91 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Atomic spectrometry update – a review of advances in environmental analysis O. Butler et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5JA90061A
2. Carbonaceous Aerosol in Polar Areas: First Results and Improvements of the Sampling Strategies L. Caiazzo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12030320
3. Elemental and water-insoluble organic carbon in Svalbard snow: a synthesis of observations during 2007–2018 C. Zdanowicz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3035-2021
4. Composition and origin of PM2.5 in Mediterranean Countryside D. Atzei et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.12.012
5. A comparison between thermal-optical transmittance elemental carbon measured by different protocols in PM2.5 samples M. Giannoni et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.128
6. Quantification of the repeatability and reproducibility of the CPMA-electrometer reference mass standard for in-situ calibration of mass concentration aerosol instruments R. Mehri et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2025.2568694
7. Organic markers and OC source apportionment for seasonal variations of PM2.5 at 5 rural sites in France B. Golly et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.10.027
8. Repeatability and intermediate precision of a mass concentration calibration system J. Titosky et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1592103
9. On the nonlinear relation between the Coefficient of Haze and Elemental Carbon mass concentration H. Brink & R. Hitzenberger https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2021.1955036
10. Quantifying residual elemental carbon by thermal-optical analysis using an extended IMPROVE_A protocol with higher maximum temperature X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2022.2119306
11. Air pollution impact on carbonate building stones in Italian urban sites⋆ G. Vidorni et al. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2019-12943-0
12. Study and Characterization of Environmental Deposition on Marble and Surrogate Substrates at a Monumental Heritage Site P. Fermo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8090349
13. A new method to retrieve the real part of the equivalent refractive index of atmospheric aerosols S. Vratolis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2017.12.013
14. Development of drone-based filter sampling system for carbonaceous aerosol analysis using thermal–optical transmittance method J. Park et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2023.2236679
15. Light attenuation versus evolved carbon (AVEC) – A new way to look at elemental and organic carbon analysis E. Nicolosi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.12.011
16. How a small accelerator can be useful for interdisciplinary applications: the study of air pollution F. Lucarelli https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00516-3
17. Lung Antioxidant Depletion: A Predictive Indicator of Cellular Stress Induced by Ambient Fine Particles B. Crobeddu et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b05990
18. Methodology to Create Reproducible Validation/Reference Materials for Comparison of Filter-Based Measurements of Carbonaceous Aerosols That Measure BC, BrC, EC, OC, and TC P. Solomon et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/metrology1020010
19. Evaluation of the Semi-Continuous OCEC analyzer performance with the EUSAAR2 protocol A. Karanasiou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141266
20. Characterizing particulate emissions from wood burning appliances including secondary organic aerosol formation potential A. Keller & H. Burtscher https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2017.08.014
21. Impact of a Summer Wildfire Episode on Air Quality in a Rural Area Near the Adriatic Coast S. Sopčić et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire8080299
22. Long-term characterisation of African dust advection in south-eastern Italy: Influence on fine and coarse particle concentrations, size distributions, and carbon content M. Conte et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104690
23. Closure between particulate matter concentrations measured ex situ by thermal–optical analysis and in situ by the CPMA–electrometer reference mass system J. Corbin et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2020.1788710
24. Two-wavelength thermal–optical determination of light-absorbing carbon in atmospheric aerosols D. Massabò et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-3173-2019
25. Combined organic and inorganic source apportionment on yearlong ToF-ACSM dataset at a suburban station in Athens O. Zografou et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4675-2022
26. A coupled atmospheric simulation chamber system for the production of realistic aerosols and preclinical model exposure M. Georgopoulou et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-024-01611-5
27. Characterization of M4 carbine rifle emissions with three ammunition types J. Aurell et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.112982
28. Photochemical evolution of atmospheric brown carbon in Arctic Svalbard J. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2026.143086
29. Fossil fuel combustion, biomass burning and biogenic sources of fine carbonaceous aerosol in the Carpathian Basin I. Salma et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4295-2020
30. An overview of optical and thermal methods for the characterization of carbonaceous aerosol D. Massabò & P. Prati https://doi.org/10.1007/s40766-021-00017-8
31. Considerations in analysing elemental carbon from marine engine exhaust using residual, distillate and biofuels P. Aakko-Saksa et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2018.09.005
