. Bressi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12875-2016
54. On the dose-response association of fine and ultrafine particles in an urban atmosphere: toxicological outcomes on bronchial cells at realistic doses of exposure at the Air Liquid Interface M. Gualtieri et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143417
55. Measurement report: Evaluation of the TOF-ACSM-CV for PM1.0 and PM2.5 measurements during the RITA-2021 field campaign X. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3405-2024
56. ACTRIS ACSM intercomparison – Part 1: Reproducibility of concentration and fragment results from 13 individual Quadrupole Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitors (Q-ACSM) and consistency with co-located instruments V. Crenn et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-5063-2015
57. Evolution of Submicrometer Organic Aerosols during a Complete Residential Coal Combustion Process W. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00075
58. Real-time non-refractory PM1 chemical composition, size distribution and source apportionment at a coastal industrial park in the Yangtze River Delta region, China X. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142968
59. On the relation between the planetary boundary layer height and in situ surface observations of atmospheric aerosol pollutants during spring in an urban area R. Foskinis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2024.107543