Ozone comparison between Pandora #34, Dobson #061, OMI, and OMPS in Boulder, Colorado, for the period  December 2013&ndash;December 2016

Herman, Jay; Evans, Robert; Cede, Alexander; Abuhassan, Nader; Petropavlovskikh, Irina; McConville, Glenn; Miyagawa, Koji; Noirot, Brandon

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3539-2017

Articles | Volume 10, issue 9

https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3539-2017

© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Special issue:

Quadrennial Ozone Symposium 2016 – Status and trends...

https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3539-2017

© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Articles | Volume 10, issue 9

Research article

|

27 Sep 2017

Research article |

| 27 Sep 2017

Ozone comparison between Pandora #34, Dobson #061, OMI, and OMPS in Boulder, Colorado, for the period December 2013–December 2016

Jay Herman, Robert Evans, Alexander Cede, Nader Abuhassan, Irina Petropavlovskikh, Glenn McConville, Koji Miyagawa, and Brandon Noirot

Download

Final revised paper (published on 27 Sep 2017)
Preprint (discussion started on 23 May 2017)

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment

- Printer-friendly version

- Supplement

RC1: 'Referee's comment on J Herman's "Ozone Comparison ..."', Robert Chatfield, 30 Jun 2017
- AC1: 'Reply to reviewer #1', Jay Herman, 05 Jul 2017
RC2: 'anonymous review', Anonymous Referee #2, 20 Jul 2017
RC3: 'Review of “Ozone Comparison between Pandora #34, Dobson #061, OMI, and OMPS at Boulder Colorado for the period December 2013–December 2016” by Herman et al.', Anonymous Referee #3, 22 Jul 2017

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision

AR by Jay Herman on behalf of the Authors (28 Aug 2017) Author's response Manuscript

ED: Publish as is (29 Aug 2017) by Stefan Reis

Short summary

A co-located Pandora Spectrometer Instrument (Pan #034) has been compared to a well-calibrated Dobson spectroradiometer (Dobson #061) in Boulder, Colorado, and with two satellite instruments over a 3-year period. The results show good agreement between Pa n#034 and Dobson #061 and with the satellite data within their statistical uncertainties.