84 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Compact snapshot image mapping spectrometer for unmanned aerial vehicle hyperspectral imaging J. Dwight et al. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.12.044004
2. Methane emissions decline from reduced oil, natural gas, and refinery production during COVID-19 A. Thorpe et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/acb5e5
3. Quantifying thermal power plants CO2 emissions globally from space using hyperspectral imagers M. Lei et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2025.101822
4. Spectral remote sensing for onshore seepage characterization: A critical overview S. Asadzadeh & C. de Souza Filho https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.03.004
5. The GHGSat-D imaging spectrometer D. Jervis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2127-2021
6. Machine Learning-Enhanced NDIR Methane Sensing Solution for Robust Outdoor Continuous Monitoring Applications Y. Yan et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25247691
7. Potential of next-generation imaging spectrometers to detect and quantify methane point sources from space D. Cusworth et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-5655-2019
8. Detection of Methane Plumes Using Airborne Midwave Infrared (3–5 µm) Hyperspectral Data R. Scafutto & C. De Souza Filho https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10081237
9. Estimation of molecular column density of methane (XCH4) using AVIRIS-NG data M. Pathakoti et al. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.12.046005
10. Detection and quantification of methane plumes with the MethaneAIR airborne spectrometer L. Guanter et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3857-2025
11. NASA's surface biology and geology designated observable: A perspective on surface imaging algorithms K. Cawse-Nicholson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112349
12. Detecting the Sources of Methane Emission from Oil Shale Mining and Processing Using Airborne Hyperspectral Data C. Xiao et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030537
13. A Multi-Sensor Framework for Methane Detection and Flux Estimation with Scale-Aware Plume Segmentation and Uncertainty Propagation from High-Resolution Spaceborne Imaging Spectrometers A. Ferrari et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/methane5010010
14. Airborne remote sensing and in situ measurements of atmospheric CO2 to quantify point source emissions T. Krings et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-721-2018
15. Spectroscopic techniques conceptualized with the remote sensing of atmospheric carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases B. Raychaudhuri https://doi.org/10.1080/05704928.2024.2326527
16. Quantifying methane emissions from the global scale down to point sources using satellite observations of atmospheric methane D. Jacob et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9617-2022
17. Methane detection and emission estimation from space: Benchmarking PRISMA and EnMAP with the GHGSat constellation D. Settembre et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2026.105557
18. Mapping methane point emissions with the PRISMA spaceborne imaging spectrometer L. Guanter et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112671
19. Improved methane flux estimation from hyper-spectral imagery via log-domain matched filtering and background homogenization F. Masin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2026.100417
20. Exploiting the entire near-infrared spectral range to improve the detection of methane plumes with high-resolution imaging spectrometers J. Roger et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1333-2024
21. Machine Learning for Methane Detection and Quantification From Space: A survey E. Tiemann et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/MGRS.2025.3599559
22. Attribution of individual methane and carbon dioxide emission sources using EMIT observations from space A. Thorpe et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adh2391
23. Improved methane emission estimates using AVIRIS-NG and an Airborne Doppler Wind Lidar A. Thorpe et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112681
24. Methane remote sensing and emission quantification of offshore shallow water oil and gas platforms in the Gulf of Mexico A. Ayasse et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac8566
25. An optimized methane retrieval approach based on morphological fusion for mapping methane point emissions from spaceborne imaging spectrometry F. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2026.115718
26. Sensitivity and Uncertainty in Matched-Filter-Based Gas Detection With Imaging Spectroscopy J. Fahlen et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2024.3440174
27. Evaluation of thermal infrared hyperspectral imagery for the detection of onshore methane plumes: Significance for hydrocarbon exploration and monitoring R. Scafutto et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2017.07.002
28. Advanced radiometry measurements and Earth science applications with the Airborne Prism Experiment (APEX) M. Schaepman et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.11.014
29. 煤炭行业甲烷排放卫星遥感研究进展与展望 秦. Qin Kai et al. https://doi.org/10.3788/AOS231293
30. Considering the observation and illumination angular configuration for an improved detection and quantification of methane emissions J. Gorroño et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-1245-2026
31. Mapping methane plumes at very high spatial resolution with the WorldView-3 satellite E. Sánchez-García et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1657-2022
32. Identification of false methane plumes for orbital imaging spectrometers: A case study with EMIT C. Xiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2025.114860
33. Geomorphological patterns of remotely sensed methane hot spots in the Mackenzie Delta, Canada L. Baskaran et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac41fb
34. Background Suppression in EnMAP Methane Retrieval Maps with a Gated U-Net Denoiser J. Bettinelli & D. Efremenko https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18193304
35. Joint Use of in-Scene Background Radiance Estimation and Optimal Estimation Methods for Quantifying Methane Emissions Using PRISMA Hyperspectral Satellite Data: Application to the Korpezhe Industrial Site N. Nesme et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13244992
36. Using a deep neural network to detect methane point sources and quantify emissions from PRISMA hyperspectral satellite images P. Joyce et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2627-2023
37. Improving quantification of methane point source emissions from imaging spectroscopy Z. Pei et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2023.113652
38. Separating and quantifying facility-level methane emissions with overlapping plumes for spaceborne methane monitoring Y. Pang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-455-2025
39. Detecting Methane Emissions from Space Over India: Analysis Using EMIT and Sentinel-5P TROPOMI Datasets A. Siddiqui et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-024-01925-y
40. Probability of detection for airborne sensing of methane plumes using long wavelength infrared hyperspectral imaging K. Daun et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2026.115556
41. Mapping methane concentrations from a controlled release experiment using the next generation airborne visible/infrared imaging spectrometer (AVIRIS-NG) A. Thorpe et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.03.032
