Articles | Volume 9, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-683-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-683-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Consistent evaluation of ACOS-GOSAT, BESD-SCIAMACHY, CarbonTracker, and MACC through comparisons to TCCON
Susan Kulawik
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Bay Area Environm. Res. Inst., Sonoma, CA 95476, USA
Debra Wunch
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
Christopher O'Dell
Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Christian Frankenberg
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena,
CA, USA
Maximilian Reuter
University of Bremen, Institute of Environmental Physics, Bremen,
Germany
Tomohiro Oda
Goddard Earth Sciences Technology and Research, Universities Space
Research Association, Columbia, MD, USA
Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, NASA Goddard Space Flight
Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
Frederic Chevallier
Laboratoire de Meteorologie Dynamique, Palaiseau, France
Vanessa Sherlock
The National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington and
Lauder, New Zealand
Laboratoire de Meteorologie Dynamique, Palaiseau, France
Michael Buchwitz
University of Bremen, Institute of Environmental Physics, Bremen,
Germany
Greg Osterman
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena,
CA, USA
Charles E. Miller
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena,
CA, USA
Paul O. Wennberg
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
David Griffith
University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
Isamu Morino
Center for Global Environmental Research, National Institute for
Environmental Studies (NIES), Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
Manvendra K. Dubey
Earth and Environmental Science, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los
Alamos, NM 87545, USA
Nicholas M. Deutscher
University of Bremen, Institute of Environmental Physics, Bremen,
Germany
University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
Justus Notholt
University of Bremen, Institute of Environmental Physics, Bremen,
Germany
Frank Hase
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Meteorology and
Climate Research (IMK-ASF), Karlsruhe, Germany
Thorsten Warneke
University of Bremen, Institute of Environmental Physics, Bremen,
Germany
Ralf Sussmann
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Meteorology and
Climate Research (IMK-ASF), Karlsruhe, Germany
John Robinson
The National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington and
Lauder, New Zealand
Kimberly Strong
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Matthias Schneider
Earth and Environmental Science, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los
Alamos, NM 87545, USA
Martine De Mazière
Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy, Brussels, Belgium
Kei Shiomi
Earth Observation Research Center, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency,
Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
Dietrich G. Feist
Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany
Laura T. Iraci
NASA Ames Research Center, Atmospheric Science Branch, Moffett Field,
CA, USA
Joyce Wolf
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena,
CA, USA
retired
Viewed
Total article views: 8,061 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 22 Jun 2015)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4,660 | 2,880 | 521 | 8,061 | 178 | 188 |
- HTML: 4,660
- PDF: 2,880
- XML: 521
- Total: 8,061
- BibTeX: 178
- EndNote: 188
Total article views: 6,293 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 29 Feb 2016)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3,905 | 2,006 | 382 | 6,293 | 159 | 180 |
- HTML: 3,905
- PDF: 2,006
- XML: 382
- Total: 6,293
- BibTeX: 159
- EndNote: 180
Total article views: 1,768 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 22 Jun 2015)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
755 | 874 | 139 | 1,768 | 19 | 8 |
- HTML: 755
- PDF: 874
- XML: 139
- Total: 1,768
- BibTeX: 19
- EndNote: 8
Cited
75 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Modification of Fraser’s Method for the Atmospheric CO2 Mass Estimation by Using Satellite Data M. Pellegrini et al. 10.3390/atmos13060866
