Articles | Volume 10, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-5017-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-5017-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
| 
20 Dec 2017
Research article |
| 20 Dec 2017
Statistical atmospheric inversion of local gas emissions by coupling the tracer release technique and local-scale transport modelling: a test case with controlled methane emissions
Sébastien Ars
Laboratoire des sciences du climat et de l'environnement
(LSCE/IPSL), CNRS-CEA-UVSQ, Université de Paris-Saclay, Centre d'Etudes Orme
des Merisiers, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Grégoire Broquet
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Laboratoire des sciences du climat et de l'environnement
(LSCE/IPSL), CNRS-CEA-UVSQ, Université de Paris-Saclay, Centre d'Etudes Orme
des Merisiers, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Camille Yver Kwok
Laboratoire des sciences du climat et de l'environnement
(LSCE/IPSL), CNRS-CEA-UVSQ, Université de Paris-Saclay, Centre d'Etudes Orme
des Merisiers, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Yelva Roustan
CEREA, Joint Laboratory École des Ponts ParisTech/EDF
R&D, Université Paris-Est, Champs-sur-Marne, France
Lin Wu
Laboratoire des sciences du climat et de l'environnement
(LSCE/IPSL), CNRS-CEA-UVSQ, Université de Paris-Saclay, Centre d'Etudes Orme
des Merisiers, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Emmanuel Arzoumanian
Laboratoire des sciences du climat et de l'environnement
(LSCE/IPSL), CNRS-CEA-UVSQ, Université de Paris-Saclay, Centre d'Etudes Orme
des Merisiers, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Philippe Bousquet
Laboratoire des sciences du climat et de l'environnement
(LSCE/IPSL), CNRS-CEA-UVSQ, Université de Paris-Saclay, Centre d'Etudes Orme
des Merisiers, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Viewed
Total article views: 4,840 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Dec 2016)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,922 | 1,675 | 243 | 4,840 | 298 | 318 |
- HTML: 2,922
- PDF: 1,675
- XML: 243
- Total: 4,840
- BibTeX: 298
- EndNote: 318
Total article views: 3,963 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 20 Dec 2017)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,477 | 1,286 | 200 | 3,963 | 258 | 268 |
- HTML: 2,477
- PDF: 1,286
- XML: 200
- Total: 3,963
- BibTeX: 258
- EndNote: 268
Total article views: 877 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Dec 2016)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 445 | 389 | 43 | 877 | 40 | 50 |
- HTML: 445
- PDF: 389
- XML: 43
- Total: 877
- BibTeX: 40
- EndNote: 50
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 4,840 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,723 with geography defined
and 117 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 3,963 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,851 with geography defined
and 112 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 877 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 872 with geography defined
and 5 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
25 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Investigation of the Spatial Distribution of Methane Sources in the Greater Toronto Area Using Mobile Gas Monitoring Systems S. Ars et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05386
- Mobile atmospheric measurements and local-scale inverse estimation of the location and rates of brief CH4 and CO2 releases from point sources P. Kumar et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5987-2021
- Anthropogenic methane plume detection from point sources in the Paris megacity area and characterization of their δ13C signature I. Xueref-Remy et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117055
- The potential of a constellation of low earth orbit satellite imagers to monitor worldwide fossil fuel CO2 emissions from large cities and point sources F. Lespinas et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-020-00153-4
- Detection and long-term quantification of methane emissions from an active landfill P. Kumar et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1229-2024
- The Community Inversion Framework v1.0: a unified system for atmospheric inversion studies A. Berchet et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5331-2021
- Natural Gas Fugitive Leak Detection Using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle: Measurement System Description and Mass Balance Approach S. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9100383
- A Bayesian hierarchical model for methane emission source apportionment W. Daniels et al. https://doi.org/10.1214/26-AOAS2202
- Accuracy of tracer-based methane flux quantification: underlying impact of calibrating acetylene measurements A. Shah et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3425-2025
- Best practices and uncertainties in CH4 emission quantification: employing mobile measurements and Gaussian plume modelling at a biogas plant J. Wietzel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4631-2025
- Estimating methane emissions from the waste sector in Southern Ontario using atmospheric measurements L. Gillespie et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2024.2435340
- Methane Mitigation: Methods to Reduce Emissions, on the Path to the Paris Agreement E. Nisbet et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000675
- Controlled-release testing of the static chamber methodology for direct measurements of methane emissions J. Williams et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3421-2023
- Assessment of current methane emission quantification techniques for natural gas midstream applications Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1633-2024
- The Potential of Low-Cost Tin-Oxide Sensors Combined with Machine Learning for Estimating Atmospheric CH4 Variations around Background Concentration R. Rivera Martinez et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12010107
- Controlled-release experiment to investigate uncertainties in UAV-based emission quantification for methane point sources R. Morales et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2177-2022
- Bayesian atmospheric tomography for detection and quantification of methane emissions: application to data from the 2015 Ginninderra release experiment L. Cartwright et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-4659-2019
- A comprehensive review of Gaussian atmospheric dispersion models: current usage and future perspectives H. Snoun et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41207-023-00354-6