32. A new proficiency testing scheme for occupational hygiene laboratories undertaking the analysis of diesel engine particulate emissions O. Butler & J. Forder https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-024-01598-7
33. Elemental Carbon and Its Fractions during Evolved Gas Analysis with Respect to Pyrolytic Carbon and Split Time J. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11167544
34. Application of an Ultra-Low-Cost Passive Sampler for Light-Absorbing Carbon in Mongolia B. Bekbulat et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23218977
35. Structural changes of CAST soot during a thermal–optical measurement protocol T. Haller et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-3503-2019
36. Overview of the French Operational Network for In Situ Observation of PM Chemical Composition and Sources in Urban Environments (CARA Program) O. Favez et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12020207
37. Mass reconstruction methods for PM2.5: a review J. Chow et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-015-0338-3
38. Elemental carbon - An efficient method to measure occupational exposure from materials in the graphene family T. Storsjö et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2024.100499
39. Sources and atmospheric chemistry of oxy- and nitro-PAHs in the ambient air of Grenoble (France) S. Tomaz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.04.042
40. Anthropogenic and biogenic pollutants in a forested environment: SPRUCE-22 campaign overview A. Matrali et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120722
41. Measurement of carbonaceous aerosol with different sampling configurations and frequencies Y. Cheng & K. He https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2639-2015
42. Tailored coefficients in the algorithm to assess reconstructed light extinction at urban sites: A comparison with the IMPROVE revised approach S. Valentini et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.10.038
43. Comparison of OC and EC Measurement Results Determined by Thermal-optical Analysis Protocols H. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2015.31.5.449
44. ACTRIS ACSM intercomparison – Part 1: Reproducibility of concentration and fragment results from 13 individual Quadrupole Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitors (Q-ACSM) and consistency with co-located instruments V. Crenn et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-5063-2015
45. Study of atmospheric aerosols by IBA techniques: The LABEC experience F. Lucarelli et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2017.07.034
46. Investigation of structural changes of atmospheric aerosol samples during two thermal–optical measurement procedures (EUSAAR2, NIOSH870) T. Haller et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3721-2021
47. Mass absorption cross-section of ambient black carbon aerosols - a review E. Asmi et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-025-01288-2
48. Wildfire and African dust aerosol oxidative potential, exposure and dose in the human respiratory tract M. Mylonaki et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169683
49. Aerosol physical characterization: A review on the current state of aerosol documentary standards and calibration strategies K. Vasilatou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2024.106483
50. Effective density and metals content of particle emissions generated by a diesel engine operating under different marine fuels A. Momenimovahed et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2020.105651
51. Mass absorption cross-section of flare-generated black carbon: Variability, predictive model, and implications B. Conrad & M. Johnson https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.04.086
52. Field characterization of the PM2.5 Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor: insights into the composition, sources, and processes of fine particles in eastern China Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14501-2017
53. The effects of air pollution on cultural heritage: The case study of Santa Maria delle Grazie al Naviglio Grande (Milan)⋆ V. Comite & P. Fermo https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2018-12365-6
54. Speciation of organic fractions does matter for aerosol source apportionment. Part 3: Combining off-line and on-line measurements D. Srivastava et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.378
55. An investigative review of the expanded capabilities of thermal/optical techniques for measuring carbonaceous aerosols and beyond Y. Shen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.125363
56. Historical variation in black carbon deposition and sources to Northern China sediments W. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.12.155
57. Controlling emissions from an ocean-going container vessel with a wet scrubber system J. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121323
58. Uncertainties in thermal-optical measurements of black carbon: Insights from source and ambient samples J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.353
59. Intercomparison of thermal–optical carbon measurements by Sunset and Desert Research Institute (DRI) analyzers using the IMPROVE_A protocol X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3217-2021
60. A novel measurement system for unattended, in situ characterization of carbonaceous aerosols A. Keller et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-1-65-2023
61. Metrological traceable calibration of organic carbon and elemental carbon based on laboratory-generated reference materials Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2023.10.031
