Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
AMT
Articles | Volume 9, issue 10
Articles | Volume 9, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4915-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4915-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Articles | Volume 9, issue 10
Research article
 | 
06 Oct 2016
Research article |  | 06 Oct 2016

Quantifying the uncertainty of eddy covariance fluxes due to the use of different software packages and combinations of processing steps in two contrasting ecosystems

Ivan Mammarella, Olli Peltola, Annika Nordbo, Leena Järvi, and Üllar Rannik

Viewed

Total article views: 4,963 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,987 1,844 132 4,963 172 204
  • HTML: 2,987
  • PDF: 1,844
  • XML: 132
  • Total: 4,963
  • BibTeX: 172
  • EndNote: 204
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Jan 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 Jan 2016)
Latest update: 08 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
In this study we have performed an inter-comparison between EddyUH and EddyPro, two public and commonly used software packages for eddy covariance data processing and calculation. The aims are to estimate the flux uncertainty due to the use of different software packages, and to assess the most critical processing steps, determining the largest deviations in the calculated fluxes. We focus not only on water vapour and carbon dioxide fluxes, but also on the methane flux.
Read more
Share