42. Airborne DOAS retrievals of methane, carbon dioxide, and water vapor concentrations at high spatial resolution: application to AVIRIS-NG A. Thorpe et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3833-2017
43. Vast and hidden urban methane emissions from the Russia–Ukraine war Z. Feng et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44284-025-00309-8
44. Satellite-based survey of extreme methane emissions in the Permian basin I. Irakulis-Loitxate et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abf4507
45. Reduced Methane Emissions from Santa Barbara Marine Seeps T. Krings et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9111162
46. Mitigation of methane emissions in cities: How new measurements and partnerships can contribute to emissions reduction strategies F. Hopkins et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000381
47. High-Resolution Methane Mapping With the EnMAP Satellite Imaging Spectroscopy Mission J. Roger et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2024.3352403
48. Improvements of AI-driven emission estimation for point sources applied to high resolution 2-D methane-plume imagery T. Plewa et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2025.115002
49. Application of airborne and spaceborne hyperspectral imaging techniques for atmospheric research: past, present, and future M. Calin et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/05704928.2020.1774381
50. Towards spaceborne monitoring of localized CO2 emissions: an instrument concept and first performance assessment J. Strandgren et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2887-2020
51. US oil and gas system emissions from nearly one million aerial site measurements E. Sherwin et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07117-5
52. PRISMethaNet: A novel deep learning model for landfill methane detection using PRISMA satellite data M. Marjani et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2024.10.003
53. Fast and Accurate Retrieval of Methane Concentration From Imaging Spectrometer Data Using Sparsity Prior M. Foote et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2020.2976888
54. Methane retrievals from airborne HySpex observations in the shortwave infrared P. Hochstaffl et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4195-2023
55. Evaluating the effects of surface properties on methane retrievals using a synthetic airborne visible/infrared imaging spectrometer next generation (AVIRIS-NG) image A. Ayasse et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.06.018
56. High spatial resolution imaging of methane and other trace gases with the airborne Hyperspectral Thermal Emission Spectrometer (HyTES) G. Hulley et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2393-2016
57. Tightening up methane plume source rate estimation in EnMAP and PRISMA images E. Ouerghi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4611-2025
58. Atmospheric remote sensing constraints on direct sea-air methane flux from the 22/4b North Sea massive blowout bubble plume K. Gerilowski et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.07.011
59. Space‐based remote imaging spectroscopy of the Aliso Canyon CH4 superemitter D. Thompson et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069079
60. Understanding the potential of Sentinel-2 for monitoring methane point emissions J. Gorroño et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-89-2023
61. Advanced Leak Detection and Quantification of Methane Emissions Using sUAS D. Hollenbeck et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones5040117
62. MethaNet – An AI-driven approach to quantifying methane point-source emission from high-resolution 2-D plume imagery S. Jongaramrungruang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112809
63. Real-time remote detection and measurement for airborne imaging spectroscopy: a case study with methane D. Thompson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4383-2015
64. Airborne methane remote measurements reveal heavy-tail flux distribution in Four Corners region C. Frankenberg et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1605617113
65. Matched Filter Based on the Radiative Transfer Model for CO2 Estimation From PRISMA Hyperspectral Data N. Acito et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2023.3327756
66. First TanSat CO2 retrieval over land and ocean using both nadir and glint spectroscopy X. Hong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2024.114053
67. An examination of enhanced atmospheric methane detection methods for predicting performance of a novel multiband uncooled radiometer imager C. Webber & J. Kerekes https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-5359-2020
68. Remote sensing of methane plumes: instrument tradeoff analysis for detecting and quantifying local sources at global scale S. Jongaramrungruang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7999-2021
69. Detection and quantification of CH4 plumes using the WFM-DOAS retrieval on AVIRIS-NG hyperspectral data J. Borchardt et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1267-2021
70. Identifying and quantifying greenhouse gas emissions with the AVIRIS-3 airborne imaging spectrometer R. Coleman et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2025.115058
71. Identification of Sources of Methane in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam C. Woolley Maisch et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00034
72. Retrieval of Global Carbon Dioxide From TanSat Satellite and Comprehensive Validation With TCCON Measurements and Satellite Observations X. Hong et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2021.3066623
73. Instrument Performance Analysis for Methane Point Source Retrieval and Estimation Using Remote Sensing Technique Y. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17040634
74. Characterizing Methane Emission Hotspots From Thawing Permafrost C. Elder et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GB006922
75. Quantifying methane emissions from United States landfills D. Cusworth et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adi7735
76. Evaluation of methane emission from MSW landfills in China, India, and the U.S. from space using a two-tier approach S. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124705
77. Global monitoring of methane point sources using deep learning on hyperspectral radiance measurements from EMIT V. Batchu et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2612145123
78. A uniformly most powerful detector of gas plumes against a cluttered background A. Schaum https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112443
79. Methane Retrieval Algorithms Based on Satellite: A Review Y. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15040449
80. Global Methane Retrieval, Monitoring, and Quantification in Hotspot Regions Based on AHSI/ZY-1 Satellite T. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16050510
81. Impact of scene-specific enhancement spectra on matched filter greenhouse gas retrievals from imaging spectroscopy M. Foote et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112574
82. Atmospheric composition and thermodynamic retrievals from the ARIES airborne FTS system – Part 1: Technical aspects and simulated capability S. Illingworth et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1133-2014
83. Challenges in Methane Column Retrievals from AVIRIS-NG Imagery over Spectrally Cluttered Surfaces: A Sensitivity Analysis M. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9080835
84. HyperGas 1.0: a python package for analyzing hyperspectral data for greenhouse gases from retrieval to emission rate quantification X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-5979-2026