62. Cytotoxicity of the soluble and insoluble fractions of atmospheric fine particulate matter L. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2020.01.012
63. Inter-comparison of carbon content in PM10 and PM2.5 measured with two thermo-optical protocols on samples collected in a Mediterranean site E. Merico et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06117-7
64. Radiocarbon (14C) Analysis of Carbonaceous Aerosols: Revisiting the Existing Analytical Techniques for Isolation of Black Carbon S. Dasari & D. Widory https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.907467
65. Occupational exposure to graphene: A pilot study combining workplace sampling with in vitro pulmonary toxicity assessment J. Kaur et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2026.100642
66. Radiative absorption enhancement from coatings on black carbon aerosols X. Cui et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.026
67. Carbonaceous aerosols in five European cities: Insights into primary emissions and secondary particle formation S. Hama et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106180
68. A new method for the quantification of ambient particulate-matter emission fluxes S. Vratolis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-6941-2023
69. Optical and Microphysical Properties of the Aerosols during a Rare Event of Biomass-Burning Mixed with Polluted Dust M. Gidarakou et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15020190
70. Deliberation between PM 1 and PM 2.5 as air quality indicators based on comprehensive characterization of urban aerosols in Bangkok, Thailand I. Vejpongsa et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2017.05.001
71. Determination of anhydride in atmospheric fine particles by optimized solvent extraction L. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119249
72. Quantifying the uncertainties in thermal–optical analysis of carbonaceous aircraft engine emissions: an interlaboratory study T. Sipkens et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4291-2024
73. Measuring light absorption by freshly emitted organic aerosols: optical artifacts in traditional solvent-extraction-based methods N. Shetty et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8817-2019
74. The new instrument using a TC–BC (total carbon–black carbon) method for the online measurement of carbonaceous aerosols M. Rigler et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4333-2020
75. Emission factors and chemical characterization of particulate emissions from garden green waste burning C. Noblet et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149367
76. Measurement report: Evaluation of the TOF-ACSM-CV for PM1.0 and PM2.5 measurements during the RITA-2021 field campaign X. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3405-2024
77. Chemical composition and source analysis of carbonaceous aerosol particles at a mountaintop site in central Sweden V. Franke et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/16000889.2017.1353387
78. Characteristics of airborne water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC) at a background site of the North China Plain Y. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104668
79. Effect of ammonia on fine-particle pH in agricultural regions of China: comparison between urban and rural sites S. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2719-2020
80. Standardisation of a European measurement method for organic carbon and elemental carbon in ambient air: results of the field trial campaign and the determination of a measurement uncertainty and working range R. Brown et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7EM00261K
81. Evaluation and Inter-Comparison of Oxygen-Based OC-EC Separation Methods for Radiocarbon Analysis of Ambient Aerosol Particle Samples K. Zenker et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos8110226
82. Online measurements of very low elemental and organic carbon concentrations in aerosols at a subarctic remote station P. Vodička et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117380
83. PM2.5 Source Apportionment and Implications for Particle Hygroscopicity at an Urban Background Site in Athens, Greece E. Diapouli et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13101685
84. An overview from hygroscopic aerosols to cloud droplets: The HygrA-CD campaign in the Athens basin A. Papayannis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.054
85. On the autarchic use of solely PIXE data in particulate matter source apportionment studies by receptor modeling F. Lucarelli et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2015.08.019
86. Mass Concentration and Size Distribution of Refractory Black Carbon in Seoul during Summer S. Lim et al. https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2019.35.6.713
87. A multi-year source apportionment of PM2.5 at multiple sites in the southern Po Valley (Italy) F. Scotto et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2021.101192
88. Inter-comparison of NIOSH and IMPROVE protocols for OC and EC determination: implications for inter-protocol data conversion C. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4547-2016
89. Quantifying the equivalency factor between PM-absorbance and EC mass concentration – converting the “old” exposure proxy in large health studies to the new metric for diesel soot H. Brink et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-025-01741-4
90. On the use of the field Sunset semi-continuous analyzer to measure equivalent black carbon concentrations N. Zíková et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2016.1146819
91. Temporal and spatial variability of carbonaceous species (EC; OC; WSOC and SOA) in PM2.5 aerosol over five sites of Indo-Gangetic Plain H. Bhowmik et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2020.09.019