Articles | Volume 10, issue 9
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 3499–3523, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3499-2017
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 3499–3523, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3499-2017

Research article 22 Sep 2017

Research article | 22 Sep 2017

Consistency of aerosols above clouds characterization from A-Train active and passive measurements

Lucia T. Deaconu et al.

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Lucia Timea Deaconu on behalf of the Authors (20 Jul 2017)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (01 Aug 2017) by Piet Stammes
Download
Short summary
This study presents a comparison between active (CALIOP) and passive (POLDER) remote sensing methods, developed for retrieving aerosol above-cloud optical and microphysical properties. Main results show a good agreement when the aerosol microphysics is dominated by fine-mode particles or coarse-mode dust or when the aerosol layer is well separated from the cloud below. The paper is also focused on understanding the differences between the retrievals and the limitations of each method.