Articles | Volume 8, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2555-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2555-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
ACTRIS ACSM intercomparison – Part 2: Intercomparison of ME-2 organic source apportionment results from 15 individual, co-located aerosol mass spectrometers
R. Fröhlich
Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
V. Crenn
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, LSCE, CNRS-CEA-UVSQ, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
A. Setyan
Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Douai, Département Sciences de l'Atmosphère et Génie de l'Environnement, Douai, France
C. A. Belis
European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Ispra (VA), Italy
F. Canonaco
Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
O. Favez
INERIS, Verneuil-en-Halatte, France
V. Riffault
Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Douai, Département Sciences de l'Atmosphère et Génie de l'Environnement, Douai, France
J. G. Slowik
Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
W. Aas
NILU – Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Kjeller, Norway
M. Aijälä
Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
A. Alastuey
Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research (IDAEA-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain
B. Artiñano
Centre for Energy, Environment and Technology Research (CIEMAT), Department of the Environment, Madrid, Spain
N. Bonnaire
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, LSCE, CNRS-CEA-UVSQ, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
C. Bozzetti
Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
M. Bressi
European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Ispra (VA), Italy
C. Carbone
Proambiente S.c.r.l., CNR Research Area, Bologna, Italy
Centre for Energy, Environment and Technology Research (CIEMAT), Department of the Environment, Madrid, Spain
P. L. Croteau
Aerodyne Research, Inc., Billerica, Massachusetts, USA
M. J. Cubison
TOFWERK AG, Thun, Switzerland
J. K. Esser-Gietl
Deutscher Wetterdienst, Meteorologisches Observatorium Hohenpeißenberg, Hohenpeißenberg, Germany
D. C. Green
Environmental Research Group, MRC-HPA Centre for Environment and Health, King's College London, London, UK
V. Gros
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, LSCE, CNRS-CEA-UVSQ, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
L. Heikkinen
Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
H. Herrmann
Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research, Leipzig, Germany
J. T. Jayne
Aerodyne Research, Inc., Billerica, Massachusetts, USA
C. R. Lunder
NILU – Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Kjeller, Norway
M. C. Minguillón
Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research (IDAEA-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain
G. Močnik
Aerosol d.o.o., Ljubljana, Slovenia
C. D. O'Dowd
School of Physics and Centre for Climate and Air Pollution Studies, Ryan Institute, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
J. Ovadnevaite
School of Physics and Centre for Climate and Air Pollution Studies, Ryan Institute, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
E. Petralia
ENEA-National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Bologna, Italy
L. Poulain
Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research, Leipzig, Germany
M. Priestman
Environmental Research Group, MRC-HPA Centre for Environment and Health, King's College London, London, UK
A. Ripoll
Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research (IDAEA-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain
R. Sarda-Estève
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, LSCE, CNRS-CEA-UVSQ, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
A. Wiedensohler
Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research, Leipzig, Germany
U. Baltensperger
Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
J. Sciare
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, LSCE, CNRS-CEA-UVSQ, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
The Cyprus Institute, Environment Energy and Water Research Center, Nicosia, Cyprus
A. S. H. Prévôt
Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 24 Jun 2015)
- Supplement to the final revised paper
- Preprint (discussion started on 04 Feb 2015)
- Supplement to the preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
- Printer-friendly version
- Supplement
-
RC C357: 'Review', Anonymous Referee #1, 23 Mar 2015
- AC C1043: 'Author reply to #1', Roman Fröhlich, 08 May 2015
-
RC C412: 'review', Anonymous Referee #2, 24 Mar 2015
- AC C1051: 'Author reply to #2', Roman Fröhlich, 08 May 2015
-
RC C668: 'Review', Anonymous Referee #3, 13 Apr 2015
- AC C1059: 'Author reply to #3', Roman Fröhlich, 08 May 2015
Short summary
Source apportionment (SA) of organic aerosol mass spectrometric data measured with the Aerodyne ACSM using PMF/ME2 is a frequently used technique in the AMS/ACSM community. ME2 uncertainties due to instrument-to-instrument variations are elucidated by performing SA on ambient data from 14 individual, co-located ACSMs, recorded during the first ACTRIS ACSM intercomparison study at SIRTA near Paris (France). The mean uncertainty was 17.2%. Recommendations for future studies using ME2 are provided.
Source apportionment (SA) of organic aerosol mass spectrometric data measured with the Aerodyne...