- A Comparative Analysis of Anthropogenic CO2 Emissions at City Level Using OCO‐2 Observations: A Global Perspective P. Fu et al. 10.1029/2019EF001282
- Towards Robust Calculation of Interannual CO2 Growth Signal from TCCON (Total Carbon Column Observing Network) L. Labzovskii et al. 10.3390/rs13193868
- Validation of methane and carbon monoxide from Sentinel-5 Precursor using TCCON and NDACC-IRWG stations M. Sha et al. 10.5194/amt-14-6249-2021
- Global-Scale Evaluation of XCO2 Products from GOSAT, OCO-2 and CarbonTracker Using Direct Comparison and Triple Collocation Method Y. Chen et al. 10.3390/rs14225635
- Southern California megacity CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, and CO flux estimates using ground- and space-based remote sensing and a Lagrangian model J. Hedelius et al. 10.5194/acp-18-16271-2018
- Study on the Ground-Based FTS Measurements at Beijing, China and the Colocation Sensitivity of Satellite Data S. Yang et al. 10.3390/atmos12121586
- Airborne measurements of CO<sub>2</sub> column concentrations made with a pulsed IPDA lidar using a multiple-wavelength-locked laser and HgCdTe APD detector J. Abshire et al. 10.5194/amt-11-2001-2018
- Spectroscopic uncertainty impacts on OCO-2/3 retrievals of XCO2 J. Hobbs et al. 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2020.107360
- Can a regional-scale reduction of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> during the COVID-19 pandemic be detected from space? A case study for East China using satellite XCO<sub>2</sub> retrievals M. Buchwitz et al. 10.5194/amt-14-2141-2021
- Global land 1° mapping dataset of XCO2 from satellite observations of GOSAT and OCO-2 from 2009 to 2020 M. Sheng et al. 10.1080/20964471.2022.2033149
- Global Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations Simulated by GEOS-Chem: Comparison with GOSAT, Carbon Tracker and Ground-Based Measurements Y. Jing et al. 10.3390/atmos9050175
- Reviews and syntheses: Systematic Earth observations for use in terrestrial carbon cycle data assimilation systems M. Scholze et al. 10.5194/bg-14-3401-2017
- Multi-Year Comparison of CO2 Concentration from NOAA Carbon Tracker Reanalysis Model with Data from GOSAT and OCO-2 over Asia F. Mustafa et al. 10.3390/rs12152498
- Comparison of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Concentrations Based on GOSAT, OCO-2 Observations and Ground-Based TCCON Data J. Zheng et al. 10.3390/rs15215172
- Satellite observations of atmospheric methane and their value for quantifying methane emissions D. Jacob et al. 10.5194/acp-16-14371-2016
- Satellite derived trends and variability of CO2 concentrations in the Middle East during 2014–2023 R. Fonseca & D. Francis 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1289142
- Contrasting carbon cycle responses of the tropical continents to the 2015–2016 El Niño J. Liu et al. 10.1126/science.aam5690
- Monitoring greenhouse gases (GHGs) in China: status and perspective Y. Sun et al. 10.5194/amt-15-4819-2022
- The potential of clear-sky carbon dioxide satellite retrievals R. Nelson et al. 10.5194/amt-9-1671-2016
- How Much CO2 Is Taken Up by the European Terrestrial Biosphere? M. Reuter et al. 10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00310.1
- Optimizing 4 years of CO2 biospheric fluxes from OCO-2 and in situ data in TM5: fire emissions from GFED and inferred from MOPITT CO data H. Peiro et al. 10.5194/acp-22-15817-2022
- A biogenic CO<sub>2</sub> flux adjustment scheme for the mitigation of large-scale biases in global atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> analyses and forecasts A. Agustí-Panareda et al. 10.5194/acp-16-10399-2016
- Improved retrievals of carbon dioxide from Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 with the version 8 ACOS algorithm C. O'Dell et al. 10.5194/amt-11-6539-2018
- An 11-year record of XCO<sub>2</sub> estimates derived from GOSAT measurements using the NASA ACOS version 9 retrieval algorithm T. Taylor et al. 10.5194/essd-14-325-2022
- Intercomparability of X<sub>CO<sub>2</sub></sub> and X<sub>CH<sub>4</sub></sub> from the United States TCCON sites J. Hedelius et al. 10.5194/amt-10-1481-2017