- A measurement system for CO2 and CH4 emissions quantification of industrial sites using a new in situ concentration sensor operated on board uncrewed aircraft vehicles J. Bonne et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4471-2024
- Ethane measurement by Picarro CRDS G2201-i in laboratory and field conditions: potential and limitations S. Defratyka et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5049-2021
- Comparison of Landfill Methane Emission Quantification Using Multiple Observation Methods L. Gillespie et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00127
- Building-resolving simulations of anthropogenic and biospheric CO2 in the city of Zurich with GRAMM/GRAL D. Brunner et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-14387-2025
- Reconciling a national methane emission inventory with in-situ measurements Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165896
- Quantification of methane emission rate from oil and gas wells in Romania using ground-based measurement techniques P. Korbeń et al. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2022.00070
- Airborne estimation of SO2 emissions rates from a coal-fired power plant using two top-down methods: A mass balance model and Gaussian footprint approach J. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158826
25 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Investigation of the Spatial Distribution of Methane Sources in the Greater Toronto Area Using Mobile Gas Monitoring Systems S. Ars et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05386
- Mobile atmospheric measurements and local-scale inverse estimation of the location and rates of brief CH4 and CO2 releases from point sources P. Kumar et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5987-2021
- Anthropogenic methane plume detection from point sources in the Paris megacity area and characterization of their δ13C signature I. Xueref-Remy et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117055
- The potential of a constellation of low earth orbit satellite imagers to monitor worldwide fossil fuel CO2 emissions from large cities and point sources F. Lespinas et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-020-00153-4
- Detection and long-term quantification of methane emissions from an active landfill P. Kumar et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1229-2024
- The Community Inversion Framework v1.0: a unified system for atmospheric inversion studies A. Berchet et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5331-2021
- Natural Gas Fugitive Leak Detection Using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle: Measurement System Description and Mass Balance Approach S. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9100383
- A Bayesian hierarchical model for methane emission source apportionment W. Daniels et al. https://doi.org/10.1214/26-AOAS2202
- Accuracy of tracer-based methane flux quantification: underlying impact of calibrating acetylene measurements A. Shah et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3425-2025
- Best practices and uncertainties in CH4 emission quantification: employing mobile measurements and Gaussian plume modelling at a biogas plant J. Wietzel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4631-2025
- Estimating methane emissions from the waste sector in Southern Ontario using atmospheric measurements L. Gillespie et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2024.2435340
- Methane Mitigation: Methods to Reduce Emissions, on the Path to the Paris Agreement E. Nisbet et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000675
- Controlled-release testing of the static chamber methodology for direct measurements of methane emissions J. Williams et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3421-2023
- Assessment of current methane emission quantification techniques for natural gas midstream applications Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1633-2024
- The Potential of Low-Cost Tin-Oxide Sensors Combined with Machine Learning for Estimating Atmospheric CH4 Variations around Background Concentration R. Rivera Martinez et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12010107
- Controlled-release experiment to investigate uncertainties in UAV-based emission quantification for methane point sources R. Morales et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2177-2022
- Bayesian atmospheric tomography for detection and quantification of methane emissions: application to data from the 2015 Ginninderra release experiment L. Cartwright et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-4659-2019
- A comprehensive review of Gaussian atmospheric dispersion models: current usage and future perspectives H. Snoun et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41207-023-00354-6
- A measurement system for CO2 and CH4 emissions quantification of industrial sites using a new in situ concentration sensor operated on board uncrewed aircraft vehicles J. Bonne et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4471-2024
- Ethane measurement by Picarro CRDS G2201-i in laboratory and field conditions: potential and limitations S. Defratyka et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5049-2021
- Comparison of Landfill Methane Emission Quantification Using Multiple Observation Methods L. Gillespie et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00127
- Building-resolving simulations of anthropogenic and biospheric CO2 in the city of Zurich with GRAMM/GRAL D. Brunner et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-14387-2025
- Reconciling a national methane emission inventory with in-situ measurements Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165896
- Quantification of methane emission rate from oil and gas wells in Romania using ground-based measurement techniques P. Korbeń et al. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2022.00070
- Airborne estimation of SO2 emissions rates from a coal-fired power plant using two top-down methods: A mass balance model and Gaussian footprint approach J. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158826
Saved (final revised paper)
Latest update: 10 Nov 2026
Short summary
This study presents a new concept for estimating the pollutant emission rates of a site combining the tracer release method, local-scale atmospheric transport modelling and a statistical atmospheric inversion approach. The potential of this new concept is evaluated with a practical implementation based on a series of inversions of controlled methane and tracer point sources in different spatial configurations to assess the efficiency of the method in comparison with the classic tracer method.
This study presents a new concept for estimating the pollutant emission rates of a site...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint