Articles | Volume 8, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3851-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3851-2015
Research article
 | 
21 Sep 2015
Research article |  | 21 Sep 2015

Intercomparison of two comparative reactivity method instruments inf the Mediterranean basin during summer 2013

N. Zannoni, S. Dusanter, V. Gros, R. Sarda Esteve, V. Michoud, V. Sinha, N. Locoge, and B. Bonsang

Viewed

Total article views: 2,997 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,744 1,130 123 2,997 100 139
  • HTML: 1,744
  • PDF: 1,130
  • XML: 123
  • Total: 2,997
  • BibTeX: 100
  • EndNote: 139
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 May 2015)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 May 2015)

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 23 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
Our manuscript shows results of an intercomparison exercise conducted on two home-built comparative reactivity method (CRM) instruments operating under the same settings for measuring total OH reactivity. Despite the corrections of the raw data sets for instrumental artifacts having different weights on the two CRMs, we found very consistent results for the final processed data of ambient OH reactivity. Furthermore, we present in detail how to validate the instruments and process the raw data.