An intercomparison of stratospheric gravity wave potential energy densities from METOP GPS radio occultation measurements and ECMWF model data

Rapp, Markus; Dörnbrack, Andreas; Kaifler, Bernd

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1031-2018

Articles | Volume 11, issue 2

https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1031-2018

© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Special issue:

Sources, propagation, dissipation and impact of gravity waves...

https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1031-2018

© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Articles | Volume 11, issue 2

Research article

|

22 Feb 2018

Research article |

| 22 Feb 2018

An intercomparison of stratospheric gravity wave potential energy densities from METOP GPS radio occultation measurements and ECMWF model data

Markus Rapp, Andreas Dörnbrack, and Bernd Kaifler

Download

Final revised paper (published on 22 Feb 2018)
Preprint (discussion started on 09 Oct 2017)

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment

- Printer-friendly version

- Supplement

RC1: 'reviewer comment', Anonymous Referee #1, 07 Nov 2017
- AC1: 'Response to Reviewer 1', Markus Rapp, 22 Dec 2017
RC2: 'Review of Rapp et al.', Anonymous Referee #2, 13 Nov 2017
- AC2: 'Response to Reviewer 2', Markus Rapp, 22 Dec 2017

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision

AR by Markus Rapp on behalf of the Authors (22 Dec 2017) Manuscript

ED: Publish as is (16 Jan 2018) by Jörg Gumbel

AR by Markus Rapp on behalf of the Authors (17 Jan 2018)

Short summary

Temperature profiles from operational weather satellites are used to determine the global distribution of gravity wave activity. This is an important information to constrain global climate models. The quality of this data set is assessed by systematic comparison to model fields from ECMWF which are considered very high quality. This reveals good agreement between model and observations, albeit the model misses localized centers of wave activity if model resolution is too low.