- Spatiotemporal analysis of global atmospheric XCO2 concentrations before and after COVID-19 using HASM data fusion method Y. Liu et al. 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1079480
- Sensitivity of the simulated CO2 concentration to inter-annual variations of its sources and sinks over East Asia Y. Fu et al. 10.1016/j.accre.2020.03.001
- A new algorithm to generate a priori trace gas profiles for the GGG2020 retrieval algorithm J. Laughner et al. 10.5194/amt-16-1121-2023
- A global synthesis inversion analysis of recent variability in CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes using GOSAT and in situ observations J. Wang et al. 10.5194/acp-18-11097-2018
- The importance of digital elevation model accuracy in XCO2 retrievals: improving the Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 Atmospheric Carbon Observations from Space version 11 retrieval product N. Jacobs et al. 10.5194/amt-17-1375-2024
- Regional uncertainty of GOSAT XCO<sub>2</sub> retrievals in China: quantification and attribution N. Bie et al. 10.5194/amt-11-1251-2018
- Intercomparison of Carbon Dioxide Products Retrieved from GOSAT Short-Wavelength Infrared Spectra for Three Years (2010–2012) A. Deng et al. 10.3390/atmos7090109
- Comparison between the Local Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter (LETKF) and 4D‐Var in atmospheric CO2 flux inversion with the Goddard Earth Observing System‐Chem model and the observation impact diagnostics from the LETKF J. Liu et al. 10.1002/2016JD025100
- Investigating the performance of a greenhouse gas observatory in Hefei, China W. Wang et al. 10.5194/amt-10-2627-2017
- A Comparison of the Atmospheric CO2Concentrations Obtained by an Inverse Modeling System and Passenger Aircraft Based Measurement H. Kim et al. 10.14191/Atmos.2016.26.3.387
- Regional CO emission estimated from ground-based remote sensing at Hefei site, China C. Shan et al. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.02.005
- Lower-tropospheric CO<sub>2</sub> from near-infrared ACOS-GOSAT observations S. Kulawik et al. 10.5194/acp-17-5407-2017
- Inter-comparison and evaluation of global satellite XCO 2 products H. Yang et al. 10.1080/10095020.2023.2252017
- Using airborne HIAPER Pole-to-Pole Observations (HIPPO) to evaluate model and remote sensing estimates of atmospheric carbon dioxide C. Frankenberg et al. 10.5194/acp-16-7867-2016
- Evaluation of column-averaged methane in models and TCCON with a focus on the stratosphere A. Ostler et al. 10.5194/amt-9-4843-2016
- The Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2: first 18 months of science data products A. Eldering et al. 10.5194/amt-10-549-2017
- On what scales can GOSAT flux inversions constrain anomalies in terrestrial ecosystems? B. Byrne et al. 10.5194/acp-19-13017-2019
- Full-physics carbon dioxide retrievals from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) satellite by only using the 2.06 µm band L. Wu et al. 10.5194/amt-12-6049-2019
- Carbon dioxide retrieval from OCO-2 satellite observations using the RemoTeC algorithm and validation with TCCON measurements L. Wu et al. 10.5194/amt-11-3111-2018
- Analyzing spatio-temporal patterns in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration across Iran from 2003 to 2020 S. Mousavi et al. 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2022.100163
- Evaluating GPP and Respiration Estimates Over Northern Midlatitude Ecosystems Using Solar‐Induced Fluorescence and Atmospheric CO2 Measurements B. Byrne et al. 10.1029/2018JG004472
- Spatio-Temporal Consistency Evaluation of XCO2 Retrievals from GOSAT and OCO-2 Based on TCCON and Model Data for Joint Utilization in Carbon Cycle Research Y. Kong et al. 10.3390/atmos10070354
- Local and regional enhancements of CH4, CO, and CO2 inferred from TCCON column measurements K. Mottungan et al. 10.5194/amt-17-5861-2024
- Validation of GOSAT and OCO-2 against In Situ Aircraft Measurements and Comparison with CarbonTracker and GEOS-Chem over Qinhuangdao, China F. Mustafa et al. 10.3390/rs13050899
- Characteristics of interannual variability in space-based XCO2 global observations Y. Guan et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5355-2023
- Evaluation of MOPITT Version 7 joint TIR–NIR X<sub>CO</sub> retrievals with TCCON J. Hedelius et al. 10.5194/amt-12-5547-2019
- Global and Brazilian Carbon Response to El Niño Modoki 2011–2010 K. Bowman et al. 10.1002/2016EA000204
- Mapping contiguous XCO2 by machine learning and analyzing the spatio-temporal variation in China from 2003 to 2019 M. Zhang & G. Liu 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159588
- Impacts of heterogeneous CO2 on water and carbon fluxes across the global land surface J. Tian et al. 10.1080/17538947.2021.1937352
- On the performance of satellite-based observations of <i>X</i>CO<sub>2</sub> in capturing the NOAA Carbon Tracker model and ground-based flask observations over Africa's land mass A. Mengistu & G. Mengistu Tsidu 10.5194/amt-13-4009-2020
- Atmospheric carbon dioxide measurement from aircraft and comparison with OCO-2 and CarbonTracker model data Q. Wang et al. 10.5194/amt-14-6601-2021
- Global satellite observations of column-averaged carbon dioxide and methane: The GHG-CCI XCO2 and XCH4 CRDP3 data set M. Buchwitz et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2016.12.027
- The Cross-Calibration of Spectral Radiances and Cross-Validation of CO2 Estimates from GOSAT and OCO-2 F. Kataoka et al. 10.3390/rs9111158
- Objective Frequentist Uncertainty Quantification for Atmospheric \(\mathrm{CO}_2\) Retrievals P. Patil et al. 10.1137/20M1356403
- The Potential of the Geostationary Carbon Cycle Observatory (GeoCarb) to Provide Multi-scale Constraints on the Carbon Cycle in the Americas B. Moore III et al. 10.3389/fenvs.2018.00109
- Minimum detection limits of the TROPOMI satellite sensor across North America and their implications for measuring oil and gas methane emissions L. Dubey et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162222
- CO and CH4 atmospheric trends from dense multi-point forest fires around the city of Chongqing using spaceborne spectrometer data Y. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.apr.2023.101807
- Assessing accuracy and precision for space‐based measurements of carbon dioxide: An associated statistical methodology revisited Z. Su et al. 10.1002/2016EA000228
- Evaluating the consistency between OCO-2 and OCO-3 XCO2 estimates derived from the NASA ACOS version 10 retrieval algorithm T. Taylor et al. 10.5194/amt-16-3173-2023
- Validation of TANSO-FTS/GOSAT XCO<sub>2</sub> and XCH<sub>4</sub> glint mode retrievals using TCCON data from near-ocean sites M. Zhou et al. 10.5194/amt-9-1415-2016
- Specific patterns of XCO2 observed by GOSAT during 2009–2016 and assessed with model simulations over China N. Bie et al. 10.1007/s11430-018-9377-7
- Seasonal and Diurnal Variations in XCO2 Characteristics in China as Observed by OCO‐2/3 Satellites: Effects of Land Cover and Local Meteorology H. Zhao et al. 10.1029/2023JD038841
- A Data-Driven Assessment of Biosphere-Atmosphere Interaction Impact on Seasonal Cycle Patterns of XCO2 Using GOSAT and MODIS Observations Z. He et al. 10.3390/rs9030251
- Potential improvement of XCO 2 retrieval of the OCO-2 by having aerosol information from the A-train satellites J. Hong et al. 10.1080/15481603.2023.2209968
- The recent increase of atmospheric methane from 10 years of ground-based NDACC FTIR observations since 2005 W. Bader et al. 10.5194/acp-17-2255-2017
- Exploring causal relationship between landforms and ground level CO2 in Dalseong forestry carbon project site of South Korea Y. Hwang & J. Um 10.1007/s41324-017-0103-9
- Does GOSAT capture the true seasonal cycle of carbon dioxide? H. Lindqvist et al. 10.5194/acp-15-13023-2015
- On the statistical optimality of CO<sub>2</sub> atmospheric inversions assimilating CO<sub>2</sub> column retrievals F. Chevallier 10.5194/acp-15-11133-2015
- Evaluating co-relationship between OCO-2 XCO2 and in situ CO2 measured with portable equipment in Seoul Y. Hwang & J. Um 10.1007/s41324-016-0053-7
71 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Modification of Fraser’s Method for the Atmospheric CO2 Mass Estimation by Using Satellite Data M. Pellegrini et al. 10.3390/atmos13060866
- A Comparative Analysis of Anthropogenic CO2 Emissions at City Level Using OCO‐2 Observations: A Global Perspective P. Fu et al. 10.1029/2019EF001282
- Towards Robust Calculation of Interannual CO2 Growth Signal from TCCON (Total Carbon Column Observing Network) L. Labzovskii et al. 10.3390/rs13193868
- Validation of methane and carbon monoxide from Sentinel-5 Precursor using TCCON and NDACC-IRWG stations M. Sha et al. 10.5194/amt-14-6249-2021
- Global-Scale Evaluation of XCO2 Products from GOSAT, OCO-2 and CarbonTracker Using Direct Comparison and Triple Collocation Method Y. Chen et al. 10.3390/rs14225635
- Southern California megacity CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, and CO flux estimates using ground- and space-based remote sensing and a Lagrangian model J. Hedelius et al. 10.5194/acp-18-16271-2018
- Study on the Ground-Based FTS Measurements at Beijing, China and the Colocation Sensitivity of Satellite Data S. Yang et al. 10.3390/atmos12121586
- Airborne measurements of CO<sub>2</sub> column concentrations made with a pulsed IPDA lidar using a multiple-wavelength-locked laser and HgCdTe APD detector J. Abshire et al. 10.5194/amt-11-2001-2018
- Spectroscopic uncertainty impacts on OCO-2/3 retrievals of XCO2 J. Hobbs et al. 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2020.107360
- Can a regional-scale reduction of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> during the COVID-19 pandemic be detected from space? A case study for East China using satellite XCO<sub>2</sub> retrievals M. Buchwitz et al. 10.5194/amt-14-2141-2021
- Global land 1° mapping dataset of XCO2 from satellite observations of GOSAT and OCO-2 from 2009 to 2020 M. Sheng et al. 10.1080/20964471.2022.2033149
- Global Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations Simulated by GEOS-Chem: Comparison with GOSAT, Carbon Tracker and Ground-Based Measurements Y. Jing et al. 10.3390/atmos9050175
- Reviews and syntheses: Systematic Earth observations for use in terrestrial carbon cycle data assimilation systems M. Scholze et al. 10.5194/bg-14-3401-2017
- Multi-Year Comparison of CO2 Concentration from NOAA Carbon Tracker Reanalysis Model with Data from GOSAT and OCO-2 over Asia F. Mustafa et al. 10.3390/rs12152498
- Comparison of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Concentrations Based on GOSAT, OCO-2 Observations and Ground-Based TCCON Data J. Zheng et al. 10.3390/rs15215172
- Satellite observations of atmospheric methane and their value for quantifying methane emissions D. Jacob et al. 10.5194/acp-16-14371-2016
- Satellite derived trends and variability of CO2 concentrations in the Middle East during 2014–2023 R. Fonseca & D. Francis 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1289142
- Contrasting carbon cycle responses of the tropical continents to the 2015–2016 El Niño J. Liu et al. 10.1126/science.aam5690
- Monitoring greenhouse gases (GHGs) in China: status and perspective Y. Sun et al. 10.5194/amt-15-4819-2022
- The potential of clear-sky carbon dioxide satellite retrievals R. Nelson et al. 10.5194/amt-9-1671-2016
- How Much CO2 Is Taken Up by the European Terrestrial Biosphere? M. Reuter et al. 10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00310.1
- Optimizing 4 years of CO2 biospheric fluxes from OCO-2 and in situ data in TM5: fire emissions from GFED and inferred from MOPITT CO data H. Peiro et al. 10.5194/acp-22-15817-2022
- A biogenic CO<sub>2</sub> flux adjustment scheme for the mitigation of large-scale biases in global atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> analyses and forecasts A. Agustí-Panareda et al. 10.5194/acp-16-10399-2016
- Improved retrievals of carbon dioxide from Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 with the version 8 ACOS algorithm C. O'Dell et al. 10.5194/amt-11-6539-2018
- An 11-year record of XCO<sub>2</sub> estimates derived from GOSAT measurements using the NASA ACOS version 9 retrieval algorithm T. Taylor et al. 10.5194/essd-14-325-2022
- Intercomparability of X<sub>CO<sub>2</sub></sub> and X<sub>CH<sub>4</sub></sub> from the United States TCCON sites J. Hedelius et al. 10.5194/amt-10-1481-2017
- Spatiotemporal analysis of global atmospheric XCO2 concentrations before and after COVID-19 using HASM data fusion method Y. Liu et al. 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1079480
- Sensitivity of the simulated CO2 concentration to inter-annual variations of its sources and sinks over East Asia Y. Fu et al. 10.1016/j.accre.2020.03.001
- A new algorithm to generate a priori trace gas profiles for the GGG2020 retrieval algorithm J. Laughner et al. 10.5194/amt-16-1121-2023
- A global synthesis inversion analysis of recent variability in CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes using GOSAT and in situ observations J. Wang et al. 10.5194/acp-18-11097-2018
- The importance of digital elevation model accuracy in XCO2 retrievals: improving the Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 Atmospheric Carbon Observations from Space version 11 retrieval product N. Jacobs et al. 10.5194/amt-17-1375-2024
- Regional uncertainty of GOSAT XCO<sub>2</sub> retrievals in China: quantification and attribution N. Bie et al. 10.5194/amt-11-1251-2018
- Intercomparison of Carbon Dioxide Products Retrieved from GOSAT Short-Wavelength Infrared Spectra for Three Years (2010–2012) A. Deng et al. 10.3390/atmos7090109
- Comparison between the Local Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter (LETKF) and 4D‐Var in atmospheric CO2 flux inversion with the Goddard Earth Observing System‐Chem model and the observation impact diagnostics from the LETKF J. Liu et al. 10.1002/2016JD025100
- Investigating the performance of a greenhouse gas observatory in Hefei, China W. Wang et al. 10.5194/amt-10-2627-2017
- A Comparison of the Atmospheric CO2Concentrations Obtained by an Inverse Modeling System and Passenger Aircraft Based Measurement H. Kim et al. 10.14191/Atmos.2016.26.3.387
- Regional CO emission estimated from ground-based remote sensing at Hefei site, China C. Shan et al. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.02.005
- Lower-tropospheric CO<sub>2</sub> from near-infrared ACOS-GOSAT observations S. Kulawik et al. 10.5194/acp-17-5407-2017
- Inter-comparison and evaluation of global satellite XCO 2 products H. Yang et al. 10.1080/10095020.2023.2252017
- Using airborne HIAPER Pole-to-Pole Observations (HIPPO) to evaluate model and remote sensing estimates of atmospheric carbon dioxide C. Frankenberg et al. 10.5194/acp-16-7867-2016
- Evaluation of column-averaged methane in models and TCCON with a focus on the stratosphere A. Ostler et al. 10.5194/amt-9-4843-2016
- The Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2: first 18 months of science data products A. Eldering et al. 10.5194/amt-10-549-2017
- On what scales can GOSAT flux inversions constrain anomalies in terrestrial ecosystems? B. Byrne et al. 10.5194/acp-19-13017-2019
- Full-physics carbon dioxide retrievals from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) satellite by only using the 2.06 µm band L. Wu et al. 10.5194/amt-12-6049-2019
- Carbon dioxide retrieval from OCO-2 satellite observations using the RemoTeC algorithm and validation with TCCON measurements L. Wu et al. 10.5194/amt-11-3111-2018
- Analyzing spatio-temporal patterns in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration across Iran from 2003 to 2020 S. Mousavi et al. 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2022.100163
- Evaluating GPP and Respiration Estimates Over Northern Midlatitude Ecosystems Using Solar‐Induced Fluorescence and Atmospheric CO2 Measurements B. Byrne et al. 10.1029/2018JG004472
- Spatio-Temporal Consistency Evaluation of XCO2 Retrievals from GOSAT and OCO-2 Based on TCCON and Model Data for Joint Utilization in Carbon Cycle Research Y. Kong et al. 10.3390/atmos10070354
- Local and regional enhancements of CH4, CO, and CO2 inferred from TCCON column measurements K. Mottungan et al. 10.5194/amt-17-5861-2024
- Validation of GOSAT and OCO-2 against In Situ Aircraft Measurements and Comparison with CarbonTracker and GEOS-Chem over Qinhuangdao, China F. Mustafa et al. 10.3390/rs13050899
- Characteristics of interannual variability in space-based XCO2 global observations Y. Guan et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5355-2023
- Evaluation of MOPITT Version 7 joint TIR–NIR X<sub>CO</sub> retrievals with TCCON J. Hedelius et al. 10.5194/amt-12-5547-2019
- Global and Brazilian Carbon Response to El Niño Modoki 2011–2010 K. Bowman et al. 10.1002/2016EA000204
- Mapping contiguous XCO2 by machine learning and analyzing the spatio-temporal variation in China from 2003 to 2019 M. Zhang & G. Liu 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159588
