Articles | Volume 10, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3539-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3539-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Ozone comparison between Pandora #34, Dobson #061, OMI, and OMPS in Boulder, Colorado, for the period December 2013–December 2016
University of Maryland Baltimore County (JCET) at Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
Robert Evans
NOAA/ESRL/GMD, Boulder, CO, USA
retired
Alexander Cede
LuftBlick, Austria and Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
Nader Abuhassan
University of Maryland Baltimore County (JCET) at Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
Irina Petropavlovskikh
NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES), University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
Glenn McConville
NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES), University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
Koji Miyagawa
visiting scientist at: at NOAA/ESRL/GMD, Boulder, CO, USA
Brandon Noirot
NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES), University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
Viewed
Total article views: 3,769 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 23 May 2017)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,309 | 1,309 | 151 | 3,769 | 181 | 224 |
- HTML: 2,309
- PDF: 1,309
- XML: 151
- Total: 3,769
- BibTeX: 181
- EndNote: 224
Total article views: 3,015 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 27 Sep 2017)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,884 | 995 | 136 | 3,015 | 175 | 208 |
- HTML: 1,884
- PDF: 995
- XML: 136
- Total: 3,015
- BibTeX: 175
- EndNote: 208
Total article views: 754 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 23 May 2017)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 425 | 314 | 15 | 754 | 6 | 16 |
- HTML: 425
- PDF: 314
- XML: 15
- Total: 754
- BibTeX: 6
- EndNote: 16
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 3,769 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,689 with geography defined
and 80 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 3,015 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,963 with geography defined
and 52 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 754 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 726 with geography defined
and 28 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
13 citations as recorded by crossref.
- DOAS-based total column ozone retrieval from Phaethon system F. Gkertsi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.02.036
- Evaluation of Total Ozone Column from Multiple Satellite Measurements in the Antarctic Using the Brewer Spectrophotometer S. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13081594
- Total ozone bias of the ozone monitoring instrument caused by secondary ozone peaks over East Asia K. Baek et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2026.2682564
- Ground-based total ozone column measurements in the Huggins and Chappuis bands using Direct-Sun DOAS observations D. Karagkiozidis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-3309-2026
- Total ozone column intercomparison of Brewers, Dobsons, and BTS-Solar at Hohenpeißenberg and Davos in 2019/2020 R. Zuber et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4915-2021
- Cross-Validation of GEMS Total Ozone from Ozone Profile and Total Column Products Using Pandora and Satellite Observations S. Hong et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17183249
- Synoptic ozone, cloud reflectivity, and erythemal irradiance from sunrise to sunset for the whole earth as viewed by the DSCOVR spacecraft from the earth–sun Lagrange 1 orbit J. Herman et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-177-2018
- Evaluation of Version 3 Total and Tropospheric Ozone Columns From Earth Polychromatic Imaging Camera on Deep Space Climate Observatory for Studying Regional Scale Ozone Variations N. Kramarova et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsen.2021.734071
- Total column ozone retrieval from a novel array spectroradiometer L. Egli et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2889-2023
- Underestimation of column NO2 amounts from the OMI satellite compared to diurnally varying ground-based retrievals from multiple PANDORA spectrometer instruments J. Herman et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-5593-2019
- Validation of geostationary environment monitoring spectrometer (GEMS), TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI), and Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite Nadir Mapper (OMPS) using pandora measurements during GEMS Map of Air Pollution (GMAP) field campaign K. Baek et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120408
- Traceable total ozone column retrievals from direct solar spectral irradiance measurements in the ultraviolet L. Egli et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1917-2022
- Are EARLINET and AERONET climatologies consistent? The case of Thessaloniki, Greece N. Siomos et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11885-2018
13 citations as recorded by crossref.
- DOAS-based total column ozone retrieval from Phaethon system F. Gkertsi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.02.036
- Evaluation of Total Ozone Column from Multiple Satellite Measurements in the Antarctic Using the Brewer Spectrophotometer S. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13081594
- Total ozone bias of the ozone monitoring instrument caused by secondary ozone peaks over East Asia K. Baek et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2026.2682564
- Ground-based total ozone column measurements in the Huggins and Chappuis bands using Direct-Sun DOAS observations D. Karagkiozidis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-3309-2026
- Total ozone column intercomparison of Brewers, Dobsons, and BTS-Solar at Hohenpeißenberg and Davos in 2019/2020 R. Zuber et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4915-2021
- Cross-Validation of GEMS Total Ozone from Ozone Profile and Total Column Products Using Pandora and Satellite Observations S. Hong et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17183249
- Synoptic ozone, cloud reflectivity, and erythemal irradiance from sunrise to sunset for the whole earth as viewed by the DSCOVR spacecraft from the earth–sun Lagrange 1 orbit J. Herman et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-177-2018
- Evaluation of Version 3 Total and Tropospheric Ozone Columns From Earth Polychromatic Imaging Camera on Deep Space Climate Observatory for Studying Regional Scale Ozone Variations N. Kramarova et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsen.2021.734071
- Total column ozone retrieval from a novel array spectroradiometer L. Egli et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2889-2023
- Underestimation of column NO2 amounts from the OMI satellite compared to diurnally varying ground-based retrievals from multiple PANDORA spectrometer instruments J. Herman et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-5593-2019
- Validation of geostationary environment monitoring spectrometer (GEMS), TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI), and Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite Nadir Mapper (OMPS) using pandora measurements during GEMS Map of Air Pollution (GMAP) field campaign K. Baek et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120408
- Traceable total ozone column retrievals from direct solar spectral irradiance measurements in the ultraviolet L. Egli et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1917-2022
- Are EARLINET and AERONET climatologies consistent? The case of Thessaloniki, Greece N. Siomos et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11885-2018
Saved (final revised paper)
Latest update: 04 Sep 2026
Short summary
A co-located Pandora Spectrometer Instrument (Pan #034) has been compared to a well-calibrated Dobson spectroradiometer (Dobson #061) in Boulder, Colorado, and with two satellite instruments over a 3-year period. The results show good agreement between Pa n#034 and Dobson #061 and with the satellite data within their statistical uncertainties.
A co-located Pandora Spectrometer Instrument (Pan #034) has been compared to a well-calibrated...
Special issue