58 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Satellite observations of atmospheric methane and their value for quantifying methane emissions D. Jacob et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14371-2016
2. The CHRONOS mission: capability for sub-hourly synoptic observations of carbon monoxide and methane to quantify emissions and transport of air pollution D. Edwards et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1061-2018
3. Improved line list of 12CH4 in the 4100–4300 cm−1 region A. Rodina et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.108021
4. Detection of fossil fuel emission trends in the presence of natural carbon cycle variability Y. Yin et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab2dd7
5. The potential of clear-sky carbon dioxide satellite retrievals R. Nelson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1671-2016
6. Geostationary Full-Spectrum Wide-Swath High-Fidelity Imaging Spectrometer: Optical Design and Prototype Development J. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15020396
7. Assimilation of OCO-2 retrievals with WRF-Chem/DART: A case study for the Midwestern United States Q. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118106
8. Diurnal carbon monoxide observed from a geostationary infrared hyperspectral sounder: first result from GIIRS on board FengYun-4B Z. Zeng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3059-2023
9. Absorption coefficient (ABSCO) tables for the Orbiting Carbon Observatories: Version 5.1 V. Payne et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2020.107217
10. The Potential of the Geostationary Carbon Cycle Observatory (GeoCarb) to Provide Multi-scale Constraints on the Carbon Cycle in the Americas B. Moore III et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2018.00109
11. OCO-2 advances photosynthesis observation from space via solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence Y. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam5747
12. The status and development proposal of carbon sources and sinks monitoring satellite system G. Meng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43979-022-00033-5
13. Simulated retrievals for the remote sensing of CO2, CH4, CO, and H2O from geostationary orbit X. Xi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4817-2015
14. Small anomalies in dry-season greenness and chlorophyll fluorescence for Amazon moist tropical forests during El Niño and La Niña R. Doughty et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112196
15. Reevaluating the Use of O2 a1Δg Band in Spaceborne Remote Sensing of Greenhouse Gases K. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL077823
16. Pixel Size and Revisit Rate Requirements for Monitoring Power Plant CO2 Emissions from Space T. Hill & R. Nassar https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11131608
17. Multi‐Order Carbon Spectral Imager: A Sensor Concept for Carbon Cycle Investigations J. Hall et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EA000419
18. Constraining regional greenhouse gas emissions using geostationary concentration measurements: a theoretical study P. Rayner et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3285-2014
19. Simulating estimation of California fossil fuel and biosphere carbon dioxide exchanges combining in situ tower and satellite column observations M. Fischer et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025617
20. PMIF v1.0: assessing the potential of satellite observations to constrain CO2 emissions from large cities and point sources over the globe using synthetic data Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5813-2020
21. The potential of a constellation of low earth orbit satellite imagers to monitor worldwide fossil fuel CO2 emissions from large cities and point sources F. Lespinas et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-020-00153-4
22. Surface reflectance biases in XCH4 retrievals from the 2.3 µm band are enhanced in the presence of aerosols P. Somkuti et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4647-2025
23. Sensitivity of remotely sensed trace gas concentrations to polarisation D. O'Brien et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4917-2015
24. Current and near-term advances in Earth observation for ecological applications S. Ustin & E. Middleton https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-020-00255-4
25. Global satellite-driven estimates of heterotrophic respiration A. Konings et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-2269-2019
26. A review of datasets and methods for deriving spatiotemporal distributions of atmospheric CO2 C. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116101
27. Spaceborne detection of localized carbon dioxide sources F. Schwandner et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam5782
28. Detecting high-emitting methane sources in oil/gas fields using satellite observations D. Cusworth et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16885-2018
29. Constraining sector-specific CO2 and CH4 emissions in the US S. Miller & A. Michalak https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3963-2017
30. Quantifying the impact of aerosol scattering on the retrieval of methane from airborne remote sensing measurements Y. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6755-2020
31. Contrasting carbon cycle responses of the tropical continents to the 2015–2016 El Niño J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam5690
32. On the impact of granularity of space-based urban CO2 emissions in urban atmospheric inversions: A case study for Indianapolis, IN T. Oda et al. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.146
33. Constraints on methane emissions in North America from future geostationary remote-sensing measurements N. Bousserez et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6175-2016
34. Remote sensing of the terrestrial carbon cycle: A review of advances over 50 years J. Xiao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111383
35. Validation of OCO-2 error analysis using simulated retrievals S. Kulawik et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-5317-2019
36. The GeoCarb greenhouse gas retrieval algorithm: simulations and sensitivity to sources of uncertainty G. McGarragh et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1091-2024
37. Characterizing model errors in chemical transport modeling of methane: using GOSAT XCH4 data with weak-constraint four-dimensional variational data assimilation I. Stanevich et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9545-2021
38. Atmospheric Simulations of Total Column CO2 Mole Fractions from Global to Mesoscale within the Carbon Monitoring System Flux Inversion Framework M. Butler et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11080787
39. Potential of a geostationary geoCARB mission to estimate surface emissions of CO2, CH4 and CO in a polluted urban environment: case study Shanghai D. O'Brien et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4633-2016
40. Assessing the capability of different satellite observing configurations to resolve the distribution of methane emissions at kilometer scales A. Turner et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8265-2018
41. Estimator of Surface Ozone Using Formaldehyde and Carbon Monoxide Concentrations Over the Eastern United States in Summer Y. Cheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028452
42. Interpreting contemporary trends in atmospheric methane A. Turner et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814297116
43. Comparative analysis of low-Earth orbit (TROPOMI) and geostationary (GeoCARB, GEO-CAPE) satellite instruments for constraining methane emissions on fine regional scales: application to the Southeast US J. Sheng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-6379-2018
44. Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence from the Geostationary Carbon Cycle Observatory (GeoCarb): An extensive simulation study P. Somkuti et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112565
45. Global GOSAT, OCO-2, and OCO-3 solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence datasets R. Doughty et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-1513-2022
46. The impact of improved satellite retrievals on estimates of biospheric carbon balance S. Miller & A. Michalak https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-323-2020
47. A global map of emission clumps for future monitoring of fossil fuel CO2 emissions from space Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-687-2019
48. A scanning strategy optimized for signal-to-noise ratio for the Geostationary Carbon Cycle Observatory (GeoCarb) instrument J. Nivitanont et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-3317-2019
49. Permafrost carbon emissions in a changing Arctic K. Miner et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00230-3
50. MERLIN: A French-German Space Lidar Mission Dedicated to Atmospheric Methane G. Ehret et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9101052
51. TROPOMI SIF reveals large uncertainty in estimating the end of plant growing season from vegetation indices data in the Tibetan Plateau J. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.113209
52. Quantifying methane point sources from fine-scale satellite observations of atmospheric methane plumes D. Varon et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5673-2018
53. Geostationary Emission Explorer for Europe (G3E): mission concept and initial performance assessment A. Butz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4719-2015
54. Evaluating year-to-year anomalies in tropical wetland methane emissions using satellite CH4 observations R. Parker et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.02.011
55. Quantification of methane emitted by ruminants: a review of methods L. Tedeschi et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skac197
56. CO2 Flux over the Contiguous United States in 2016 Inverted by WRF-Chem/DART from OCO-2 XCO2 Retrievals Q. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13152996
57. 静止轨道全谱段宽覆盖成像光谱仪光学系统设计与高保真分光系统研制 朱. Zhu Jiacheng et al. https://doi.org/10.3788/AOS221884
58. High accuracy absorption coefficients for the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) mission: Validation of updated carbon dioxide cross-sections using atmospheric spectra F. Oyafuso et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.06.012