- Impacts of heterogeneous CO2 on water and carbon fluxes across the global land surface J. Tian et al. 10.1080/17538947.2021.1937352
- On the performance of satellite-based observations of <i>X</i>CO<sub>2</sub> in capturing the NOAA Carbon Tracker model and ground-based flask observations over Africa's land mass A. Mengistu & G. Mengistu Tsidu 10.5194/amt-13-4009-2020
- Atmospheric carbon dioxide measurement from aircraft and comparison with OCO-2 and CarbonTracker model data Q. Wang et al. 10.5194/amt-14-6601-2021
- Global satellite observations of column-averaged carbon dioxide and methane: The GHG-CCI XCO2 and XCH4 CRDP3 data set M. Buchwitz et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2016.12.027
- The Cross-Calibration of Spectral Radiances and Cross-Validation of CO2 Estimates from GOSAT and OCO-2 F. Kataoka et al. 10.3390/rs9111158
- Objective Frequentist Uncertainty Quantification for Atmospheric \(\mathrm{CO}_2\) Retrievals P. Patil et al. 10.1137/20M1356403
- The Potential of the Geostationary Carbon Cycle Observatory (GeoCarb) to Provide Multi-scale Constraints on the Carbon Cycle in the Americas B. Moore III et al. 10.3389/fenvs.2018.00109
- Minimum detection limits of the TROPOMI satellite sensor across North America and their implications for measuring oil and gas methane emissions L. Dubey et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162222
- CO and CH4 atmospheric trends from dense multi-point forest fires around the city of Chongqing using spaceborne spectrometer data Y. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.apr.2023.101807
- Assessing accuracy and precision for space‐based measurements of carbon dioxide: An associated statistical methodology revisited Z. Su et al. 10.1002/2016EA000228
- Evaluating the consistency between OCO-2 and OCO-3 XCO2 estimates derived from the NASA ACOS version 10 retrieval algorithm T. Taylor et al. 10.5194/amt-16-3173-2023
- Validation of TANSO-FTS/GOSAT XCO<sub>2</sub> and XCH<sub>4</sub> glint mode retrievals using TCCON data from near-ocean sites M. Zhou et al. 10.5194/amt-9-1415-2016
- Specific patterns of XCO2 observed by GOSAT during 2009–2016 and assessed with model simulations over China N. Bie et al. 10.1007/s11430-018-9377-7
- Seasonal and Diurnal Variations in XCO2 Characteristics in China as Observed by OCO‐2/3 Satellites: Effects of Land Cover and Local Meteorology H. Zhao et al. 10.1029/2023JD038841
- A Data-Driven Assessment of Biosphere-Atmosphere Interaction Impact on Seasonal Cycle Patterns of XCO2 Using GOSAT and MODIS Observations Z. He et al. 10.3390/rs9030251
- Potential improvement of XCO 2 retrieval of the OCO-2 by having aerosol information from the A-train satellites J. Hong et al. 10.1080/15481603.2023.2209968
- The recent increase of atmospheric methane from 10 years of ground-based NDACC FTIR observations since 2005 W. Bader et al. 10.5194/acp-17-2255-2017
4 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Exploring causal relationship between landforms and ground level CO2 in Dalseong forestry carbon project site of South Korea Y. Hwang & J. Um 10.1007/s41324-017-0103-9
- Does GOSAT capture the true seasonal cycle of carbon dioxide? H. Lindqvist et al. 10.5194/acp-15-13023-2015
- On the statistical optimality of CO<sub>2</sub> atmospheric inversions assimilating CO<sub>2</sub> column retrievals F. Chevallier 10.5194/acp-15-11133-2015
- Evaluating co-relationship between OCO-2 XCO2 and in situ CO2 measured with portable equipment in Seoul Y. Hwang & J. Um 10.1007/s41324-016-0053-7
Saved (preprint)
Latest update: 21 Nov 2024
Short summary
To accurately estimate source and sink locations of carbon dioxide, systematic errors in satellite measurements and models must be characterized. This paper examines two satellite data sets (GOSAT, launched 2009, and SCIAMACHY, launched 2002), and two models (CarbonTracker and MACC) vs. the TCCON CO2 validation data set. We assess biases and errors by season and latitude, satellite performance under averaging, and diurnal variability. Our findings are useful for assimilation of satellite data.
To accurately estimate source and sink locations of carbon dioxide, systematic errors in...